CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › wiredraven82 › Posts

Posts by wiredraven82

317 posts shown.

Bradley Wood43 As follows:
I see the debate over soap operas has officially kicked off around here... so let's actually define what makes a series a "soap opera." And no—I’m not talking about those mindless, endless daytime dramas meant for bored retirees or people looking to zone out while doing chores. We're talking about something with actual substance.

Listen, just because you throw in a few flashes of insight regarding a specific individual doesn't make a series a masterpiece—it certainly doesn't turn it into some high-brow soap opera. I get what you're driving at—you think that by centering an episode around one of the main characters to "showcase" their psyche or add a layer of depth—as if that sudden peek behind the curtain is some revolutionary storytelling move—that you've suddenly elevated the material. It’s a common misconception. Diving deep into a character's motivations isn't a shortcut to quality; it's just basic character development, and when it's done poorly, it feels forced and hollow.

But seriously—if that kind of behavior becomes the standard for an individual... man, just... non, god damn, stop. 😁 It’s happening almost non-stop lately—and I’m not just talking about that one specific character. It eventually bleeds into the rest of the cast, too. They start centering entire episodes around these central premises or debates that, quite frankly, my friends and I wouldn't have even given a second thought to back when we were teenagers.

To be clear—when I used the term "soapmaker," I wasn't actually referring to someone who manufactures legitimate bars of soap. 😁 Look, you already know how this goes... 🙂

Take *Battlestar Galactica*, for example—you had Baltar, and honestly, I lost count of how many episodes were dedicated solely to him. It was all centered around his specific personality traits. Look, I’ll be the first to admit it: the guy is a complete mess, a total wreck, yet somehow he’s a genius. I don't necessarily care for his character—honestly, just move the plot along already—but eventually, the show branched out to the rest of the cast. Still, there were seasons where it felt like nearly every single episode was just an endless loop of character studies—just constant, nonstop deep dives into their psyches and those tedious, soap-opera style conversations happening on the ship.

I honestly think I must have been heatstroked while I was watching Battlestar Galactica—specifically that sequence where they hit the Pegasus, right before some damn hurricane finally tore through their precious little Parlor inside the ship.

There’s this specific trope in television—let's call it the "Soap Opera Element"—where a show decides to just spin its wheels and stay stuck in one place. It becomes incredibly frustrating when the core concept itself is supposed to be about constant evolution or survival—take *The Walking Dead*, for instance. If you’ve followed that series, you know exactly the stretch I’m talking about. Honestly, there was a point where I almost walked away from *The Walking Dead* entirely because I just couldn't stomach it anymore. For an entire fucking season, it felt like the actual zombies had vanished from the face of the earth. Instead of any meaningful progression, we were forced to sit through endless, repetitive filler centered entirely around the characters' "personalities" and their petty little social hierarchies. It was just people posturing and circling each other for an entire season without any real momentum. It’s exhausting. 🤣

And what’s truly infuriating about the whole mess—what really grates on my nerves—is that we aren't even being fooled. We all know exactly why they’re pulling this stunt. It’s nothing more than a transparent attempt to hit a specific episode count for the season or satisfy some arbitrary production quota, but frankly, I’m not buying it. It's lazy, and I refuse to pretend otherwise.

Look, I’m not suggesting that a series shouldn't have an occasional "monster of the week" episode here or there—I mean, even Star Trek: The Next Generation did that from time to time to keep things moving. But when that formula starts eating up half a season, or worse, becomes the entire skeletal structure of the show—just look at Battlestar Galactica—then we have a serious problem. 🙄Look, at the end of the day—and that’s just my take on things—that kind of stuff isn't for me. I'm not out here looking for a consensus or begging anyone to see things from my perspective. That's just how I feel. 🙂
Richard Wilson4 said:Then I’ll probably spend the next five episodes wondering why I even bother watching this garbage.

Let's be real here. When we talk about actual masterpieces, we're talking about The Sopranos, Oz, or Boardwalk Empire. Not The Walking Dead, which is just a total scam and a cheap little drama, and definitely not Game of Thrones, which is nothing more than shallow, soft porn.

What truly makes The Sopranos what it is—and why I consider it such a monumental series—is its sheer, unapologetic depth. 🙂The core issue—if you want to call it that—is that the series never actually struggled to maintain its momentum. It didn't suffer from those mid-season slumps where the tension evaporates and the performances start feeling hollow; instead, it delivered the exact same level of intensity in the middle of the season as it did during the premiere or the finale. When I really sit back and think about it, the writers didn't even seem to care about pacing the season to hook people in later on—they weren't trying to "save" anything for a big payoff. They just stayed consistently engaging from start to finish.

