Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)
in Soccer ·
Is the movie Pain & Gain actually based on a true story?
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
470 posts shown.
Joseph Clark37 said:It strikes me as strange that almost exclusively epidemiologists make up the expert task force during this pandemic. Why aren't we seeing neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, or OB-GYNs involved? Something doesn't add up...
Matthew Young35 said:Of course there are lunatics.
With seven billion people on the planet, it would be statistically bizarre if there weren't.
And it takes a special kind of idiot to stand against vaccines, which are easily one of the greatest achievements in human history.
And yes, it’s certainly "crazy" when some woman featured on HuffPost decides to meddle in epidemiology despite clearly knowing absolutely nothing about viruses.
She doesn't even grasp what any amateur could figure out after reading two articles: the coronavirus isn't part of the influenza family. We are talking about two entirely different types of viruses.
Is it really "insanity" to refuse to weigh in on a subject where you have zero expertise?
Laura Chavez93 said:And honestly, if you step outside without a mask, people stare at you like you're some kind of biohazard intentionally trying to spread the virus everywhere...🙂
Matthew Young35 said:So, epidemiologists are useless when it comes to actual epidemics, but we should definitely listen to a retired pediatrician from Maxportal, a totally unhinged Sladoljev, some crazy anti-vax internist, and the "experts" over at Bujanec.
Not.
Laura Chavez93 said:🙂
And instead of isolating the high-risk groups—namely retirees and those with chronic illnesses,
they choose to wreck the entire fabric of society by declaring a state of emergency, banning people from doing anything, outlawing social gatherings, and essentially killing off all social life...
just so these old-timers can linger for a few more months... what a brilliant strategy... ☕
Matthew Young35 said:If this "flu" mutates even slightly into something with a high mortality rate, we are absolutely screwed.
We know nothing about this virus. We don't have a vaccine, we don't have a cure, we don't have enough ventilators, and we don't have enough hospital capacity. Is it seasonal? Who knows. For all we know, we don't even fully grasp the exact mechanics of how it spreads.
All we know for certain is that it is highly infectious, and that's it.
On the flip side, we know a great deal about the flu. It's seasonal, we have vaccines, it's less contagious, and we understand its transmission.
Are we really supposed to believe that every single country on Earth is either incompetent or part of some grand pharmaceutical conspiracy?
I wouldn't go that far.
Just try considering the possibility that epidemiologists across the globe might actually be right, while a retired pediatrician posting on Reddit—someone whose expertise doesn't even cover this field and who apparently doesn't realize that Coronavirus isn't even part of the Influenza family—might be wrong. Just try it.
Paul Martinez73 said:Comparing America to Sweden and Germany?
Alright, enough arguing. You win. ☕
restlesssurfer97 said:Look, SARS and MERS are basically the same family of coronaviruses as this current one, and I spent a good couple of months diving deep into all the research a while back—I’m getting a little fuzzy on the specifics now, but if my memory serves me right, there are about seven well-known coronaviruses out there. Four of them have been causing basic common colds for decades, and then, totally catching everyone off guard, SARS showed up back in 2002 and proved these things can actually be lethal with pretty high mortality rates, and then MERS came along being even more deadly, and now we have this.
So, you really shouldn't downplay this as just some other run-of-the-mill flu strain; calling it SARS-CoV-2 is actually totally justified.
The death rate isn't just 1% of people who get hospitalized; if you're looking at those actually in the hospital, the fatality rate is way higher, though here in the States, the mortality rate among those tested is sitting at around 1%.
What everyone is assuming, and what’s probably the truth, is that the actual number of people infected is way higher than what we see, but we won't really know for sure until we start massive testing and maybe look into antibody studies too. That's the only way we could truly prove if the mortality rate is actually lower than it looks.
The reality is that they're implementing this total lockdown without any kind of long-term strategy for how to actually fight this, which feels like a fast track to disaster, but honestly, when it comes to us in America, you can't really expect much better, since we tend to just wait for someone else to come in and put out the fire for us.
Matthew Young35 said:You forgot to use quotation marks or cite a source—just a retired pediatrician on Reddit.
And naturally, the text is riddled with errors, such as the claim that the coronavirus is one of the many viruses in the Influenza group.
It is not. Therefore, you can strike down everything written following that error as inaccurate.
Paul Martinez73 said:https://www.cnn.com/news/coronavirus-updates-link
Well, this whole thing is just 🤣
So, Vincent doesn't have Corona—we’ve known each other for ages. This lady had her grandkids over because it was Grandpa's birthday, which is the biggest thing ever. Honestly, I've changed my mind; instead of banning everything, we should just issue guidelines on what people should and shouldn't be doing...
If it turns out those seniors voluntarily hung out with infected people (even if they were showing symptoms), we should just deny them medical care, treat it as an attempted suicide, and mandate psychiatric treatment.
And for all the young folks, if they keep partying and it turns out they were in contact with more than ten people during isolation, let's treat that as intentional spreading of the virus and attempted murder.
Anyway, see ya. People are animals; they don't care about themselves, let alone the vulnerable. Then, once they get hit, they start whining to everyone for help.
brightpilot6 said:Look, liberals aren't idiots.
I’m not really trying to nitpick whether their estimates regarding themselves or Dalton are actually accurate. I'm just making a broader point—being a liberal doesn't mean you have to turn a blind eye to behavior that poses a genuine threat to the community, does it? At least, that's how I've always understood it.
loneseal said:I’m usually working until almost 5. If I need to pick up something mid-week that won't sit on my desk for a few hours, I just head out a little early and make up that extra half hour or so the next day. No sane boss is going to give you grief over that.
The logic behind this rule is pretty straightforward—it's meant to stop people from being forced into shift work. All this whining about retail hours is just pure nonsense.
urbanhawk17 said:I'm a solid 5 on this, I think I get your point, but I just don't see the logic in working until 5 p.m.
Like I said, if it actually makes sense, they should just wrap things up by 1 p.m.
urbanhawk17 said:I don't touch bread; I stick to meat. I guess some people just can't function without their carbs. 🤷
Take your example, for instance. I guess you could ask why they don't just put the people commuting from out of town—say, someone driving from a suburb into downtown Chicago—on the first shift.
Maybe they should just cap the number of people working at the store. It’s way too crowded right now anyway. If they shifted the hours to run from 8 AM to 8 PM and actually redistributed the shifts properly, I guess everyone would end up with an extra day off. Maybe that would work.
It’s just stupid. You clock out at 5:00 PM, realize you forgot to pick up something essential for dinner, and suddenly you're stuck. You have nowhere to go. You're just stranded.
A friend sent me a photo from two days ago showing a line outside a 24-hour CVS. It was crazy—people stretching out at least a hundred yards down the street. And that was only around 6:00 PM. I guess things are getting pretty desperate.
edit:
I don't really care if they work until 5 PM or if they wrap things up by 1 PM, assuming that actually makes sense. I just don't see the point. What's supposed to happen during those three extra hours, anyway?
urbanhawk17 said:And for those of us working regular hours, I suppose there's always someone at home who can drop us off at 8:00 AM.
What, am I supposed to just buy a week's worth of bread and meat from Walmart on Sunday?
Great idea.
urbanhawk17 said:So everyone else—except for retail workers—just happens to have a ride? Must be nice.
What about the people working until 5 or 6 PM? How are they supposed to grab groceries?
urbanhawk17 said:People are going to be stuck waiting around until 5 or 8 because these local corner stores can't handle more than ten people at a time.
And honestly, does it even matter if they close at 5 or 8?