CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › wiredraven82 › Posts

Posts by wiredraven82

317 posts shown.

bluenomad2 said:Quote: shadow dancer

This is exactly what I was talking about on the last thread. That bolded part tells me you don't have the slightest clue how TV eras actually work.

Those golden eras started back in the '50s with the Twilight Zone, moved through the '90s with Twin Peaks, and hit a peak when The Sopranos arrived late in the decade. Each period produced shows that completely revolutionized television.

People are getting it completely wrong. They think we’re living in some unique golden age of television, but that’s a misconception. Golden ages have been popping up every few decades for over half a century now.

The internet works wonders.

I guess they call this the "golden age" simply because everything is available at the click of a button, rather than having to actually wait for a weekly episode like they did in the 50s or the 90s.😁

To this day, my favorite day of the week is Thursday—mostly because back in the 90s, The X-Files aired on Thursdays around 8 PM, and I’d spend the whole afternoon counting down the minutes until I could get home from school to watch.🤣
jadecyclist36 said:I don't hang out on this forum much, but I’ve definitely had déjà vu with this topic before.
I knew I wasn't completely losing my mind.😁

I'm practically a permanent fixture on this board, so I felt that same wave of déjà vu the second I laid eyes on this topic.😁
bluenomad2 said:😍

image

Haha, I definitely remember that episode from yesterday—and look, you can never truly predict what kind of nightmare might mutate in the sewers thanks to all the waste and various toxic crap we dump down there. 😁If you have a spare moment, check out this tribute video for The X-Files; whoever put this together deserves massive respect:

The X-Files - Serenata Immortale (tribute video)

Sometimes I’ll just loop this video while listening to the monologues and dialogue between Fox Mulder and Dana Scully—I've probably played it five times in a row while trying to get some writing done, haha.
cosmiclynx57 said:I'm honestly stuck in such a massive rut right now—I am seriously struggling to pick out a movie to watch!

Honestly, I just don't see how any TV series can even come close to the greatness of top-tier movies. I mean, really, where is the originality? It feels like almost every single series out there is just rehashing some story we've already seen on the big screen, only to find that the original film did it way better and with much more impact. Why bother reinventing the wheel when the cinematic version was already perfect?
Look, I’ll say it: The Sopranos is easily one of the greatest series ever made, and honestly, it sits right at number two on my all-time favorites list. But let's be real for a second—can any TV show actually compete with the sheer greatness of The Godfather and The Godfather Part II? I just don't think it can.

And honestly, let’s talk about how much these series get dragged out lately. Don't get me wrong, I totally get that a series needs more breathing room than a movie does—it's just common sense, right? But does every single story really need to be stretched into fifty or sixty hours of content? There’s just no reason to make things that complicated! You could easily tell those same stories in a few hours, or maybe even ten if you’re looking at something epic like The Godfather trilogy. Why turn everything into a marathon when a sprint would work just fine?

Look, I’m a huge fan of TV series—if they’re actually good and keep me entertained, I don't mind a long run—but let's be real for a second, right? There is absolutely no reason to drag a story out just for the sake of it. Why stretch things thin when you don't have to? Take *Breaking Bad*, for example; that's widely considered one of the greatest shows ever made, and honestly, I feel the exact same way about it. But think about it: could that entire intense narrative not have been told in maybe two hours? Or even better, could they have just turned it into two solid movies, like one two-hour epic and another slightly longer one? If we're being totally honest here, there really isn't a logical reason to pile on fifty or sixty hours of content when the core story could have been finished in a fraction of that time. Is it actually better, or are we just consuming more because it's there?

And honestly, I should probably mention why TV series always seem to snag those higher ratings than movies—it’s pretty simple, right? When you’re following a show for years, you actually start to care about the characters and get genuinely invested in the story, so you naturally end up giving it a higher score. That’s just how most people work!
Look, I don't really see things the way you do—my whole process is a bit different. For me, you can't just lump a movie rating in with a series rating; they’re two totally different beasts. A cinematic masterpiece isn't the same thing as a series that happens to be my personal favorite, you know? I like to keep them strictly separated. Honestly, I actually place a higher value on a movie that I give an 8/10 than I do on a series I give a 10/10, simply because I just weigh the impact of a film much more heavily than a show. Does that make sense? It’s just how I roll.
Look, when I say a series is a 10/10 for me, I’m talking about a straight-up masterpiece—we're talking top-tier, legendary stuff within the entire world of TV. You know what I mean, right? Like, it's not just good, it's absolutely flawless.