Some people might argue that the difference comes down to the genre itself—comparing it to something like The Walking Dead, for instance. They’ll claim that because it's a crime drama, you have more room to be an "artist." But please—and I’m not talking to you specifically, just speaking generally—let's be real: The Sopranos simply never "stood" in that same way.

I suppose I could call myself a bit of a Goodfellas type—if I’m being honest with myself, anyway. 🤣 It’s like a marathon run of Goodfellas blended seamlessly with The Godfather. 🤣 (I’m not trying to make a direct comparison here—I just want to find some way to illustrate exactly what I'm getting at.)

Take *The Walking Dead*, for example—and look, I follow the series and I actually like it, but my God, there were so many episodes that were nothing but pure shit. I’m talking about filler episodes consisting of absolute nonsense and tedious, dragging sequences designed solely to hit an episode count. It felt like they were just running out the clock instead of actually telling a story.

It’s like when you’re watching an episode where the entire plot hinges on some trivial detail—say, why one character has a mole on their hand—and suddenly everyone else in the scene starts losing their minds over it. It feels completely disproportionate, right? I’ll throw this out there as a bit of an analogy, even if it seems a little random.

I was honestly on the verge of walking away from The Walking Dead entirely because of this kind of absolute shit—I found myself sitting there thinking, "For God's sake, just get a move on already." Seriously, pick up the pace. We need some actual momentum here—some real action—instead of this endless stalling.

And then there was that previous season—which, let’s be honest, was actually fantastic. The episodes were engaging, tight, and genuinely compelling. My only hope now is that this premiere serves as a legitimate blueprint for the rest of the season, rather than just being some hollow bait used to hook the audience before they completely pull the brakes on quality. It feels cheap—frankly, it's beneath them. To manufacture hype with a strong opening only to coast on mediocrity later is such a transparent, pathetic tactic; it’s hard to even put into words how low that goes. And I don't just mean with this specific show—it's a pattern I see far too often in this industry.

Look, what I witnessed in The Walking Dead isn't even unique—I’ve seen those same patterns in other series, some that might actually hold more weight than The Walking Dead itself. Take Battlestar Galactica, for instance. Go ahead and crucify me if you want, but honestly? That show was acting like a total soap opera set in deep space, and it was completely unhingalding. It just wasn't right. In terms of sheer melodrama, The Walking Dead is practically a kitten compared to the chaos in Battlestar Galactica.

I used to find myself sitting there, staring at the screen, wondering why the hell I was even following this series—I suppose it was just that stubborn need to see how it all ends, right? And look, I’ll be the first to admit, there were some absolutely stellar episodes; the acting was top-tier, the production was solid, and everything seemed to click. But man, there were moments where it felt like such an exhausting chore to sit through. Honestly, good Lord... what a ride.

Don't get me wrong—I’ve always had a soft spot for Battlestar Galactica, and I still do—but nothing will ever quite hit the same way as certain other series. Some shows offer much more straightforward plots, sure, but they maintain that same high level of quality while delivering something far more essential: that feeling of, "Hey, move aside and let me actually see what's going on here." Take Stargate SG-1, for instance; I found following that journey significantly more engaging. At the end of the day, it probably just comes down to personal taste, but that's where I stand. 🙂

I can’t shake the memory of how that absolute pile of shit, Stargate Universe, tried to rip off Battlestar Galactica—and I mean they were total hacks about it. They leaned way too hard into that shaky-cam aesthetic, which, honestly, God, I absolutely loathe. Look, I get it—a little handheld movement can add tension or make things feel more grounded—but they took it to such an obnoxious extreme that it just became nauseating. It’s a classic case of style over substance, and we all saw how that played out when the show was tossed in the gutter after only two seasons. If I had my way, I wouldn't just let those episodes fade away; I’d gather every single Stargate Universe episode, burn them onto a stack of DVDs, toss them into a trash can made of solid iron, douse the whole mess in gasoline, and strike a match. 🙂

Some people argue that action series save their big moments for the season premiere or the finale—especially in the sci-fi genre—simply because of budget constraints. It’s not easy to pull off high-end VFX, so they ration them. But honestly? Give me a break. 😁 I’ve seen mid-season episodes in Stargate Atlantis featuring incredible effects and combat sequences that don't even come close to being inferior to the best stuff in Battlestar Galactica—yet they just deliver that... how do I put this... that sense of unprovoked, high-octane intensity right in the middle of the run.

