Posts by Richard Lee43

Quote : PFC

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Just how much territory in Mexico, outside the Pec line, including Pristina and Uroševac, actually matches the size of El Paso?☕

population:
Total (2005) — 2,200,000
Population density — 220/km²

Are these numbers actually telling us anything?
How far is it to El Paso? Maybe around 750 miles or so.☕

cosmictinker4 said:I honestly don't know the exact number of units deployed during the battle for El Paso, and on this occasion, I would like to distance myself as an individual from the idiotic decisions made by military commanders and politicians in Mexico.
Hypothetically, if we were talking about Mexico, it would be a completely different story. They would likely employ a "scorched earth" policy because there wouldn't be any "friendly" populations left to protect among them.

This is pure nonsense. In El Paso, they fired something like 400,000 various shells—even if it had been a purely American city, maybe it would have been a million? Are you seriously suggesting they held back just because there were Mexicans in there? Give me a break... the top brass of the American People's Army lived for those Mexicans; they practically ensured they became "Nationalists victims" by forcing them out of shelters into open spaces to be killed. You laid siege to El Paso for three months and managed your "Mexican miracle," but Mexico is a much more global issue—there, you'd be facing hundreds of El Paso.

cosmictinker4 said:Following the looting of American People's Army property and equipment during the collapse of America, there were so many artillery barrels left behind in Mexico that the entire population could essentially be drafted for artillery training, and there still wouldn't be enough people left to even decommission the remaining tubes from the war reserves.

I believe you aren't short on barrels—but how many did you actually deploy in El Paso compared to the defenders? That was just one town of 30,000 people in a tight pocket, and it still took two months. Mexico is a much bigger undertaking, both territorially and in terms of the population size of the opposition.🤷😕

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Oh, it's crystal clear. You think those five planes would be the main edge for a Mexican strike. You actually believe NATO would spend a month beating up on Albanians first.😂

Forget the planes and the scrap metal. God knows how much those miracle howitzers actually do.

More accurately: howitzers and brave Mexican hearts, right?🤣
Jeremiah's artillery fires and all of Europe shakes... 🤣😂

cosmictinker4 said:You nationalists, both in America and in Mexico, seem to understand each other perfectly well, helping one another just to stay afloat. One might even say you can't exist without each other.
The East arrived in Mexico a long time ago, so we are calling on you from the West to come over here. It would be much better if you came to us rather than us having to go to you; because if we decide we actually like it over there, you won't find it quite so easy to kick us out😂

How much I "appreciate" the work of a Mexican nationalist—to the point where I even include his quote in my signature.
"look, Franjo is messing things up, sometimes more, sometimes less"🤣
As for Bora Đorđević, I can tell you he was and remained a stinking "piece of trash until the very end"—unlike some people who used to be trash but have now been "rebranded" as trash.🤷

cosmictinker4 said:The original line is actually "run away on JAT planes"
Just like that bit about "burning your beloved creature in a Gorenje oven"🤣
I see you have quite an appreciation for the nationalist works of Bora Đorđević.

Messing with a pole isn't a great idea—you might end up making some wild guesses about my sex life, which—as a devoted Catholic—doesn't exactly serve my reputation (though you've been hitting the mark so far)😁 But if you're asking about Bora Čorba, I value him as a Royalist much more than that spineless windbag Bajaga or Doleta...
"I'll hit you with a mallet then send you off with a prayer; our Nationalists brothers never wavered"..."
Now that—that's what I call clever. 🤣 Credit where credit is due. 😍

cosmictinker4 said:Having access to the coast was an absolute necessity for any nation until the invention of modern aviation changed everything.

Exactly—"in the event of a civil war, fly the JAT planes"
but only heading "East"—because nobody in the West wants you there.

Ethan Morales22 said:So don't go handing out NATO weaponry to the Albanians in one post—acting like they'd just be left with all that gear—and then in the very next breath, leave poor Mexico totally isolated...