I totally get where you're coming from, man. Honestly, I've lost count of how many times I've sat there thinking, "Why on earth am I sinking all this time into one single series with a plot that just keeps stretching and stretching forever?" Like, seriously, why commit to one massive, overblown storyline when I could have knocked out a whole mountain of incredible movies in that same timeframe? It really makes you wonder if we aren't just wasting our lives on endless seasons when there's so much cinematic greatness waiting for us!

But honestly... the whole thing really just boils down to whatever kind of mood I'm in at the moment, you know? It all depends on what I'm actually feeling like doing when the time comes!
You know how it goes, right? Sometimes I’ll get into this total groove where I just want to binge nothing but movies for an entire month—just pure, cinematic storytelling from start to finish. But then, other times, I really crave that deep dive, you know? I just want to get lost in a massive story and actually spend some quality time hanging out with the characters, so I'll pivot and spend weeks glued to a great series instead.
Lately, I’ve been leaning into this specific vibe where I just mix things up—you know, watching one movie and then knocking out a few episodes of whatever series I'm currently binging all in the same day? It’s become my go-to routine over the last few years, and honestly, why wouldn't I? It keeps things fresh!

Man, can we just talk about Mad Men for a second? Seriously, does anyone else feel like they could just get lost in that show for hours on end? It’s one of those rare gems that actually stays with you long after the credits roll, you know what I mean? Every single episode feels like such a deep dive into this incredibly stylized, moody version of mid-century America, and honestly, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like it. Is it just me, or is the tension in those office scenes almost suffocating in the best possible way? It’s just masterfully done! 👍

So, if I'm looking at my all-time favorites, Mad Men lands right there at number five, while Game of Thrones takes the sixth spot. It’s honestly such a close call, you know? They’re both absolute masterpieces in my book, but Mad Men just edges it out by a hair—it’s slightly better, though it’s a total toss-up!

I’m with you there—I’d definitely pick the movie, too—but I still stand by my original point: we shouldn't be putting people in a position where they even have to make that kind of choice in the first place. It’s a matter of perspective, really; those two worlds are operating on completely different wavelengths.

Look, if you forced my hand—if we were standing there and someone shouted "stand with the movie"—I’d obviously take the side of the film. But let's be realistic here: you simply cannot deny how much certain episodes of a series like *The Twilight Zone* paved the way for the creation of major motion pictures. It's an undeniable influence. There have even been legal battles over it—not that I'm naming names—but the precedent is there. 🙂
bluenomad2 said:Right now, among the superior shows that haven't wrapped up yet, I'd pick Rectify, True Detective, Fargo, Mad Men, House of Cards... there are definitely more.

I'm not arguing that Game of Thrones has a massive budget or that the costume design isn't top-tier. The locations are great too, and I won't deny the acting is solid. But my issue is that it's just a medieval soap opera with a fantasy skin. I can't stand when a serious series devolves into a soap opera for seasons on end. The biggest problem for you seems to be those twists. Those plot twists have become pathetic and way too frequent. A shock is fine, but when you do it constantly, the impact dies. Now they're stuck in this repetitive cycle where they're addicted to them.

As for the ones you listed, The X-Files and The Twilight Zone—I agree. They're influential and easily among the best series ever made.

Regarding The X-Files and The Twilight Zone, sure. 👍 But look, regarding Game of Thrones and the other shows you listed, you have to admit we're talking about personal taste here—everyone likes different things, you know? They all hover around that same high level of quality... perhaps my take on GOT was a bit too blunt, specifically because of that one factor. 🙂
bluenomad2 said:Game of Thrones is the best series out there today? Give me a break.

Alright, go ahead then—tell me which one is actually better? And try to be objective for once. 🙂
William Hall93 said:Look, don't get me wrong, I have nothing against a good series, but I just don't get this whole obsession with bingeing shows instead of watching movies. :-)

A lot of series end up having a disappointing finale or just lose steam in later seasons, leaving you feeling like you wasted a massive chunk of your life. With a movie, you put in an hour or two and then move on to something else.

