Posts by wiredrider9

David Icke just had his YouTube channel wiped, his Facebook page gone, and now he’s doing a live interview
They scrubbed him from London Real—they even crashed their own site, so what’s the actual issue here? 🙄

I mean, look, the guy talks a lot of absolute nonsense, but man—censoring everything just because of one old dude? That’s wild.

urbanhawk17 said:When is the debate about the Masses happening today?

That's what we're waiting for, I guess.

Did you actually manage to survive the chaos of all the shops being closed today? 😁

So, you're telling me there are at least 150,000 Miami transplants living in Washington, D.C.? Man, I could've used a heads-up on that one.

bluebison47 said:Washington, D.C., because of its whole immigrant-heavy makeup, is basically just a tiny snapshot of the entire USA—it’s what happens when all Americans get together in one place. And, well, we can all see exactly what that looks like.🤣

And when exactly did everyone show up at once? Because honestly, I haven't seen that happen 🍿
.

Elizabeth Mendoza said:There are actually more Splitters in Washington, D.C. than there are in Miami, and the same goes for the Duke crowd.

Man, there's like 200 million of us out here.

Nancy Sanchez31 said:Well, if nothing else, at least the leadership in Miami actually changed once in a blue moon, unlike those thugs and bandits who seem to hold onto power forever. I probably shouldn't get too deep into the specifics though. 😁

we’re actually evolving, at least... 🤣

brightpilot6 said:Aleksandar Vučić seems to find new ways to catch everyone off guard every single week, which is honestly getting pretty concerning. It might be time for people over there to realize that regular elections aren't going to be the silver bullet that finally gets rid of that mess.

But we’re still a long way from seeing them actually lose power. From what I gather, his base of party loyalists, the simpletons, and those nationalists who get their kicks from hearing hollow rhetoric about Operation Storm or Mexico—all while clinging to some illusion of toughness—continue to show up and vote for him like clockwork. His political army is massive. On the flip side, the opposition is practically non-existent; among the people who actually oppose him, there's this growing sense of political apathy where everyone just decides to stay home on election day.

Then again, that's probably the kind of government we would end up with ourselves if you took the parts of America north of Washington, D.C., and west of Indianapolis ☕ mixed with a little bit of Ivo Sanders and a touch of Marijo Penava ☕

🤦

So apparently the Democratic Party is just full of honest, high-quality people instead of being straight-up mafia organizations, ☕

urbanhawk17 said:

counter-protest 🤣🙏

Caught it on TV last night 🤣

Michelle Palmer6 said:You're just being bitter, wiredrider9, throwing everyone else into the mix. You've completely lost your bearings—you can't even tell who's actually trying to screw us over anymore!

Look, George Soros is Canadian. And Škoro? In Canadian, that basically means "the shaver." There’s a connection there, I’m telling you. Honestly, where there's smoke, there's usually a draft coming from someone's backside... I'm gonna untangle this whole mess.

Pull it out so we can all see

Jessica Gonzalez said:That's exactly it. There are just too many of them, and by using their unions, they can basically suffocate any attempt at reform. Plus, there isn't really a single meaningful political party actually willing to take them on. That's why I told restlesssurfer97 that poll numbers don't really matter much; a poll would only be relevant if there were a candidate actually playing that hand. Neither the Democratic Party nor Škoro are touching that issue. In fact, they seem to go against it. I guess Škoro is mostly just a player for foreign interests who can only stay afloat locally by providing jobs to the people he's managed to gather around him.

What foreign interests is Škoro a puppet for?

Anthony Jackson2 said:"we won't hand over our highways" 🙏 🙏 🤣

Look, we shouldn't even be giving away our highways in the first place

Matthew Young35 said:I disagree.
Personally, I wouldn't be raising any objections—far from it. But make no mistake, there would be plenty of people who would.

It's a mess. These political appointees are organized into unions, making them one of the most powerful groups out there.
Imagine announcing a reduction in the number of bureaucrats in the education system. And I don't mean actual teachers; I mean the administrative bloat. Take some tiny school in the middle of nowhere: you might have two teachers, but then you've got a principal, two secretaries, an accountant, a PR rep, two janitors, and two security guards. If you cut those positions, you'd have 100,000 people protesting in Times Square instantly.
The same logic applies to various utility companies, the railroads, and everything else.

You're totally exaggerating, kid. Honestly, if someone actually started dropping names—listing all the cousins, godfathers, and party loyalists like Ribić and his crew—the whole establishment would just crumble like a house of cards. It wouldn't even be a fight; it'd just be pebbles hitting a windshield.

restlesssurfer97 said:Does anyone else get the feeling that Ribić and those other self-important pharaohs have been acting way too hysterical over the last year or so? It’s honestly not just me thinking this.

