CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › stormybadger8 › Posts

Posts by stormybadger8

4456 posts shown.

Kyle Edwards5 said:There were some whispers floating around about a potential upgrade for the Renault engine ahead of this race; maybe one of their tweaks actually holds water for once...🤔
On the flip side, I really don't see this being some massive catastrophe for Ferrari. It’s just qualifying, after all. Nobody is realistically banking on a pole position or a win from them anyway...
We'll just have to wait and see how things play out between Nico Rosberg and Lewis Hamilton.

It’s a total disaster when you clock a slower time on softs in Q1 than you did on mediums during FP3. Absolute joke. 🤦
When you pull a slower time on softs during Q3 than what you clocked back in FP3... just wow.
Honestly, calling it anything other than a total disaster would be a lie. 🤦

I honestly don't recall ever seeing anything like this happen to any team. 🤷

Maybe Renault actually pulled off an upgrade that works, but even if they did, that still doesn't explain why Ferrari was slower in qualifying than they were during FP before the session...
If he wasn't even half a second faster, it’d be weird. Honestly, if the times were identical, that would just feel plain wrong.
steelmaker83 said:That’s what happens when you take advice from some "brilliant" development driver...

Then both drivers would be in trouble, because both Ferraris are a total mess compared to FP3...☕
Ferrari 🤦🤦🤦

Honestly, I have zero clue which kid 😵

Vettel FP3 - 1:23.225
Vettel Q1 - 1:24.124
Vettel Q2 - 1:23.688
Vettel Q3 - 1:23.334

😵

What kind of brat was messing around with the car? Wouldn't that just slow them down? 😵🤣
Or are they just having massive issues with track temps? 🤔

The weirdest part is how much slower they were in S1 and S2 during qualifying compared to FP3. S3 wasn't even that bad—he actually looked faster in qualifying than in FP3—but S1 was a complete disaster...
All of Vettel's qualifying times were about half a second slower in S1 compared to his S1 pace in FP3...
According to the F1 PDF, it's Verstappen 😁🤣
Experiment: Voting for moderators in Feedback & Suggestions ·
crimsonhound80 said:Pure nonsense.
You could have "colored letters" too if you just knew how to color them yourself. 🍿

Usually, those old-timers get that option around Easter, when they're busy dyeing eggs.

Did you know some users here actually have their own signature colors? 😁

Like this:
crimsonhound80's color 😁

This whole thing started once the server went haywire with special characters. 🤣
Accounting for Sole Proprietors: Tax & Bookkeeping Tips in Business, Accounting & Taxes ·
It’s not like they have their own set of rules; it’s just obvious that in certain local police departments, you get officers who haven't the slightest clue what they're actually doing...
Just because they claim something is the rule doesn't mean it's actually written in the law.
Jacob White49 said:if Alonso had been driving Vettel's Ferrari in Los Angeles, they would have definitely taken the win...

Yeah, right.🤣
The car would actually be a total piece of junk because it would’ve been built to his specific preferences (roughly 2014 levels, give or take 10%)...
And even if some miracle happened and he did win, he’d probably still start 5 spots back and then pull off some "phenomenal" drive worthy of the Maestro to grab 5th—or maybe 3rd if someone else's engine blew up by pure luck.😍
Roger Wright94 said:What else could they have used? They didn't exactly have a buffet of options. That's the whole damn problem.
And those first Safety Cars were way too short—they got called off way too soon because everyone was scrambling to pit for Rosberg.

This definitely holds up.👍
And that’s the biggest screw-up right there. In theory, they might have even come out ahead with one less pit stop. Since Kimi pulled into the pits just a lap before the red flag, if that hadn't happened, he would've scored a totally free pit stop. What a joke. 😉
It’s always easy to play the genius once the race is already over...

In that final stretch, it was honestly a smart move. They played it safe to hold onto the track position, and let’s be real—Ferrari knows damn well that the Mexicans won't have a prayer if they can't find a way past.
At the end of the day, they clearly have no clue what they're doing—they can't even tell she's on softs while the Mexican is sitting there on mediums.
That’s the whole issue with these kinds of cars. It was painfully obvious, especially when you look at Luxury vs STR.

