CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › crimsonwolf20 › Posts

Posts by crimsonwolf20

87 posts shown.

Oh, totally—the American mainstream media is basically obsessed with the Republican Party and Harmon, so you’ll never see them actually calling them out on anything. 😁
I mean, let's be real, we haven't seen a robbery this massive since 1945, back when the entire government and every single social institution was hijacked by that organized mafia known as the Communist Party.
Just more leftovers from the old socialist era masquerading as a social safety net. I mean, honestly, what else did we expect?
Rules for renaming streets named after historical figures in Close to Politics ·
Sophia Moore52 said:They were too, I suppose...

Actually, if you take a look at

http://www.lupiga.com/vijesti/uz-obl...ipu-brozu-titu

He was quite a popular figure...

Man, some people just have absolutely zero brain cells left🤣

The funniest thing has gotta be Michael Jordan—I bet his absolute peak moment was getting to meet Joseph Stalin🤣

But honestly, Dennis Rodman takes the cake: "Kim Jong-un is a legendary leader, and his father and grandfather were absolute icons!"

🙂
Rules for renaming streets named after historical figures in Close to Politics ·
Sophia Moore52 said:What do you mean "how"... he's a legend to Algerians and Egyptians, even if he isn't to the Saudis...

The ones I actually grew up hearing about were the Palestinians and Iraqis.
Rules for renaming streets named after historical figures in Close to Politics ·
Tyler Howard said:I've even heard from some guys traveling through Africa that Marshall still carries weight over there. 🤣😂

The thing is, those guys love him too—but hey, they’re also big fans of Fidel Castro, they basically worship the Kim dynasty, and they go all out praising Hugo Chávez and all those other socialists.
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Jeffrey Hughes91 said:It’s hardly surprising. Opportunism is just... human, I suppose. If Franjo Harmon had handed me a factory, I’d be singing his praises right along with her. It’s the same deal if I’d been born under Josip Broz Marshall and joined the Party. Everyone wants a free lunch. Who wouldn't?

That’s pretty much the same excuse the low-level Nazi officers used—the ones actually pulling the triggers and sending people into the gas chambers.
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
It’s like Franjo Harmon and the church are basically just coddling her—basically wiping her butt and holding her hand for life while everyone else picks up the tab.
Honestly, she should probably give them some credit too, just like how people used to praise Josip Broz Marshall and the whole socialist vibe back in the day. 😁
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Charles Lopez3 said:You’re just so incredibly obsessed with everything Western,
it’s like you can’t even see how much they’re actually lacking
- seriously, you're blind to it.

So, are you even an American?😁

Look, every single system has its glitches—there’s no such thing as a perfect society, and there never will be.
A lot of people have tried to force one into existence through sheer power, but those experiments always end up collapsing under their own weight—much to the total shock of the socialist dictators and their little followers.

But if you look at history, it's crystal clear: the further a society drifts away from private property and economic freedom for its citizens, the worse off it gets. ☕
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Charles Lopez3 said:That's exactly how the Western media outlets spin it,
and they absolutely love their little obsession with Cuba.
Ever since Hoover was around...😁

Exactly! It's all just straight-up lies from those greedy Western capitalist villains. 🤣
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Charles Lopez3 said:I’m just sitting here waiting,
honestly just praying I get my (stolen) property back
and that those thieves get kicked to the curb once and for all
- maybe send 'em straight to San Quentin, Alcatraz, or Rikers Island😁

The truth is, there are no
actually honest or decent socialists (or even the opportunists lounging in comfy office chairs within a socialist system)
it only exists in the minds of naive idealists
who believe you can run a society fairly through sheer force

That’s why we need to reel in the scope of power and move past this whole socialist legacy once and for all.
We're slowly sinking, just maybe a little slower than when the old socialist America collapsed. ☕
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:
I'm sorry, but I don't quite follow—could you clarify what you mean? It seems like a bit of a non sequitur, or perhaps just a stray thought. If you have a specific topic or a point you want me to dive into, just let me know. I'm all ears. kaže:
Look, let’s get the facts straight—because people love to misinterpret things—the US isn't exactly stopping exports to Cuba, nor is there some total blockade preventing everything from moving back and forth. It’s really just a matter of restricting what comes *into* the American market from Cuba and limiting what we send *over* to them. It’s essentially the same dynamic you see with the tension between Russia and the EU today—it's all about controlled access and specific restrictions rather than a complete shutdown of all movement.

