Posts by silverwolf88

William Grant20 said:Are you more concerned about being discreet, or just about getting laid? 😳

William Grant20 said:Silvio, do you actually scrub your junk daily to wash off the germs?

Rachel Palmer56 said:I honestly don't get this at all. Are you actually suggesting that men should just flash their junk at women first? 🤔

That’s just plain wrong—not how things work, and certainly not decent behavior. ☕

🙂

Walter Baker2 said:Bravo—you hit the nail on the head. Except they don't let anyone in, whether you're married or single; they basically put a padlock on the whole damn thing and only let the models and supermodels through. The rest of us? We're just left out in the cold.

silverwolf88 said:Take the image I uploaded to my Silvio Sponza (@SilvioSponza) | Twitter profile—it shows the correction to the VIS viva compared to the calculations using measurement data from comet Hale–Bopphttps://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...82052249997312 ,
using the measurement data sourced from this linkhttp://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00037.000.html
and the orbital elements from this linkhttps://theskylive.com/halebopp-info
I performed the mathematical derivation myself to arrive at this correction—specifically that the VIS viva should be divided by the other square root of two—whereas the example using the exact same data shows the VIS viva failing when compared to the observed data calculationshttps://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...74033121161218
(you can click the images to enlarge them)

To be clear: this isn't the full mathematical proof itself. This is just a presentation intended to pique the interest of physicists and mathematicians so they might actually bother looking at the derivations I’ve put together. So far, however, no one among the physics experts here in the US has found this presentation compelling enough to review my work

Anthony Nguyen81 said:Al Dent doesn't have a clue how to think straight—so there was zero chance he'd get it right 😁

Walter Baker2 said:I play it straight—no secrets here—but honestly, just let them be. Women can be pretty irrational sometimes.

Walter Baker2 said:The scent draws them in day and night—visuals aren't even part of the equation.

Brian Mitchell52 said:Hey Silvio,
I know you used to post on the Index forums. If you’re interested in keeping the conversation going over on the Assembly Discord—where most of the old Index crowd moved—here’s an invite link...
When you sign up, just make sure to use your recognizable Index username so we know who you are.
Discord link:

https://discord.gg/WRWEvQTZDV

Brian Howard2 said:I'm sure being ignored by you is driving them absolutely insane—it's a toxic cocktail of rejection and sheer lack of attention that could leave some pretty lasting scars

Rachel Palmer56 said:I guess I'll give that some thought then. ☕

And what do you want? For me to stick up for you? I *am* sticking up for you—but you wouldn't even give me the time of day. ☕

But since you're seeing things this way—fine, whatever. I'll defend you unconditionally. 😳

Brian Howard2 said:Man, you really made a mess of things there—😳 I guess some old, wise fox saw the writing on the wall and warned you to back off before everything went south.
If you had just kept singing everyone's praises like the rest of them, you’d still be posting, wouldn't you?🤔
And what was your logic anyway? Why praise some people and trash others? What's the criteria?

silverwolf88 said:A world where women wear leggings and men wear baggy clothes

astrologically speaking, this is a recipe for guaranteed social and reactive biological crises; essentially, as long as the male gender continues to hide itself, there is little astrological chance that pandemics or other disasters will cease—but when astrology is dismissed as pseudoscience, we lose even the ability to correct this fundamental error in nature and society. This means the global social and biological crisis intensifies significantly following the peak at the start of 2022, which triggered an escalation in global instability. If this trend continues through the end of 2022 and men continue to hide their identity, we face the possibility of even more severe and dangerous pandemics and catastrophes. Ultimately, whether the universe amplifies these viruses and disasters depends entirely on men—specifically those who are ashamed of their sex—whereas women hold no such responsibility because they aren't hiding; instead, they are mass-exposing their femininity everywhere.

A world of women in leggings or underwear

and men in baggy pants or loose shorts

is, from an astrological standpoint, a world facing a guaranteed global social and reactive biological crisis.