Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco
in Political Scene ·
So, the preservationists can't decide between option A or B?
90 posts shown.
velvetmason14 said:She deserves a little seaside bungalow of her own...
How long are these people going to keep complaining in the papers about things they used for free? Don't they have any shame?
This woman hasn't paid a single cent in rent for seven years for an apartment right in the heart of downtown. And she was working for the Associated Press and Reuters...
Elon Musk stepped up to defend the journalist being evicted by the City: ‘She’s standing at the door just so nobody from the rural territories shows up...‘
Maybe those Elon Musk types should just scrape together the money to cover her debt and then keep paying it 🤔 Or maybe the editor-in-chief of Sell California can just settle the bill herself. 🤔 There are plenty of ways to handle this...
Slobodna said:...since the City is ruled by what you might call the lesser evil—basically incompetent hacks who wouldn't last two days in the private sector or serious scienceand, they listed a retiree's debt and rushed her name into the news, just so a woman already suffering from paranoia would stand at her door to prevent some entrenched bureaucrat from the City showing up and throwing her out onto the street. It might sound funny, but Mary's reality is such that if she hadn't stepped out into downtown on time, Derrick wouldn't be gloating about how she and an antique dealer were tossed out with a sick pensioner.
Or maybe she would? Books and retirees are worthless anyway...
velvetmason14 said:I see you guys finally caught onto the brilliance of my idea. I’d actually suggest adding an antique shop for the lady too. Put it on the top floor—it would be pure 🙂
velvetmason14 said:That's just pocket change. Look, the guy runs a decent little family business and everything seems fine, but man, he’s clearly lost his mind because he landed some meaningless, cushy government gig. You can't read an article without him spewing all that "wannabe bureaucrat" bile. The only bigger joke is that massive political appointee from the county who's never even at his desk, Dalibor Lovrić... 😁
California sold out to serve the psychotic slackers from the county. 🤦
County employees are protesting the very doors that injure them—their methods are a total circus; tossing bags, waving hands in the air...
velvetmason14 said:That's just pocket change. Look, the guy runs a decent little family business and everything seems fine, but man, he’s clearly lost his mind because he landed some meaningless, cushy government gig. You can't read an article without him spewing all that "wannabe bureaucrat" bile. The only bigger joke is that massive political appointee from the county who's never even at his desk, Dalibor Lovrić... 😁
California sold out to serve the psychotic slackers from the county. 🤦
County employees are protesting the very doors that injure them—their methods are a total circus; tossing bags, waving hands in the air...
velvetmason14 said:Let me introduce you to a local attorney...
Everywhere you go online looking at comments about Puljko and his crew, this guy Sinke pops up obsessively, leaving the absolute worst kinds of remarks.
Check out what Mr. Google says: 🙂
REACTION FROM AN UNSELECTED CANDIDATE: What happened to those slogans like 'qualified over connected' and 'keeping business out of politics'?
The thing is, Puljko and his team passed on Sinke for some random board position because it turned out he didn't even have a college degree. Now, the psychiatrist son of Sinke claims he runs a super-duper successful company and is way too busy to be looking for a cushy government job. Despite that, he spends all his time lurking on news sites, spitting venom in the comments section under every single move Puljko makes.
Honestly, we should probably implement psychological testing for people like Sinke before they try to land a government gig. It would also save those "super-duper successful" private companies from suffering while their owners spend all day trolling online... I mean, the man is supposedly so tied up with his private business, yet somehow he has plenty of time to lead a Facebook revolution against Puljko.
This is a whole new breed—the wannabe bureaucrat. 😁
vividraven79 said:They aren't actually forcing the corporation to pay. Instead, they're squeezing the entity into fulfilling a non-monetary obligation by hitting the individual in charge with heavy fines.
I’m just trying to wrap my head around what specific non-monetary duty the City is being forced to carry out here.
vividraven79 said:The Department of Inspections slapped them with a fine under Section 142 of the Administrative Procedure Act.
That specific section covers "monetary penalties used to enforce non-monetary obligations."
I'm just wondering which non-monetary obligation the City of San Diego failed to meet that required such heavy-handed enforcement against the individual in charge?
The Department of Inspections... said:The Building Inspection Department checked up on the site and found they were still working after the whole project was shut down without any legal paperwork. Because of that, the inspectors slapped them with fines to force them to stop construction immediately... Under Section 142, Paragraph 2 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it’s clearly laid out that the fines imposed... A corporation is forcing an execution...The decision is issued directly to the individual in charge and the legal entity itself...
