Posts by silverwolf88

I posted the link here http://www.alternativa-forum.com/ast...roskopu-4.html
From an astrological standpoint—and this is my take as an alternative astrologer—there’s a real possibility that nature and society are intertwined. For a society to actually function properly, both genders need equal rights and freedoms. It’s simple: social harmony between the sexes acts as a catalyst, allowing all other sectors of society—and even nature itself—to operate smoothly. Now, look, mainstream science won't acknowledge astrology's utility, but I still believe people benefit from hearing diverse perspectives. It helps them grasp the reality of their situation, making it easier to adapt to shifting circumstances. If we want to navigate through global crises, bypass deadly pandemics, and dodge other catastrophes, we need that adaptability.

A world of women in leggings and men in baggy

From an astrological standpoint, we’re looking at a guaranteed social and reactive biological crisis.
Basically—as long as men continue to hide their nature—there’s little chance that pandemics or other disasters will subside. But since astrology is dismissed as pseudoscience, nobody even attempts to correct this fundamental error in both nature and society. This means the global social and biological instability only intensifies—reaching a peak in early 2022, followed by an escalation in late 2022. If men keep hiding who they are, we can expect even more severe and dangerous pandemics and catastrophes. Ultimately, whether the universe ramps up viral intensity and disaster frequency depends entirely on men—specifically those ashamed of their gender—whereas women aren't responsible for this, as they don't hide who they are; instead, they openly express their femininity everywhere.

I’m about to shave my balls just so the wind doesn't blow viruses directly onto them 😁

William Grant20 said:The poll is anonymous, so there's no need to worry about privacy. Feel free to use the comments to break down their process or even drop some photos ☕

Based on the data from this poll so far, it looks like they’ve let their "Venus" go

Maybe it's because they want those stray hairs—which, let's face it, fall out way faster than anything else—to act as a sort of natural barrier against dirt?

Chloe Cooper10 said:Welcome to the club of the broke, Silver🙂

@
Hey, drunks.😍

🙂

William Grant20 said:..
Do you honestly think women at a swinger beach are staring at your junk, actually wanting it?

I can only speculate—but frankly, I have no clue which women actually want it since women aren't exactly known for being upfront with me. That's why I asked if the male anatomy is even a draw for them in this thread here:

William Grant20 said:Who cares about a relationship? The main thing is you got it ☕
Why do you think a woman is ever going to approach you? That’s exactly why you’ve been solo for 30 years—jer you're just jerking off. You always have to be the one to make the first move. Go up to those women who are staring at your junk on the beach and ask them if they've ever played with a python ☕

Back when I was young and naive, I actually cared about relationships. Now? Not so much. I’ve seen how many women look down on me just because I’m wearing tight leggings—it's ridiculous. So, I moved into the swinger scene instead; all I care about now is having a good time with women

There is a higher statistical probability that some virus will mutate into an even more dangerous pandemic in the next four months than there is of me being the first guy to walk up to a woman and beg for sex. I might consider a third or fourth option only if she approaches me first—but she needs to make it clear that I'm not being rejected, that I'm at least moderately attractive to her. Once I know there's mutual attraction, the plumbing starts working immediately. Look, I notice women and I turn heads their way, but if they act stuck-up, it means they aren't interested. Occasionally, a woman will give me a serious look, but that’s rare—and even then, they often change their minds after some other girl calls them out for being "bad," or some guy comes begging them for sex

I don't need to be the one initiating things. The more women mistreat the male minority, the larger this global crisis becomes—basically, the era of women is winding down. If I haven't had to chase them until now, I certainly don't see the point in starting now

William Grant20 said:So, how was touching her? Was she actually what you’re into, or just some random thing? Did you actually go all the way or just stick to hands?

Do you honestly think women at a swinger beach are staring at your junk, wishing they could get it?

We mostly just touched, made out, and rubbed up against the women I was hanging with—though I only had actual sex with the women I was officially seeing. I messed up once with this college student; we hooked up, then she just ghosted me. I was naive enough to want a relationship, but she just moved on to the next guy.

