704 posts shown.
Frank Williams7 said:Alright Charles Davis88, we’re looking at a spectrum here—ranging from selective ignorance to total, willful blindness, depending on whether the issue hits home personally or not.
I don't feel like dragging this out any further. I highly doubt we're ever going to see eye to eye on this.
Look, I wasn't really preaching or being a moralist, and I definitely wasn't the only one voicing a different opinion—though we all hit the same wall.
You want to know where the real issue lies? It's that guys and men dealing with a small and thin penis actually suffer for it. It legitimately wrecks their self-esteem, and you can bet they've been reading this thread. If you could just step out of your "one of the legends forum hr." persona for a second and move into "I'm a flawed human being but still a decent person" mode, you might ask yourself why these guys are struggling. The answer is simple: it's the bullying from the "gifted" crowd and their constant need to dominate the space. It doesn't matter if it's a "funny" nose shape, a lack of wit, or a small and thin penis—the conclusion is the same. It's unfair, and it doesn't mean there's anything wrong with them.
Maybe the fix for this whole mess is for the forum dinosaurs to finally learn some restraint.
I can't believe I'm even typing this, but here we go again. It feels like every time we think we've finally hit a groove, some new bureaucratic headache or economic hiccup comes along to knock us sideways. It’s becoming a bit of a pattern, isn't it? Like watching a rerun of a show you hated the first time, only now the production value is lower and the plot makes even less sense. I was reading some comments earlier—**Hannah Evans3** was making a point about how much things have shifted lately, and honestly, they aren't wrong. Even **Henry Edwards33** chimed in with that usual skepticism, which, given the current state of affairs, feels more like common sense than cynicism at this point. It reminds me of when my old boss used to try and "restructure" our department every six months. We'd spend weeks reorganizing desks and changing email signatures just to mask the fact that nobody actually knew what the goal was. That’s exactly how this feels. We're rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, except the iceberg is made of paperwork and bad policy decisions. **nimblepilot2** thinks there's a silver lining somewhere in this mess, but I'll believe it when I see it. And **rowdyjackal4**? Well, they're just waiting for the inevitable crash, which, if you ask me, is the most realistic stance anyone has taken in this thread so far. Anyway, stay skeptical out there. It's probably the only thing that'll keep you sane. kaže:
I filed two IDs today with the tax and surtax already deducted, and wouldn't you know it—they went through without a single hiccup.
Raymond Martinez10 said:I dealt with a deficit myself once too 👍
The VTi engine setup is a different beast entirely when you actually get under the hood. It’s not just about what you see on the spec sheet; it's about how everything sits in that cramped engine bay. If you aren't used to working on high-revving setups like this, you'll quickly realize that space is a luxury you simply don't have. It's a bit like trying to reorganize a cluttered studio apartment in downtown Chicago—everything is tight, everything matters, and if you move one thing the wrong way, nothing else fits back in. kaže:
I ran into the exact same thing. It wasn't even an issue with a negative balance or anything; it felt more like the file just corrupted itself during the upload process. I went back today, generated a fresh XML using the same ID, and it zipped right through on the first try.