CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › stormybadger8 › Posts

Posts by stormybadger8

4456 posts shown.

copperdrifter26 said:I was telling everyone earlier that Sebastian Vettel could have easily taken half that gap. He drove an absolute beauty, but honestly, that little slip at T9 and being a bit sluggish on the entry into T1—where he had to fight just to make up ground later—cost him at least 0.150s. It looks like Sebastian is braking a bit later, while Lewis Hamilton is getting back on the throttle just a touch sooner. Plus, you've got the Mercedes PU still feeling a bit more powerful, though I wouldn't be surprised if Ferrari has a slight edge on the aero side.

Here’s my breakdown:


The analysis is kind of flawed right from the jump...
At the T1 entry, there's a massive difference, and it's not even about how much gas they're giving it—it's the gear selection...
It's obvious either Mercedes and Ferrari have totally different gear ratios, or Vettel just stayed in the wrong gear. 🤷
Watch closely: Vettel enters the corner in 5th and stays there, while Hamilton is in 4th... obviously, Hamo can hammer the throttle way harder since he's in a lower gear. 😉

Sure, there was a mistake at T9, but I seriously doubt those two little slips cost him enough to miss pole. I don't buy that he lost a full 0.268s just there.
That's not a tiny margin to blame on just two minor hiccups...
Maybe he could've closed the gap to about 0.100s, but I don't see him pulling ahead.

Then again, it wouldn't surprise me if he ends up ahead of Mercedes down the road. Australia wasn't exactly kind to them in qualifying, yet they were still this close. 👍
They had some ERS issues on Friday, which messed up their whole program, so who knows how much that actually trashed the car setup. Plus, it was pretty cold during Q3, which traditionally sucks for Ferrari but usually works fine for Mercedes...

So yeah, all things considered, there's definitely hope.👍
neonfox65 said:Who said that...? 🤦

I’m honestly much happier that Ferrari jumped straight into developing this year's car and PU last year—seeing them actually give Meck a run for their money now is huge. Meanwhile, Red Bull Racing can't even touch them... if they hadn't just grabbed a couple of wins last season and thought they were set, they wouldn't be in this mess right now. They're totally cooked...

It’s easy for Ferrari when they actually have the right engines—they’re solid. But the massive headache for Red Bull Racing is definitely their power unit... specifically dealing with Renault. If Red Bull could just snag a Mercedes or a Ferrari engine, they'd be running away with it—but it looks like those guys were too chicken to hand over their tech... ☕

Exactly. Red Bull has the best chassis and the most "talented" drivers out there...
The chassis is so good it basically bounces through corners like a newborn deer in a meadow, and the drivers? Just flawless. 🙏
One spends his time kissing the walls with a big grin on his face, while the other is a master of the "fifth gear." 😁

The only one to blame is that damn Swiss guy who decided to start building engines after his hours were up...
2017 NASCAR Season in Formula 1 ·
neonfox65 said:What a drive though. He was actually faster than Max in everything until that one mistake...

Things are heating up at Red Bull Racing and they're looking to move a certain driver out—today was just the result of him getting too rattled...

Well, if they stay this bad, I'd love to see them push Daniel Ricciardo into that Mercedes seat instead🙂

Max was giving him trouble quite often last year,

And now Rick is doing it even more frequently🙂

Yeah, sure, if you say so. 🙂
He was lagging about 0.300 behind Max in the first two sectors...
Max was outrunning Kimi at that moment, while Ricciardo was trailing behind—that’s exactly why he pushed like crazy in S3 and ended up hitting the wall.
2017 NASCAR Season in Formula 1 ·
If he keeps driving like he did today without a care in the world, they won't just kick him out of Red Bull; he won't even find a seat in a mid-tier car...

Red Bull is already looking for an excuse to drop a driver, and today was clearly just the fallout from him losing his cool...
I mean, Max has been breathing down his neck constantly. Even today, he was faster through the first two sectors, which is exactly why he started forcing it and ended up being a jerk...
What’s worse is that the second team isn't actually that far behind Red Bull, and since they have great drivers, the main crew definitely won't tolerate being sabotaged by the junior squad...