Now, I realize I'm coming off as a total Stargate fanatic here—both SG-1 and Atlantis, ha!—but that’s not the point. I’m just trying to make a specific observation, whether anyone agrees with me or not. 🙂
Carl Hill53 said:Exactly. That level of violence caught me completely off guard. Honestly? Looking back, the first four seasons felt like nothing more than softcore compared to this. This is... something else entirely.🤦

I have always been a massive fan of zombie stories, and I think this series really has the potential to take the whole concept in a million different directions. It's got so much depth to work with.🍿

I’m also a zombie enthusiast and have been following this show religiously since day one.🙂 The Truth is, the series was essentially softcore—not that I had an issue with it, it was plenty intense, just nothing on *this* level—until this current season hit. Regarding that recent episode we were discussing (spoiler alert), specifically that location where they trapped them and the things those characters were doing there... frankly, even at Auschwitz, you wouldn't see that kind of depravity; even the Mongols during the Middle Ages probably didn't inflict that kind of cruelty on conquered populations. It was just... ugh. And the way they do it so casually, as if it’s perfectly "normal," that's what makes it truly terrifying.

And don't even get me started on what they're actually doing with all those people once they find out.😲
Carl Hill53 said:Now that I've finally sat down to watch it, I have to say—what an absolutely stellar start to season 5 of The Walking Dead. 🙏

SPOILER.

That episode was so visceral I could barely process it—and that scene involving the baby? Good grief... look, I’m a father, and seeing that idiot threatening an infant nearly drove me over the edge. But when that guy finally took him out with his bare hands because of it? Honestly, I can't remember the last time I felt that level of pure, cathartic satisfaction from a show or a movie. It's been a long time. My mind was racing with how much I wanted to jump through the screen and beat him myself—maybe he should have been tortured a bit longer first, just to be sure.

Beyond that, everything else we witnessed in this episode was genuinely shocking...
shadowangler50 said:I watch The Walking Dead too, but I can't stand waiting for weekly releases. I'd rather just binge an entire season once seven or eight episodes have dropped. Why wait around?
Based on the trailer, this season looks absolutely brutal—even more intense than the previous ones.

Look, I get where you're coming from, but waiting for an 8-episode chunk is way too long for me—haha. You know what my biggest pet peeve is? It’s when you’re following a series, and then life happens and you can't watch it for a while, and THEN—boom—you suddenly have to binge the whole thing all at once to catch up.🤣

But regarding the brutality—that's the Truth. Judging by that first episode, I haven't seen anything quite like this yet...
I caught the season premiere of The Walking Dead yesterday—look, I’ll be the first to admit I’m a fan of the series, no shame there. 🙂 But man, that was absolutely depraved. The sheer sickness of some of those characters in this new episode... it was beyond the pale. Honestly, it was so visceral I actually felt physically ill.
Fellow X-FILES fans, I’d love to get your take on this video tribute I put together for one of the most striking episodes of the series. 😁

[HD] THE X-FILES - Don't Look Any Further

I actually finished this video quite a while ago, but I ran into some issues trying to get it uploaded to YouTube—mostly due to FOX's aggressive copyright claims on the audio and visuals.
I’m going to say this for the thousandth time—and yes, I realize I sound like a broken record on this thread—but I have to: it is fundamentally unfair to draw direct parallels between films and series. They are two entirely different beasts. What do they actually share? Acting and cinematography? Sure, fine, but that's about it.

Let’s pivot the debate for a second—I'm sure there are sports fans lurking here anyway—who is the superior athlete: Michael Jordan or Diego Maradona? 😁

They are both legends, but if you forced them into a one-on-one matchup, who comes out on top? 🙂

Most people probably hate this analogy, but I had to reach for it because, again, comparing movies to TV shows is a false equivalence. There are plenty of people here who love both mediums, myself included.

If someone were to corner me and force me to choose—under duress, mind you—between a movie and a series, I’d pick the movie. But honestly, it’s a cheap tactic for anyone trying to force a choice between two things that don't belong in the same category.

A few pages back in this discussion, I laid out the strengths of film versus television; now, it occurred to me to mention one specific advantage a series can hold. For instance, I can think of one particular show that exemplifies this.

My professional background is in Arch and Pov, and one of my all-time favorite series has to be HBO's Rome. Why? Because in all my life, I have never seen any other production—film or otherwise—reconstruct ancient Rome and its world with such faithful accuracy.

