Posts by Angela Cox

Charles Jackson5 said:Of course you can, pal—why wouldn't you? Honestly, we need someone who won't ask too many questions and just gets the job done. You'd be the perfect head of liquidations for the New American Security. 😁

I wouldn't touch that with a ten-foot pole; you'd be better off running the CIA's field operations instead.😁

Is it possible for me to head up a department dedicated to liquidating the "deserving" ones whom the courts have conveniently overlooked? 😈 😁

Kenneth Scott41 said:ambermason16, I honestly feel the same way about Oxazepam; it seems to me that the diazepam from Pfizer is significantly more intense than our usual Normabest—you can actually tell the difference. And as for Robert Collins2, well, I suppose all pharmacists will always insist that they are identical. It’s true that there are plenty of people who complain that Normabest feels weaker, but doctors and pharmacologists tend to act like they're infallible gods, looking down on you as if you're just some patient who doesn't have a clue what they're talking about. ☕

I would be curious to hear your methodology. How exactly do you distinguish between a drug's actual side effects and the symptoms of the underlying condition itself? For instance, if the medication remains constant, but your physiological state fluctuates over time, you might easily misattribute a change in your baseline condition to the medication when it truly isn't responsible.

ambermason16 said:Listen, people, I am begging you—just once, please help me wrap my head around this. I am getting the same story over and over again, from doctors to everyone else in the medical field. They keep insisting that Diazepam, Normabest, and Oxazepam are all essentially the exact same thing, just coming from different manufacturers. Is anyone actually going to tell me the truth here?

So why am I even bothering if...

Two Diazepam pills and I’m out like a light—it's like being knocked unconscious by two shots of Hennessy.
I'm feeling a little drowsy after taking four Oxazepam.
I took 10 Normabest pills and honestly? It felt like I just ate 10 peanuts. Absolute waste of time.

Just a quick heads-up here: we’re talking specifically about the blue pills, the 10mg ones.

🤔

It just doesn't sit right with me. Sure, they might be similar in some ways—relatively speaking—but calling them the same thing? Not a chance. Not even close. 🤷

It is all just diazepam. Whatever you're feeling is happening in your head. 😉

Gregory Jackson, look, here is my take on this: I found myself getting boggedrightarrow stuck on those Faraday cage frequencies and who knows what else—mostly because you brought up certain frequencies yourself and I bit the bait. But honestly, it is a triviality. It is much like how I operate my computer; I understand the hardware exists and I know which components are inside, yet I do not dwell on the mechanics while I am actually using the machine. That is precisely how one should approach the spiritual realm. You utilize it. Why bother worrying about the underlying mechanics? Practical application exists on a plane far superior to mere operational principles.

Since everything in this universe is energy, one could argue that the limitations we impose upon ourselves are simply energy vibrating at specific frequencies. Think of it as a mental Faraday cage, trapping our creative energies and preventing them from escaping. The only distinction between a physical cage and a mental one is visibility; the essence remains the same. We need to purge this "energy of limitation" from our minds—to dismantle the internal cage that creates these blockages. Once that barrier is removed, truly anything becomes possible.

Gregory Jackson said:Honestly, I really have to hand it to you for trying to break this all down, and if I’m being real, I think you’re actually getting pretty close to the heart of it. Personally, I don't think we're ever going to get our hands on the nitty-gritty details—you know, like the actual raw data or whatever—but I feel like we can definitely grasp the underlying principles or the general concept behind it all. It might sound kind of wild, maybe even totally absurd, to suggest that spiritual energies are actually steering us away from certain types of research, but I guess it's more like they're nudging us toward spiritual growth first? Like, if that's the ultimate goal of life anyway, then once we've leveled up spiritually, we'll naturally find our way to those high-level sources of knowledge where everyone can dive deep into whatever they're passionate about based on their own vibe. It’s almost like there's a cosmic filter, because if someone explicitly tells you a specific path of inquiry is just a total dead end, then you aren't going to find anything there, right?

So, look, I was thinking about this image, and honestly, it’s just so symbolic, you know? It shows this super spiritually evolved person—maybe like a healer, or a shaman, or some kind of mystic—who’s basically reaching out to this massive spiritual energy that looks all tangled up like these intertwined vines. They're praying to it to help heal someone who's lying there sick. And I guess what's happening is that this request, almost like an energetic arrow, shoots straight toward that energy. Then, the energy starts analyzing everything, right? Like, it's checking if the request actually aligns with the Creator's will, and whether the person asking even has the right spiritual level to get an answer, or if they're even ready for it. It also looks at how intense the response should be based on their vibration, and maybe even checks if they've had any past connections with this energy before. Once the energy "makes a plan," it sends back this response that looks like a cloud of energy descending toward the patient, or maybe just pouring through the air until it dissipates. So, I really think it’s kinda wrong when people say, "Oh, so-and-so healed me," because, well, that person was just the one making the request! They might not even truly understand the root cause of whatever illness the person is dealing with. I mean, no single human being actually has those kinds of healing powers on their own, but I guess if we all work on our spiritual growth, the whole universe kind of steps in to help us out. Even Jesus, I mean, He had all that support from the exact same kind of energy you see right there in the picture.

That whole "everything is within us" thing... honestly, I’m just sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out what that even means. I don't think anyone actually knows how to put it into plain English, you know? It's all so vague.

So, I guess in a way, they "pass through" because they're occupying the same space as us. I mean, from what I understand, we generally can't really connect with energies that aren't part of our specific slice of the universe (there might be some exceptions, but I haven't really figured out why yet). But, you also have to keep in mind that a lot of these energies probably don't have any interest in chatting with humans; they've got their own stuff going on and we're just not on their radar. It's only when we start growing spiritually that some of them might be open to—well, occasional and limited—communication. At first, it usually shows up as answers to prayers during healing sessions or things meant to lift our spiritual level. Only much later can you get to a point where there's actual conversation, starting with intuition and eventually moving toward something more audible.
I'm not sure if I'm explaining this right, but that kind of "conversational" communication is basically just our consciousness—or our brains, I guess—co-vibrating at the exact same frequency as that energy or that specific energy center (those fixed energetic complexes, if you want to get fancy). You know, if you want to sound like an expert or whatever.

