Posts by Ethan Campbell81

Look, honey, you know better than anyone how many tears I’ve shed over you, but for heaven's sake, you still can't even whip up a decent pot of chili (or so my mother insists).

Fine, let's have it your way one more time. It means I'll be sleeping on the couch again tonight, but whatever. I earned it, I suppose.

And forgive me for airing our dirty laundry like this, but I have to admit, I drank myself into a stupor because for a split second, I actually thought you were seeing someone else. You know exactly how I get when I've had a few too many.

I am not here to complain about trivial matters like cardboard boxes. This is simply my way of making a public announcement: Morgan Peterson is finished with us. In my estimation, the guys in the van will be arriving this afternoon to settle things.

Furthermore, I would like to dedicate a song to you—the one we used to listen to while embracing at dawn, out in the meadow soaked in dew during the spring of 1985.
I still hold onto that little secret you tucked away for me...



I wish you luck, light of my eyes. Only now will you truly grasp how good we had it, and exactly what you have thrown away.

Mark Cruz15 said:What exactly are you trying to say? There has always been a direct link between anti-vaxxers and sheer ignorance. Those who aren't actually ignorant are simply looking to profit from book sales and clicks, or they are just attention seekers. I have followed them for two or three years now, and I can confirm that firsthand.
The modus operandi is simple: "they" are always to blame. There is a constant lack of understanding, or more likely, a blatant twisting of the facts to suit a personal agenda. Am I missing anything?

This isn't about anti-vaxxers. It’s about shoving every single dissenter into the same basket. It’s about blatant overgeneralization and this pathetic, black-and-white worldview—much like that drunk, washed-up loser hanging around the ExxonMobil stations.
So, if I don't happen to share your exact perspective, I am suddenly considered too ignorant to distinguish between fact and the nonsense peddled by crackpot websites and anti-vax portals?
Look, I share your sentiment regarding those genuine anti-vaxxers with messianic complexes. Do you honestly believe I spend my time wandering around buying books from New Age gurus or donating money to websites that promise to increase your height by four inches?

You have a black-and-white view of the world, which is a hallmark of a limited mind. I cannot change that, nor do I particularly care to. Continue riding the wave of your own ignorance if you must.

Joseph Allen71 said:Look, gold, when you start drawing conclusions based on insufficient data, you’re just guessing.

You’re doing the exact same thing. Honestly, you've clearly lost your grip on reality after consuming that amateur, low-grade swill. It looks like that junk fried whatever brain cells you had left. 😵

Joseph Allen71 said:In 99.999% of situations, you end up looking "brilliant," just like you do right now.

I am doing exactly what you are doing. I am simply meeting you on your own terms. You came here to lecture "anti-vaxxers," but instead, you only succeeded in embarrassing yourself.

Joseph Allen71 said:You haven't the slightest clue regarding my formal education or the actual scope of what I have mastered over the years. You possess no real insight, yet you claim to "know" simply because you conducted some superficial "research."

You lack substance yourself, yet that hasn't stopped you from coming here to patronize everyone without any basis. You have no idea who I am, what my profession is, or my level of education. It doesn't matter to you—not regarding me, nor anyone else contributing to this thread. Your only goal is to act "superior and brilliant," as if you need someone beneath you just to function in daily life.
Frankly, people like you are a necessity, let's be clear (I know you aren't looking for my sympathy, but just so we are clear)

Joseph Allen71 said:Once again, which part of my 2:30 AM post was factually incorrect?!

I already explained everything above. You made an assumption based on your own lack of knowledge, which only serves to make you look pathetic and ridiculous.

Joseph Allen71 said:Edith Citron, damn it, why should I bother arguing while responding to a world-class scientist? You know that in situations like this, I type more easily because I have to have at least one drink just to lower my cognitive abilities to his level. 🙂c

Stick to your lane, buddy, and go polish some golf clubs. I suspect your life only feels meaningful when you have a blood alcohol level high enough to numb your brain. Just don't get behind the wheel like that. ☕

Joseph Allen71 said:My sincere congratulations on stalking me and offering your "free interpretation" of my previous posts, not to mention that tragicomic attempt at a personal attack. None of that changes the fact that what I wrote remains accurate. 🙂
Tell me, honey, what exactly do you think is inaccurate about my last post?! 🙂

The reality is, you look ridiculous. You’re some washed-up gas station attendant at a Shell station trying to lecture someone on education. Let's be clear: I don't divide people into educated and uneducated—I divide them into humans and "non-humans"—but you were the one who started that. And yet, you can't even manage to hold down a job at a pump. How low is that?
Bottom line: sweep your own porch first, little mouse, before you try playing the intellectual. ☕

Joseph Allen71 said:Go check out some community college website, because unless you're just trolling, you clearly need an education more than you need food.