If you spend all that time on a series where the writing goes completely to hell by season four, you could have easily watched a dozen high-quality movies in that same window.

Look, I get where you're coming from—I really do—but have you ever experienced that specific internal conflict? That moment when you’re absolutely obsessed with a movie (or maybe a trilogy of films from the same franchise) and you have this desperate, almost primal urge to just consume more? It’s like saying, "God, I need more of this right now," while simultaneously feeling this sinking realization deep down that if they actually *do* make more, it will only serve to tarnish the perfection of what you just witnessed. You want it, but you know more might actually ruin it.

🙂

Look, TV series are just... they're something else entirely compared to movies. It’s like a whole different world—once a show hooks you with its atmosphere or those deep, complex characters, you're essentially living in that universe. You don't just watch it; you inhabit it. You find yourself constantly needing to know what happens next, driven by this internal momentum that a two-hour film simply can't replicate.

Look, if you want my honest opinion, The X-Files stands alone as the absolute best series I’ve ever watched—it’s easily my all-time favorite. Honestly, I can't even wrap my head around the idea of The X-Files being just a single movie. For me, that simply wouldn't work; I can't imagine only getting to experience Fox Mulder and Dana Scully a couple of times and then having it be over. No way—there's just no chance I'd be satisfied with that. 🙂 That’s exactly why I say they are two entirely different beasts—movies versus series.

If anyone ever forces me into a corner—though, frankly, they really shouldn't—and makes me choose between a movie or a series, I’m going with a movie every single time. It's a clear-cut decision for me, but honestly, putting someone in that position is just a bit unfair.

The X-Files remains my absolute favorite series—it’s the gold standard for me. That said, I have quite a collection of other cult classics that I find myself revisiting from time to time; shows like the original The Twilight Zone, Twin Peaks, The Sopranos, HBO's Rome, and Oz.

These are the kind of series defined by top-tier acting and narratives that feel entirely self-contained—stories that possess their own internal logic and atmosphere. They belong strictly to the medium of television; they simply wouldn't work any other way—though, of course, I wouldn't want them to be anything else.

Up until today, I’ve mostly kept to myself here, but I figured I’d take a crack at comparing the sheer scale of TV series versus movies. Just this once, anyway. To be blunt, I have yet to see a depiction of ancient Rome that hits quite as hard as HBO's Rome—nothing in any movie or series has ever captured that era with such raw authenticity. The only possible contender, if we look at it from a linguistic-archaeological standpoint, would be Gibson's Passion—but that’s assuming you set aside the whole Jesus aspect of it all.

To be perfectly honest, life has been pretty relentless lately—I haven't had much breathing room for movies or series over the last three years—BUT I always find a way to carve out time for them. It’s more than just a hobby; it's deeply ingrained in who I am. There is something almost meditative about revisiting the classics—especially those specific films I absolutely adore—and watching them for the hundredth time. 🤣

It’s the same deal with TV shows—whenever I actually find a spare moment, I’ll grab an episode and dive in. But let’s be clear: I’m not just binging anything that pops up on my feed. I only go after the series that actually hold water—the ones where the storytelling, the genre, and the acting are all top-tier. If it doesn't hit those marks, it isn't worth my time.

You wouldn't believe the sheer volume of shows I go through—I'm constantly cycling through everything from Game of Thrones to The Walking Dead, then jumping straight into The 100 or Falling Skies. 🤣🤣

Let’s be real—when it comes to the current landscape of television, nothing even comes close to the sheer scale of Game of Thrones. I mean it. You can browse through every major streaming platform from Netflix to HBO all day long, but honestly? No other series is even playing in the same league.

Look, I wouldn’t go so far as to call myself some die-hard fanatic for Game of Thrones—I try to keep my cool—but if we’re being objective here, it is easily the best series on television right now. From the caliber of the acting to the sheer complexity of the narrative, it’s unparalleled. You get twists in almost every single episode that just keep you reeling; the plot is so intricately layered—it’s honestly an absolute explosion of a series.