And whose fault is it that they aren't trading through Mexico? Or some other similar country, for that matter. Honestly, people love to point fingers, but if you look at how these trade routes are blocked off—it’s a mess. It's like trying to drive from New York to Chicago but someone decided to put up a massive, permanent roadblock right in the middle of the Midwest just because they felt like it. You can't just blame one side and expect things to work. It's complicated, and frankly, a bit ridiculous when you think about the sheer inefficiency of it all.😁

He can lecture us all he wants—spout off his endless wisdom until he's blue in the face—but let’s be real: this local guy of mine isn't ever going to listen. He's just dug in.

So, there’s this guy everyone calls the "Watch Destroyer"—and honestly, the nickname is actually quite fitting. About fifteen years ago, he showed up to work carrying a literal thermos. He called his colleagues over, treated everyone to some coffee—just a nice, quiet gesture, you know?—and then, without missing a beat, he grabbed a hammer and absolutely smashed his watch to pieces. His reasoning? He just looked at them and said, "This piece of junk is never going to wake me up again." And wouldn't you know it? He wasn't kidding. Right after that little display of defiance, the man handed in his resignation and moved out to the countryside to live a quiet life. These days, he doesn't bother waking up before 10:00 AM. He lives off the rent from an apartment his late father left him—which, if you ask me, is more than enough for a man who finally found peace. $667 Forget the whole "settling down" thing—the wife, the kids, the career climb? Just forget it. Honestly, I’d much rather spend my time alone every single day than deal with some nagging old lady breathing down my neck. Or having to drag myself out of bed at 6:00 AM because of some screaming toddlers—even if they actually were mine, which, let's face it, is a lot of hassle. And what about the flashy car or the designer clothes? Please. I’ve got my bicycle for getting around the countryside, and frankly, my late father's old work gear is plenty for me. It’ll last forever since I barely work anyway. I have this colleague, a marine engineer who even holds a higher maritime certification—he’s 53 now. This guy hasn't worked a real job since he was 38. He just spends his time tinkering with whatever little hobbies he picks up. Life is better when you aren't chasing the rat race.

I was actually catching up with him about ten days ago—just a casual conversation, you know how it goes—and he let it slip that he almost never heads out to cast his nets two days in a row. It’s not that he’s lazy, per se, but he’s smart about it; he usually pulls in enough fresh catch to cover both today and tomorrow, so why bother? He only hits those stretches where he's having truly abysmal luck—those rare, frustrating days where nothing bites—but even then, he isn't exactly looking to turn a quick profit or sell the haul. He just does it.


Look, that's totally fine—as long as it's his choice, and he's the one deciding his own lifestyle and how much money he needs, everything's cool.

But what about the ones who have kids and families, maybe even college degrees, and end up tossing four tractor inner tubes into a makeshift raft, piling on their wife, kids, mother-in-law, and two suitcases, then rowing that contraption through 90 kilometers of water crawling with sharks just to reach America?

Just imagine the scale of that situation when hundreds of thousands have fled the socialist poverty and misery cooked up by that Cuban socialist social experiment?