If we look at films, perhaps you could compare it to Mel Gibson's Passion—setting aside the depiction of Jesus and the Biblical elements, I am talking strictly about archaeological authenticity. In that regard, and even regarding linguistic authenticity, I tip my hat to Gibson (just as I did for Apocalypto). But the point remains: in terms of long-term impact, HBO's Rome, with its portrayal of the Republic and the Empire, absolutely crushed every single Roman epic ever made through sheer authenticity.

And let me be clear: I am talking about authenticity... not necessarily which one is the "greater" work of art.

That is precisely where a series holds the upper hand in this context.

What else can you say about The Sopranos?

It is such a high-caliber series—the acting, the writing, the narrative arc—that if it had been condensed into a film, it wouldn't have come anywhere close to being this good. As it stands, it's masterful.

The same logic applies to (my personal favorite) The X-Files in terms of its genre and atmosphere.

Et cetera, et cetera...

This will be my final contribution to this thread, but I felt compelled to get these thoughts out there.

My conclusion remains unchanged: you cannot compare a FILM TO A SERIES. Why would anyone even try to weigh one against the other to see which is "better"? To me, the premise makes zero sense. So, go ahead, write whatever you want. 🙂
Emily Ward56 said:Tonight on NBC, at 11:45 PM, they’re finally dropping the premiere of 4. The Final Destination. 😁 😉

Why on earth would they cast her🤣
?
Zachary Nguyen2 said:NCIS is great.

@leMONZoo, @Zachary Nguyen2... look, I respect your take—I really do—but man, I just cannot get behind CSI. I don't know what it is, but I run from those shows—every single iteration of the franchise—like the plague. Ever since they first hit the airwaves, I've just been unable to wrap my head around them. It’s not that I’m sitting here trashing them or claiming every single episode is garbage—it’s more fundamental than that—I simply can't stomach the concept. It's not my fault 😁
Nicholas Watson said:and everyone could just perish in total agony 😈

Lately, TV shows have actually become more appealing to me than movies, mostly because a single episode doesn't drag on as long as a full feature film. When you've got a little kid running around the house, that's a massive deal since you barely have any downtime to actually sit down and enjoy something 😁

Good grief, I absolutely loathe those FBI-style "procedural" shows. Honestly, I can't even wrap my head around them—whenever one pops up, I practically break out in hives. I find myself slamming the channel button with the speed of a gunslinger in an old Western just to escape, purely out of disbelief that I accidentally stumbled upon such garbage while browsing.
Frank Thomas92 said:When you stumble upon something truly special, you just don't want it to end. It’s that exact feeling you get when you're buried in a massive, gripping novel—the kind that pulls you so deep into its world that by the time you hit those final ten pages, you're actually tearing up.
Too often, movies feel rushed, like they aren't giving the story enough room to breathe, yet somehow they still manage to drag on far too long.
I find myself sitting there for two and a half hours (sometimes even longer) watching a film, only to realize that certain plot points could have been much more fleshed out. Instead, the screen is cluttered with mindless scenes that stretch the runtime to a point of genuine physical discomfort. On one hand, having that extra time feels like a luxury, but when you consider how great modern TV series can be, it feels unnecessary.
A good series usually runs anywhere from twenty minutes to an hour and a half, allowing the story to develop naturally. You get regular doses of that incredible fictional world, but it doesn't consume your entire existence; you can actually live your life and still catch up on everything.
However... there is one thing about series that absolutely drives me crazy and makes me want to turn them off: that same obnoxious padding. In a desperate attempt to bait viewers into impatiently waiting for the next season, writers will stretch out the last few episodes with such garbage filler that you honestly start questioning your own intelligence for watching. And some shows (I won't name names, but we all know who they are) should have been retired years ago to preserve their legacy as classics. Instead, they just keep dragging on—or they were painfully overlong to begin with—even though they're basically being kept alive solely by a handful of die-hard fans. At this stage, it isn't even sad anymore; it's just awkward to watch them linger on.

People claim those FBI shows are actually good—personally, I’m just praying they finally pull the plug. 🤦
The sad truth about Reddit in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Daniel Cooper40 said:Do you honestly think we’re sitting here on a 24/7 clock, just waiting for someone to drop a red card within an eight-minute window? The user was sanctioned the second I laid eyes on that post—I'm certain any other moderator would have handled it the same way—it’s just that, quite simply, nobody happened to be online at that exact moment.