Let us add a layer of complexity to this proposition: Suppose we consider an individual undergoing treatment while enclosed within a solid iron Faraday cage. In such a scenario, healing would necessitate intervention at a purely quantum level—utilizing ultra-high frequency signals capable of penetrating the crystalline lattice of the iron itself. Now, consider a different case: someone residing in a modern apartment constructed of reinforced concrete, which essentially functions as its own Faraday cage. In this instance, the primary vulnerabilities are the windows and doors. To reach such a person, one might employ minimal frequencies with wavelengths long enough to permeate those openings, or perhaps a slightly higher frequency. It certainly wouldn't be achieved through small, short-wave frequencies.

In high-frequency electronics, when you're dealing with signal transmission at extreme levels, standard wiring becomes entirely obsolete. You simply cannot rely on wires because the parasitic capacitance and inductance become overwhelming obstacles. Instead, engineers utilize waveguides—essentially precision-engineered "tubes" designed to channel energy. Every single detail, from the dimensions of the branching apertures to the exact spacing between components, must be calculated with absolute rigor. To put it in more pedestrian terms, one might compare it to a home’s plumbing system, though that is a crude analogy. In a house, water flows through pipes; in this context, energy waves flow through these specialized structures. However, the level of precision required for these waveguides is orders of magnitude greater than anything found in residential plumbing. It leads one to wonder if the universe itself functions as a similarly meticulously constructed waveguide. If such a structure exists, any disturbance within it would necessitate an immediate energetic correction to ensure everything returns to its rightful equilibrium.

If memory serves, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding light emphasizes its dual nature—the idea that certain phenomena are best explained by treating light as a stream of particles, while others necessitate viewing it as a wave. It is a persistent duality. One is forced to wonder why we don't apply this same logic to the fabric of the universe itself. It stands to reason that the cosmos could be fundamentally dualistic: linear and holographic. We could utilize the linear framework to account for our mundane, terrestrial existence, while employing a holographic model to explain the spiritual realm—that invisible dimension inhabited by various beings and higher powers. It seems like a far more coherent way to structure our understanding of reality.

Gregory Jackson As I have noted before, there is an inherent tendency in modern discourse to overlook the most fundamental truths in favor of fleeting, superficial observations. One must approach these matters with a certain degree of intellectual rigor if any meaningful conclusion is to be reached. It is quite exhausting, really, watching the same cyclical arguments play out without any real progress being made.
"Everything is within us." It is a statement that I, for one, find utterly impossible to decipher. To be quite honest, I don't believe anyone actually possesses the capacity to interpret such a vague sentiment correctly.

I view this entire mechanism as an internal feedback loop. All these omnipresent energies exist both within us and around us simultaneously. We lack any empirical proof that we possess some kind of external transmitter capable of broadcasting signals into the void; rather, we simply "plug in" to the energy residing within our own being. One might think of it as submitting a request for healing on one specific frequency, only for the restorative energy to transmit a response back to us on a different frequency—an exchange that remains entirely contained within the self. If this healing beam were an external force traveling through physical space, it would inevitably encounter interference—say, someone living in a high-rise in Chicago who has no need for such a transmission. However, there is a more compelling possibility: what if this healing signal is encoded specifically for the recipient? Drawing from my background in biomedical electronics, I know that every single cell in the human body functions with a certain level of data storage capacity; through the exchange of sodium and potassium ions, a cell can essentially "remember" a bit. In a resting state, it maintains one potential, and in an excited state, another. By leveraging this, we could effectively transition into a digital existence—a realm far more potent than the analog one. It would be akin to interfacing directly with the architecture of a cosmic supercomputer.

Gregory Jackson said:Honestly, I really have to hand it to you for trying to break this all down, and if I’m being real, I think you’re actually getting pretty close to the heart of it. Personally, I don't think we're ever going to get our hands on the nitty-gritty details—you know, like the actual raw data or whatever—but I feel like we can definitely grasp the underlying principles or the general concept behind it all. It might sound kind of wild, maybe even totally absurd, to suggest that spiritual energies are actually steering us away from certain types of research, but I guess it's more like they're nudging us toward spiritual growth first? Like, if that's the ultimate goal of life anyway, then once we've leveled up spiritually, we'll naturally find our way to those high-level sources of knowledge where everyone can dive deep into whatever they're passionate about based on their own vibe. It’s almost like there's a cosmic filter, because if someone explicitly tells you a specific path of inquiry is just a total dead end, then you aren't going to find anything there, right?

So, look, I was thinking about this image, and honestly, it’s just so symbolic, you know? It shows this super spiritually evolved person—maybe like a healer, or a shaman, or some kind of mystic—who’s basically reaching out to this massive spiritual energy that looks all tangled up like these intertwined vines. They're praying to it to help heal someone who's lying there sick. And I guess what's happening is that this request, almost like an energetic arrow, shoots straight toward that energy. Then, the energy starts analyzing everything, right? Like, it's checking if the request actually aligns with the Creator's will, and whether the person asking even has the right spiritual level to get an answer, or if they're even ready for it. It also looks at how intense the response should be based on their vibration, and maybe even checks if they've had any past connections with this energy before. Once the energy "makes a plan," it sends back this response that looks like a cloud of energy descending toward the patient, or maybe just pouring through the air until it dissipates. So, I really think it’s kinda wrong when people say, "Oh, so-and-so healed me," because, well, that person was just the one making the request! They might not even truly understand the root cause of whatever illness the person is dealing with. I mean, no single human being actually has those kinds of healing powers on their own, but I guess if we all work on our spiritual growth, the whole universe kind of steps in to help us out. Even Jesus, I mean, He had all that support from the exact same kind of energy you see right there in the picture.

That whole "everything is within us" thing... honestly, I’m just sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out what that even means. I don't think anyone actually knows how to put it into plain English, you know? It's all so vague.

So, I guess in a way, they "pass through" because they're occupying the same space as us. I mean, from what I understand, we generally can't really connect with energies that aren't part of our specific slice of the universe (there might be some exceptions, but I haven't really figured out why yet). But, you also have to keep in mind that a lot of these energies probably don't have any interest in chatting with humans; they've got their own stuff going on and we're just not on their radar. It's only when we start growing spiritually that some of them might be open to—well, occasional and limited—communication. At first, it usually shows up as answers to prayers during healing sessions or things meant to lift our spiritual level. Only much later can you get to a point where there's actual conversation, starting with intuition and eventually moving toward something more audible.
I'm not sure if I'm explaining this right, but that kind of "conversational" communication is basically just our consciousness—or our brains, I guess—co-vibrating at the exact same frequency as that energy or that specific energy center (those fixed energetic complexes, if you want to get fancy). You know, if you want to sound like an expert or whatever.