As for your question about why some people nowadays seem to binge-watch series more than they watch movies—honestly, I don't even know what to say about them. That just isn't me... 🙂 Movies will always be my number one choice, though—I'll admit, my heart aches a little even typing that because of how much I love The X-Files, The Sopranos, and stuff like that—so I truly believe nobody should be forced (and I'm not saying you're doing that) to pick sides between a movie or a series 👍

And those folks who exclusively grind through series? Well, whatever... let them live their lives 😁
I don't see it that way—series and movies are two entirely different beasts, and frankly, I have a deep appreciation for both.

A series works by hooking you and refusing to let go; the best ones allow you to just "dip in" episode by episode, consuming them at your own pace...

But a movie? You can't just "dip in" to a movie. A movie has to be crafted as a single, living entity that you present to an audience—and if you mess up that singular vision... well, you've failed. Period.

So, if I’m forced to weigh the two, I’d argue that making a movie is actually the harder feat given that high-stakes context. If I absolutely had to pick a side, I’d lean toward cinema—but honestly, why bother? As I said, they belong to different worlds, and there's no reason anyone should feel pressured to choose one over the other.🙂
The sad truth about Reddit in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Look, I’m not here to play the victim, but when I experience something firsthand, I’m going to speak up and ask what the hell is actually going on.

I basically got slapped with a month-long ban—stretching all the way until September 21st—simply because I was talking trash about Ukić during a basketball game. The whole thing was more of a chat topic than an actual discussion since it was happening live during the match.

It feels like every other time I hang out in the Basketball sub-forum, someone is jumping down my throat just because I hold a firm opinion. My views don't always align with the crowd, sure, but I NEVER resort to personal attacks. Period. Instead, I get hit with constant personal insults like, "you're an idiot," "get lost, loser," or "you don't know anything about basketball." Thank God I actually know more about the game than 70% of the people on that board, so their insults don't sting, but how much longer is this going to continue?

Are there really no warnings or penalties being handed out to those users? Is there some kind of inner circle or elite clique there that rules are meant to bypass? Does the moderation only apply to everyone else while they let certain people run wild, insulting whoever they want just because they belong to the "in-crowd"?

Here is the latest "compliment" I received—and of course, nobody cares:
You know what:

image
Emily Ward56 said:Seriously? I didn't really pay attention to that since I hadn't read any spoilers and wasn't expecting a twist like that. 🙏 Well, now I'm definitely going to rewatch it. Do you happen to remember exactly which scene it was?

The guy with glasses who ends up in that Chinese sauna right before that old woman starts messing with him during the massage 😁—in that specific scene, he’s using one of those old-school flip phones, you know, the kind that feels totally dated even then... 😁 And then, right when Death makes its move, the phone starts vibrating, and they give you this full-on product shot of the device 🙂
Emily Ward56 said:Great topic/poll. Personally, I’m a huge fan of this franchise. Honestly, the main thing that keeps you hooked is just seeing the sheer variety of bizarre ways someone can actually die. 😲 That’s really what sets this series apart from your typical horror flicks. 🙏

As for my top "FD" picks, I went with the first one and the fifth. My reasons: 1. It completely reinvented the genre by introducing a concept we hadn't seen before—the premise itself is just brilliant. 👍 I’ll admit, certain scenes actually gave me a physical jolt—it’s the only entry that truly rattled me (not to mention that excellent, chilly and creepy soundtrack); the others leaned much more heavily on pure gore. Even so, the death sequences in the subsequent films always left me 😲. I mean, what kind of twisted mind comes up with that? Not in a bad way, obviously—haha—but you have to admire the creativity required. 😬 🙏 Plus, the original has this uniquely dark, brooding atmosphere that feels distinct.

I almost included the second one because it’s fantastic too, but since the poll limits us to two, I stuck with the fifth. That highway pile-up is such a great sequence—pure adrenaline. And it works so well as a direct follow-up to the first.

The third one is alright—solid enough. The accident on the roller coaster was also very well executed.

The fourth one is actually my weakest pick, even though it's the only one I saw in theaters. I wouldn't call it bad, per se—more of a guilty pleasure given how much I love the "FD" franchise.

The fifth really blew me away, primarily because of that plot twist at the end. It turns out it’s effectively a prequel to the original. 😲 🙏 I should have realized something was off when Sam and Molly were boarding that plane. Once we see Alex and the rest of the group getting kicked off/exiting the aircraft, I was just 😲. Of course, the bridge collapse scene was genius again, even if the CGI looked a little cheap when that metal rod goes through the guy's eye. 😛 But still... the soundtrack is killer here too, especially the opening and closing themes.

