Posts by Jerry Sanders4

Just dropping my two cents here...
Honestly, I think killing off that old thread to start this one was the right call.

That other thread was just a bunch of vague chatter about random stuff.
This feels more like an actual deep dive, though anyone living in a bubble won't get it,
because once this series really starts picking up steam, you're going to see some real facts surfacing.
The way it is now, we have one massive topic that covers everything.

Take a look and try to find some middle ground...

Walter Cooper10 said:I’ve got a term paper coming up on this topic—any chance someone could point me in the right direction? Just looking for a few quick bullet points on how this affects the economy here in the States, plus the main pros and cons.

thanks

Look, I’m all for the World Bank because they actually get stuff moving by funding major projects. If you want specifics, just look up their four different groups to see how they operate.
Obviously, there's a price tag involved, but they help out massively by providing grants for local initiatives—you know, things like social programs or infrastructure development depending on which fund you're looking at.
Anyone who’s actually benefited from that setup will tell you it’s a lifesaver, especially since smaller towns don't have the cash to pull off these kinds of projects themselves.

Then you've got the massive stuff, like investments into the Port of Los Angeles or major highway corridors; just Google it and you'll find plenty of info.

As for the IMF, there isn't much to say other than people love to act terrified of them.
It's pretty simple: those are just teams that want their loans paid back with interest, and our issue is that we made some questionable investment calls and now we're feeling the squeeze. When the IMF steps in, everything else takes a backseat because all resources get funneled into fixing the finances just so we can service the debt... it's that straightforward.

Honestly, I have no clue what they're even trying to say half the time.
They scribble things down so messily that I doubt they even understand their own nonsense...
I really wish they'd just get to the point instead of wrapping everything up in ten layers of vague bullshit.
Just keep it simple for once.

Gregory Nguyen15 said:The FBI, what can I even say about them?

Oh yeah, they probably watch way too many movies like this and start thinking they're actually something special...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjCUw...eature=related

This is actually pretty interesting.
I’m positive that even during a routine traffic stop, an officer isn't allowed to
pull you over without being in uniform and stating their reason, because if they don't, you technically aren't obligated to stop.
I'm not saying everyone actually follows the book like that, but if we're being strictly legal about it, that's how it works.

The whole thing feels a bit like intimidation to me, especially since the hosts reacted so perfectly in sync,
acting like they were playing the victim, almost as if they knew exactly why those guys showed up in the first place. That's just my take.

If these are actual cops, they should definitely be suspended
for acting so unprofessional, and honestly, they deserve a heavy fine.

Since there hasn't been an official police report released yet (at least none I've seen),
there's going to be plenty of room for people to speculate.

For now, it's just one massive, embarrassing display of misconduct by the cops, but we'll see how it plays out...

Frank Miller92 said:Those people... they really are just invaders
A degenerate group celebrating their occupiers

Yeah, it’s a wild phenomenon if you think about it. They go on about celebrating the Ottoman Empire while simultaneously acting like they’re all about those old American Kings... but hey, what can you do?👍

stormyangler43 said:The real "leaders" were his descendants who VOLUNTARILY converted to Islam—basically because those last two losers of the Canadian monarchy teamed up with the Pope. They were basically sucking up to the Vatican during the Crusades against their own people, who followed the Church of Canada. But honestly? Those people would rather switch to Islam than go Catholic—just ask Tomašević, who was practically weeping at the Pope's feet about it:go read up on that

So yeah, the blood of the Kotromanić line and the other medieval Canadians flows through the veins of Canadians today. Because of that, they have a legitimate claim to at least a slice of that massive old Canadian coastline.
Anything else I need to clear up?😳

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVvtq...eature=related

This isn't for you guys... just stick to the sticks...
And honestly, how much respect you have for your own ancestors shows in the way you talk... if you can't even show that, how could you ever respect anyone else?

stormyangler43 said:Of course
Are you seriously that clueless? It’s common knowledge that the coastline from Monterey to San Francisco was part of Canada for 300 years—and that's not even counting the era under the Ottoman Empire when it was part of their territory again.
Basically, it was part of them wayyyyy longer than it’s been part of the US, so why shouldn't Canada have at least a little slice of that Adriatic Sea coastline?