I lack the jargon to explain it more professionally, but I can offer this: Following my service, I underwent a minor surgical procedure. As I was coming out of anesthesia, I was gripped by a sudden, sharp anxiety because I felt an overwhelming urge to die. In that moment, someone told me that I wasn't permitted to die yet because I hadn't completed my purpose. It wasn't a conversation in any traditional sense; I didn't utter a word, nor did the entity responding to me speak aloud. It was more of a profound, internal realization of spoken thought. Whether that was merely a side effect of the anesthesia or a genuine encounter with the spiritual realm remains to be seen.🤷

Everything I have previously articulated regarding communication on specific frequencies assumes a linear understanding of the universe. If we follow that logic, communicating via signals traveling through space is an impossibility within a finite cosmos. However, if we consider communication with omnipresent energies that permeate our very being, then frequency becomes irrelevant. These omnipresent, intelligent energies serve as the mechanism by which our thoughts propagate through the universe in ways we cannot yet grasp. Essentially, they act as our primary communication channel for connecting with anything in existence; under the current linear model, they are our only gateway to the rest of the universe.

Let us pivot to a different perspective: Back in 1979, I had the opportunity to observe how holographic photography functions. A table was set with various objects, including a magazine and a large magnifying glass positioned above it. Once the objects were removed and the holographic recording was viewed, the image was indistinguishable from the original. When looking through the magnifying glass from various angles, one could read the enlarged letters in the magazine just as if everything were still physically sitting on the table. Most fascinatingly, when the "plate" containing the image is broken into numerous fragments, even the smallest shard still contains the complete image of everything that was on that table.

If we conceptualize the entire universe as a hologram, then every single part of the universe contains the whole—including ourselves. Everything occurring in the vastness of space is simultaneously occurring within us, and by inversion, everything occurring within us is occurring throughout the entire universe. Consequently, all communication with omnipresent, intelligent energies happens within us, much like in the linear model, rather than externally. The distinction is that in a holographic universe, direct communication between individuals becomes possible without the mediation of these pervasive energies, regardless of cosmic distance, because there is no loss of signal intensity over space. Therefore, no amount of modern electronics designed to probe the nature of reality will ever uncover its true essence, because our technology remains shackled to the linear model. We will reach actual results only through the advancement of spirituality, just as Tesla once remarked. It appears that in a holographic model, or something akin to it, almost anything is possible, whereas the linear model offers very little.

I shall attempt to illustrate my viewpoint using this image:


I am aware that the image is symbolic; I would have drawn it differently to facilitate a clearer presentation, provided I had additional explanatory notes. On the left side of the image, the cloud and the air should be placed within the reclining figure. Similarly, on the right side, the tree and the dashed line should be contained within the standing figure, rather than existing outside of them.

Gregory Jackson said:Thanks so much for that little nudge, seriously. It actually got me thinking back to my school days and how much I used to love physics, even though it was honestly pretty frustrating at the time because some of those teachers just couldn't explain anything worth knowing, you know? But man, what really blows my mind when I dive into spirituality and trying to figure out how the world works is this whole concept of energy and these different energetic entities. It’s wild to think that they can all basically occupy the exact same space without bumping into each other or getting in each other's way, mostly because their fields are vibrating at such different frequencies. So, I guess it means that in one single spot, you could have the Creator, four major global energies, Angela Cox's aura, maybe even Gregory Jackson's aura, and who knows what else, all just hanging out together in the same place at once. It's pretty crazy when you really sit with it.

I mean, honestly, I really don't know for sure, but maybe it works like this... an aura is basically just this energetic envelope surrounding your body that vibrates at around 20.6 Hz, I guess. You can't really have a body without an aura, and you definitely can't have an aura without a body—at least when we're talking about physical beings, anyway—so it feels like you can't really say one is more important than the other, you know?
So, I was thinking about how the whole thing with the aura starts, and it’s actually kind of wild because it's like this genetically programmed process that kicks off the very second an egg is fertilized. Basically, these little energy structures start forming around it—they look sort of like hollow, dried-out twigs, I guess? And these are actually the beginnings of the acupuncture meridians where one of those two types of aura energy, you know, the white bioenergy, flows through. It all starts vibrating at 4.7 Hz, which is pretty crazy when you think about it. Then, once it hits 4.8 Hz, these little "twigs" start turning their thicker ends toward each other. After that, they begin pulling in particles of white bioenergy and then just pushing them out into that central space between them, which eventually sprays them out into the area surrounding the egg at 4.9 Hz. By the time we hit 5.0 Hz, these branches really start growing and developing, and eventually, there are twelve of them in total. This creates this visible center between them called the "Energy Stabilizer"—sort of like an energetic heart—which basically functions to collect any extra white bioenergy and redistribute it back into the aura, which is what it keeps doing throughout our entire lives, I suppose. At this frequency, the embryo finally gets its recognizable shape, and that’s also when the seven-chakra channel forms, drawing grey bioenergy from the open space at the bottom and venting it out through the top. In the next step, the embryo shifts, and what will eventually become the spine aligns itself perfectly with that central chakra channel. By 5.5 Hz, the aura has all its main parts and functions ready to go, and by the time someone is born, it’s vibrating at 11.5 Hz. Then, after about six months, it reaches 20.6 Hz, which is apparently the frequency it stays at for the rest of your life. Pretty intense stuff, right?

I honestly feel like there’s this deep, constant interaction happening between our emotions and our thoughts, kind of like how you described it earlier. It’s almost like our feelings leave this sort of energetic footprint in our aura, maybe appearing as a 180° arc right above the head and shoulders. I guess if you look back at history, energy readers used to see this as that halo effect around the heads of saints—you know, the kind of thing we still see in old paintings today just out of habit, I suppose. It seems to me that you could actually tell what someone is feeling in any given moment just by looking at the color of that energy field within the aura. Like, when we’re feeling really good and totally chill, I imagine these misty pinkish-yellow tones start to take over. But then, red might pop up if someone is dealing with aggressive vibes like anger, or maybe some greenish tones show up when sadness kicks in, and I guess a pale blue might signal a bit of dissatisfaction. If we’re just totally exhausted, a dark gray probably dominates the field. Even sadness might show up as a pale yellow, while fears could be more of a dark brown. It’s wild to think about, but if that color in the aura shifts, our mood probably shifts too, and vice versa.