All in all, I absolutely love this franchise.

I often pick up on little details even during my very first viewing of a movie, so I really need to bring this up...

I truly didn't see that twist coming in the fifth installment when I watched it for the first time, but you know how I am—I started sensing something was off while I was watching. 😁 Specifically, something felt genuinely weird: in almost every single modern film, whenever characters are on their phones, they're using iPhone's, Samsung Galaxy devices, or similar touchscreen novelties—and usually, those phones represent the absolute cutting edge of technology for that film's setting. So, in the fifth movie, I found it bizarre that there was zero sign of that; when someone actually used a phone, they looked like an old lady. I found myself wondering what on earth they were even using those handsets for, but I pushed the thought aside to focus on the movie. Then, lo and behold... it turns out we're looking at the year 2000 😁
cosmiclynx57 said:I've only ever seen the pilot episode of Supernatural, so is the vibe actually similar to a Final Destination film?

Honestly, you could even pull off a killer parody of Final Destination. Imagine some crazy scenario where someone gets their head sliced off, but they just slap it back on and keep playing the game, or a girlfriend gets torn apart but somehow pulls herself back together because she's got Werewolf blood in her veins... wouldn't that be wild?😂

It’s honestly a stretch to say you could ever truly equate *Supernatural* with a *Final Destination* film—not when you look at the actual substance of the storytelling. I mean, let's be real: *Supernatural* is built on this massive, sprawling mythology filled with spooky entities, various apparitions, and these cosmic "forces" (including Mr. Death himself). It’s essentially a buffet of everything you’ve ever seen in a horror movie. If you’ve watched even a handful of paranormal flicks, you’ll recognize almost every single creature or phenomenon they throw at the screen. It covers the absolute spectrum of the supernatural.

Each individual episode tackles a different subject matter—though, to be fair, the series maintains its momentum through a single overarching narrative thread while simultaneously exploring those supernatural phenomena on the periphery. Honestly, given your tastes, I think you’d actually get a kick out of it.

I was once a die-hard Supernatural fan—someone who followed every single episode religiously right up through the end of Season 7. Then, for reasons I can’t quite pinpoint, I just stopped. It wasn't that the show had become unbearable or that I'd grown tired of the formula; it wasn't a case of "giving up" out of frustration. It was more of a sudden, unexplained hiatus. That said, my intentions haven't changed—I fully plan on circling back to finish every last episode.

If you dive into Supernatural, you’re basically signing up for the full buffet—everything from Wendigs and Werewolves to Vampires and even Satan himself. And honestly, Satan isn't just some background extra; he’s a major player who stays woven into the core premises right alongside the Winchester brothers. Then you’ve got the whole celestial hierarchy thrown into the mix—Angels and Archangels included. Though, I will say, one of the Angels turns out to be an absolute disaster of a human being throughout the series. 😁The demons are present, the ghosts are lurking, Mr. Death is hovering—honestly, the whole crew is there, haha. You even get those specific episodes that dive into the manifestations of ancient deities from various pagan mythologies, whether we’re talking Germanic, Norse, Sumerian, Roman, or Greek traditions. For the most part, though, they tend to play the villains.

There is this one specific scene where Dean Winchester tries to strike a Deal with Mr. Death to take down the Devil—basically attempting to talk Mr. Death into intervening, even though he’s playing that strictly neutral, "not my problem" role. 😁 Imagine if they actually wrote an episode where Lucifer—the literal Devil—just absolutely dismantles those ancient Gods. I’m talking about him taking them down like flies because he’s fundamentally more powerful than they are. Personally, I would love to see that play out; those ancient deities are nothing but absolute garbage.

The series eventually dives deep into the mechanics of Hell, Heaven, and Purgatory—and honestly, things get incredibly interesting once Purgatory enters the fray. It introduces this whole layer of beings, these specific forces that can actually give both Demons and Angels a run for their money. It’s a messy, layered concept—I can’t exactly sit here and map out the entire cosmology without you actually sitting down to watch it. It’s just too convoluted to summarize in a single paragraph.