Hold on a second, "genius." Aren't you that failed gas station clerk who couldn't even handle pumping gas or stocking shelves without hitting an intellectual wall? You couldn't even hold onto that basic job.

And now you're lecturing someone else about education? 🤣

You are a complete joke. 🤣

driftingtinker said:At least I don't have to hide the fact that I got the shot, unlike you, "hero." 😁

Pure comedy. This is easily the most ridiculous post on this entire board. 🤣
Then people claim we are paranoid or obsessed with conspiracy theories. 🤣
As if I am some mindless sheep. I have taken four doses because I am just so incredibly progressive and enlightened. My shoulder is so loaded with shots that I might as well start taking them in the groin next. ☕

Let’s make a bet, driftingtinker. We meet for coffee. I will show you my medical records covering the last two years—vaccinations for polio, hepatitis, and so on, though certainly not for COVID. I will also present my COVID passes, which I keep printed, along with every single negative test result from the last 20 months. I travel frequently, so testing is a necessity regardless of vaccination status. If everything I say is true, you will leave this forum forever and never return.
If I am lying, I will pay you $1,000 in cash, fifty-dollar bills. I will publicly admit here that I am a liar and a fraud, and I will request that my profile be deleted so I never appear on this forum again.

Consider this a public challenge. I will cover the bill for dinner, drinks, or whatever else you desire. You can live large on my dime all night if you want. Let’s see how confident you actually are in your claims. You have an incredible opportunity to make easy money while proving that I am nothing more than a common fraud.

If you nonchalantly decline, you simply confirm my assertion: that you are talking nonsense without any basis in reality and that you are merely a spineless coward without a shred of conviction.

Looking forward to hearing from you. 🍿

Regards
Regards Hez

driftingtinker said:Just soft little snowflakes, always being hunted down while you're just trying to pick some wildflowers. 🙂

Look, you spineless coward, I wasn't addressing you because I don't engage with lower life forms.

Later.

bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

It is over for me too. I am living my life according to the "old normal" again without having been vaccinated (pure shock and disbelief 😲) and I have zero intention of complying, nor is anyone forcing anything on me with some COVID pass.

driftingtinker said:You’ve got that picture on "that" forum, showing that "respectable" little outburst that everyone greets with total awe and just assumes is pure perfection.
But you didn't realize that, did you?

The moment you actually manage to throw someone off their rhythm, that's when you see what a bunch of lowlifes and frauds they truly are.🤣

Casey Bennett said:I thought I made myself perfectly clear. What, do I need to draw you a picture? ☕

Fine. Why don't you just draw it out for me? Clearly, you lack the ability to express yourself directly with words—you can't even decide if you're going to be helpful or just useless (which is quite ironic, given your "modest" persona).

Casey Bennett said:I would honestly give you that exact answer, but I know you all grasp irony and sarcasm like a toddler grasps a loaded gun, so I won't bother. I have to consider Giod's mental health; it’s not as if any of us need to make things even worse for him. 🐔

Look, this is the problem. That attitude—you’re slowly exposing yourself, being insidious and subtle in how you insult us (and occasionally quite openly), so what exactly do you expect from us?
Drop the middle school schemes. Just say what you think plainly. You are on your own turf anyway; you should feel right at home.

Jessica Kelly4 said:You can see the threads are being moderated. When someone crosses the line into aggression, they get a warning. That’s how it should work here. But no, instead we get instant red cards and bans. God forbid you write something that doesn't fit perfectly inside Ego or Anderlon's heads—then the persecution starts. They could actually learn a thing or two from how Giod handles moderation.

So much of what was banned has turned out to be true that the entire moderation team involved in the COVID era should be blushing with shame. Some might even feel a bit of guilt, especially for blocking the spread of information regarding Ivermectin.

The issue isn't actually about the bans or the warnings. I'll be the first to admit it: I earned every single reward point and every single ban I've received on this damn Reddit. That part isn't up for debate. I have issues with self-control. If I can't control myself, then I'll just have to learn the hard way. I have no problem with that.

