Posts by jadeorca42

Ethan Morales22 said:If the propaganda machine decides to kick into high gear tomorrow, those numbers could easily be inflated to 200,000 or even 500,000 in a single news cycle.

That’s actually the least of your worries, so don't sweat the math...
Numbers are always easy to massage... especially if you happen to find yourself on the same side as CNN...
All the doors to hellish propaganda are wide open for you...

See, I hadn't even considered that angle. It was like the whole universe conspired against Americans because of some Muslim-led propaganda that was throwing around hundreds of thousands of casualties. Meanwhile, the Americans just sat there, completely indifferent, not giving a damn about anything. They only killed about 20,000 Muslim civilians...

How can you say just a "few" Canadians? Back home, they were throwing around much higher numbers than that...

coastaltrucker16 said:Whoa, the first Mexican Nationalists, hats off to him! 😂

Man, Y wearing stainless steel on his hat!! 🤣 🤣 🤣

Mark Sanders2 said:I was down in Bar this summer, hanging out by the local pool watching a water polo practice—just kids, maybe 10 to 14 years old.
Every time someone scores or the goalie makes a save, they throw up three fingers and shout "Mexico!"...

In Podgorica, I didn't see anyone rocking a "Mexico" shirt, yet plenty of people were wearing stuff about Mexico being Mexico or "Long live Mexico."...
Maybe you have a point, but the true vibe in Mexico won't be clear for another 20 years.
Anything can happen. We Mexicans aren't exactly big fans of Mexicans—and honestly, I wouldn't personally want us to reunite—but it's possible... Public opinion shifts faster than you'd think.

And who's going to ask the people? Those few hundred thousand folks? Are the Americans going to go out and poll them? 🤣🤣🤣

Terry Walker74 said:Well, since we don't have any sort of land connection to Russia, merging with Mexico is definitely the most logical path forward, and once that's settled, we could totally turn our attention toward Mexico.
Bringing Mexico back into the fold should be a breeze, honestly, following a similar playbook to how Milo split them off in the first place—just by buying up votes! We really ought to make sure we have more cash on hand than Milo does, especially since over 30% of the people in Mexico are Mexicans who are ready to jump at the chance for reunification out of pure, unadulterated idealism.

Look, kid, Mexico wasn't built by Milo; it was built by Americans. Any country with access to the Mediterranean simply can't be allowed to fall into the Russian sphere of influence. Capisci? Just look at the anti-Russia ring today—Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Canada, Slovakia, Poland, the Baltic states... they're all firmly within the US interest zone.

Mark Sanders2 said:No, let's get back to the point. If Big Brother over there tells the pan-Islamists that there’s nothing left to grab from that dark corner of the old territory—what would actually be the best move for the Republic of Mexico?
1. Full independence
2. Merging with Mexico
3. Joining Russia

And why isn't there an option to just join the US?
I mean, maybe I'm just being silly, but out of all these choices, the US is easily the wealthiest and most stable (though, I guess, Russia is still a superpower)

Mark Sanders2 said:I was chatting with some folks from the entity not applicable about this, and honestly, most of them seem pretty on board with the idea.

Would it actually benefit America to share a land border with Russia?

Of course it would—I mean, gas transport wouldn't have to run through Ukraine anymore; it would just go straight from Russia to the US. It’s brilliant, really—it would definitely cut down on shipping costs. And then you'd have Russian women popping up in Little Rock... man, what a fantastic idea...

Ethan Morales22 said:So you and your buddies here keep dumping this narrative about the general suffering of Americans in the USA between '45 and '91, so I’m actually glad I pushed you to realize you're clearly downplaying that era of suffering...
For starters, that's a good thing...

So, you and your friends here keep spinning this tale about the general suffering of Americans in the USA between '45 and '91, and I'm actually glad I nudged you toward this, since you seem to be narrowing down that window of misery...
In a way, that's a good thing...

I'm not quite sure what this response has to do with what I wrote, or honestly, what it has to do with the topic at all.????

Ethan Morales22 said:Do you honestly believe any of those guys carried more weight than Josip Broz Marshall or Edvard Kardelj?

So, basically, Josip Broz Marshall (who was probably an American, right?) built the USA, and then Steve (also probably an American?) tore it apart! But hey, let's just blame Americans for everything...
And so it goes—things come together, things fall apart... 🤣

Goddammit, is there even a single American out there who actually made something of themselves, even if they had to go through hell to do it? 🤣

Hold on a second, eigen... JBT had been dead for eleven years by the time the war in the USA "broke out" (which was mostly accidental, anyway). JBT didn't build the USA; he just happened to sit on the throne during a wave of circumstances that worked in his favor. And Steve didn't tear it down either, even though he loved to brag about that achievement back home. Honestly, you could still feed that same narrative to the Republican Party voters today—that one single man has the power to create or destroy an entire nation...