Look, this show is a total hybrid—you’ve got genuine horror elements, especially in those early seasons, mixed in with solid action, heavy drama, and even some actual comedy when it hits right. Honestly? Just man up, give it a shot, and start watching. I really think it could be right up your alley. You can't judge the whole thing based on the pilot alone; I remember sitting there myself, totally on the fence, thinking, "I don't know... maybe I'll stick with it, maybe I won't." But once you actually dive in? It becomes incredibly addictive.

cosmiclynx57 said:I've only ever seen the pilot episode of Supernatural, so is the vibe actually similar to a Final Destination film?

Honestly, you could even pull off a killer parody of Final Destination. Imagine some crazy scenario where someone gets their head sliced off, but they just slap it back on and keep playing the game, or a girlfriend gets torn apart but somehow pulls herself back together because she's got Werewolf blood in her veins... wouldn't that be wild?😂

🤣
cosmiclynx57 said:Man, wouldn't it be absolutely killer if they actually made a series?

I feel like it could actually work so well. Imagine if every season had like 10 episodes, and each season featured 10 main characters who just... die off one by one in every single episode... you know, sort of like that, where every season brings in a totally fresh cast of actors...
Just a quick little idea I cooked up on the fly.

But look, the Winchester brothers already went head-to-head with Mr. Death in the Supernatural series.😁

Still, I get what you mean—it's a solid concept, and I’d definitely tune in.

Anyway, getting back to this whole Final Destination fifth installment thing—it was refreshing to see that the fifth movie actually held its own against the third and fourth entries across the board. So, following that lead, it would be great if someone actually stepped up to handle a sixth film with a real, high-caliber Hollywood script—you know, something substantial. If they need to tweak the established lore or throw in a massive shocker—like that huge twist we saw in the fifth one—they should go for it.

For instance, if I were calling the shots (director's hat on, haha), I’d want to introduce the mystery of WHO—or rather, WHAT—is actually sending those warnings in the first place.😁 Even if it turns out to be some kind of "positive" force, there needs to be that lingering sense of dread.

I honestly won't understand directors who take on a sixth installment only to churn out the exact same formula we saw in the second, third, or fourth movies. Seriously, WTF? At that point, it's just a blatant cash grab.

Maybe we should suggest Wana takes a crack at the sixth one, haha...
Emily Ward56 said:Great topic/poll. Personally, I’m a huge fan of this franchise. Honestly, the main thing that keeps you hooked is just seeing the sheer variety of bizarre ways someone can actually die. 😲 That’s really what sets this series apart from your typical horror flicks. 🙏

As for my top "FD" picks, I went with the first one and the fifth. My reasons: 1. It completely reinvented the genre by introducing a concept we hadn't seen before—the premise itself is just brilliant. 👍 I’ll admit, certain scenes actually gave me a physical jolt—it’s the only entry that truly rattled me (not to mention that excellent, chilly and creepy soundtrack); the others leaned much more heavily on pure gore. Even so, the death sequences in the subsequent films always left me 😲. I mean, what kind of twisted mind comes up with that? Not in a bad way, obviously—haha—but you have to admire the creativity required. 😬 🙏 Plus, the original has this uniquely dark, brooding atmosphere that feels distinct.

I almost included the second one because it’s fantastic too, but since the poll limits us to two, I stuck with the fifth. That highway pile-up is such a great sequence—pure adrenaline. And it works so well as a direct follow-up to the first.

The third one is alright—solid enough. The accident on the roller coaster was also very well executed.

The fourth one is actually my weakest pick, even though it's the only one I saw in theaters. I wouldn't call it bad, per se—more of a guilty pleasure given how much I love the "FD" franchise.

The fifth really blew me away, primarily because of that plot twist at the end. It turns out it’s effectively a prequel to the original. 😲 🙏 I should have realized something was off when Sam and Molly were boarding that plane. Once we see Alex and the rest of the group getting kicked off/exiting the aircraft, I was just 😲. Of course, the bridge collapse scene was genius again, even if the CGI looked a little cheap when that metal rod goes through the guy's eye. 😛 But still... the soundtrack is killer here too, especially the opening and closing themes.

All in all, I absolutely love this franchise.

👍 Nice post. And yeah, true—like I said, the fifth one is a really strong film, right up there with the first one, maybe alongside the second, but the way they handled the narrative in the fifth was just great.
cosmiclynx57 said:I get that, but for me? It’s always a blast to watch, no matter how predictable or overplayed the tropes get.