So don't sweat it, Daniel Ricciardo will be out of Red Bull in a heartbeat if he keeps this up. The real question is whether Mercedes-Benz would even want him...
neonfox65 said:It says here that Rick is starting 10th.

http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-result...-1-grand-prix/

Max might just dive into that first corner and mess things up for someone—he did say this race was looking pretty boring...😁

Here you go again, acting like you actually know anything about Formula 1.🤦

Here’s your link...
http://www.fia.com/events/fia-formul...information-19

Until it shows up at 10th on the official starting grid, nothing is set in stone.
That thing you posted isn't even the official qualifying results, let alone the grid.

Chances are he trashed the gearbox. Given how loud that bang was, a replacement is almost a certainty...
Even if they can swap it out, I wonder if it's even worth the risk for this race and the ones coming up.
neonfox65 said:It’s not the shine—it’s the neck🙄

If you'd rather see Red Bull sacrifice this season just to be second place next year, fine, great idea.👍
Personally, I'd much rather see Ferrari focus on developing this year's car and PU like they did last year, which is why they're actually fighting Meck right now. I don't care if Red Bull had won a few more races last year if it meant being totally screwed today like a bunch of idiots...
neonfox65 said:It’s about how you develop through the season, not just how you nail that first race. And right now, Ferrari isn't exactly thriving—they lost ground to Red Bull Racing last year and ended up in third... which means they've actually slipped behind where they were back in 2015.

That’s just plain wrong...
It’s not that Ferrari regressed; they just had a mountain of trophies and some incredibly stupid pit wall decisions. Based on what we saw today, they were clearly smarter than Red Bull Racing because they shifted their resources toward the 2017 car and Power Unit way ahead of schedule...
Meanwhile, Red Bull Racing and especially Renault kept pushing upgrades until the very end, so it’s no surprise they caught up last year. Honestly, though, it looks like a massive blunder on their part—a total Pyrrhic victory, considering how hard they're hitting this season.
It’s pretty interesting that for three straight seasons, Hamilton and Vettel were driving the two fastest cars—one Ferrari, one Mercedes—at the US Grand Prix.
Makes for a decent little comparison over those last three years...

Ferrari's gap to Meck 2015:
Hamilton 1:26.327
Vettel 1:27.757
- 1.430

Ferrari's gap to Meck 2016:
Hamilton 1:23.837
Vettel 1:24.675
- 0.838

Ferrari's gap to Meck 2017:
Hamilton 1:22.188
Vettel 1:22.456
- 0.268

That gap is shrinking, and fast, too. 😁
Even if they don't catch them this season, they definitely will if this trend keeps up...
northerncobra31 said:You seemed pretty certain Vettel would take pole.

It's a good thing you won't tell me what you're betting on; I like keeping my money.

That guy Palmer certainly has guts making claims like that. He's lucky he's even still in F1 after last season, where he couldn't finish a single weekend without spinning out or hitting something.

That clown never deserved to be in Formula 1 in the first place.🤦
Honestly, those Sky Sports guys are the best. I don't know what kind of madness drives them to defend a driver like him, let alone praise him just because he managed to actually cross the finish line.🤣
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/03/2...-in-the-race/?

There it is. Like I said, Ferrari just didn't have the pace for pole...
Sebastian Vettel says he could've squeezed out a slightly faster lap, but definitely not enough to change anything...
northerncobra31 said:How much did Sinek lose out on for pole position?

Just realized I completely screwed myself thanks to Richie 😳
I can predict just about anything except for that clown Richie landing in the top 8 🤦

If only Doug had rooted for him until the end of his career 😠
mellowtiger83 said:Well, here he is. He put his money on $333 Alonso - Perez and won, though it was hardly a massive windfall.🙂

Maybe you aren't...
What are they even betting on in the sportsbooks? 🤷
Is this the standings right after qualifying or the official results? 🤔

Perez almost certainly picked up a penalty there and ended up starting right behind Alonso.
William Bennett53 said:Ferrari has closed the gap during qualifying, so now we just have to hope—for the sake of the entire season—that they can actually step up and be more competitive on Sunday than they were on Saturday. But I suppose we’ll find out tomorrow. Honestly, the idea that Vettel could have snatched pole feels a bit like a stretch; I highly doubt he was missing that much pace.