Jessica Kelly4 said:You can see the threads are being moderated. When someone crosses the line into aggression, they get a warning. That’s how it should work here. But no, instead we get instant red cards and bans. God forbid you write something that doesn't fit perfectly inside Ego or Anderlon's heads—then the persecution starts. They could actually learn a thing or two from how Giod handles moderation.

So much of what was banned has turned out to be true that the entire moderation team involved in the COVID era should be blushing with shame. Some might even feel a bit of guilt, especially for blocking the spread of information regarding Ivermectin.

The core issue here is the blatant double standard. We see this constant distinction between actual trolling and "trolling," between genuine insults and "insults"—it’s just one endless cycle. Ultimately, everything hinges on the identity of the author rather than the substance of their words. That is exactly what that PDF demonstrates. It's obvious.

driftingstag84 said:That's not true. Sure, IPs change every 24 hours, 😁😵
plus VPN, Tor, and whatever else... like what, for example? 🤦
Acting like a genius in every field, yet the money still flows.

Laz Quote🤣

She didn't realize that Morgan Peterson and driftingtinker are the ones running the show, so she overstepped. 🤣

Like silverpuma61 told you, they aren't on that Reddit because I banned them. So it's not very classy to act smart when you aren't even 100% right in this case.

If you read with any actual understanding, you'd realize immediately she isn't complaining about the moderation. That means you've truly asked yourself the right question. 🙏

She still doesn't get it. It has been several hours and five pages of this thread, yet she remains unable to detect the issue—or rather, what we commoners perceive as the problem (and I am still waiting 🕺).

driftingtinker said:Like this?

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...bbf53ca565.jpg

Yes. What is the issue here? I went too far in that post out of pure spite, and consequently, I received a warning from a moderator telling me to calm down and stop writing that way.

On the other hand, regarding the coronavirus threads, you have allowed an absolute frenzy of trolls and agitators. They provoke constantly, and when someone finally snaps back—because we aren't all emotionless robots—they get banned. Meanwhile, their own provocative posts often remain untouched, presumably in the hope that someone else like me will fall into the trap.
Extremely insidious, if you ask me.

Furthermore, when I overstep, I admit it. If you don't believe me, go ask Morgan Peterson; she can tell you exactly how I react to the points I've earned (hint: I don't complain about the penalties, I complain about the double standards).

Casey Bennett said:It doesn't affect anyone except the forum owner. While the moderation team is solid, nobody actually cares if a moderator goes by Anderlon, Mr. Pink, or Guesswho—it doesn't matter who they are or where they post.

Reddit is meant to be a space for users to communicate and debate, and in that regard, it functions perfectly well.
I suppose it's true that congregants don't get a say in electing their local clergy, nor does anyone bother asking them, so your parallel is actually spot on—mea culpa.🙂

Yes, but congregants have every right to express dissatisfaction and thereby force the removal of a local priest if they are unhappy with him, regardless of whether they voted for him.
Regarding ownership of this Reddit, nobody is disputing that. The issue is that you claim to be an objective platform for exchanging ideas, yet in practice, you fail to uphold that; certain opinions are treated as more "equal" than others.

Casey Bennett said:Do I seriously have to draw you a map to explain that you shouldn't care who the mod is? It doesn't affect you, and it certainly isn't your job. As a user, you just need to follow the rules of the Reddit community; anything else is none of your damn business.
Is that clear enough for you?

Now we're talking 🍿

By the way, let me answer you;
No, he does care, and yes, this affects all of us.
Why?
Just as believers create a church, forum users create the forum. The forum exists to serve us, not the other way around. I assume you understand that concept.

Casey Bennett said:I’ve been reading through what people are posting on this subreddit and within this specific thread. As for that COVID PDF, I couldn't care less about how much dirt is buried under those fingernails; I left a few comments over there only because I followed a link posted here on this forum.

Naturally, I had to poke fun at a user who’s been lurking here for years with an impressive post count, yet somehow acts like they're hearing the rules for the very first time regarding not commenting on moderation in these threads.
Then, of course, he goes ahead and critiques the mods, only to come storming back to this PDF post all hysterical and terrified because his comment was deleted. Give me a break.