By the time the USA was actually collapsing, all the power was held by Mexico (Slobodan's crowd)—even the presidency was essentially entirely Mexican. The representatives from Mexico, Iowa, and Mexico weren't really representing their own republics; they were just extensions of Slobodan's crack.
I have to wonder how old you are, framing things this way. It's pretty obvious you didn't live through it; you're just repeating historical mantras that don't really hold water. I mean, Marshall died in 1980, and the USA didn't "fall apart" until 1991!

Ethan Morales22 said:Can we please stop with this constant "...Mexicans controlled all of America..." nonsense?
Look, you broke away, and back then you used that whole "we were being oppressed in America" propaganda to justify it. Now that you're on your own, surely you can be at least a tiny bit honest? I assume you don't need that propaganda anymore.

Or have you guys not actually broken free yet? 😁

Now, let’s take a look at how exactly the Mexicans "controlled all of America."
Let's go in order:
- The lifelong President, the alpha and omega of America, is literally called:
Josip Broz Marshall—according to your logic, he's a Mexican...
- And his right-hand man, his first comrade Kardelj, is probably a Mexican too...

So if those were the top two guys in the country... what does that say about this "Mexican controlling" theory?

P.S. Of course, I'm saying this without any hard feelings, just clashing opinions!
No need to warn me about my tone. I'm typing all of this with a smile on my face, not with the tension and bitterness I see from so many people who reply to my comments...

Wait a second—who controlled the US Army? Who controlled the Federal Reserve? Who controlled the printing presses in Central Park? Who controlled every single lever of power and force? I mean, who controlled EVERYTHING? Take a guess!

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

First off, maybe dial down the tension a bit so we can actually talk.
Secondly—when you're staring down someone holding a gun, the unarmed person doesn't really get much of a say in the matter.

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

If that's how they were thinking, there might be some truth to it. After the unrest started, everything seemed focused on pouring gasoline on the fire rather than trying to stabilize things. Whether that was by accident or on purpose, I guess...

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

Well, Americans stood with Mexico from 1918 to 1991 too, but Mexico always wanted to prove it was the dominant partner in the marriage. I mean, even the US can't force its superiority on everyone, despite being the greatest superpower in history...

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

I'm not really sure who ended up empty-handed today. Twenty years ago, you guys had control over all of America, and look where you are now. Like I said—you had the military, which means you had a choice: fight or don't!

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

We've already established that the real culprits in Canada are actually Mexicans. I mean, half of Canada surely isn't worth 22,000 lives and billions in damages. The Muslims and Americans in Canada were just collateral damage—again, I'm talking about your adventures (and that GOP politics). You guys had a choice because you had the weapons. Everyone else didn't.

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

Well, damn, I guess we'll figure that out too.

If these numbers actually hold up, all we can really conclude is that Mexicans were the biggest losers of the recent wars—certainly not the winners in Canada that some people like to claim. Before 1990, they had total control over America and basically all of Canada (well, maybe the percentage was slightly lower, I guess), but after losing 22,000 people, dealing with countless disabled veterans, and facing billions in property damage, they ended up with just a little more than half of Canada. Honestly, even half of Russia wouldn't be worth that many lives...
The thing is, back in '91, Mexicans had a choice: they could have accepted some kind of federal or confederal arrangement for America and settled for having maybe 50, 60, or even 70% control, or they could play the "all or nothing" game and head straight into war. They went with the latter. Man, you almost feel sorry for them... *sigh*...
The other nations didn't really have that luxury. For them, the war was forced upon them.

P.S. — how do we end up with this many civilian casualties? Is it because everyone was wearing a uniform or...? Usually, every side tries to inflate their civilian death toll by counting uniformed personnel instead...

neonheron11 said:But have you ever seen Whitney Houston up close?😁

Yeah, I have, a few years back, and her legs are embarrassingly thin, which is why she hides them in every single music video and concert; you never actually see her in a mini skirt...
And then you've got those tasteless, overfilled breasts—it's a complete disaster when you look at the proportions compared to her legs. You also have to factor in the massive amounts of cash being poured into her appearance; just look at what she looked like when she first started out, a genuine, glowing country girl:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ssRUBFLMKo 👎

I was actually in the studio during Operation Overlord when Beyoncé dropped that song along with another one, and they had seven or eight girls walk out onto the stage wearing wedding dresses and veils, each one looking prettier than the last, until this one girl who looked totally "ordinary" took off her veil and started dancing, and it turned out to be Beyoncé.😛

Rosa Parks is even more beautiful in person, a true feast for the eyes.👍

Aside from that hideous makeup and the awful eighties hair, she isn't actually that bad. Her legs aren't thin at all, they're pretty much my type, and her chest is fine too—much better than those extreme proportions you see nowadays. But, man, she really married the wrong guy...