So, I was thinking about how you actually get to that kind of rosy, golden-hued state of mind—you know, that glow where everything just feels right—and I guess it all comes down to this deep spiritual growth, which basically shows up in how you process things. Like, instead of just playing guessing games or constantly looking for someone to blame when things go sideways, you start focusing on actually solving the problem, which I think aligns your headspace with the Will of the Creator. And then, if you’re lucky enough to maintain decent health and can embrace the wisdom of just letting go of those impossible problems that aren't worth your energy, that’s probably the real guarantee for keeping that emotional stability steady, I suppose.

I guess you could say that stress and having a totally warped mindset—you know, like when you're obsessed with pointing fingers instead of actually fixing what's broken—are really the main culprits behind creating this nasty emotional field that basically shifts colors depending on whatever mood is taking over at the moment. It's kind of wild, but I think those toxic thoughts that pop up because you've been stressed out for way too long just end up making that whole emotional atmosphere even more unstable. And then, well, that instability starts pushing back against our own consciousness, which I suppose just triggers a whole new wave of negative thinking, creating this sort of endless loop.

I mean, I guess if you really stop to think about it, our feelings are just totally inseparable from our thoughts and everything else going on inside us, you know? It's like they're all tangled up together, and honestly, they end up driving almost every single one of those massive, life-altering decisions we have to make.

I guess emotions don't necessarily have to be the star of the show when you're making a big life call, but man, they definitely pull a lot of the strings behind the scenes, right? It’s kind of impossible to ignore them, and honestly, I feel like they’re probably the biggest reason we end up doing what we do most of the time. But that’s really where the trouble starts, because human feelings can flip on a dime, you know? One minute you're fine, and the next, you're hit with this wave of anger, sadness, fear, or just straight-up frustration, and suddenly those negative vibes start clouding everything, which might lead you to make a choice you'll totally regret later. That’s why I always think it’s super important to try and stay in that "rose-gold" headspace—you know, that calm, mellow zone where you're feeling relaxed and nothing is pulling at your sleeve. When you're in that sweet spot, you can actually think clearly without all that emotional noise getting in the way, so your decision ends up being the right one. I mean, I'm sure you've been there before, where you make some huge, impulsive move while you're caught up in the heat of the moment—like, maybe even rushing into a marriage with someone you barely even know because the sparks are flying—only to look back once you've settled back into that rose-gold "normal" and realize, "Man, what was I thinking?"

I appreciate you providing these explanations; they certainly force one to pause and reflect. The logic follows that low frequencies present minimal issues—given their long wavelengths, they rarely trigger resonance with everything in their path—which aligns with how brain waves and vital bodily functions operate. It stands to reason that an aura would follow suit. Conversely, high frequencies pose a significant challenge; because their wavelengths are so short, every living organism essentially acts as an antenna, creating massive interference, especially since we aren't encased in metal shielding to prevent one function from disrupting another. While low frequencies are impractical for long-distance communication due to the sheer power required, high frequencies excel there despite needing less strength. But then again, who is to say we are even communicating over distances at all?

It brings to mind a specific technical analogy: Consider the cable entering my house. Through that single line, signals for telephone service, high-speed internet, and cable television all pass simultaneously. Each occupies its own distinct frequency band, allowing them to coexist on the same wire without interference. If we assume a telephone call requires a lower frequency, I could theoretically wrap a coil around that wire and connect it to a variable capacitor—an oscillatory circuit paired with some basic electronics. By adjusting the frequency of that circuit until it matches the telephony band, I could listen to the conversation perfectly. In this scenario, the wire serves as the communication channel, and I am effectively "plugged in" right next to it via the coil; distance becomes irrelevant.

By extension, one might argue that various energies pass through our physical bodies, each utilizing its own specific "channel"—much like the aforementioned telephone wire. Our task, then, would be to "attach" ourselves to that channel, much like the induction coil. Once connected, communication with low frequencies occurs effortlessly because the signal doesn't need to travel a vast distance; as for how that energy radiates our signal out into the universe, that remains anyone's guess.

It is a difficult endeavor to explain the unknown using only the known; it is nearly impossible. We require a glimpse into the unknown itself. Therefore, I suggest you continue your writings and share whatever further insights you manage to uncover. 🙂

Gregory Jackson said:I mean, I don't fully grasp the mechanics, but it works, I guess. Spiritual energies are just everywhere, especially those four global ones that permeate every single point in the universe and exist within us too, just like the creator does. We might not even be communicating with energies that only cover parts of the universe, but these specific ones? They're more than enough. And there are tons of super-intelligent energies right here on earth at special spots—you know, places like Mount Olympus, Kailash, Delphi, maybe even certain hubs in New York or Chicago, or even out in the Midwest—lots of power centers so you don't have to travel too far. For these kinds of energies, distance doesn't really exist; the response is always pretty much instantaneous.

Lowering brainwave frequencies always happens during sleep or meditation (like alpha, theta, and delta waves), but we're unconscious then. When we are actually conscious, all sorts of things happen, ranging from astral projection to communicating with cosmic entities and energies.

It’s true, I actually used that same Quote myself once upon a time. I really feel like Tesla was just on another level of enlightenment, almost like his energy field was centered right where the power of Mount Gora—you know, like Mount Olympus—would be. It's wild to think about, but having a conversation with Tesla actually resulted in that whole book, *Conversations with Tesla* from 2002 by Ljubisa Stojanovic.

I mean, since we were basically out of it and totally unconscious at the time, it’s no wonder nothing sticks in our memory, right? But honestly, you still walked away with some kind of intel—whether you realize it or not—that you're going to end up using, either through your own conscious mind or just through your vibe and your subtle body, I guess. Maybe you should look into some stuff about lucid dreaming or even astral projection, and if you happen to have a knack for that kind of thing, you should definitely give it a shot!