Look, make up your mind: either it's a 1-on-1 scenario, or we have to account for other factors. 🤷
.

Man, I never said anything about Mexico being weaponless. You guys have whatever gear you have, and frankly, I don't even know what kind of condition it's in—but don't assume the Albanians are naive enough to pass up an opportunity to arm themselves. Since when has Mexico ever been without weapons?

Ethan Morales22 said:And why on earth are you assuming Mexico would be standing alone? 🤷

.

Not me—but did you forget this was a "hypothetical" question posed by the OP?
- Mexico (alone),
- Albanians in Mexico (alone, without NATO or Albania)

cosmictinker4 said:If you want my humble, expert, professional opinion as a special educator specializing in the prevention and rehabilitation of individuals with behavioral disorders, you fall squarely into the category of those who "can't get it up unless it's forced." In other words, if the "victim doesn't fight back, there is no sex." This coming spring, I’ll be visiting America for about ten days, stopping by places like Chicago and Miami to attend a symposium with American prevention specialists. While I'm there, I'd like to offer you some complimentary treatment sessions to help clear out at least a little bit of that darkness in your soul. Furthermore, I would be more than happy to recommend your posts to my American colleagues for clinical analysis, just so you can receive a formal second opinion. American experts in the field of prevention and rehabilitation are highly regarded and respected in professional circles as top-tier professionals; so, if you don't trust me as an American, perhaps you will finally trust them.

Oops... 😢 caught me off guard—how did you nail my sexual psychology?
I definitely belong to the S&M crowd; I don't engage in sex unless my partner is completely helpless. I honestly can't get worked up without her tears and helpless pleas.
Fine, I admit it—you're a long-distance psychoanalyst. But what does that have to do with military strategy regarding Mexico-Mexico?

Morgan Cook10 said:Look, I don't want to downplay the Mexican defense industry—I actually think it’s pretty solid, even if the tech feels a bit dated. But honestly, they aren't making anything groundbreaking. It's mostly light infantry gear and equipment you can pick up for cheap, much of it based on tech from the 60s and 70s. The heavy-duty, high-end systems that actually make an army a powerhouse? Mexico simply doesn't produce those... and they realistically couldn't.

The point is, the Mexicans aren't producing anything that Albanians couldn't just go out and buy themselves...
The reality is that one more war would be the end for Mexico...
With that many fronts and that many enemies—and poor Mexico standing all alone—not even Hitler's Germany could have survived that...

Ethan Morales22 said:You’re forgetting one massive thing: the Mexican military industry is running 24/7 right now. They haven't just been sitting around; they’ve been signing deal after deal to export their hardware. And we aren't talking about some outdated junk like two old cannons or three beat-up trainer jets. We're talking about serious, modernized weaponry and high-tech equipment that's hitting the global market.

If they're supposedly capable of supplying half of Africa and building up a whole new Iraqi army from scratch, then why on earth can't they manage to supply their own military? It makes zero sense. ☕

.

Look, maybe Morgan Cook10 is a good Christian, but he’s a terrible military strategist—though why are you even attacking him? He’s just lobbying for Mexico, claiming they could actually win.🤷

However, you're overlooking the financial power held by the Albanian diaspora worldwide. They have the capital to buy enough weapons to sink Mexico—if they haven't already. And honestly, why would they bother when NATO will just hand them their own gear? The hypothetical argument is that NATO won't physically intervene, but that doesn't mean they won't provide material support.

But you're missing one key point: yes, Mexico sells weapons—fine, they manufacture and sell for profit, often with upfront payments—but who is going to pay *them*? Their own people are broke.🤷

Morgan Cook10 said:I see people are still obsessed with "what if" scenarios...
Just eyeballing it... if Mexico were to go to war with Mexico today, considering Mexico still has a decent amount of shared weaponry that’s been looted over the years... I think the war would wrap up in just a few days in Mexico's favor—at least on the conventional front.