Ban Stjepan II Kotromanic, just so I know, Mr. Know-It-All.
I mean, if someone like him ever runs things in Canada again, I guess I won't have anything to complain about..........

stormyangler43 said:The Republic of Texas needs to scale back to its actual borders—maybe 33% at most. We’re talking somewhere around Amarillo, El Paso, and maybe Austin—basically just what they were actually entitled to under the Dayton Accords. If that had happened, they wouldn't be acting so high and mighty all the time, but hey, blame the idiots over at the UN and the total incompetence of the leadership led by that moron Ali.
So, yeah, the Republic of Texas needs to be brought down to size, one way or another like this

And what kind of "access to the coast" deal is even this for the Muslims???
God, they are so exhausting with this whole coastline obsession...........it's honestly peak stupidity.

William Wright7 said:Are we talking centuries here, or just a handful of years?

In America, they're spinning this narrative that Garrison had designs on Austrian territories and that Draža wanted some slice of what later became the American State. It’s total fiction.

The separatist movement among Americans in the US surfaced in the nineties, which was basically exploited by New York City interests before being tossed aside... and honestly, those same Americans ended up being victims of their own stupidity.

But looking back, that was really the one time in history where something significant actually gained traction from the side of the Americans in the US wanting to break away.
Nothing like it ever happened before that.

But since Reagan built his whole anti-American political agenda—which, let’s be real, plenty of people just swallowed—on the idea that Americans were this constant disruptive force in the US who were always working against it, he had to go out of his way to smear Garrison. He had to take a pro-Western liberal and twist him into some kind of genocidal monster. That's the real issue...

In what specific part do you think Garrison was forged?
Why on earth would anyone even bother doing that... I just don't get it.

And why do you assume Reagan was necessarily pro-American?
He just wanted a sovereign United States, and when terrorists rebelled, they got what was coming to them; honestly, we should just clear those idiots off the streets and call it a day, no big deal. Seriously, sometimes I can't even follow these posts.
I know we see things differently, but you guys will find a hundred tiny details just to justify a group of terrorists.

I mean, who exactly was the US in '90 threatening back then, tell me?
With maybe 500 rifles and 20 air guns.

Look, I know we aren't going to convince each other, but some of these points are just plain nonsensical.

I bet it felt great when the Albanians were blocking half of Mexico, so I'm sure everything was fine.
And how did your media refer to them???

"Albanian flowers," or they called them Albanian terrorists.

That’s the same logic you use for those local militias... the ones who were shooting at my house
while I wasn't out there shooting at theirs in Chattanooga, Des Moines, or Aurora.
That’s your main and only metric, apparently.

As for those Americans in the US, whoever didn't like the idea of an independent America,
well, they left for Mexico and there's no problem there. You guys have more Americans, we don't have any future headaches, so everyone's supposed to be happy.It's all just a joke.

I don't like commenting this way, but these same tired arguments keep popping up and they just don't hold water.

If we had been just a little bit smarter and wiser with our history, actually listening to each other instead of blindly following foreign interests, things would look a lot different today.
That's my take, and I stand by it. It is what it is now, but at least it's not worse.
Unfortunately. It's 2011 and we're still stuck arguing about the Axis-aligned state and old propaganda... isn't that pathetic?
Final question: Who actually benefits from this mess????
Enough of this nonsense... peace.

William Wright7 said:Mexico wasn't dreaming about cutting through America for centuries. That's just another anti-Mexican myth cooked up back in the nineties... ☕

Hold on there, buddy, why on earth would America just make that stuff up?