No, no, they just don't know, I guess. See, I really believe people have this free will to ask whatever they want, and the future isn't some set-in-stone script already written out—it’s more like there's just a higher or lower probability of things happening, you know? But here's the thing: they aren't going to just drop answers for any random person walking by. It seems like they only open up to people who are actually doing the spiritual heavy lifting, and even then, they only share as much as they feel is necessary, right when they feel the timing is just right. And honestly, they aren't answering every single little question either, especially since they don't exactly love it when someone is just being nosy about stuff that has nothing to do with their own soul searching or just trivial nonsense. Sometimes, if they notice you're totally tripping up in your spiritual practice, they might step in and guide you, but generally speaking, there's always this sense that information is being held back, and you kind of end up getting the cold shoulder. I remember once, Ljubisa Stojanovic was actually getting pretty worked up about it, and he was told he was being way too naive—apparently, even Jesus and Buddha were more or less in that exact same boat when it comes to how many answers they were willing to give. I think I'll post that "conversation" sometime soon because it's actually pretty eye-opening.

I mean, honestly, why make it complicated? It’s not even some wild theory or anything, just a really practical way of living. My daily routine has reached about 35 prayers a day directed toward various holy energies, spiritual beings, and the Creator. And every single time, I get this "session" back—like a response—that just keeps getting stronger and more intense. I guess you have to be super focused and really *want* it in the moment when you're praying, so I actually realize that maybe at least 50% of my prayers aren't quite hitting the mark yet, like they're below optimal quality. So, my first big task is basically just refining what I'm already doing. In a practical sense, though, you're totally right—it isn't exactly simple, because it requires a ton of work and just staying present in the moment. But then again, you need a really high level of spiritual development to actually have a "conversation," whether that's through pure intuition or actual words. What you build up over years are these energetic feedback loops—responses to your prayers—that heal you and keep pushing your spiritual growth forward. Plus, it kind of shields you from all those "unnatural" energies, you know? Like the energy from your own stray thoughts or even those negative vibes people throw our way.

Honestly, don't even bother trying to wrap your head around how the whole mechanism works, because I guess it's just not really worth all that effort, you know? It might be better if you just dive in and try it out for yourself, since it isn't actually that hard once you get going.

As for why I feel compelled to speak: I am from a technical background, and the frequencies discussed in this thread have piqued my interest. I possess certain personal experiences regarding the "unreality" of the world around me—specifically regarding my own "distorted perceptions" of it—but I won't delve into that now. Instead, I want to comment on high frequencies based on what I studied in school, purely to assist your reasoning if you are interested in approaching this from a technical perspective: A prerequisite for communication is an oscillating circuit and an antenna (roughly speaking). The simplest antenna is a wire with a length equal to a quarter wavelength of a given signal. An oscillating circuit alone is sufficient, though the signal range becomes significantly limited without an antenna. In electronics, an oscillating circuit consists of a capacitor and an inductor connected in series or parallel, vibrating at a specific frequency determined by the capacitor's capacity and the inductor's inductance. A standard resistor acts merely as resistance at low frequencies, but at high frequencies, it functions as resistance, inductance, and capacitance simultaneously. Consequently, at a certain high frequency, it becomes an oscillating circuit, causing frequencies to "scatter" in all directions. Similarly, at high frequencies, everything living essentially functions as some type of oscillating circuit and antenna of varying efficiency. This is precisely why high-frequency components in radio equipment are meticulously engineered and shielded (using a Faraday cage) to prevent high-frequency signals from interfering with other circuits operating at lower frequencies.

Regarding the human aura you mentioned, I have no idea, though I can approximate what it might look like. In my view: the human body lacks antennas, but it possesses numerous "oscillating circuits" (consider the principle used in MRI imaging) that vibrate at high frequencies, scattering them in every direction around the body. Low frequencies cannot scatter around the body due to their massive wavelength; they simply cannot achieve resonance, much like how a resistor behaves at low frequencies. This leads me to conclude that the "arrows" you refer to may simply be high frequencies shooting through the aura.

Shifting toward spirituality, one thing comes to mind: we might agree that a thought is a frequency traveling somewhere. But what of emotions? Are they also frequencies? I ask because when I direct a question toward the omnipresent, intelligent energy of the Creator, the thought feels somewhat dry unless it is "colored" by an emotion. If emotion is a frequency and thought is a frequency, then they must travel together. This raises the question: is the thought modulated by the emotion, or the emotion by the thought? Regardless, high frequencies scatter them everywhere. The wave serves as the carrier, like an "arrow," while the harmonics—the sums and differences of these frequencies at lower intensities—act like feathers to stabilize the arrow's flight. I am inclined to say that emotion carries thought to unfathomable distances, regardless of the underlying mechanism. One should think at a higher level rather than exhausting oneself with technicalities; you are right in that regard, much like how a programmer writes in a high-level language rather than machine code—it is far simpler. And if so, it would mean that the theory about flying teddy bears mentioned by Ken is entirely correct.

I give up. I won't continue, as I will likely never understand the technical mechanics of how this illusion of a life actually functions.

Gregory Jackson said:Yeah, you're probably right about that. How do you say, "it works in practice, but the real question is if it works in theory"...
Maybe someday someone will actually dig into it, but honestly, I feel like it's way more important to spend our time on spiritual growth, which gives us a better shot at getting answers from a higher source. Though, most of these energies aren't exactly chatty—they've got their own massive jobs involving how the universe functions, so they aren't really looking to hand out info on a silver platter or waste time hanging out with people. Most of what you read here has been gathered over years, mostly bit by bit. In the last few years, though, we've started seeing more than one energy center, sort of like a cosmic library. I remember Stojanovic once mentioned how it actually feels. If you ask a general question about a phenomenon, you usually get back a principle or a concept that’s been tailored to our level of understanding so it isn't too overwhelming. Then, you can keep asking for deeper and deeper explanations, and you could probably end up with enough material for a whole book—but that only applies when you're communicating with that specific center. The thing is, it's pretty exhausting, and it just demands way too much time, which that guy absolutely doesn't have.
There have even been times where these energies cut those "conversations" short, basically saying that's enough and that people shouldn't be obsessing over details when there are much more important things to focus on. If someone is really curious about a specific topic, I guess they should work on their own spiritual development and reach enlightenment first, and then they'll have the capacity to actually investigate things. They don't just bend to our curiosity...

Just a thought on frequencies: The formula for the relationship between frequency and wavelength is c = (wavelength) x frequency (where c represents the speed of light). This implies that the wavelength for a signal at, say, 10Hz would be 30,000km. For someone to communicate at that frequency, they would require an antenna at least a quarter of a wavelength long, which suggests the antenna would need to be 4661 miles(one must wonder if we possess such an "antenna" within our minds?)