No, no—I wasn't suggesting the job is being done poorly; if anything, it's the opposite. 🙂 My point was simply that I was personally insulted in that PDF—as casually as if someone had said "good morning"—while I haven't targeted anyone else. Then, to top it off, I ended up getting a month-long ban because of some comments made about Ukić during a basketball chat thread back when the World Cup was on. That’s all there is to it. I just wanted to point out that this kind of thing happens. Even though basketball is my number one sport, I certainly won't be volunteering my input on that PDF ever again.
bluenomad2 said:I'd agree. Season one is some of the best television ever made.

Oh, absolutely—season one was peak performance.🙂

Whenever someone asks me to explain what *Twin Peaks* is all about, I usually just point them toward this specific scene:

Twin Peaks - (dati Cooper Tibetan Lecture)

Dale Cooper is the absolute man! What a character... honestly, I’m convinced he’s the reason I became obsessed with drinking my coffee as fast as humanly possible as a kid. Even now, whenever I grab a cup, I find myself thinking of him—he always, always had to comment on how good it was: "DAMNNNN GOOD COFFEE."😁
Carl Hill53 said:Haha, 🙏

Look, Carl, I’m not going to say you should be ashamed—mostly because I assumed you were just messing with me when you claimed you'd never even seen or heard of the Twilight Zone.

If you actually meant that, then man... you really should be. 🙂
Betty Ross6 said:TV shows might actually have the edge since they can really dig into the relationships and character dynamics. They’ve got all that extra time to sit with an emotion or let a pivotal moment breathe without rushing into a cliché, which is always such a struggle for movies. Makes making a truly great film a much bigger mountain to climb...

Well, you basically answered your own question regarding which medium holds more value. If you manage to pull off everything she mentioned within a single film, but a series has all that extra runtime at its disposal to achieve the same thing, which one comes out ahead? 😁

But I’ll play the parrot and repeat myself one more time: it’s a false equivalence to force a choice between film and television. They are two entirely different universes—let's just let them exist on their own terms.
Carl Hill53 said:Look, bluenomad2, I’m sorry, but I just can't get behind that—series from fifty years ago and what we see today? They aren't even in the same league. It’s not even close, whether you're talking about the direction, the acting, or just the sheer level of quality.

You're flat-out lying.

Alright, Carl, look—it's fine. Today there are plenty of shows with genuinely great acting, and that holds up, but I can't just sit here and watch this go by without stepping in...

Good grief, 🙂 Look, I'll just offer an example using the original Twilight Zone episodes—though I could pull from other series too—but let's take this one, which many consider the greatest show of all time. Let's throw that out there so everyone who disagrees can get worked up (for me, the best are The X-Files and the original Twilight Zone—those two, specifically). I have seen acting in the original Twilight Zone—even from the most minor characters—at such a level of performance that they would put to shame the leads in some of today's most popular and "prestige" shows that everyone seems to be obsessing over... no offense intended.

I mean, take the most minor character in an episode—some guy on a ship's deck who gets maybe three or four minutes of screen time—and I won't even get started on the protagonists.

I think every era has its highs and lows when it comes to television, but glorifying modern shows the way you are doing is just not objective.

And then there's Twin Peaks. See, Twin Peaks is like opera. Why do I say opera? Because you either love it or you hate it; there is no middle ground. I absolutely adore Twin Peaks, yet I despise opera—but I respect it...

Cheers.👍
@Carl Hill53, @bluenomad2, @hiddenbear4

I think you three are all somewhat right—you just happen to disagree on the specific points where that other half of the group isn't quite sharing the same perspective as one another 😁
Look, I’m not trying to be dismissive or anything—I don't want to sound like I'm just throwing things around—but whenever I see an HBO logo attached to a series, I’m pretty much certain it’s going to be high quality.

To give you some context, some of my absolute all-time favorites are HBO productions: think *Rome*, *The Sopranos*, and even *Game of Thrones*, among others...

I’m not sure if I’m overgeneralizing here, but honestly, the moment I spot that HBO branding, I immediately go check out whatever show they're putting out—and in about 99% of cases, boom, I’m hooked (especially if it falls into a genre I already enjoy).
Angela Alvarez10 said:Of course I love both, but I’m way more into series😍 There’s just a different kind of connection you build with a show. You actually get attached to the characters, the chemistry between them, and that slow-burn plot development. For me, there's a certain thrill in watching something where I don't get all the answers handed to me after ninety minutes. A great series is basically my drug of choice. With a movie, you spend two hours on it, you either like it or you don't, and that's that—I just don't get nearly as invested in them.😉

Now, this is the kind of response I was waiting for...

My fellow X-Files enthusiast 😁