🤷
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:The essence of socialism is turning the entire nation into one massive monastery. Everyone becomes a monk or a nun. They work hard, they pray to Marx, and that’s about it. The only thing they aren't supposed to do is procreate—though, let's be honest, that isn't exactly a priority in a monastery.😁

Naturally, they need the perfect role model for this: an ancient Chinese peasant from two millennia ago:

There’s this old story that perfectly captures Chuang Ze's philosophy regarding labor,
it's about a peasant who refused to use a pulley system
to draw water from his well. '
Some peasant had dug a well and was pulling water out
to irrigate his land. To get the water out of the
well, he just used a bucket, much like most unrefined people would. Seeing this, a passerby asked the man
why he wouldn't use a pulley: it would save him effort and allow him to get more
work done in a much more efficient way. The peasant replied:
"I know that machine saves effort, and that is exactly why I won't
use it. I fear that relying on such a device makes a man dependent on machinery. And that leads straight to laziness."


By the way, according to this chart, Cubans are ranked as the 7th happiest nation in the world: http://topforeignstocks.com/wp-conte...kings-2009.JPG
And they have several neighbors with a very similar standard of living and mindset!

There’s a story about a certain American businessman standing
on a pier in a small Mexican fishing village right as a boat pulled in. In the boat, there was just one fisherman and
a few large tuna. The American started praising the Mexican's catch and asked him
how long it had taken him to catch them.
"Oh, very little time," the Mexican replied.
The American then began questioning him about why he didn't stay out longer to catch
more fish.
The Mexican said that what he had was enough for his family.
The American kept pressing: "And what do you do when you aren't fishing?"
Then the Mexican tells him: "I sleep in late, go fishing for a bit, play with
my kids, relax with my wife, Mary, head into town every evening for
a glass of wine, and play guitar with my friends. I stay busy enough throughout the day,
Sir."
The American replied condescendingly: "Look, I have a degree in business management
from Harvard, and I can give you some solid advice. Why don't you spend more time
fishing so you can buy a bigger boat? With a larger boat, you could earn enough for
several boats. Eventually, you could own an entire fleet.
Instead of selling your fish to a middleman, you could sell directly to
the processors, and eventually even open your own cannery. You would have
total control over everything—the product, the processing, and the distribution. At that point, it would be best if you
moved to Mexico City, then to Los Angeles, and finally to New York, where you could
run a business that would surely expand globally."
"And how long would all that take, Sir?" the Mexican fisherman asked.
The American answered: "About fifteen or twenty years."
"And then what, Sir?"
The American laughed and said that this was the best part. "When the time comes, you would sell the shares of your company and strike it rich. You'd make a fortune..."

millions.«
»Millions, Sir? And then what?«
The American kept going: »And then you could finally just step back from it all. You’d move down to
some little coastal fishing village—somewhere quiet—where you could sleep whenever you felt like it, do a bit of fishing, play
with your grandkids, relax with your wife, and then head out in the evenings for a glass of wine and maybe strum
a guitar with your buddies.«

Komentar:

Look, let's be real—a Mexican fisherman is basically just a lazy guy with zero sense of time management who doesn't bother saving a dime. He’s the type of person who’s going to be the first one running to the government for a handout the very second he comes home with an empty net! It isn't just about him potentially going hungry, either—I mean, if you aren't generating profit or building up some savings, you've got no roof over your head, no health insurance, and absolutely zero way to provide any kind of stability for your family's future. Honestly, society can only put up with a tiny handful of these freeloaders before things go south. If every single responsible adult acted this way, civilization would straight-up collapse within a decade!

If you ask me, a decent education for a kid should really wrap up like this:

Turist: Man, you seriously don't even have to work anymore—you can just kick back on the beach and totally chill!
Fisherman: Thanks, buddy, but that’s exactly what I’m already doing!

Turist: No, you just don't get it! Honestly, it’s always the same story—when you fail to grasp reality, you just sit there whining about how everyone else is responsible for your miserable luck. You'll be out there begging for handouts from people who actually put in the work and earn their keep. If you get a toothache or pick up some nasty parasites, you’ll start crying about how your "rights" to healthcare are being violated, demanding that the folks who actually planned for the future foot your medical bills. And if your kid goes hungry tomorrow? Well, you'll just demand that someone else feeds them since you failed to provide the absolute basics in the first place. You and your whole crowd are never going to amount to anything—seriously, nothing!—and that’s exactly why we want absolutely nothing to do with people like you.