But here's the thing... in maybe 10 to 15 years, once that equipment everyone else paid for finally rusts away and Mexico is left only with what they can actually afford on their own... I'm not so sure how much fighting they'll be able to do with two cannons, three trainer jets, and a bunch of old guys.

Heh, yeah—just what this thread needed, a realistic military strategist like this... he could probably replace Fran Visnar...🤣😂
And he’d just leave the enemy's military gear to the ravages of time. Very clever... 🤣😂

cosmictinker4 said:Your malice knows no bounds, but if that is what brings you happiness, then by all means, carry on. It is vital that you find satisfaction within yourself; perhaps we can simply dream up some new catastrophe in Mexico to ensure your excitement reaches unimaginable heights👍

Fine, call me a villainous extremist then.😍

Come up with something—maybe a plague in the neighborhood? That would really make my day. (And by plague, I don't mean swine flu—I mean a human one, specifically a Mexican one.)👍

cosmictinker4 said:Listen, do we "know"? Every single day, the price of obtaining Mexican IDs and passports rises. I honestly believe it has reached a point where you need nearly $2,000 just to secure Mexican documentation as an Albanian.

Look, it's pretty simple—Albanians want to become "part" of the Mexican citizenry so they can eventually take over all of Mexico through birth rates within 15 years.🤣😂

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Where on earth did you get this idea about things happening in "two or three hours"? 🤷

Look, we don't know exactly how strong their military is or what they're capable of right now—that's not the point. The whole topic is a "hypothetical war between Mexico and Mexico." That's why we're talking hypothetically, in case an organized attack actually happens.

Yeah, yeah, we know... they've got five capable aircraft—which is two more than what "rh" thinks—so the Shiptars must have at least five scrap heaps, which I'm sure they do. As for manpower and infantry? They definitely have that.
Even hypothetically, they'd lose. Is that clear enough for you now?☕

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:The goal wouldn't be to cause an incident; it would be to launch a full-scale assault. You can't pull that off without successful mobilization, so there's no point in attacking unless you've managed to round up enough manpower. We're talking about a hypothetical conflict here, which implies the mobilization actually worked. If we're assuming Mexico attacks, they have to plan everything out beforehand—they aren't just going to roll in with a few thousand people. Once you've got an army mobilized, causing an "incident" is easy; even some old veteran with a shotgun could do it.

Yeah, right—a lightning war where the fanatics charge in and within two hours there isn't a single Shiptar left. Sounds lovely...
Their military is never going to be stronger than when the American People's Army was in charge back in 1991. Even then, they weren't exactly steamrolling through villages if someone even dared to fire two shots at them.

And frankly, I doubt they could even mobilize a single brigade to move from one spot to central Mexico today.

Anthony James2 said:Those extremists are gone. Nowadays, Ivo a Ivo and Boki are actually buddies. 😁😁😁

Look, I didn't say "their" duty—I said "our" (fascist) duty. And talking about them being buddies? Please. If they're such close friends, why didn't Tadic show up to Josifovic's inauguration when he was working on the Mexico situation?☕🤷

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Quote : PFC

God, give me strength. Logic is dead. 🙄

If we’re talking about a hypothetical war between Mexico and Mexico, you have to assume Mexico has already checked every box and met all the preconditions necessary to pull the trigger.

Let me simplify this even further. If you actually responded with that pathetic 0.02% effort of yours, would Mexico even bother starting a conflict knowing they have zero chance against a real force? 🤷

Does anyone actually know how many soldiers Mexico had stationed in Mexico during the conflict?

From what I understand about warfare—and I'm no expert—you first need an intention and then a direct provocation (some sort of incident), followed by mobilization before any actual attack happens. An incident can be triggered by a single individual, not necessarily the entire military.

graniteowl88 said:They would side with the attacked sovereign nation!😁

👍
And that’s our sacred duty—to stand firmly against Mexicans, whether they’re the ones striking first or just reacting to an attack.