From what I’ve gathered through experience, most women today basically just want a guy who acts thirsty for them—someone who’s clearly turned on so he performs better. But for the most part, they don't seem to care about looks. It doesn't matter if a guy is handsome or ugly, what his equipment looks like, or if he's fat or skinny. Maybe the only physical trait they care about is being jacked, and since I'm thin, I'm failing there too. Even looking at couples here, I see way more women with beefy guys than thin ones.

Basically, based on how the majority of women act toward me, my dick is irrelevant—and my balls even less so. Sometimes I wonder if women are only with men because men are the ones constantly approaching them, paying for things, and catering to them. If men didn't initiate, maybe women would be perfectly happy on their own, since they rarely approach men first like they're desperate for it. But when some guy won't stop hitting on them, they eventually give in to someone. That's just the reality of the female dynamic—you worship the body, beg for sex, and then ask yourself why we're facing this massive social and biological crisis. I have no interest in begging for sex. If I'm not "good enough" for them—if being thin or having unattractive anatomy is a dealbreaker—then they shouldn't be with me. I've spent 22 years being single because, frankly, I haven't been good enough for any of them.

William Grant20 said:So you're claiming you're packing heat? How big are we talking when you're actually ready to go? ☕

It’s decent—long enough to get the job done—but obviously, there are bigger and thicker options out there.😁

William Grant20 said:Ever actually touched a woman down there?

Yeah, back when I was young and naive about twenty years ago—but clearly, if I had, none of them would have been sticking around for the last two decades.

The reality is, when I’m at a swinger club, I just watch—I don't go touching anything because I have zero interest in being the first guy to approach a woman just to beg for sex.

When a woman is checking me out at a bar or a party, waiting for me to make a move, she’ll usually have ten other guys swarm her first, and she’ll end up with one of them. I’m not jealous, though—if she actually found me attractive in my gear, she would’ve come to me first. I’d much rather be a loner than some desperate guy begging for sex from a woman who isn't even into me.

P.S.

It’s just basic math—you need a long enough space for a long object, and you need width to accommodate width. It’s simple physics, really.

William Grant20 said:What kind of anatomy are you into?

I prefer that high-fashion model look

a tight vulva, recessed clitoris, deep vaginal canal, and a wide uterus

Walter Baker2 said:They aren't even looking our way because we aren't young, hot, or ripped.

Why is this forum nothing but kids? Where are the older women—the ones who might not be models but actually know what they're doing in bed?
Honestly, I'd take an older, less attractive woman who can actually perform over some young, pretty girl who's useless in bed any day of the week.😁

electrichawk94 said:So, basically, Venus with teeth. ☕

Ugh, yeah, there is absolutely no way I'm going there.

electrichawk94 said:What kind of person even are you? ☕

Ugh, you really covered it all. 🤣

See? You actually managed to win an award 😁

William Grant20 said:It’s honestly embarrassing ☕ But hey, we finally have an answer regarding the sudden disappearance of women everywhere ☕

Why even be surprised? OnlyFans is what's trending now, not Reddit.😁

electrichawk94 said:I'm with you—Joe Biden and Conan are both pretty awkward to deal with. ☕

Look, the whole point is that the topic itself is uncomfortable. I've gotten used to it—so if you can't handle an awkward conversation, just don't show up for it.

electrichawk94 said:The absolute worst part is how infectious that lifestyle is. One look at a guy like that and suddenly you're caught up in the whole scene.☕

You’ve got your definitions all mixed up—we aren't talking about men's anatomy here, we're talking about women's; basically, swingers show off their gear to the ladies.

Anyway, from what I can tell, the ladies on this thread aren't exactly paying much attention to you guys.

electrichawk94 said:We'll have you back under an iron boot before you know it. ☕

The European Union won't let that happen.

electrichawk94 said:No nationalism, no hatred, no bigotry, no intolerance... honestly, just a totally bland and boring town. ☕

In Carmel-by-the-Sea, everything is all about love and personal freedom—but then you look at Miami, where it's basically a dictatorship because you aren't even allowed to be naked, yet somehow there's way more violence and assault. So, go ahead—decide for yourself which one is actually the primitive environment.