CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › nimbleharbor10 › Posts

Posts by nimbleharbor10

83 posts shown.

Look, this isn't some novel issue; it’s a cycle that repeats year after year, not just on Maui, but in a thousand little towns all across California. As long as church bells are allowed to wake up tourists in the early morning, they might as well go ahead and ban walking through the center of "town"—and I use quotes there because, let's be honest, Maui isn't really a city; it's more of a tiny village, a cute little spot filled with old stone buildings that perhaps functioned as a city back in the Middle Ages, but today it's nothing more than a tourist trap. Next, they'll probably try to ban drinking alcohol in public spaces, insisting everyone patronize "diverse establishments with an extensive selection" instead.

The whole concept strikes me as ridiculous. People don't travel to Maui looking for "museums" or "high culture." They come for the ocean and the relaxation. There is infinitely more culture to be found in the major European cities these travelers are coming from. Besides, if someone happens to strip down (or just stay in their swimwear) in a park or by a river in the middle of Chicago, nobody thinks twice about it, no one is shocked, and nobody feels threatened. It's summer; people swim and sunbathe, which is perfectly normal behavior. New York allows men and women to walk through the city center shirtless, yet compared to a metropolis like New York, Maui acts like a den of debauchery.
Not to mention how, in the center of almost every city in Europe, people stroll around in the summer wearing shorts, tank tops, and all sorts of non-traditional clothing without anyone batting an eye.

Bottom line: dear Maui, you aren't getting my money.
James Rogers53 said:You have no way of knowing what the margins look like at Walmart versus Metro. Metro is a massive operation pulling in $32 billion annually. Walmart is doing about $1.5 billion.

Can you see the difference in bargaining power there?

Besides, Walmart's profit margin isn't some 20% windfall—it's measured in fractions of a percent. You can easily verify that in the financial statements. You can also read that Ivica Todorić isn't raking in astronomical sums considering the size of the company he runs, and honestly, he’s probably hovering right on the edge of survival.

But looking at the rest of your post—your ideas about the government setting margins and your apparent lack of awareness that we already have quality control agencies—I'm not sure how much opening up the financial statements would actually help you.

That might be true if they are operating at a loss or intentionally shifting profits into some subsidiary, but the idea that coffee costing $19 at an Austrian Walmart could jump to over 150 at an American Walmart—or even higher at Kroger—suggests something is seriously wrong.

Once July 1st hits, what is actually stopping someone from loading up a van with coffee at $19 and driving it straight to Chicago to sell it for $22? Essentially, just how greedy or incompetent do these companies have to be to justify having such massive overhead in Chicago compared to Austin that they require a 200%+ markup?
Malware on the forum? in Forum Help! ·
AdBlock FTW