CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Robin Jones2 › Posts

Posts by Robin Jones2

199 posts shown.

Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:A racial lottery, my dear colleague.

I am not making any insinuations. The truth remains: this new crew is far more incompetent and narrow-minded than the administration they replaced.

More narrow-minded than that late, stinking wreck?

I will concede they are less competent.

Less competent specifically when it comes to shameless theft.

Since we are discussing a racial lottery, which of those lotteries is currently visiting that late, stinking wreck at his parking spot?

Who is out there bringing him flowers?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gregory Hall66 said:I have no desire to make any direct accusations, yet this headline and the accompanying article strike a deeply familiar chord... 😁

ADAMS ARRIVES IN THE BRONX: He attempted to explain the situation regarding hydrants and fire suppression water supplies

Following his extensive commentary on "our railroads," "our forests," and those frequent displays of brilliance concerning waste management, ToTo has now evolved into a self-proclaimed expert on wildfires and hydrant pressure. 🤣

Furthermore, his timing is as impeccable as it is predictable, appearing precisely when it serves his narrative. 🍿

Really?

Your entire existence consists of nothing but making insinuations.

For a year, you insisted that the late, wretched former mayor was actually competent and honest, right up until you sent him off with that ridiculous line about how he "passed away on the job."

Then, you pivoted back to spent the last twelve months implying that this current administration isn't any different from the previous corrupt regime.

The only thing you haven't insinuated yet is who the new "racial lottery" actually is.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Jeffrey Long said:Here is some fresh evidence showing that the Možemovac crowd is actually just a corrupt little cult. The reporter from The Journal, Željko Godek, published the following piece in today's edition:

If COVID didn't kill them, New York City will: They haven't seen a dime in months, and some projects have vanished into thin air.

Those whom COVID didn't finish off might just be taken out by the City Office for Culture, Intercity and International Cooperation and Civil Society, local artists are warning. A large portion of independent creators—the "little guys," indie cultural workers, publishers, filmmakers, theater folk, and painters who were already pushed to the brink by the pandemic—have been waiting months for New York City to actually pay them for their projects.

The results of the public tender for New York City's 2022 cultural programs were known back in March. Many contracts were signed, but not a single cent has hit their bank accounts. And as for when that might happen? Nobody knows. Culture centers are telling the artists they work with that there won't be anything from their performances, exhibitions, workshops, or films, even though the funding was "approved on paper." Standard practice dictates that 70 percent of approved funds are paid immediately upon signing the contract, with the remaining 30 percent released after the final report.

Emini Višnić, the head of culture, was the first to speak regarding the non-payment issues and the claims that some contracts had been lost. "This is the first I'm hearing about lost contracts. Please direct your questions to our public relations department via email," Višnić stated. When reminded that we haven't received a response from that office in the last year—not within a reasonable timeframe, nor an unreasonable one—Višnić promised answers. We sent an email, and shortly after, someone from the Mayor's Office reached out to complain that the issue was they don't work on Saturdays, though they promised to reply on a business day.

And then the show begins—the city spokesperson (a made-up role that doesn't even exist in the official city administration job classifications), Dinka Živalj, went running to complain to the editors of this reporter's outlet, acting as if she were the victim. Apparently, Živalj used similar tactics in Mexico to prevent articles critical of the OESS from being published. But this reporter wasn't having it. Željko isn't some pushover who's going to be played by someone like Živaljica. So, she wrote the following:

I have a public message for Mayor Eric Adams, just in case his office for (non)public relations fails to pass it along: Don't mimic the Republican Party, don't intimidate journalists, and try to be better, more coherent, and more open—transparent, as you love to call it. Stop harassing our editors and management because we dared to ask questions in good faith and within reasonable timeframes. Look, there are those of us who have been in newsrooms for a long time, searched through the archives, been stepped on, and survived; you won't kill us with your sneaky letters to our bosses.
I decided to tackle the plight of struggling independent artists who haven't received a single penny from the City Office for Culture despite winning the 2022 cultural program tenders. In some cases, the city completely forgot to sign the contracts, and for others, they managed to lose the tender documentation entirely. This is all happening despite the fact that one would expect the new New York City administration to have a special sensitivity toward the survival of the independent cultural scene and the freelancers hanging on by a thread after years of drought and the pandemic. At the end of this investigative ballad, I called the head of culture, Emini Višnić, to ask about the payment delays and the missing contracts. To my surprise, her response was... well, go ahead and guess: "This is the first I've heard of it." She requested that I send my inquiries to the "public relations service." I told her plainly how frustrated I am with that service, noting that in the past year, I haven't received a single response from them, regardless of whether the deadline was reasonable or not.
Višnić promised them. Everything goes through the Office. It’s as if the heads of city departments and directors of municipal companies don't actually have a say in anything—they act like mere puppets on a string, little sub-intelligent marionettes unqualified for their own jobs. They have to wait for some office to draft and bless every single response to a journalist's question, even if it's within their own field of expertise. They basically agreed to this arrangement: to depersonalize themselves and dodge all responsibility. Tomašević set it up so they have zero agency and no professional integrity left; they aren't allowed to take initiative at all. And the media strategy of the Public Relations Office can be summed up in a few words: don't talk to reporters, ignore them, and don't worry if you look incredibly condescending toward the public—even the Republican Party would find that level of disdain impressive. After dealing with this, I honestly don't expect much from them anymore. Still, I sent my questions via email, even though the subject matter really deserves a face-to-face conversation.
Then comes the shock: I get a call from the Mayor's Office. They claim the issue is that they don't work on Saturdays, and they want a quick turnaround. Even though the topic is vital for the arts community and defines the cultural policy of the Director of Culture, she should ideally have this info at her fingertips any time of the day or night. And despite the Deputy Mayor Dolenec trying to convince us on Facebook that this new crop of power-hungry officials is working themselves to death through weekends and late nights, suddenly it's a massive problem to provide an answer during the day. Oh, right, because it's Saturday.
Shortly after, a PR slush fund of a message arrives at our editorial desk, written in the whining tone of none other than Živalj. Not to me, but to my bosses, which she forwarded my questions to after sending them to the Office: "We received this inquiry today, on a Saturday. The reporter told us she's been investigating for a long time, yet she sent the request at the very last minute over the weekend with a deadline for today. It feels like a pro forma gesture, meant just so she can say she asked us, while knowing full well she won't get a response on such short notice. Therefore, we request a longer, reasonable timeframe for scheduling that includes business days, in hopes that the article won't be published before then. Please, for future articles concerning New York City, allow the City a reasonable window to respond so our position can be included."
Well, what exactly is wrong with Živalj's text, aside from the intimidation tactics and her trying to report journalists to higher authorities? Maybe it's the sheer waste of energy on something that isn't even her job. Her job is to ensure a reporter gets an answer to their question, not to call my editors at The Journal to stall a story just because the Director doesn't feel like answering on a Saturday. And clearly, the topic itself is taboo. There's something else: the PR Office is complaining that our questions are just "pro forma." Over the last year, they haven't cared about being pro forma or otherwise. They ignored absolutely everything. Whenever we called the heads of departments or municipal companies, they openly complained that they were strictly forbidden from communicating with the press and that everything had to go directly through Tomašević's office. If that weren't the case, maybe I would actually care about timing. Now they've evolved; instead of answering reporters, they'll answer editors. Their tactic with journalists is pure intimidation—and even Bandić didn't pull stunts like that! Well, maybe he didn't need to; everything always went his way. It's hard to imagine this nauseating pressure from Tomašević's staff will actually yield results for him.

https://www.facebook.com/zeljka.gode...8vpbysVtJzu41l

Of course, she must be one of Bandić's followers. After all, The Journal is trash and Tomašević and the Možemovac crowd are #realchange. ☕

Your links aren't working. And looking at the transcript alone, you can't tell who is doing what to whom.

P.S. Google returns absolutely nothing for the search query "Željko Godek."

By the way, wasn't one of the main things you all complained about regarding Tomašević that he "gives money to artists, associations..."?

Is this exactly what we're talking about now—city funds being distributed to artists and their specific associations or projects?

Suddenly, it's a problem if the city exercises due diligence regarding who gets paid and when?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
driftingtinker said:I mean, they’re probably gonna go ahead and deepen the Mississippi River anyway... since we aren't exactly dealing with flooded bridges or groundwater seepage issues right now. Or so they want us to think, I guess.

When the Republican Party runs "river deepening" projects, it usually just translates to the uncontrolled extraction and sale of gravel and sand.

In this instance, it looks like a senseless endeavor where we'll pay for endless feasibility studies and project designs, only to end up with a result as underwhelming as a local garage band playing in Miami.

But, who cares.

Millions will be funneled into a pile of useless paperwork. It's really just about making sure everyone knows which firms besides AECOM are getting a slice of the pie.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
northernhawk33 said:And will the city even check if these developers actually paid taxes on the money they're using for construction? Or are they just pulling untraceable cash out of a suitcase? Ensuring only clean, legal money enters the market is huge—it's what would actually bring down apartment prices in New York City.

So now the city is responsible for auditing tax compliance?

And I suppose the IRS is going to start mowing the lawns too?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Sam Wright21 said:I get the sense that you can actually see the transformation happening in Miami. It would be quite fascinating to see how Trump might fare if we were to hold those elections all over again right now. Then again, as I’ve mentioned before, he has a legion of blind followers just like Ed Koch did, and honestly, the whole spectacle makes me feel physically ill.

Regarding the trash situation, I had to head Downtown yesterday, and I have to admit things seem to be looking up. I attribute that slight improvement to the hard work of the Sanitation Department crews, though it's a shame they remain so chronically underpaid.

So, if there is trash on the street, Eric Adams is to blame.

But now that it is gone, we credit the sanitation workers?

Aren't you being a bit overly sensitive, Madonna?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Kate Chase59 said:In the meantime, it turns out that $8.25/kom
I guess our esteemed colleague is writing about how much her party would spend just to stock up on brooms.