As far as I'm concerned, they should just keep rolling with this until they hit ten movies! If franchises like Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees can get stretched out, why can't this one? I mean, I know they eventually dilute the magic, but honestly, I don't think I'll ever get tired of this series.

That’s exactly it—you watch them knowing exactly how the plot beats will play out, yet you still sit through it, haha. I’m the same way.👍

It used to be the same deal with Friday the 13th and stuff like that... not to mention those Halloween sequels where you just know Michael Myers is going to survive; you could hit him with an atomic bomb—just him, mind you—and somehow he'd still be standing.🤣

P. S. Friday the 13th actually has much more in common with that whole repetitive cycle seen in Final Destination in terms of being "more of the same," but I couldn't resist throwing Michael Myers into the mix.🙂

Just to add my two cents regarding Final Destination 5—I have to admit, that one actually surprised me quite a bit with how well it holds up. In my opinion, it is genuinely better than the third and fourth installments... just fundamentally better.🙂
frozenraven39 said:I was about 15 minutes into the fifth installment—the one with the bridge collapsing—before I just gave up. It felt way too predictable and repetitive to keep going. It left me wondering if all five of them follow the exact same formula, which makes you think: what’s actually the draw here? Who wants to sit through five movies built on the same single premise?

Then again, I recently sat through the whole Omen series, and you could definitely draw some parallels there. Specifically, The Omen II feels pretty similar to Final Destination—except in the latter, death isn't exactly a personified entity. In both cases, you're basically just watching a sequence of "accidents" play out for every character that shows up.

That’s a fair point, but you can't exactly blame the original for how the studio handles the sequels—I try to view the first one as its own entity whenever possible. Besides, I don't know if you'll agree, but because of this endless string of sequels (and it looks like they aren't stopping anytime soon), this franchise has basically become the modern-day equivalent of the old Friday the 13th series—though you could probably make the same argument for Saw and its various entries. With Friday the 13th, you knew exactly what you were getting into, yet people kept watching it, haha. Well, maybe not everyone, but those who did watch certainly knew the drill. 🤣

One aspect—and certainly not the only one—that makes the duology of Final Destination feel superior to the third, fourth, and fifth films is the way the second one is actually woven into the narrative of the first. They even bring back that female character from the first unit—even though Death didn't take her out then—which gives the story some actual cohesion. But everything after that? All those sequels... Good God, I found myself wondering: if you're going to keep making these, at least give us something shockingly new. Have Death show up in a cloak or something, haha; just stop making it the same thing every single time.

cosmiclynx57 said:Honestly, the first one is my absolute favorite. I mean, don't get me wrong, the others are pretty solid too, but that first movie just hit different because it was all so fresh and original, you know? It definitely left the strongest impression on me.

@wiredraven82 Love the idea for a poll! Even if the franchise isn't exactly groundbreaking or anything, it’s still totally worth voting on.

👍
northerntiger57 said:The first one is solid, mostly because the soundtrack absolutely slaps.

As for the sequel... I guess that highway pileup scene is worth a look.

Skip everything else. Just don't waste your time.

Hard to argue with that... 👍
imageimageimage

Alright folks, maybe this isn't a franchise that strictly warrants a poll, but hey, why shouldn't it get 🙂? To be perfectly honest with you, I find these to be genuinely solid entries within their genre—specifically the first and second installments.

I realize that every movie in this series feels somewhat similar—one after another, almost indistinguishable—but regardless, I find them engaging; they range from good to very good... and here are my reasons:

1. I believe the core CONCEPT of the story is masterful for a horror film. My God, truly masterful. Now, could it have been executed better? Probably. But the crucial point is that the premise itself is brilliant, at least in my eyes.

2. My favorite subgenre of horror involves themes of God, Satan, ghosts, demons, and such—and here, for the first time (at least in this specific way), we were introduced to yet another "player" on that stage: Death itself.

3. In a sea of unwatchable modern horror and psychedelic garbage—and I really can't stand psychedelic horror, which is why I always bring it up—these movies are the absolute gold standard for just sitting down and watching something. They aren't cinematic masterpieces, obviously, but I think you all understand what I mean.