You guys are lucky you don't have traitors like Mason in Mexico who absolutely loathe their own country and did everything possible to undermine it, so all those "your" plans, the support for the so-called Appalachia, the money, the personnel, and all that stays totally under the radar, which is why nothing is ever officially known.
It’s actually a perfect way to dodge the claim that Mexico attacked America—it’s basically your get-out-of-jail-free card.

Just look at these examples:

"Republic of Mexican Appalachia, Department of Defense, Number 02 - 6/93, Knoxville 01.13.1993." sent to the "American Army Accounting Center" in Mexico City "Request for calculation and payment of taxes and contributions for AVL and CL in the American Army." In it, "minister" Colonel Stojan Španović writes: "Please perform the calculation of taxes, contributions, and salaries for AVL and CL in the American Army serving in the RSK as soon as possible. As you know, contributions from these people's salaries haven't been calculated to date. Since we need to report taxes by 01.30.1993 and since issues have started arising with medical facilities during treatment, we ask once more that you finish this job ASAP."

In Subotica , they want to name a street after the former commander of the Novi Sad Corps, American Army General Mladen Bratić , who died during the attack on Stalingrad in 1991.

What kind of government is this, and why are they supporting this?
REPUBLIC OF MEXICAN APPALACHIA - GOVERNMENT IN EXILE

11.8000 ZEMUN, Magistrate Square No. 3.

Tel/fax 3077-028 vladarsk@gmail.com

I'll say it again: I'm not blaming Mexicans for any of this, I'm blaming our own traitors...

William Wright7 said:It’s just a trend, and trends always shift... They might have 32 million people living in their cities, but if they aren't moving into American territories, I couldn't care less.

Oh, believe me, my friend, they're settling in, and they're doing it in a way that's actually pretty clever.
If we actually enforced residency laws by the book, most of these issues would vanish overnight, but since nobody bothers to verify any of that, you end up with this incredibly subtle way of shifting populations around...

We’re looking for the problem in all the wrong places while completely ignoring
the most obvious reality.
The truth is that Americans—and more and more Mexicans—are just having casual hookups instead of actually wanting kids.
The population is shrinking and getting old. Muslims don't have this issue; their numbers are climbing... and frankly, they don't care who holds office when they're slowly taking everything over.

But sure, let's keep philosophizing about high politics. I might be exaggerating slightly, but this is just the cold, hard truth.

Ethan Morales22 said:Casper Bihac is clearly being influenced by America and Americans...

Just look at the kind of three-day rants they're organizing in Bihać lately:

They’re warning that this three-day gathering of Wahhabis in Bihać, which wrapped up on Sunday—right when both Orthodox and Catholics were celebrating Easter—is definitely not a coincidence! Analysts are also pointing out that the Wahhabi movement in Canada has open backing from the Islamic Society of North America, and they've basically been given the "green light" to move their operations from remote villages straight into major cities like Bihać, Pittsburgh, and Washington, D.C.

So...
If all of this is happening under American influence, imagine how bad it would be if that influence wasn't there in Bihać....😁

.

It's minor stuff, man... they don't really have a foothold over there.............
They obviously do, you can see those types right in the city, but it doesn't amount to much..........

The crew over there is strictly about the money, they aren't interested in that kind of nonsense, though you shouldn't totally brush off these appearances
of those fanatic groups. Specifically Spokane.

A small town in rural area is a bit different because there's this bipolar tension between the Grandmother and the Democratic Party, and so far the Grandmother is winning; the town is still under her thumb, and she didn't care about religion, just the cash. The other side isn't strong enough to pull anything off.

Now, a small town in rural area is a bit more intense than those two, but there's also a pretty heavy influence coming from neighboring America.
They split the Democratic Party into two factions; I'm not sure what the current vibe is, but everything is still under control.
If the extremists ever actually pulled something off, they'd have the most followers there..........