I attempt to illustrate the lowering of thought frequencies by using the analogy of a record player. We can adjust the RPM of the platter, and via the Doppler effect—which in this context means the perceived frequency decreases as the platter slows down and increases as it speeds up—we hear a change. Suppose we place a record on the player featuring a political speech; at normal speed, the speech is clear. As we decrease the rotation speed, the speech begins to mumble because the frequency of the speech (in our case, thought) is dropping due to the Doppler effect. Eventually, at a low enough speed, the speech becomes unintelligible and finally fades into absolute silence—peace and quiet. This would suggest that low frequencies are not suited for communication, but rather for a state of peace and relaxation devoid of thought. If a thought does arrive in that state, it would surely exist at a much higher frequency suitable for communication. Thus, peace exists at a low frequency, while thought acts as an impulse at a high frequency. Perhaps those "thought impulses" during a state of peace are actually those "arrows" one refers to during prayer. That is my logic, though I cannot say for certain how it truly functions.

One must certainly attend to spirituality; Tesla remarked that humanity will progress more in ten years by focusing on spirituality than it has in all of recorded history.

You mention a cosmic library; occasionally, I find myself reading books in my dreams. I have no idea what they contain or what is written in them, as I never remember them upon waking. I don't know who places them in my dreams or for what reason, nor do I even think about it.

Regarding those ever-present, intelligent energies of the creator, I fail to see why I would bother asking them anything at all. They already know what my questions would be before I even formulate them. They are omniscient; they know exactly which inquiries they intend to leave unanswered, despite my questioning. To ask is merely to perform curiosity. The only logical course of action is to request their assistance, and even then, these energies already understand precisely what kind of help I require. In essence, the entirety of the world's spiritual literature could be condensed into a single sentence: Relax and enter a state of tranquility (a low frequency), then launch a "thought impulse" (a high-frequency "arrow") that simply says: Help. By doing this, I avoid being meddlesome; I am not grasping at things that aren't mine to hold or that exceed my capacity to comprehend. This way, I receive what I actually need rather than what I imagine I need. Consequently, I receive more and more in alignment with my own spiritual evolution without wandering aimlessly. It seems far too simple to be true! 😁

Gregory Jackson said:Look, I’m definitely no physicist or anything, so please bear with me here, but I’ve been trying to wrap my head around what you’re actually getting at. I guess my hunch is that we’re talking about how a person connects with spiritual energies, rather than just the usual person-to-person communication, if that makes sense? Like, maybe a thought itself acts as its own kind of energy wave vibrating at a specific frequency. So, if someone has a negative thought, I imagine that might be sitting at a frequency below 20 Hz, and as that wave passes through your aura or your physical body, it could potentially disrupt one of those two types of bioenergy that make up our aura and live within our organs and tissues and all that stuff. Anyway, I don't want to go off on too much of a tangent if this isn't really what you're interested in, but yeah, that's just my take on it.

I honestly don't think we even need to bother building anything fancy just to communicate, because, you know, we can all just talk through prayer and petitions to these superintelligent entities, including the Creator himself. It’s actually kind of a simple thing when you think about it—these beings are mostly just interested in the spiritual level of whoever is reaching out to them. I guess if a person is below a certain spiritual threshold—which, let's be real, is pretty hard for us regular folks to pinpoint exactly—any thought or prayer that actually helps their aura or their physical body just radiates outward like a circular wave. But then, once a person reaches a certain point of development, maybe, those prayers and requests to spiritual energies aren't sent out as waves anymore; instead, they look more like these continuous arrows shooting straight up toward the heavens... at least, that's how people who can actually perceive energy describe it. Everything else, though, I suppose, still just vibrates out in those little circular frequency waves.

So, I guess if you send out a request in the form of these little arrows of spiritual energy, they’ll actually react and send something back to us—you know, like this feeling of pure bliss, or just total calmness, or maybe even some pain relief, depending on all sorts of different factors, I suppose. But there's this one super important rule to keep in mind: the intensity of that response really just matches up with an individual's own spiritual level. And when we're talking about spiritual energies, that level isn't just determined by those "arrows," but also by the specific frequency your prayer is vibrating at. It's kind of interesting because, you know, those low-frequency circular waves coming from our brains can actually be pretty bad for us, whereas these "arrows" at lower frequencies reach certain energies and then we get that feedback loop. Every single one of these spiritual energies has its own minimum "arrow" frequency required just to trigger a response—like how Christ's energy responds at 8.6 Hz, for example. So, if Gregory Jackson were somehow able to get his brain to emit a request at exactly that frequency, he'd get an answer, though it might be pretty minimal. But, if I'm praying to that same energy at a frequency lower than the minimum, say around 4 Hz, the response would actually be way stronger, I think. Now, I don't really know what frequency I'm personally praying at right now, and honestly, as I work on my own development through these special exercises, that frequency is gradually lowering over time. This whole process takes years, so I should probably clarify that so nobody gets confused! I'm not entirely sure what my lowest frequency is at this moment, but a colleague of mine who's a bit further along is currently sitting somewhere between 5 and 6 Hz, so I'm guessing I'm probably around the 7 or 8 Hz mark. But, to be honest, I don't really care too much about the specifics, just like I don't care what frequency a TV channel is on when I'm watching it, since all that stuff just happens automatically, I guess.

Look, I really don't think you need to stress yourself out about the frequency side of things, because that whole process just kind of happens in the background anyway, I guess. Our main job is really just to focus on our spiritual practice, and if we do that, the frequency will just sort of settle in during meditation without us even trying. It’s like, once you're deep in it, that frequency starts to drop down naturally depending on your own level and how much spiritual energy you've got flowing, and it just arrives on its own without you having to ask for anything at all. But, honestly, I feel like making a request—like a prayer or an intention—is actually way more effective, maybe? Like, you could probably get a better result from just one minute of focused intention than you would from sitting there meditating for half an hour without even asking for what you need. Plus, it's super easy to direct that request toward one specific problem or a particular goal you're working toward, which I think makes the whole thing a lot smoother.