As for which film in the franchise stands as my favorite... well, it's the first one. 😁

Partly because it reminds me of back in 2000; I had just finished middle school 🤣. Looking back from today's perspective at the fashion, the tropes, and even the cast—it still feels so fresh that I can hardly believe 14 years have passed. 😲 Man... 14 years...

There’s also something else regarding that film—something purely subjective on my part. I remember when I watched it for the first time, a certain scene sent chills straight down my spine from head to toe. I'm not sure if it's wise to mention this on a forum, but the main character who receives the vision of everyone dying—before boarding the plane in the movie—there was a specific detail about the exact hour the flight departed, and guess who happened to be born at that exact same time... My God. 🤣

I remember watching it with my friends, and everyone turned to look at me right then. 🤣

But without rambling any longer, here is the full list of films in the franchise with my personal ratings:

Final Destination 1 - 7/10
Final Destination 2 - 6.5/10
(actually, the second one is quite strong, nearly on par with the first)
Final Destination 3 - 5.5/10
Final Destination 4 - 5.5/10
Final Destination 5 - 6/10

P. S. I set the poll up so you can select more than one option, but I'd ask that you limit yourselves to two votes maximum—unless you absolutely MUST use a third.


image
Why are TV shows rated higher than movies? in Movies ·
Jessica Morris6 said:The Outer Limits... I've mostly been sticking to the newer stuff lately, though I might sprinkle in some of the classics once in a while if they happen to be on the schedule. But yeah, of course... Twilight Zone... It had an influence on... The Outer Limits...Yeah, the concept and the themes are pretty much the same... It’s just that... Zone S. It’s entering a total horror zone... The Outer Limits... there's just something about that specific kind of dread, isn't there? It’s not like the flashy, high-budget jumpscares you see in modern blockbusters, but rather that creeping, existential unease that settles deep in your bones. It captures a certain type of cosmic isolation that most shows today seem too afraid to touch... it lingers. I’m leaning much more toward science fiction lately... honestly, I don't see the point in playing judge and deciding which one reigns supreme when both are perfectly good shows in their own right. It's enough for me just knowing they're both worth the watch...
A Twin Peaks... I'm thinking about giving it another shot sometime... last time I tried, I actually ended up calling it quits right after the first episode of season two.

I’ve spent quite a bit of time diving into The Outer Limits—both the original run and the revival—and I have to say, it’s a genuinely top-tier series. Even though people often lump it in with the Twilight Zone because they share a similar premise, I think there are fundamental conceptual differences between the two that most viewers overlook. You actually touched on one of these points earlier, though I wouldn't say it's the deciding factor when comparing it to Zone S., but in my view, these two shows are vastly different in their DNA—much more than anyone would realize at first glance:

The Twilight Zone doesn't care whether you classify it as horror or sci-fi—it’s simply interested in being the Twilight Zone. It’s about those moments where something happens that you wouldn't even dream of in your wildest fantasies; something that defies the logic of our dimension (which, for the record, could be set in the past, the present, or the future). It’s all about that final twist that brings everything home. While the endings in The Outer Limits are ALMOST ALWAYS negative—I’d say about 99% of the time they leave a grim outlook for the individual or humanity as a whole—the Twilight Zone often offers outcomes that are actually positive for the characters. Sometimes they aren't even good or bad; they’re just... uniquely Twilight Zone. 😁 I'm honestly not sure how else I could put this.

Generally speaking, episodes of The Twilight Zone tend to be shorter—which, if you ask me, makes them much more enjoyable. I’ve always found that a tighter, punchier runtime suits the format better; it keeps things sweet without dragging on.

To build on that first point—The Outer Limits leans heavily into pure science fiction. It’s designed to construct these entirely different worlds, giving us a glimpse into what things might look like if a specific scenario actually became our reality. On the other hand, most episodes of The Twilight Zone keep the setting firmly planted in our own world, but they shift the perspective so that, for one specific group or individual, everything becomes completely untethered from this dimension by the time you hit that final twist.

To wrap this up, I honestly find *The Twilight Zone* to be such a singular phenomenon that I’d probably invent an entirely new genre just to house it—let's call it "Twilight Zone-esque." It’s simply because what they were doing there defies being pigeonholed by the standard labels of "horror" or "sci-fi." Those terms feel far too narrow to capture the essence of what makes those stories work. 🙂