To actually form an opinion about someone, you have to observe their behavior and listen to the stances held by that individual or group. So, tell me: what kind of impression would an outsider get of the author of this thread based solely on the title and the content of the very first post? Just that—there's no need to dig any deeper into the thread.

And no, what you quoted above wasn't some subtle mockery. On the contrary, I was being anything but subtle.

First, he did not comment on the moderation itself within that thread; rather, he made it perfectly clear that such a method of communicating with users is unprofessional, pathetic, and transparent.
I assume you have access to deleted posts, so verify this for yourself.
Second, as a moderator, you really should refrain from trolling and (obviously direct) disparaging users. You are supposed to set an example for others, are you not?
Or am I expecting too much from this forum?
You certainly have the right to your opinion, and I am not the one who can—or wants to—dispute it. Quite the opposite. However, I believe you should work on how you treat other users, especially those who have an enviable "tenure" here.

Morgan Peterson said:I must admit, I am somewhat perplexed—what kind of tyranny is being exerted by the moderation team and this new moderator over all of you?
From what I can gather, and based on my acquaintance with this group, if Peter were to be appointed as a moderator, you would undoubtedly find some reason to grumble.
It was explicitly stated that we require assistance; the PDF is massive and incredibly taxing to moderate while we navigate these current and acute phases of the pandemic, so it was only a matter of time before extra help was added to the moderation staff.
The fact that the new moderator remains entirely anonymous should not trouble you, as the rules applied to them are identical to those applied to us veterans.
Do not insult, do not comment on the moderation within the PDF, and rather than engaging with controversial posts, simply report them.
Simple as that.

For instance, I reported a post where one user is calling all of us mentally ill, yet the post is still sitting there.
Is that what you call objective moderation, Morgan Peterson?
Is it acceptable to label other users as mentally ill just because you disagree with their perspective?
Is it acceptable to compare us to the rebellious Mexicans from the 90s, then smugly point out how "we all know how that ended"?
I fail to understand—why do you truly view us as a lower class? Idiots, retards, uneducated fools—exactly what is it?

And suppose a few people complain about all this; it’s actually everyone who refuses to write according to the official narrative who complains. In that case, "objective moderation" is an abstract concept (fine, occasionally there are exceptions; I must admit you have surprised me pleasantly a few times by showing flashes of objectivity, but those are isolated incidents).

And this has been dragging on and on and on... how long, Morgan Peterson? Exactly how much longer?

Either start moderating properly—even if that means I am the first one to be banned—or simply rename the PDF to "Official Bulletin of the Expert Staff and the US Government" so people at least know where they have landed.

Casey Bennett said:Of course you can. He asked, and he received an answer. It’s simply the interrogative structure used to frame the question.
Honestly, you all seem to have much more severe issues when it comes to processing even the most basic, trivial information. What on earth is happening to you people? 🙂

Yes, he received a response from bluelynx52. It was a standard reply, and there is nothing controversial about that. This, however, is where the issue lies:

driftingtinker said:That is just classic Sprajc, 100% guaranteed.

According to your standards, this constitutes trolling and mockery. But hey, since it’s coming from a moderator, I won't complain.

I ovo:

Casey Bennett said:Unless the person behind the anonymous "Amy Rogers6" profile is actually a different real-life individual who just hijacked the account from someone who joined the forum yesterday—which would explain that quoted snippet—the alternative is that someone with a massive amount of forum seniority and history suddenly has absolutely no clue about basic forum rules or standard etiquette.

So, let me get this straight: in order to ask about a new moderator on the PZK, one must first post something off-topic on a more strictly moderated subforum, wait for that post to inevitably be deleted without any penalty, and then swoop in here fueled by pure hysteria, which is clearly evident from both the thread title and the opening posts you've left?

You little fish 🙂

Subtle mockery and condescension. It clearly demonstrates exactly what you think of us—those "anti-vax, ultra-right-wing, low-IQ Americans," or whatever label you're using to describe us these days.

And I find myself asking: where has all the objectivity gone on this Reddit?
You mock us. In another PDF, certain forum members label us as mentally ill or compare us to the rebels from the 90s who faced zero sanctions. Yet, you delete posts containing links to official FDA pages without providing any meaningful explanation.

The objectivity of the moderator? Please. Give me a break. 🥱

Casey Bennett said:So many words, yet so little sense or logic to be found. 🤷

That is why your argument failed completely. The applause from the cheering crowd is still ringing in my ears. 🤦