I guess you don't really need to be physically present at some specific location to experience things, because honestly, energy just finds you wherever you happen to be, you know? Like, everywhere is basically an event in itself if you look at it that way. I’ve been working on these exercises lately, and my whole goal is kind of to lower the frequency of my prayers—which sounds weird, I know—but it's all about the practice. By consistently using these prayers, the energy starts helping out with healing, growth, protection, and fixing stuff, and eventually, your own requests start vibrating at these much lower, more grounded frequencies. I really think that one day, the brain might actually learn how to operate on any frequency while we're totally conscious. It’s like, once you hit that point, if you want to connect with a certain energy, you'll just get an answer instantly, and maybe even move into those more advanced ways of communicating, like actually hearing a voice or something. It's wild to think about, but it feels possible.

I honestly feel like it’s super important to figure out that exact turning point—you know, that specific moment when your prayer shifts from just being this circular wave of energy into more of an "arrow" shape? Because I guess that's really when you actually establish that deep connection that starts growing from there. There are these pretty easy prep exercises you can do to kickstart this ability, which is kind of this ancient human talent we've basically forgotten about, though I think someone mentioned how our ancestors used it naturally in one of the threads here or maybe on some other spiritual forum. If you stick with it for, I don't know, maybe four months or so, and assuming your general health is doing alright—which is easy enough to gauge, I suppose—then you can try this kind of test with people who claim they can see energy. Basically, you ask for the person's light body—that energetic structure attached to everyone's aura, what various religions might call a "guardian angel"—to step in and heal them. Then, the person praying will feel a response internally, while the person watching will see this beautiful golden rain falling onto the aura being projected by the light body. Once that happens, I guess you really know you can pray for energy using a specific program and just dive headfirst into the whole experience.

I guess you could say that training your brain to hit those lower frequencies—you know, like when you’re deep in prayer—is actually a pretty massive strain on the nervous system if it isn't used to that kind of rhythm, so I mean, you really shouldn't even attempt this sort of test regardless of how much you want to, unless there's an actual medical need for it and you've done all the necessary preparatory exercises first, because honestly, you just can't fake that kind of readiness.

I mean, at the end of the day, I guess the whole point is just reaching enlightenment through those spiritual energies from the creator and finding that eternal life, you know?

I'm not totally sure if I actually hit on what you were trying to get at, though? Like, honestly, physics is kind of secondary in this whole conversation, I suppose.

My intention was merely to highlight a massive hurdle regarding the transmission of low-frequency thoughts over long distances—specifically, their propagation through the universe as we understand it. To achieve such a feat, we would require a staggering amount of energy, a resource we currently lack and will likely never possess. Furthermore, since signal strength diminishes according to the inverse square law, any such signal would become negligible somewhere out in the void, failing to permeate the cosmos.

However, let us consider an alternative: Suppose you were confined within a massive steel vault at a major bank (a Faraday cage). Regardless of their frequency, your thoughts would be trapped within that vault, unable to escape. This implies a sentence of intellectual isolation. Or does it? If the omnipresent energies of the creator are present even within that vault, then one could communicate via low frequencies without needing immense mental power. Since those omnipresent energies reside within us, thoughts do not actually need to traverse vast distances. Consequently, one might communicate with others across the entire universe by simply requesting that the omnipresent, intelligent energy of the creator act as a channel—a repeater, if you will—to facilitate communication with those people, regardless of the fact that your physical thoughts cannot realistically exit the vault.

Therefore, everything is possible, though we are not truly transmitting low-frequency thoughts over great distances. Instead, we are communicating over a distance of zero, because we are interacting with the omnipresent energy of the creator that dwells within us. Thus, the "event horizon," so to speak, is right here (within our own minds).

It appears the issue is purely technical: we lack the descriptive framework for how the mechanism operates. We know that it works, yet we remain ignorant of the "how."

Mark Torres14 said:Why specifically 8.6 and not 8.7? I'm guessing this comes from some experiment. Care to explain how that works?

There isn't any mysticism here, just physics—but let's not get bogged down in that.

What branch of physics? And why skip over it?😕🤷

I would like to touch upon both this and that:

Gregory Jackson said:Well, I guess if you really look at it, the main difference is basically just the frequency at which your brain broadcasts those thoughts, which then totally changes how they mess with our energy field and our physical bodies.

It’s kind of like all our thoughts just ripple out from the brain as this sort of energy wave—kind of like a sphere that keeps expanding until it hits the edge of the universe, I suppose.

Generally speaking, negative thoughts tend to really beat up our energy field, and they’re probably responsible for most of the physical and mental health struggles we see. There are these four big categories, I think: dissatisfaction (which vibrates around 16-18 Hz), fighting for power (maybe 9-14 Hz), sadness or grief (around 8-11 Hz), and then fear for survival, which is usually 6-9 Hz. When a wave of negative thought hits—whether it's just a quick flash or something that lingers—it passes through our energy field and body and basically neutralizes the gray bioenergy whenever it makes contact. And, you know, the more negative the thought is, the lower the frequency goes, making it even more damaging. Plus, the more intense the emotion, the worse the damage; and I guess fear for survival is usually where that intensity hits its peak.

On the flip side, positive and even neutral thoughts also radiate out from the brain in every direction like a spherical wave, reaching the furthest reaches of space just as fast as the negative ones do. But these don't do any harm to the gray or white bioenergy, and they don't mess with the harmony of the energy field at all. Instead, they actually trigger a bunch of good stuff for both the energy field and the body. The frequency of positive thoughts seems to match the baseline bioenergy frequency of the human race—which is about 10.93 Hz—so when a positive wave passes through, it kind of recalibrates the energy field's frequency toward that ideal state. It also creates this sense of contentment, which I imagine helps the nervous system run smoother and keeps all our organs working the way they should. It even helps the chakras function better, which allows more of that gray bioenergy to flow into our energy field and our bodies.

A single frequency represents nothing; it is merely a basic "tone" that carries no information other than its own audibility if the frequency falls within the audible range. For any frequency (a carrier wave) to actually convey information, it must be modulated by a second frequency (the information) via known methods such as Amplitude, Frequency, Phase, or other modulation techniques. The lower the frequency of the carrier wave, the greater the power required from the "transmitter." Consequently, if humans intended to communicate over vast distances using low-frequency thoughts, they would require heads the size of a football stadium and incredibly long antennas. Furthermore, there is the matter of wave properties; for instance, long waves diffract around the Earth, often resulting in a ham radio operator hearing their own signal after it circles the globe and returns to their antenna. Additionally, long waves reflect off the D layer of the ionosphere at an altitude between 60 and 50 miles km, effectively making them useless for deep space communication—they are essentially "trapped on Earth." Therefore, to communicate over great distances with minimal energy, the frequency must be significantly higher (in the GHz range, certainly not Hz).