I'm not even sure they would've pulled it off at the end, even without that red flag... maybe Hamilton, but definitely not Rosberg.
They barely managed to pull that overtake right at the finish line. And honestly? Don't hold your breath thinking they’ll pull off something similar next time. 😉
Mexican drivers really have it figured out. They’re just faster right out of the gate, mostly because they clearly get their tires up to temperature way quicker than Ferrari does.
And in what mode was that full tank actually faster? I mean, it’s not like Rosberg was some nobody—he still managed to hunt down Ferrari in a single lap, even after being over three seconds behind before hitting the pits. 😳

Basically, the Mexicans are still pretty fast, but that gap isn't nearly what it was last year. It’s just not enough for them to breeze past everyone else during the race anymore.
Looks like they're going to run straight into some serious traffic issues...

I’ve got this feeling that someone’s going to organize a race where they just let drivers run around with whatever random tires they want. Imagine if they just had a Mexican driver pull 57 solo laps on the track first.
So then she pulls a move where I'm stuck behind that Ferrari for 57 laps just to keep the gap somewhere between 20 and 30 seconds in favor of the Mexican driver.
I'm thinking the same thing. A Mexican driver isn't going to just overtake a Ferrari on pure track pace. It’s more likely they’ll have to play the tactical game through the pits. Even then, pulling off an undercut is probably their best bet—it won't be that simple, though.
A good chunk of this season might actually come down to which crew is faster in the pits. Honestly, those tire changes could decide everything.
It’s not even about the components; it’s all about the strategy...
They should have gone straight to the new Soft, then switched to used SS.
Maybe even put Kimi on mediums just to slow down Nico Rosberg down a bit.

Honestly, the biggest blunder was picking those used SS tires. It was blindingly obvious they weren't going to gain more than two seconds a lap with them. And let's be real, there was zero chance they could pull more than ten laps out of them, let alone twenty... So from the jump, it was clear they had no shot at getting back ahead of the Bear after pitting. It would’ve been way more logical to save the faster rubber for the finish.
rowdyrider12 said:I mean, the big teams (Mercedes, Ferrari, Force India, Red Bull, etc.) could probably breeze through Q1 on Softs alone...

In a normal qualifying session? Maybe...
but not in this absolute mess. Honestly, nobody would be crazy enough to gamble like that when there's zero time to swap tires...

Just look at Mercedes—even they weren't dumb enough to try running Softs in Q1, and they actually had plenty of them left over...
steelmaker83 said:Look, you get an extra fresh set just for Q3, so missing out on Q3 isn't actually a bad thing.

This whole "saving" obsession is pure idiocy. Why even bother limiting tires? Why limit fuel flow? Why even have these damn tokens? It all just ruins everything.

It’s pretty obvious...
Go ahead, look at the table again and see what it actually says. 😉

The table says Sets available for the race...😉
So if that's accurate, everyone who made it into Q3 according to this table only has 6 sets of tires, while everyone else gets 7...
To even make it to Q3 and finish the job, they have to burn through at least 3 sets of Softs if they're dominating like the Bear, or if they don't drive like Ferrari and skip Q3 entirely, they end up burning 4 sets of Softs and have basically nothing left for the actual race.

With all those "brilliant" tactical choices 🙄 in play, thanks to the qualifying stupidity, everyone who makes Q3 ends up with just 1 set of mediums, 1 set of Softs (which they obviously need per the rules), and a massive pile of trashed Softs...
and maybe—and I mean *maybe*—one fresh set of Softs left over...
Morgan Hill4 said:Turns out Ferrari didn't actually have another fresh set of Softs. Just checked the tire regs. For the whole GP weekend, they allocate 13 sets of slicks plus wets, but 6 sets go back after FP—even if you didn't touch them. Those 6 sets are reserved for qualifying and the race, plus whoever makes it into Q3 gets one extra set of the softest compound, which also goes back to Pirelli after qualifying wraps up. Honestly, the rule is pretty retarded.

image

Man, I had no clue about this nonsense. 🤦
Good grief, that is peak stupidity right there. 😵
Realistically, nobody’s getting through qualifying without burning at least 3 sets of SS to finish in a decent spot (basically just making it through Q2),
and even then, only Mercedes can pull that off. Everyone else needs at least 4 sets of SS, leaving them with maybe one Medium and one Soft. 🤦
Mother my race, races where everyone just shreds tires like crazy are going to be absolute madness. 🤦 😵

If this table is actually right, then for teams like Williams/FI/RB/STR, even attempting to hit Q3 is insanity, let alone actually driving in it. 🤣
Because according to this, anyone who missed Q3 ended up with 7 sets of tires...
while those who made Q3 had 2 fresh sets and 4 worn ones...
maybe they could have had 3 vs 3 like Ferrari if they hadn't run two laps in Q3...