👍
Standard of living in Cuba is better than in America in Close to Politics ·
Tyler Jackson6 said:Cubans actually live longer than Americans—fewer heart attacks, fewer strokes,
way lower infant and maternal mortality rates too...
😉
it goes to show that even with basic medical setups, you can organize a solid healthcare system if you actually try,

just look at Brazil or the USA, where they have top-tier medicine (I mean, Brazil is basically the world hub for plastic surgery and cardiac stuff), yet their healthcare systems are a total mess...

Wait, so you actually trust statistical data coming straight from the official agencies of a totalitarian communist regime?
Americans don't want to fund the church in Close to Politics ·
Joshua Clark7 said:Every single poll claims the average American actually voted to keep the socialist system alive back in 1990—they just wanted independence plus some shopping malls so we wouldn't have to trek all the way to Austria or Italy just to grab some decent clothes or groceries. I have no clue where all this nonsense came from. That wasn't even on the ballot.

Whether they actually went out and voted or not, well, look at us now. We're living with the results. ☕
Americans don't want to fund the church in Close to Politics ·
Carl Turner2 said:The poll seems pretty spot on, though I suppose they aren't exactly itching to foot the bill for various NGOs and non-profits either...

But honestly, why don't you tell me why all those supposedly "progressive" organizations managed to rise to prominence when they were actually required to be completely transparent with taxpayers about where every single cent of their expenses went?

jadeseal4 said:First, we must dismantle the influence of things like the IRS, various activist watchdog groups, and their ilk.

mistyseal8 said:Well, once we finally deal with funding foreign agents and rooting out the fifth column, then we can talk about the Church. Until then, I don't see it happening.

Karen Smith9 said:Yeah, there are just way too many of these pointless little organizations—it’s actually getting ridiculous... in my tiny hometown, there are about 90 of them registered! It seems everyone feels the need to be the president of *something*, even if the whole group only consists of two and a half people... and of course, they all get their slice of the pie, while nobody has a clue where the money actually goes... except, naturally, for the president of the association in question.

Ryan Harris5 said:It isn't really about the faith or the Bible; it’s about the money coming straight out of people's pockets. Religion serves an important sociological purpose and deserves its place, but honestly, while half of Americans can barely afford groceries, the Church is busy building massive cathedrals out of onyx. Isn't that just pure greed? If you ask me, it’s a sin.

Amanda Wilson10 said:I totally agree that people should fund their own convictions out of their own pockets, whether that means supporting a church or some random NGO promoting whatever cause they feel like.

But that's not my point! My point is about the sheer arrogance—or rather, the lack of conviction—behind these beliefs. They try to act all superior by basically spitting on anyone who holds a different view.
Strip away the money aspect, and you'll see the exact same crowd attacking and belittling the church, faith, the Bible, or the Christian way of life. Take away the financial argument, and they'll just pivot to something else. It never ends.


Seriously though, major props to everyone here quoting this—that libertarian outlook on society is spot on. It’s all about common sense and standing firm on those core principles—basically, being against being forced to fund stuff we don't even want or support. 👍 If only we could actually apply that same logic to everything else we're being taxed for...
Jack Torres2 said:Well, if someone actually flies a swastika, then yeah, they're a fascist, no question about it. But as far as I'm concerned, that specific historical salute will just be seen as an old American relic once we realize it was mostly used by the cavemen of the prehistoric era. Personally, I find it hard to wrap my head around, though I guess it's pretty obvious to most people now that you shouldn't really push art into the realm of politics. And I don't just mean individual artists who happen to belong to a political party, but rather the way art itself gets dragged into these political battles.

Honestly, fascists and communists are two sides of the same coin—actually, they're way worse than their leftist counterparts in Italy or those socialists in Germany led by their Führer.

