Posts by David Price5

According to IMDb, there was only one Pennywise.
http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0099041/

briskhound2 said:Which movie are we talking about? They only seem to be making films these days... anyway, the series is pretty decent—got a few solid hits in there if you're looking.

When you’re looking for pure, gritty realism, I always go back to that opening sequence in The Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake—man, that part is killer. You’ve got this journalist coming down the stairs, the whole thing shot in black and white, giving it this heavy, antique vibe... then you've got water up to your knees and spiders everywhere crawling around skulls. It feels less like a movie and more like some ancient, cursed crime scene footage you weren't supposed to find... brrrr.

I recently revisited this classic. It remains a standout achievement in cinema.
It plays out just like a movie. I can't quite recall how they aired it here in the States.

Most of us tend to gravitate toward horror movies that feel grounded in reality. That’s exactly why The Exorcist maintains such a legendary reputation. While we can easily dismiss things like vampires or werewolves as pure fantasy, there's something much more unsettling about stories that feel plausible. For anyone looking for a solid recommendation that leans into realism, I highly suggest Eden Lake (2008)..

Christian Taylor3 said:I guess I'd say movies or topics that don't even fall under the horror genre. For instance...

By the way, there are plenty of other great films missing from this list. Oh, and The Silence of the Lambs 😲

Today, the line between a thriller and a horror movie is incredibly thin. I think *The Silence of the Lambs* sits right on that edge.

Donna Gray4 said:I’m with you on that; I was actually just about to bring up [REC] myself.

I live for horror, and honestly, one of the main reasons is that horror movies possess this damn atmosphere that you just can't find in any other genre, which makes the whole thing special to me—like when I see heavy snowstorms, a dark night, a full moon, or some isolated mountain range... it isn't even about being scared at first, it's just that the mood is indescribably beautiful, and if you toss some werewolves into that setting, it’s perfect. But that's not what actually creeps me out; what I'm trying to say is that without a genuine sense of atmosphere, a movie isn't a real horror film, or at least it can't be a masterpiece. What actually scares me? A remote little town with maybe a hundred people where some monster—or even just one of the locals—starts a massacre? Even then, that wouldn't exactly leave me shaking. Werewolves, vampires, zombies—they don't scare me, even though there are some great films featuring them... what really gets under my skin? Ghosts, definitely ghosts, and stuff like [REC].

But you can find that depth in other genres too, like war movies, historical epics, or intense dramas. You have to admit, not every single horror flick actually nails the atmosphere properly.

It’s all about simplicity and realism. Just look at one [rec]. There aren't any Rambo-style heroes here..

Adam Moore said:Exactly. Bone is just a comic book character fighting for his own goals, which doesn't make him a superhero🤷
. Just because you're a simple guy in a comic doesn't mean you're a superhero. You'd need at least some X-ray vision to peek under skirts or something like that to earn the title😉.

Well, of course you aren't. But it is one of the assumptions. "Super" doesn't just refer to having powers; it simply means your actions set you apart from everyday heroes like firefighters. For instance, Daredevil (2009) and Kick-Ass are also considered unconventional superheroes.

As I mentioned earlier, I consider Batman and Punisher to be exceptions as well..

I mean, what similarities does V for Vendetta actually share with Superman?

They are both comic books or graphic novels. Both protagonists fight for their own specific goals..

Well, the guy has an animated series and a video game... it’s definitely a bit of a gray area. I'm not even sure if he has his own comic book yet. He's more of an anti-hero, I suppose. :-)

I suppose so, but I really think everyone should be included. In the end, the best ones will naturally stand out. :-D

Adam Moore said:since there isn't a single superhero in the movie, 🤷 the comic itself doesn't fall under the superhero genre, and honestly, neither does the film.

If you're in a comic book beating up a villain, you're a superhero. 🙂 Special powers are merely
a bonus. 😉

George Alvarez3 said:Why is Unbreakable even included? It doesn't really belong here.

Anyway,

We are talking about comic books and superpowers. You know as well as I do that it deserves its place.😁

If we’re going by those rules, then neither Batman nor Punisher should even be on the list.

And you completely overlooked The Crow.

Steven Palmer3 said:Does this movie even have any dialogue? I'm watching the trailer and everyone is just dead silent...

Oh, there is plenty of it.

placidmarlin3 said:@David Price5/">@@David Price5,
No, I didn't watch Wolf Kingdom while exhausted—even though
they aired it at 3 AM (total idiots!), but rather while
watching certain scenes, I kept wondering how I could possibly
express my excitement about the cinematography,
the special effects, and those little details where I just couldn't find the right words.

Well, my comment was just meant generally. Now I'll read other reviews to see if anyone else managed to find the right words to describe that same enthusiasm you felt for this film. 🙂

copperhawk19 said:Yeah, I watched both of them last night... and I was absolutely blown away by the movie. 🙂 🙂
If you set aside those flying scenes and the usual clichés, it’s a phenomenal film... pure Art of War... or basically China: Total War. 😂
I've always been a fan of those military thrillers focused on tactics and morale. It’s fun to bridge the gap between gaming culture and cinema.
Anyone who enjoys the Total War genre will be more than impressed by this one. 👍

That exists in
Dynasty Warriors. Check out some clips on YouTube. It shows what it's like when one person takes on a hundred enemies at once. 😁

Nicholas Walker3 said:This movie is pure cinema. There’s zero leniency here for plot holes or inconsistencies because that’s just not how this director works. In his world, stupidity simply isn't allowed. 😉

There certainly is. If we don't, we end up forcing unnecessary drama into everything. We could toss out horror, action, comedy, and sci-fi altogether, but that’s not the point. Even within those genres, there are much more grounded, realistic versions of horror, action, and comedy. It all comes down to knowing exactly what you're looking for when you sit down to watch.

Whenever I sit down to watch something like *Commando* or *True Lies*, I can't help but realize I'm not watching a gritty crime thriller like *Heat* or *Collateral*.

Here is the most vital takeaway: you simply need to get a feel for this reviewer's cinematic taste.

Please be mindful of what you are watching. If you are sitting down for an action blockbuster, you should focus on its specific strengths within that genre rather than comparing it to something entirely different.

Here is the most essential rule, without which none of this matters:make sure you are well-rested and relaxed while watching. Otherwise, don't be surprised if you find the movie you're viewing at 3:00 AM to be underwhelming :-)

wiredbison82 said:I was referring to the phrase "much more clearly defined." To be honest, I'm not entirely sure how they meant to use that specific word,

Perhaps the idea is that it feels more credible given today's landscape—YouTube, Facebook, all this modern tech. That specific wording still leaves me a bit puzzled.