Basically, it looks like Ricciardo would've definitely grabbed a podium if he hadn't made Q3 and finished 9th in Q2 instead.
He would've started just one spot further back but would've had 2 more fresh sets of rubber, and he'd have started on a brand new set...
So instead of running used SS, new SS, new Soft, used SS, he could have run new SS, new Soft, new SS.
And if he'd run new Soft, new SS, new SS, who knows, maybe he would've even snatched the win, since there's always a chance he wouldn't have had to pit before a red flag...
Who knows, maybe he'd even have lucked out and started on SS...
Timothy Castillo6 said:I'm wondering, did they have any clean SOFTs left? 🤷

These are the tires used during the race:
image

And these were the ones available for the GP weekend...
image

So obviously there were softs left—maybe even an extra set for everyone...
They barely even drove in FP1 and FP2, at least not on slicks...
In FP3, they couldn't exactly burn through a mountain of rubber, and everyone ran SS for qualifying. As far as I recall, nobody even bothered trying the softs 🤔
Basically, every team definitely had at least one more set of softs lying around. Maybe Sainz, Verstappen, and Wehrlein didn't, but for the rest? It's obvious they had them... Hamilton probably had 5 or 6 sets left over...
If you want proof of how bad Ferrari's strategy was, look at this:
http://www.fia.com/file/39511/download?token=JbqotgcF

Here’s who hit the pits after the red flag restart:
9 Williams Racing
22 Jenson Button McLaren Honda 30
55 Carlos Sainz Red Bull Racing 31
33 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing 32
94 Pascal Wehrlein Haas F1 Team 32
5 Sebastian Vettel Scuderia Ferrari 35
3 Daniel Ricciardo Red Bull Racing 42

And that's basically it. Everyone else played it safe, trying to nurse their tires to the finish on a single set.
But Ferrari? They're the only ones who restarted on a used set...

Also, this comparison between Rosberg and Vettel is pretty interesting:
http://en.mclarenf-1.com/index.php?p...Nico%20Rosberg
It looks like the soft tires just don't work for Mercedes-Benz at all. 😕
It’s weird that Vettel was losing more time on softs than he was on mediums. 😕
And even weirder—Rosberg’s first lap out of the pits was identical on both softs and mediums, but his second lap was way faster on mediums than on softs. 😵

It honestly looks like the Bear is struggling with softs, while Ferrari can't get anything out of the mediums...🤔
STR definitely has the pace, but man, they have even less common sense than Ferrari...
Maybe it's just the climate affecting them 😬 but hey, it's still an Italian team 🤣

Someone seriously needs to slap little Max Verstappen and bring him back down to earth; the kid took a page out of Fernando Alonso's book, but applied all the wrong lessons...
Someone should explain to these kids that you actually need to show some respect to your teammate on track by showing some backbone, not just whining over the team radio...
Look, Alonso had a legitimate reason to complain to the team about moving Sergio Perez ahead of him, but I have absolutely no clue what Max Verstappen was thinking when he decided his team should ditch Carlos Sainz 🤦
John Thomas8 said:I don't get these Ferrari excuses, "Mercedes caught us off guard with mediums," please. There was a ten-minute red flag; they had plenty of time to see what everyone else was planning.
Same goes for the track temp—they weren't the only ones who noticed it dropping and realized the SS wouldn't perform at 100%.
Decisions like this just kill any chance of actually challenging Mercedes.

It’s pure idiocy that they left Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Räikkönen out on used SS tires, especially since those were the exact tires used to clock that exit lap and initial flyer.
Basically, they didn't even get a launch advantage over someone on fresh softs...

If they’d gone with new softs and botched it, whatever, they tried.
If they’d gone with mediums and failed, no big deal...
But this looked like the mechanics were out grabbing beers and just couldn't be bothered to swap the rubber.
There is absolutely zero tactical logic to justify this...
From what I saw, they were probably the only ones who didn't swap tires; it looks like everyone else went for fresh rubber before the restart. 🤔

Dammit, it was obvious that this strategy would cost them track position, and then they handed themselves a slower tire profile right when they needed to hunt down and pass Mercedes. 🤦
It would have been fifteen times more logical to start on softs and then either pit for another set of softs later or try to hunt them down on that used SS set...
This makes no sense, even for a car that was faster than the competition, like how Germany dominated in Los Angeles last year. 🤦
Surely they aren't so brainless that they thought they could make up a 25-second gap to Mercedes on old SS tires before hitting the pits...
Even Mercedes couldn't pull that off on SS, let alone Williams or F1, much less anyone actually serious about winning. 😵

The only way this strategy makes any sense is if:
1. Sebastian Vettel pulls away upfront.
2. Kimi immediately jumps Nico Rosberg at the restart and holds him up for the next 20 laps...
3. Sebastian pits and comes out ahead of Kimi.