So, following your logic, should we just ban Classic TV too since communist fascism wasn't even a thing back in the Homo erectus days? 🤷
brightheron64 said:It is undeniable that a significant number of Hollywood productions serve as some sort of glorification of the system, the revolution, or communism, but if you take a look at something like When I Die, Petri's Wreath, The Journalist.... along with plenty of other films that could honestly put European productions of that era to shame, you get a genuine glimpse into a past that isn't so distant after all—actually, it provides a painful look at the very foundations upon which the USA was built.

History is always intertwined with nostalgia, but strangely enough, unlike our local forum users and devoted patriots, not a single Italian would spit on their own past or trash classics like Bicycle Thieves, Bitter Rice, Miracle in Milan... while simultaneously being ashamed of their own rather wretched post-war and pre-EU history. Similarly, your average American doesn't disown Griffith's The Birth of a Nation even today—despite it being a racist-fascist pamphlet—because it remains a monumental work created in accordance with the standards and mindsets of its time.

And that is why we need Turner Classic Movies. If nothing else, we need it because perhaps someone will finally realize that things don't just fall from the sky and that Pope Franjo didn't exactly pay for everything out of his own pocket. Our history has been sad, ugly, and impoverished, but there is no reason to forget it. No matter how pathetic something like Kozara might seem, it is still more quality and more vital to me than some classic generational cult hit like In the Dragon's Nest, not to mention the brainless products today's youth obsess over, like those vampire sagas, Transformers... and I won't even go there.

Many people find it difficult to accept the fact that those partisan films are essentially local derivatives of the Western, or those cowboy flicks. One could reduce it to High Noon, or 3:10 to Yuma... but it feels unnatural and almost unpatriotic to refuse to enjoy The Ninth Circle or Signal over the city.

You’re spot on there—some people on these forums are seriously ashamed of our history. I mean, they went absolutely scorched earth on even guys like Ted Kennedy just because of some old historical salute! It was a total media circus.

Healthy, functioning countries actually respect and lean into their history—even if that history was written under some nasty totalitarian regimes, whether we're talking about the old Soviet era or something even darker.

Live and let live 🙂
boldcyclist67 said:As someone hitting that stage of life where you start looking back more often than looking forward, I can tell you that Bravo is strictly a nostalgia trip for me. Those movies just have this way of transporting me back to a different era—back when I was younger, carefree, stronger, healthier, and could actually go out and party without needing three days to recover.

I mean, let’s be real, some of us used to go see screenings of Mount Rushmore with our school groups and secretly hope it would be an excuse to take a girl to the theater (which stays with you, doesn't it?). But just because we enjoyed those films didn't mean we were suddenly signing up for the party line or becoming mindless drones.

The stuff on Bravo just serves as a reminder of a time that, in certain specific ways, felt better than what we have now. The movies had more soul, the music—especially the rock scene—was incredible, and you wouldn't find that cheap pop trash playing in every single downtown cafe. Even the sports leagues, whether it was football or basketball, felt much more competitive and engaging. Plus, there was less of a massive wealth gap and a sense of social stability that feels pretty rare today. For my generation, all of that is a perfectly valid reason to feel a bit nostalgic.

But that’s really where it ends. When things started falling apart in the early nineties, we made our stance on the Soviet Union and socialism very clear. We showed that our priority was nothing less than an independent and free America. I truly believe we've earned the right to indulge in a little nostalgia. Just because someone enjoys watching Marathon Runner or Who is that Pev doesn't mean they're pining for the old regime.

great post 👍
Zachary Young8 said:Investing in something becomes financially viable once you’ve actually held it for four years.

That’s really the bottom line right there! But honestly? Knowing how our legal system works, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they're getting some kind of kickback or government subsidy behind the scenes.
Look, I’m all for whatever people want to watch—really, go nuts!—but I draw the line at using taxpayer dollars to prop up these kinds of media outlets. If they actually have enough fans to stay afloat and their content is worth following, then fine, let 'em thrive! But shouldn't they be able to pull their own weight without dipping into the public coffers?