However: Everything I have just stated regarding low-frequency waves does not apply to thoughts if the entire universe is contained within every single point of existence. If that were the case, then Gregory Jackson is incorrect in asserting that our thoughts radiate outward toward the edge of the universe; there is nowhere for them to travel if the entire universe is already housed within our minds. The moment a thought is conceived, it has already arrived everywhere. If this premise holds, we cannot speak of a single frequency to which we must "tune in" if we view thoughts as frequencies; rather, we must consider a multitude of diverse frequencies that constitute a thought. To illustrate: I listen to someone playing a guitar live. Each note is a frequency, and their collection forms a song. There is no need for a secondary carrier wave to bring that song to me because I am physically present at the event. Conversely, someone miles away listening to that same performance on the radio requires a carrier wave from the station, which has been modulated with the music. They hear the same thing I do, but because they are not at the scene, they require a carrier wave to deliver it.

It appears the fundamental issue is how to exist "at the scene of the event" rather than being detached from everything. If we achieve that, we won't need anything—no frequencies, no transmitters. Everything is right where it has always been: within us.

Anyway, I suppose I have rambled quite extensively. 😁

James Fowler52 said:Wait, when did Francis Scott Key actually say that? Is there any kind of record of it out there?

He never actually said that. It’s a complete misrepresentation taken out of context from an interview conducted by Nenad Ivanković back in the early '90s. At the time, he was working as a correspondent for The New York Times in Washington, D.C., interviewing Franck Harmon and drawing a comparison between America and Japan, where the economy is essentially controlled by just 200 families.

Nicole Nelson77 said:haldol is an antipsychotic, which basically tanks your mood by messing with serotonin and dopamine. they give it to those "jumpers"🤣 just to keep them grounded.

And don't even start with the Akineton talk if you don't know what you're talking about. Akineton is an anticholinergic; it stimulates dopamine receptors. Honestly, you'd probably need to knock back about 20 pills before you actually felt like you were "flying"... taking two or three won't even register.

I took three once and didn't feel a single thing.☕

Not a single sensation in my head, my chest, or my limbs—nothing at all.🤣

It was necessary, apologies.😉

For the stoker 👍

My experience followed this trajectory: Following my time in the service, I took Xanax for about two months before deciding to stop because it felt utterly trivial, almost as inconsequential as eating popcorn. For quite some time after that, I remained off any medication and everything was stable. However, things took a sudden, sharp turn for the worse toward the end of 1999 when I stumbled upon this forum. Back then, the layout was nothing like what you see today; discussions were confined to a single subforum called Chatovi. Within roughly fifteen days of joining, everything unraveled, and I slipped into a psychosis without even grasping what that term actually entailed.

It happened this way, this way, this way, this way, this way, this way, this way, this way and this way.

Following that initial psychotic episode, I was prescribed Lexapro, followed later by Modafinil and Cogentin, and eventually Risperdal.

Two years ago, I discontinued the Risperdal and managed to stay off it for at least a year. Then, inevitably, the intrusive thoughts and irrationalities resurfaced, leading to an eleven-day stay in a psychiatric ward. Recovery was relatively swift, and I am currently stable provided I maintain a daily dose of 1mg of Risperdal. Even at this minimal dosage, however, I feel a persistent sense of lethargy and apathy; life feels rather dull. Interestingly, if I miss a single day of that 1mg dose, I notice my mood lifts and my cognitive processes feel sharper. I am certain that I could remain off Risperdal for five months without consequence, but I always find myself needing to return to small doses. Perhaps I could sustain it longer if it weren't for the internet and forums, which can be detrimental to one's psyche; these digital spaces allow for realities that simply do not exist in the physical world, causing a certain mental disorientation. Ultimately, Risperdal isn't such a burden if it helped stabilize my mood, and I have no desire to add more mood stabilizers to the mix, as I prefer to avoid excessive chemical intervention. Consequently, I experiment slightly with the Risperdal—skipping a dose here and there. My primary objective is to avoid triggers, and there are plenty of those on this forum. I make it a point to avoid clicking on threads that might destabilize me, and as long as I do that, I manage.

Jonathan Morales79 said:Exactly, all those bodies were victims killed after May 1945.

Maybe if you just hammered your head against Gojko Ubiparip’s anvil down there beneath the hammer and sickle, you wouldn't just look better... you might actually become significantly smarter... and then you wouldn't have to rely on so much "presupposition."

You know? 🙂

Was it 1941 or 1945?

Nicole Collins13 said:It’s just the right wing playing out here—Falcon first, then Dee. And speaking of Dee, my bad. Huge mistake on my part. *facepalmsalloverasplatteredshirt*

You be Tarzan 😉

casualskipper8 said:Think of it as a unique work builder—this massive bridge tucked away in some remote hills in the Soviet Union becomes a huge strategic target right as WWII is winding down. A group of commandos gets sent in with one mission: blow that bridge to hell to stop an advancing German armored division. The catch? The guy who actually designed and built the thing is part of the squad, and he’s absolutely torn because he can't bring himself to destroy his life's work. But despite all the chaos and setbacks, those guys pull it off and get the job done.

😂 😂 😂

If they hadn't decided to write off shows like this, we'd be watching something ten times better than all these cheap knockoffs.

They should have just filmed "The Bridge on the River Kwai" instead.😁

Karen Smith9 said:It’s pretty obvious how much you actually know about this. "Man is Not a Bird" isn't some partisan propaganda piece—it’s just good old Makavejev at work. And honestly, if you're going to take issue with black-and-white films too, then we really have nothing left to discuss regarding your level of intellect.

Look, buddy, if you can actually point out where I ever claimed it was a partisan film, I'll personally buy you a whole roast bull!!

If you had actually grasped my point, you'd realize the issue isn't the Battle of Sutjeska itself, but rather the broader trend of screening old movies featuring Mexican actors—films designed to drag us back into the past under the guise of restoring "brotherhood and unity" (which is really just a way to drive us apart).

There you have it. A brief summary of your intelligence levels.