Ethan Johnson said:Anyone here actually self-aware enough to have a sense of their own "Self"? I’d love to hear a few thoughts from you guys. Once you start digging into your "Self," this weird phenomenon happens where the "Self" starts observing "itself." We basically have to step into the shoes of the thinker—but can the thinker actually know who they are? It's kind of like asking if a knife can cut itself, right?
This whole thing actually popped up from that other thread about "being what you are." But here, I really want to figure out if we can even talk about our "Self" in any meaningful way. Are we just a collection of our thoughts—those random ideas floating through our heads? Probably not, since thoughts just drift in and out whenever they feel like it. So, are we our bodies? Nah, because our bodies are constantly shifting, cells are swapping out, and we're all just getting older. So... what the hell is the "Self" actually?
I just finished a book by DeMell regarding this "self" thing... I think... according to him, you could be a pencil instead of a person and still have a "self," but he didn't really define it. It seems like he doesn't have a clue either.
I've read Tolle too... "The Power of Now"... and he tries to explain the "self" through this state of being in the "now," where you stop overthinking, though that eventually turns into a kind of general numbness over time.
From what I gather, you have the option to either contemplate the "self" or simply *be* the "self," which can be useful, but you could also end up losing your mind depending on how you handle it.
Or, you can just stop thinking and simply observe the "self"... like a bystander... or a dog watching its own brain (per Tolle).
I'm not sure how to approach this. It's a massive shift, and you can easily lose your way and mess up your life either way.😁