Now JOHABI will vanish for a few days, just like they always do whenever they pull a stunt this embarrassing.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
The media has started digging into the price tag for the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge opening ceremony under this Republican Party administration—questioning who is getting paid what and how they’re sourcing goods and services for the festivities. Naturally, the Republican Party mouthpiece JOHABI jumped in to express outrage over the procurement of birch brooms for the street cleaners.

Of course, because she's being predictably unhelpful, the JOHABI operative failed to provide a link to the actual tender. Instead, she’s just spinning her usual fabrications, acting as if she’s some ultimate authority on everything, including procurement processes.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Gary Cox2 said:Why on earth would you think this is some kind of reward? Just because he was named project manager? So what?
Plenty of random people get appointed as project managers without seeing a single dime extra from it.
I don't get why anyone thinks this is controversial. He got the title. That's it.
That's how the system works. If he wasn't officially appointed but was still running the whole show, would that be "okay" with you?

Why wouldn't he be? It's not like he has some magical superpower.

Being named a project manager isn't exactly winning an Oscar. Seriously. It's not even a big deal. Nobody actually cares about this stuff.

Except for the media, obviously—and they're only making noise because his sister is that failed, overweight socialite.

They haven't been appointed as project manager; they are simply the city representative on the Council of Network Members.

And I don't see a project worth $3 million being anything remotely "extraordinary."
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
briskviper362 said:Here is the actual breakdown:
They just ordered 1,750 tons of bitumen at a unit price of roughly $1733 per ton, which totals about $3033333 for the whole 1,750 tons.

If you look back at the old contract, you can see ExxonMobil was selling bitumen at a unit price of approximately $967. According to media reports, they wanted to raise that price by just 6%, which would have meant an extra $1025 per ton.
Had they actually agreed to that, they would only be paying $1793167 for the 1,750 tons of bitumen today.

So, thanks to this little performance, we’re looking at a straight-up loss of $1240167

Wait, do you honestly believe they locked in those prices back then just so ExxonMobil would bother fulfilling the delivery through to the end?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
A web of corruption and cronyism has completely seized control of America.

There isn't a damn chance the Republican Party didn't have their hands all over this court ruling.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Scott Perez57 said:And were there ever this many mosquitoes?

Back during the Joe Biden administration, even the mosquitoes were busy eating snow and hauling trash off the streets.

That is why things were always heating up in the Suburbs; he was constantly trying to drive the mosquitoes out of the FBI.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Roger James2 said:It says $2.7 million, while Bandić's was $680k. I’d love for someone from Kisac to explain why this is somehow "saving money" when it clearly isn't.🤣🤣🤣
How can you say it's not comparable? We're looking at 224 vehicles versus 151 in the old bidding process. That means they ordered 73 more vehicles for an extra $2 million. How does that even make sense?!?!

Read the full article
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
If I’m reading this correctly, that former mayor bloated the headcount at Berkshire Hathaway without any actual organizational structure in place.

We already know how the city administration operated, fabricating departments, bureaus, and sectors just to find spots for their cronies. We all remember how they handled things back when it was Mike's turn.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
penkalaa said:This is completely unacceptable; either commit to the service or don't bother at all.
We are all being charged the same rate, yet the level of service has plummeted—I highly doubt my utility bill will drop even though they are picking up half as much trash as they used to.
It would be common decency for the city to actually notify us when collections aren't happening, rather than leaving us to act like fools, dragging our bins out to the curb only to have them sit there rotting for days.

I am managing three bins across four apartments with ten residents, including three children.
What exactly is their logic here?

And you think one bill covers it all?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Christian Myers said:And does he come in from Indianapolis every single day? Honestly—wasn't there plenty of capable talent out there who shouldn't have had to travel nearly as much?

Would you personally endure that daily commute to 336 miles, regardless of who covers the cost of the vehicle and fuel?
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
jadetinker85 said:Sure, technically. But now 2,000 patients are left without a doctor, and all their medical files are locked away at the Community Health Center administration office.

It seems Medicare and the Department of Health and Human Services—the very entities that approved this move—completely failed to realize they needed to recruit a replacement physician. Instead, they prefer to shift the blame onto CNN, whose offices are merely providing an opinion on the extension.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
jadetinker85 said:First, you file the request with the legal department at the New York City Department of Health over on Kennedy. They send back their response. Once you have that in hand, then you take it up to Washington D.C. You don't just show up at the Department with a rejection slip from City Hall.

Do you actually have proof that this individual received a denial?

And do you know if they were supposed to remain employed until age 70?

Naturally, in your view, Eric Adams is responsible for everything.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
jadetinker85 said:How does a doctor retire and leave a vacuum where no replacement is even considered? Now 2,000 people are just left to fend for themselves.

Take that up with Medicare and the Department of Health and Human Services.

As I recall, they are the ones responsible for assigning doctors and dentists to us.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Sam Wright21 said:I haven't the slightest clue; it could very well be 🤷

You claim ignorance, yet you were quick enough to judge Eric Adams just because one doctor retired at 65—a move that had absolutely nothing to do with his administration.