680 posts shown.
Brandon Lopez6 said:Why is this poll public? 🙂
I mean, I'm all for Facebook coming back, but we should really just stick to anonymous polls from here on out. 🙂
lonehawk172 said:Look, you've been on this forum far too long to play dumb. You know perfectly well that every sub-forum reserves the right to set its own specific moderation standards.
Sam Wright21 said:I fail to see what makes this specific post problematic, nor can I fathom who would issue a warning or why such an action would even be warranted here. 🤷
I wouldn't exactly call myself a right-winger, yet somehow I find myself caught in the crosshairs just the same. It seems to be a recurring theme in my life; I end up facing a ban at least once every month. Most recently, it was because I dared to voice an opinion regarding Politics.
What kind of Task are we even talking about here? Or perhaps, is it you all who are actually facing the Task?
It certainly isn't coming from slybison8 or Robert Hall7, is it?
I wanted to point out that you’re essentially thinking like a totalitarian if you believe a Prime Minister’s speech—or any great leader's address—is so sacred that it shouldn't be interrupted by boos.
And what’s the alternative here? Are you just bitter because someone had enough sense to leave America before things went south? It’s honestly staggering to me that slybison8 sees the reality of this situation more clearly than those of you attempting to shield Linić. ☕
slybison8 certainly has some sense, but as bluecyclist64 mentioned, it isn't about holding a grudge; it's all about fairness.
Well, of course they seem loathsome to you; they don't go stomping through threads looking for a fight, whereas you seem eager to criminalize mere words—that's simply your personal preference. On top of that, it's obvious you can't stand the fact that they have opinions and express them without sugarcoating, and you'd love nothing more than to see them punished for it.
You haven't the slightest clue what true condescension looks like, much like a dim-witted child; you certainly didn't provide a helpful example.
Paul Ruiz86 said:Look, I’m just gonna ask everyone here to maybe chill out for a second. Honestly? The vibe over the last few days has become totally exhausting and—well, just plain sad. That one female user who basically handed herself over on a silver platter, she really let things spiral way beyond what anyone expected.
placidorca16 said:Hey, don't go pinning that on me—you said it, not me. And if you're feeling the urge to have a good cry, be my guest; at least you aren't emotionally stunted like some of us.🥳
placidorca16 said:So?🙄 Oh, sure—apparently, asking the moderators to actually step in when people start slinging misogynistic labels around or claiming women have "inferior intellect"—you know, the usual garbage—is what they call being "aggressive."😁
Maria Reyes4 said:It’s honestly more depressing to watch people mock things—some out of pure ignorance, others just because they think being edgy is "cool"—when they clearly haven't the slightest clue what they're actually talking about. Or at least, they pretend they don't.
Feminism advocates for political, social, and economic equality between men and women—nothing more. It isn't some aggressive crusade, nor does it require a sense of humor to function—it’s simply about fundamental human rights. It's a decent idea, really; an idea rooted in basic humanity. If certain people can't distinguish between individual behavior and the core philosophy itself, that isn't a flaw in feminism—it's just a reflection of individual apathy and stupidity.
Look, feminism—just like any other movement or ideology—inevitably attracts aggressive idiots who end up doing more damage to the cause than they ever do good. It’s pathetic, really. Under the guise of feminism, certain people just vent their own personal frustrations through battles that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual movement. To call yourself a feminist while simultaneously trampling over men simply because of their gender is pure stupidity. Treating these creatures as relevant—or worse, equating them with the core idea itself, which is noble, non-aggressive, and genuinely good—is just plain foolish.
Maria Reyes4 said:It’s honestly more depressing to watch people mock things—some out of pure ignorance, others just because they think being edgy is "cool"—when they clearly haven't the slightest clue what they're actually talking about. Or at least, they pretend they don't.
Feminism advocates for political, social, and economic equality between men and women—nothing more. It isn't some aggressive crusade, nor does it require a sense of humor to function—it’s simply about fundamental human rights. It's a decent idea, really; an idea rooted in basic humanity. If certain people can't distinguish between individual behavior and the core philosophy itself, that isn't a flaw in feminism—it's just a reflection of individual apathy and stupidity.
Look, feminism—just like any other movement or ideology—inevitably attracts aggressive idiots who end up doing more damage to the cause than they ever do good. It’s pathetic, really. Under the guise of feminism, certain people just vent their own personal frustrations through battles that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual movement. To call yourself a feminist while simultaneously trampling over men simply because of their gender is pure stupidity. Treating these creatures as relevant—or worse, equating them with the core idea itself, which is noble, non-aggressive, and genuinely good—is just plain foolish.
Maria Reyes4 said:It’s honestly more depressing to watch people mock things—some out of pure ignorance, others just because they think being edgy is "cool"—when they clearly haven't the slightest clue what they're actually talking about. Or at least, they pretend they don't.
Feminism advocates for political, social, and economic equality between men and women—nothing more. It isn't some aggressive crusade, nor does it require a sense of humor to function—it’s simply about fundamental human rights. It's a decent idea, really; an idea rooted in basic humanity. If certain people can't distinguish between individual behavior and the core philosophy itself, that isn't a flaw in feminism—it's just a reflection of individual apathy and stupidity.
Look, feminism—just like any other movement or ideology—inevitably attracts aggressive idiots who end up doing more damage to the cause than they ever do good. It’s pathetic, really. Under the guise of feminism, certain people just vent their own personal frustrations through battles that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual movement. To call yourself a feminist while simultaneously trampling over men simply because of their gender is pure stupidity. Treating these creatures as relevant—or worse, equating them with the core idea itself, which is noble, non-aggressive, and genuinely good—is just plain foolish.