Joseph Kern5 said:We haven't been relevant in swimming since the Athens 2004 Olympics. We aren't showing up in track and field—the 100m, the 110m hurdles, the marathon, 3.1 miles, 6.2 miles. To me, that’s what real athletics looks like. People brag about some results in 25-meter pools, and apparently, their top swimmer publicly claims everyone else is doping. There was some drama involving uniforms too, where they claim to be guaranteeing success for their athletes. But you see the reality: Australia, the USA, Brazil, even Zimbabwe are stronger in swimming. They don't even have much water infrastructure, yet they produce medalists.
As for equestrian sports, we get a trainer who shows up at the Olympics and finishes 78th. If we actually pooled enough money for a world-class horse, maybe we could win a medal, just like the Britons, the Irish, or the Dutch.
In pentathlon, we definitely have a tradition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milan_Neralić
I was there; I saw it happen.👍
Jamaica is ten times smaller, yet they dominate track and field. Not to mention Uruguay, which with only 2.3 million people, has secured 2 World Championship titles and 14 or 15 Copa America trophies. Denmark is a European champion in soccer. All these are small nations with similar populations.
Canada wins about 10 or 15 medals at the Summer Games. They have 497 total. In Rio, they had 15 medals, and it wasn't just water polo; they've had 10 gold medals in track and field throughout history. Meanwhile, we're out here winning medals in amateur boxing.😵
The Czech Republic made the Euro soccer finals, Portugal is the European Champion, and they've been finalists...
There are plenty of small countries with elite results. The truth is, we are weak in team sports. Everyone always brings up how small we are; they act like being big is the only way, which just creates complexes. You're raised being told you belong to a tiny nation.
The track disciplines you mentioned don't exist here because there's nowhere to even train.
We aren't in swimming because the conditions for it simply don't exist in America. I don't think that's going to change anytime soon.
I thought someone would bring up Neralić, but check the date and the country he represented.
All those countries you listed invest heavily in one or two specific sports where they can excel. Norway leads the medal count in the Winter Olympics, but aside from handball, what do they really have? Beyond Nordic sports, they basically have nothing.
The Czech Republic is a tennis powerhouse; they had strong soccer once, but again, they aren't present in other sports.
Look at Poland, for example. Collectively, they are terrible, except for volleyball and maybe handball. They were good at soccer a long time ago, faded away, and now they're trying to wake up again. That's a country of 40 million people.
VB—what is there to say? Collectively, they don't exist. India, China, Indonesia, Iran, Turkey?
The issue is how sports are perceived. In Anglo-Saxon countries, swimming is highly valued. Rowing is for the aristocracy, and so is equestrianism. Nobody gives a damn about basketball in England because that's for the guys across the Atlantic. But cricket and rugby stadiums are always packed.
Handball is a European sport, especially in the Germanic regions, which is why it's the second most popular collective sport in Germany.
Portugal? They have absolutely nothing besides soccer. Nothing at all. A former colonial power with 11 million people.
America has 44 Olympic medals in 25 years. If that's considered small, then I don't know.