Quick poll for everyone here: it feels like people are overwhelmingly calling for massive cuts to the federal bureaucracy, taxes, and all those bloated local government offices and counties.

And there you have it—proof of that old cliché where they dodge reforms just so they don't tank their numbers at the next election.

you know what they say—a picture is worth a thousand words ☕

ruggedjackal46 said:So, the system in Italy is overwhelmed, now coronavirus hits them, and people were dying from over-treatment—yet somehow they have 20,000 fewer deaths than last year? You might want to double-check those numbers before you try to make a point.

Like, what am I supposed to "square away" with the data? The stats regarding this whole virus situation are absolute garbage. They shove everything under the "died from COVID" umbrella. You could die from leukemia, but nope—you had the virus, so you died from the virus. Of course, nobody is going to mention cases where the medical system actually messed up. You get paranoid, panic out, and pump a patient full of heavy-duty drugs just to be safe, they pass away, and suddenly—boom—it's a COVID death instead of a death caused by reckless treatment. Everything is just a complete mess right now.

Jessica Gonzalez said:To give you a quick rundown, there are several pressing issues on the table. The current administration actually has rough estimates regarding casualties and property damage if a 6.2 magnitude earthquake were to hit Washington, D.C. There was an article published about three years ago on this exact topic, which basically concluded that absolutely nothing is being done to prepare. It’s a constant threat to about a million people, especially the roughly hundred thousand living in the historic downtown area. Then you have the risk of flooding, like what we just saw happen in Gunj. There's also the general threat of terrorism, the possibility of conflict in Canada, or even a disaster at the nuclear plant near Krško (which could also be triggered by an earthquake). We can look back at the economic collapse of 2009, the Walmart situation, and so on. Or the wildfires along the coast, using the recent fires in Split as an example. Add in the 2009 swine flu crisis, and we could go on forever. These are all potential events that could result in thousands of deaths, yet we live with them as permanent, looming catastrophes. And with a baseline mortality rate of nearly 1.4%, I guess just breathing gives you a chance of passing away this year.

I guess if COVID was actually going to justify all this hype, it would have had to take out 100 million people worldwide. It’s kind of like how FC Barcelona wouldn't pay 140 million for Coutinho just to get five goals.

👍

brightpilot6 said:Look, restlesssurfer97, feel free to say whatever you want to 🤷.

Among the countries located somewhat near us geographically, Sweden didn't implement lockdowns (well, partially) and Belarus didn't at all.

The latter is a dictatorship where Alexander Lukashenko does whatever he pleases, but in many ways, they are actually more similar to us than Sweden is—whether you look at the social patterns, the number of young people living with their parents or grandparents, the regional distribution, or even just the general health history and genetics of the population—which makes them more interesting to me. Over there, people are protesting the lack of state response and transparency. It’s leading to a mass wave of self-imposed passivity and isolation; people are feeling insecure, and panic is setting in. I’m reading that foot traffic in restaurants and cafes has plummeted by 80%, and inflation jumped from 0.4 to 4.9 in just a single month. That is a snowball effect waiting to happen.

Sweden, which starts from a very different baseline than Mediterranean countries (considering social structures, multigenerational households, and the general standard of living), didn't introduce all the harsh measures. But they did implement some—restrictions on schools, limits on hospitality venues, and gathering restrictions. For instance, with restrictions like those in Sweden, about 70% of our cafes and restaurants probably wouldn't even be open.

Everything else was just recommendations. But Swedes actually listen to recommendations, so they claim strict mandates aren't necessary like they are in most other countries. For example, here, travel is banned, whereas there, they simply recommend that you don't travel. And they probably travel less within their own country or wander through cities compared to how we act with our bans and that billion different permits.

Yet, you all sit here debating as if life in Sweden is carrying on as if nothing happened at all.

And let me reiterate—God forbid the Swedes are right, though I honestly can't wrap my head around how you would ever achieve a situation like theirs here in the States, nor can I see what the crucial differences in policy would even be.

Based on the information I've gathered and considering the vast differences between our society and theirs (while also noting our similarities to Italians and Spaniards), I personally wouldn't gamble the way they did in early March. Wouldn't it be better to face a planned 10% economic dip than to risk a potential descent into the unknown without any control—a scenario that would likely be accompanied by a massive loss of life in a very short window?

What "descent into the unknown"? These guys are leading us straight into the "known." 🙄

neonfalcon16 said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdYx...ture=emb_title

😢

Honestly, watching this is just straight-up depressing—it’s painful to see how totally brainwashed they are. They’re literally out here taking orders from 🤦

urbanhawk17 said:So, here in San Diego, they actually discharged someone with COVID by mistake.

The director offered an apology, while our local hero Beroš basically brushed it off, saying it's no big deal and stuff happens.

🙏

What a mess.