The Department of Inspections issued a statement noting that on February 14, 2023, they confirmed construction work was continuing despite the site being shut down without any legal authorization...
vividraven79 said:The Department of Inspections slapped them with a fine under Section 142 of the Administrative Procedure Act.
That specific section covers "monetary penalties used to enforce non-monetary obligations."
I'm just wondering which non-monetary obligation the City of San Diego failed to meet that required such heavy-handed enforcement against the individual in charge?
George Diaz said:Don't sweat it, they’ll probably set up some fundraiser down on the Boardwalk or right outside the Rose Bowl, wherever,
The people here in San Diego are going to pay this fine just to show them we aren't backing down.
That place belongs to us forever.
| These two key details are just the tip of the iceberg in this absurd saga over some minor infrastructure project that somehow turned into a national scandal. He isn't the first mayor in history to be held personally liable—his predecessor, say, once got slapped with a $1,000 fine for handing out a contract to renovate local preschools to a buddy without a bidding process. But sure, let's act like he's paying for everyone else's sins now. |
Dana Martin95 said:State Inspectors: Puljak is under attack and being smeared
I guess we'll just keep watching how this case develops to see if Ivica Puljak ends up having to pay anything. It feels like the GOP is digging an even deeper hole every single day... maybe it's time to say goodbye to the local administration in San Francisco for good
He even produced the handover report signed by the federal commissioner for the city of San Diego. "On page 67 of the handover report, it states that the terrace and main building sewage repairs were completed. It mentions returning everything to its original state because construction inspectors halted the work. Basically, the commissioner confirmed that everything was restored to its original condition," said Ivica Puljak.
Kenneth Perez15 said:If you look at almost every election over the last decade, it shows that voters actually prefer having a leadership group that comes first with an indictment and then with a final judicial verdict.
Like my colleague just pointed out, the legality of traveling to Canada isn't really the issue here—it's the fact that Biden was hanging out with the very people we hoped he wouldn't associate with, the ones he thought he was somehow above.
All his resentment toward Donald Trump and the Republican Party stems from that exact moment.
Kenneth Perez15 said:If you look at almost every election over the last decade, it shows that voters actually prefer having a leadership group that comes first with an indictment and then with a final judicial verdict.
Like my colleague just pointed out, the legality of traveling to Canada isn't really the issue here—it's the fact that Biden was hanging out with the very people we hoped he wouldn't associate with, the ones he thought he was somehow above.
All his resentment toward Donald Trump and the Republican Party stems from that exact moment.
Kimberly Perez82 said:What's the point of even choosing between us to represent us then?
Kimberly Perez82 said:That's reality; standard politics just sucks.
Kimberly Perez82 said:dignity and respect
Kimberly Perez82 said:I was merely pointing out how unprofessional the communication has become at the highest levels of government, yet somehow, people have taken my comment and spun it into these massive political essays that honestly have nothing to do with what I actually said. Look, let’s be real: the current administration isn't doing a great job, and frankly, the previous guy wasn't much more effective while he held office either. That is just the reality of things. Politics is broken, period. And now, on top of everything else, the way they talk to each other is just trash. There used to be such a thing as dignity and basic respect in public service. If we lose that, what is even left? If everyone is just going to bicker and scream like we're all sitting in some dive bar in Chicago, then what’s the point? Why bother choosing one side over the other to represent us when we already know they’re just going to fight regardless?
Kimberly Perez82 said:Neither side is any good, really. And look, even if the President doesn't exclusively communicate with the Republican Party in that specific manner, the whole subject revolves around him. Honestly, the voters who keep choosing these types of options bear some responsibility too. But, listen, there are certain standards of conduct in political discourse that simply shouldn't be crossed. If we let them, we'll all slide right into the arms of radical movements—think Marine Le Pen or Meloni—where this kind of aggressive rhetoric becomes the daily norm. Before you know it, we'll find ourselves looking like 1930s Europe. I truly hope nobody is actually wishing for a scenario like that. And it isn't an impossible leap, given how things are unfolding lately. It's something no one could have even imagined ten years ago. Back then, even public political engagement was somewhat civilized. Now? Even the most vile insults and threats have become commonplace, ranging from personal slurs to threats of nuclear Armageddon. It’s a pathetic state of affairs when a society accepts such behavior as "normal." I believe most citizens expect their politicians to act as role models in both conduct and speech, rather than engaging in this polarized, street-level bickering. That kind of talk absolutely destroys public trust, and that applies to every single politician out there. Anyone who thinks this way is already on the wrong path.