But that’s practically impossible. It's a stretch to think Kimi could hold Nico Rosberg back for 20 straight laps while running about 1.2 to 1.5 seconds slower than Sebastian...
Plus, that would likely leave Kimi out of the points... and even then, it would still make more sense for Kimi to be on softs rather than SS.
dustyskipper77 said:What are you even talking about? Lewis Hamilton couldn't pass Max Verstappen if he tried. He was stuck behind him for ten laps. Before the crash, both Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Räikkönen were holding off Nico Rosberg without breaking a sweat... Honestly, Vettel would've cleared Hamilton if he hadn't spent forever in the pits.
Even if Ferrari had switched to mediums, Rosberg would've overtaken him, and Hamilton would still be stuck in the rearview mirror.

And obviously, if there wasn't a safety car, they might have stood a chance. But on mediums at a track like this, Rosberg was destined to win...
Bottom line: Mercedes was tactically flawless after the start. A well-deserved win!

The issue with every single car on the grid is overtaking. Unless you've got a massive gap of over a second per lap, you're stuck—and even then, if the car ahead is lightning fast on the straight, good luck.

Just because Ferrari might catch up to Mercedes doesn't mean they'll actually pass them. There’s no way they have a full second per lap advantage, even when comparing old Medium tires on the Mercedes versus fresh SS tires on the Ferrari.
Plus, I highly doubt Ferrari has any major advantage on the straights compared to the Mercedes.😉
So, until they have a real gap, they don't have a shot. Then again, the Mercedes drivers aren't exactly having an easy time passing the Ferrari either...

Ferrari's biggest headache is just trying to beat the Mercedes in qualifying so they can actually start ahead of them.😉

P. S. str, it's blindingly obvious that Red Bull is easily one of the top three fastest cars this season. It doesn't get any more obvious than that.
Everyone is going to struggle against them, not just the Mercedes.
Joshua Rivera56 said:I wouldn't call it a handout... It was earned fairly on the grid and out on the track. If we’re looking at the whole mess, things probably wouldn't have played out this way without the SC.

Just like how Alonso's stupidity combined with the absolute idiocy of Ferraria Rosberg and Hamilton handed them a 1-2 on a silver platter, Rosberg and Hamilton basically served Ferrari a 1-2 at the start because of their own screw-up... I don't see much of a difference here.😉

It just reminds me of that shady business with Michael Schumacher in Singapore.🤔

First signs that he's just washed up for F1.🤔
What are we calling him now? AlDed, FeDeda, Deda? Or what?😬

Or maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Flavio pulled some strings so he could land that seat at Mercedes.😬
At first glance, the starts look way better...
Everything else is more or less the same crap as last year. Maybe some slight improvement here and there, but nothing enough to matter...

And those starts could give Ferrari a massive edge. If I caught what the Sky crew was saying this season, they aren't using dual clutches or automated procedures anymore. So, either Ferrari is lightyears ahead of Mercedes on this, or Kimi Räikkönen and Sebastian Vettel are just killing it compared to Nico Rosberg and Lewis Hamilton 🤷
No matter what, it looks like Ferrari has the upper hand here 👍
dustyskipper77 said:Ferrari looked great. If they hadn't completely botched the strategy, Vettel would've been second... and Kimi could've grabbed a podium if his engine hadn't blown up.
They were right there, even on a track that wasn't built for Ferrari..
Daniel Ricciardo was awesome, and solid result for Sergio Pérez and Williams....

Can't wait for the next race. Ferrari is going to demolish Mercedes, provided they fire that idiot running the strategy department...

If she were a guy, her name would be Duško.🤣
Man, forget about whether Ferrari messed up or not—what if Mercedes hadn't had such a pathetic start?

Ferrari threw away a win handed to them by Mercedes, but honestly, if both teams had played at their actual level, they would've screwed up just as badly as last year...
Let’s be real: Lewis Hamilton was noticeably faster than Nico Rosberg the entire time, and he only finished behind him because his start was even worse than Rosberg's...
If Hamilton had finished the first lap in the lead and Rosberg in second, Vettel would've ended up at least 20+ seconds behind Hamilton.😉