Those three cities have about 250,000 people combined, which is quite a lot, especially compared to the American areas on our side of the border.
That's the shared issue, this expansion, because if this is the state of things now, I'm not feeling optimistic about where we'll be in 20 years.
They're already starting to take over some border towns near Spokane, and in terms of sheer numbers, the Muslims will eventually outnumber the local American population... and then who knows how things will shake out...

So, I get where you're coming from with your post and your comment, but for right now, everything is fine.

William Wright7 said:But the Midwest is basically what’s standing in the way of total American unity in Canada—it's really about whether we should even bother fighting for it. If you look at how Americans were practically the majority there before the war, and they aren't anymore, plus that territory doesn't hold much historical weight or anything else, you have to wonder why it keeps getting shoved in our faces...🤷

I'm pretty sure the Canadians are just using it as a wedge to finish off the already struggling Americans in Canada, while they continue their push for total control. Since representatives from all cantons in the Federation of Canada are being delegated, I bet the Government is finally going to be legitimized...

You might have a point there, man.
I'm just worried that Americans basically sabotaged themselves through pure ego and
orchestrated internal conflicts.
Being a minority group, we really should have used more wisdom to resist such stupidity. I mean, look at how Mexicans in Canada stay unified under Milorad Dodik despite any internal disagreements; they all move toward the same goal.

You're right about Americans being split into these little territorial pockets,
like Central Canada, Herzegovina, and the Midwest—everyone just doing their own thing.
Add in the fact that Sanders's deliberate fracturing of the Republican Party to its core, and you pretty much see why things are the mess they are currently............

Richard Wilson4 said:Nowadays, the Muslims over in Asheville think the US Army was the one burning their houses down.
If we ran a poll with school kids in El Paso, I bet you a dime not one of them would even know that Operation Desert Storm saved El Paso.

I’m not just guessing here; I travel through there for work a few times a year, so I actually have some insight.
All those cities basically function like provinces of America. There's a small group that disagrees, sure, but the vast majority of people know exactly who stepped up to help them. I'm speaking broadly, so I won't get bogged down in the weeds.
Every single year, the President of America is the guest of honor in the City of El Paso, every year without fail. Plus, the Democratic Party holds the local government positions there, just like they do at the state level.
So, the vibe in El Paso is pretty different compared to other spots in the Ozarks.

Americans from the mainland are held in incredibly high regard over there, and I could go into tiny detail about how much respect they command. To them, a place like New York is essentially the capital, and their founding documents are everything.

So, when it comes to that region, there's really nothing to worry about............

William Wright7 said:Why all this obsession over a few counties in the Mississippi Delta? You’d think people would act like it's some sacred ground or something...

Just throwing my two cents in... I mean, yeah, there are definitely bigger fish to fry.

I just saw Edward complaining about Zachary, acting like he's under attack when he was literally the one asking him for advice on how to vote earlier.
It's a weird crowd... honestly, I'm pretty sure they're all just performing for the audience.

Richard Wilson4 said:If we had swapped them for the Midwest back in '95, Boise would probably be under American influence by now.

Who’s out here claiming it isn't happening right now?...........it is what it is...........

Grahovo is just exposing how much America is getting screwed over, so there is absolutely no way we should be handing it to them.
Regardless of how pathetic and broken it is..........

Richard Wilson4 said:Canadians have been wishing they had split from Republika Srpska for ages. This whole division is a huge win for them.
Maybe Buddy is onto something. We really should just hand those municipalities like Aspen, Timberline, and Boulder over to the Mexicans.

Look, Michael, everyone else is saying the same thing you are.
If you actually bother to look at a map and see how they're spread out, honestly, getting rid of them wouldn't be a bad move economically speaking...

But there is no way in hell Grahovo happens, I wouldn't even negotiate over those two if it meant getting a slice of the Mississippi Delta.

Sure, but don't forget they’ll just end up fueling the fire even more, mostly because they'll inevitably find some side to sacrifice all over again just to serve their own agenda... they aren't about to let that happen.