Maybe, but I’m skeptical... plus, Los Angeles isn't exactly his playground...
but hey, if nothing else, I'm pretty sure he'll snatch pole in Singapore and Suzuka😁
And China won't be far off either.😍
neonfox65 said:But wasn't it like that in Q3 before all this?🙂

He finished Q2 first, which earned him the spot in Q3...
Honestly, what's the point of driving if you can't even finish a lap? If the lap doesn't exist, it doesn't count. 🙂

Renault is surprisingly good—so good that I’m practically expecting free breakdowns on the Red Bull soon. 🙂
Just so you know, Hulk clearly botched his Q2 lap; he's one of the rare ones who was actually slower in Q2 than in Q1. 😉
With a 1:24.975 from Q1, he would've made it into Q3 and been ahead of Carlos Sainz, who somehow ended up ahead of Ricciardo. 😉

I'm not even factoring Palmer into any of this. That guy doesn't even deserve to be in the paddock, let alone an F1 car. 🤦
gentlebear47 said:First lap of Q3!
Vettel and Hamilton are neck and neck through sectors one and two, but then Hamilton just rips it open, pulling almost three-tenths clear in sector three.
Vettel is looking a bit rough in that third sector, isn't he? 🤔

http://www.fia.com/file/54532/download?token=Fta3oaWB
Vettel actually has the fastest time in sector 3, so what's your point?
That’s basically the only sector where Kimi was even close to Hamilton and Bottas—and somehow, miraculously, even Gozni is hovering near the top there...
It’s pretty obvious that third sector is mostly thanks to that new Ferrari Power Unit...
neonfox65 said:Are you seriously trying to convince me that Ricciardo didn't make it into Q3? Just admit you messed up—there's no way the Renault is faster than the Red Bull 🙂

Ricciardo hit a wall...🙂
And honestly, a snail running a marathon would be faster than that car, so of course it's a Renault...😁

Why don't you just start rooting for Hamilton so we can actually have an interesting season?🎉🤣
copperdrifter26 said:What are you even talking about? Lewis had a flawless session, while Vettel completely blew it in Q1 by just two-hundredths of a second—he looked just as gutted as the folks over at Ferrari.

It’s such a shame because Ferrari actually showed more pace in Q3, and they were neck-and-neck in Q2, which pretty much tells me their aero package might actually be the superior setup at Ferrari.

http://www.fia.com/file/54532/download?token=Fta3oaWB
Ferrari held their own in Q2 and were faster in Q3, but they were noticeably lagging in Q1 throughout qualifying...

Mercedes was consistently way faster in Q1, but that final lap from both Ferraris was the closest anyone got to them in Q1 all session...
Maybe he thinks he could've been faster, but there's no way he missed out by just two-hundredths in Q1—Ferrari definitely doesn't have that kind of pace, not even close...
neonfox65 said:How can you be so blunt? One Renault dropped out in Q1 while the other didn't make Q3, yet both Red Bulls made it into Q3. Don't mess with me.

One Red Bull made it into Q3 and finished the session, while the other one slammed into a wall...
Linda Peterson43 said:I didn't catch the action, what ended up happening in Q3 with Kimi? Is he trailing significantly behind Vettel?

They said Vettel is driving an ex-Alonso car, so that's why he's 0.6 seconds faster than Kimi... just a standard feature.😉
neonfox65 said:Just because this guy made a mistake doesn't change anything—otherwise, Renault is definitely slower than Red Bull 🙂

From what I can see, Ricciardo's Red Bull is easily the slowest one out there...
I mean, a car pinned against the wall is obviously slower than everyone else—it's even slower than Palmer. 🙂

It’ll be interesting to see if Ricciardo can even manage to finish ahead of Hulk by the end of the race...