Republican Party - General Discussion
in Political Scene ·
It’s gonna be a real uphill battle to bridge that gap from the center all the way to the far right.
583 posts shown.
mellowbadger0 said:I have often found myself pondering the psychological origins behind the adult compulsion to construct elaborate concepts of heaven and hell. Furthermore, I find it quite curious how such narratives—much like the whimsical tales of Santa Claus—fail to diminish in relevance once a child moves past their early preschool years. 🤔
cosmicdriver42 said:But what happens if dementia hits and you lose your grip on everything? Is there dementia in heaven, too?
goldenjackal6 said:It seems like you’re just doubling down on this whole "psychopathy" thing based purely on your own biases without even bothering to address a single point I’ve actually made.
goldenjackal6 said:Look, I don't expect you to get it, and honestly, I'm done with this discussion. It's pretty clear you're just pulling arguments out of thin air based on biases you refuse to let go of.
No, like I said, those are just stereotypes cooked up by pop culture in movies and TV shows. Psychopaths who are sadistic and act on those impulses make up a tiny, tiny fraction of the overall psychopath population.
Just like with neurotypical people, the dysfunction in psychopaths is also driven by growing up in a broken environment. But for them, it isn't "trauma" in the classic sense; it's more about having terrible role models and a brain that shaped itself that way.
For instance, if you dig into notorious serial killers, you'll see a recurring pattern: their parents or guardians were violent, alcoholics, junkies, prostitutes, or religious fanatics, and as kids, they went through absolute nightmare scenarios that would make most people lose their lunch.
Joseph Bailey41 said:And there goes Valkyrie again. 😁
goldenjackal6 said:Evolution is actually pretty brilliant, which is exactly why high IQ shows up so frequently among psychopaths.
Using the word "normal" is really just a synonym for whatever trait most people happen to have. It doesn't mean something is inherently "good" when you step back and look at the big picture or try to plan long-term.
Affective empathy is only one side of the coin; the other is cognitive empathy. And honestly, depending on the situation, sometimes being driven by emotion works, and sometimes being rational is the move. Usually, being rational is the better bet.
Joseph Bailey41 said:That's how Americans played games with things in Vietnam. They didn't exactly love the outcome.
Joseph Bailey41 said:Yeah, you've pretty much secured your spot with that one. 😬
Exactly. How do you build fanatic warriors? You sell them a narrative. Symbols are what run this world.
bluemason3 said:That sounds pretty foolish and counterproductive to me. Fear exists for a reason; having too little of it is just as dysfunctional as having too much.
It’s better to stay stone-cold calm when a lion is attacking you.😁
Priests overcomplicate things. They’re always chasing after some nonsensical unicorns and trying to manifest these naive, impossible fantasy projections about what should or shouldn't happen.😁
Joseph Bailey41 said:Sure. But what’s the point of being that ready if he still has decades of nothingness ahead of him?
George Wood2 said:Should we strive to be devoid of emotion?
Until now, I had assumed this particular dilemma was reserved solely for Mr. Spock and the inhabitants of the planet Vulcan. What manner of individual could possibly exist entirely untouched by feeling? Perhaps some sort of mutant hybrid, a mere android masquerading as a man?
Rachel Kern5 said:That’s why they have these two:
(so, which one of them is the 'witch'?)
Betty Williams7 said:Whenever I try to wrap my head around what heaven might look like, I get the exact same mental headache I get when thinking about the infinite expansion of the universe.
It’s not even a physical pain, really—it’s more like my brain cells are just straining to grasp something that sits way beyond my capacity as a mere mortal. Just a regular guy on this planet. Honestly, I don't think we're spiritually (or even biologically) wired enough to actually visualize paradise. If you ask me, though, it would probably just be a quiet forest in late October, somehow appearing in the middle of spring. 🙂
Then again, I’m not convinced heaven has any physical shape we could actually see with our eyes. It feels more like a specific sensation that means something different to every conscious mind out there. For me personally, it would be total silence, complete stillness, and pure peace. Just an absolute nothingness that brings a sense of satisfaction and balance—which, let's face it, is pretty much what most people spend their entire lives chasing, right?