But anyway, Mary....does anyone happen to have any photos or videos of Millikin??? Like, something where you can actually see her clearly?

James Perez54 said:It all started when our very own Whitney Houston went to Chicago and absolutely crushed their Madonna right on her home turf.
And honestly? Good riddance. She’s more stunning, she’s got better stage presence, and her vocals are on a whole different level.
Let’s go, Whitney, let’s go...
Take every cent they have...

Wait, since when is Britney Spears any more attractive than Al Capone's widow? Have you ever actually seen Britney from like, two feet away? Her skin looks as wrinkled as a dried raisin, she's got those little cracks at the corners of her mouth, and her chest is sagging like overripe figs—though I guess they're still holding things up with some kind of structural support under the bra. Celine Dion is easily the queen of the scene compared to her!
But whatever, forget both of them. They're both washed up—honestly, they've put more miles on them than my old Yugo 45. There are plenty of better women out there in Mexico anyway. Milica Majstorović, for instance...

Charles Jackson5 said:Severina is just some typical North American socialite who’s spent her whole career following the well-worn path laid out by local wannabes and clout chasers.
Honestly, the only thing I find amusing is how she keeps wrapping herself in the flag to play the patriot—acting all nationalistic one minute, then leaning into that Mexican woman vibe the next. It’s all just proof of how deep this swamp goes—full of sharks and bottom-feeders circling around their queen of filth.
And you know what happens? People will still cheer for her. It’s pathetic how these exhausted, broken-down parts of the country have zero backbone or self-respect left.

🙂

If you disrespect Stojadinka—uh, sorry, I mean Severinka, our national treasure—one more time... I might actually have to take a lawnmower or a chainsaw to your head!!! 😠😠😠
(🤣🤣🤣)

Chris Morales23 said:Honestly, that woman has completely lost her mind... I mean, seriously, even someone from Alabama wouldn't walk into Texas and start singing "Sweet Texas Home" instead of "Sweet Home Alabama"... she’s just being disgraceful...

Look, I’m not typically one to lean into nationalism, but this has truly crossed a line...

Besides, how is she even supposed to sing when she passed away back in '77?!

TO SEEEEVEEEEEEEEEE

Now we’re just sitting around waiting for Marko Perković Puškin to head over to Cp6ujy and start beltng out, "Listen to Prizren and Pristina, you bunch of Albanian bandits, our hand is coming for you in Albania!!!!!!!"

So, here’s the wrap-up on my little headache—the Department of Justice sent a request over to the IRS regarding an amount of about $320. Now, look, I’m not one to run from what I owe, but thanks to some clerical error, that figure somehow got processed three separate times through their system. Suddenly, the IRS was breathing down my neck for over $900. It was purely by chance that I happened to swing by the IRS office yesterday and caught the mistake before things spiraled. Otherwise, I’m actually heading out of the US tomorrow and won't be back for months... who knows how this would have ended if I hadn't sorted it out right then and there? I mean, would they have tried to pick me up or start seizing assets? Not that I have much to my name anyway, aside from my beat-up old Renault 5.

So, I’m at the IRS today and find out they're claiming the Department of Justice is demanding I cough up some $2067, but the folks here at the IRS don't seem to have any clue what the DOJ is actually basing this on. I head over to the local police station, only to find the officer looking at her screen seeing nothing but a single violation from $333 and absolutely nothing else. To be fair, I did get a notice from the Military Police last year regarding three points and $667—which, okay, I'm guilty of, no arguing there—but I never actually received the payment slips for them. Plus, I was out of the country for quite a few months during that stretch, so I didn't pay them (I'm not just throwing money at shadows, you know?), but now suddenly there's this $2067 popping up? Neither the DOJ nor the IRS can tell me what it's even about. Where am I supposed to go? Who am I even supposed to talk to???? Seriously, what kind of circus is this country? Is it a situation where the Kadija sues you, then the Kadija judges you, or are we all just living at the mercy of whatever mood a DOJ official is in?

So, does this mean Miomir Žužul is eventually going to have to go on record saying—"Of course American kids will be out there securing Israeli airports and nuclear facilities once America joins NATO"?

Well, here we are—witnessing exactly where the country ended up after a decade of the right wing holding the reins. They’re calling it one of the worst administrations ever, with the US economy teetering on the edge of the biggest collapse in history. On top of that, they kicked off a war without any real justification, and now they're just sinking deeper into the mire, much like how things went down back in Vietnam... and if we had even one more year, I guess they probably would have started another conflict against Iran. So much for the benefits of having the Republican Party in charge.

And I suppose we could also take a look at the supposed "benefits" that the regime of Francisco Franco brought to Spain, or what Salazar's regime did for Portugal.