Posts by silverwolf88

William Grant20 said:Just more endless chatter—still zero explicit descriptions or photos. ☕

If you've been single as long as I have, why the hell are you so obsessed with anatomy? 😁

Rachel Palmer56 said:Silvio, do you actually know how to do a natal chart? If so, I need one done for me too.

I would appreciate it if you could do me a favor. 👍

Jeremy Johnson18 stripped my partial privileges—the ones originally granted by the first moderator on this forum. That same moderator ended up banning me anyway because I was trolling about tajice, and then she went ahead and handed out a partial ban on "usamljen srce." Since that moderator stepped down, the other mods have jumped on the bandwagon and started banning me over the tajice thing too.

Međtutim, not one single woman has helped me secure the right to have the experts at Astrofon actually vet my astrological theories—meanwhile, the staff at Astrofon is almost entirely female. It makes you wonder if there’s some underlying gender bias going on here, even though I guess a few guys have started trickling in lately. [links]
Looking for an astrologer? You can find them here.
Check out Astrofon at https://astrofon.com/
I can't believe I'm even addressing this—it’s like watching someone try to drive a car with no steering wheel. You see these discussions popping up everywhere lately, and frankly, they're exhausting. People are treating Astrofon like it's some kind of infallible oracle when, in reality, it's about as reliable as a weather forecast in a hurricane zone. Let's look at the facts—if you can call them that. We have people following these "insights" blindly, ignoring basic logic. It’s an absolute joke. You have individuals acting like they've discovered fire, but all they've really done is find a new way to be confidently wrong. It reminds me of those amateur stock pickers on Wall Street who lose their shirts because they thought a meme coin was a "sure thing"—pure delusion. And don't get me started on the community reaction. Every time someone tries to bring actual scrutiny to the table, the crowd swarms. They protect these ideas with a ferocity that borders on the irrational. It’s not "belief"—it’s a refusal to face reality. If you want to base your life decisions on something this flimsy, go ahead, but don't act surprised when the whole house of cards collapses. We need more skepticism and less blind worship. That’s my two cents.
Astrology—is it actually a legitimate tool for self-discovery, or just another way to sell people a sense of destiny? I see it everywhere lately, especially online, where folks act like their birth chart is some kind of cosmic GPS. Look, I’m all for introspection. We all need to make sense of our lives. But there’s a massive difference between using archetypes as a psychological framework and treating the movement of distant planets like they’re personally dictating your career moves or who you should date. It’s one thing to say, "Maybe my impulsive nature comes from this placement," and another entirely to believe that Mercury being in retrograde is the reason your Wi-Fi cut out during an important Zoom call. That last part is just convenient scapegoating. The problem isn't the concept itself—it's the commercialization of it. You have entire industries built around telling people exactly what they want to hear just to get them to click a link or buy a subscription. It turns deep human curiosity into a commodity. Is there value in looking at the stars? Sure, if you view it as a metaphor. But if you start making life decisions based on a horoscope, you aren't navigating your own life anymore—you're letting a set of ancient symbols drive the car while you sit in the passenger seat. Real agency comes from understanding your own patterns, not waiting for a celestial alignment to give you permission to act.

Why does the masses of women just turn a blind eye to the discrimination against men? Why aren't they stepping up to help stop the professional and social marginalization of men in this country?

So, let me get this straight—is someone actually expecting me to provide free horoscope readings for women while I’m stuck scraping by on minimum wage? It’s ridiculous. Because I’m a man, I’m being blocked from working on Astrofon platforms, yet these women are out there charging full price for their astrological services on those exact same sites. It's a total double standard.

How is it even possible that Astrofon people are out here chasing astrology degrees? Science doesn't recognize astrology credentials—period. The scientific community classifies astrology as pure pseudoscience, plain and simple. Does this mean the folks running Astrofon are essentially picking a fight with actual scientists?

Why haven't scientists moved to invalidate those pseudo-scientific degrees? If astrology is clearly nothing more than pseudoscience, why let those credentials stand?

Walter Baker2 said:Well, she played you—if she isn't interested in sex, why stay? I’d walk away by the fifth date.

Look, whether a woman is terrified of getting pregnant, worried about health issues, or maybe she just doesn't want her kid looking like that guy because she's holding out for someone who actually fits her type—whatever the reason,

it's her right.

It's better to call it quits now than to stay and end up feeling cheated, which just leads to resentment later. Honestly, we wouldn't see nearly as many failed marriages if guys wore leggings and bailed the moment a woman wasn't interested—especially since they could just move on to the next one. Out of a hundred women, maybe one is "the one," and then the relationship actually works. That's just the law of large numbers; finding the right person right out of the gate is rare. And given this era where women are all in leggings and men aren't, finding a real match feels almost impossible. For a guy, it’s probably best to just cycle through different women and enjoy the variety while he can. Since women aren't approaching men first—mostly because they aren't interested in guys wearing leggings—it shows they don't have a deep need for men, just an occasional one when it suits them. But once a woman *does* decide she needs someone, there’s a slim chance any guy will reject her, especially since guys like that are incredibly rare in this fashion cycle where it's basically just women in leggings.

So, I'm definitely on your side: keep moving from woman to woman until you find the right one (once you start wearing leggings 😁).

As for me? If a woman writes me off, she's dead to me. On to the next.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:Hang in there, Silvio. 🎉
When works best for a call? 🍿

I’m hoping to wrap this paper up and get it sent off in about a week—I'd rather just get it out the door and over to the peer reviewers without any more stalling. So, yeah, roughly a week.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:Silvio, my friend—when exactly are you going to get around to looking at my birth chart? 🍿

I can barely even log into this damn forum. I'm starting to think Garofeeder is intentionally messing with my access—the guy has been obsessed with targeting me for over a year now. He’s spent way too much time treating me like garbage, and frankly, if my review goes through, I’m taking this straight to my lawyer. I'll be demanding a public apology in the news for every single lie he’s spread about me on here—all that nonsense claiming I don't understand math despite my credentials—and for the way he's consistently treated me.
I'm just wrapping up some work right now, so I won't have much time to chat. Can you hit me up on Google Hangouts instead?
How about we jump on Google Hangouts so I can walk you through your astro chart verbally? It’s way easier than trying to type out this massive amount of info.

I'm putting the finishing touches (really almost done now) on a paper where I mathematically prove that Gottfried Leibniz was actually right about E = m * ( v ^ 2 )
which—following the derivation from Daniel Bernoulli suggesting E = m * ( v ^ 2 ) / 2
sparked a massive controversy that dragged on for nearly a century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_viva ,
but through my own differential mathematical derivation, I’m restoring what was considered established truth prior to 1741
If this review passes, I hope that as an American citizen, I've made a significant contribution to the United States by finally resolving this kinetic energy dilemma that's been hanging over us for two and a half centuries

I can't even list everyone who helped me since I reached out to so many people, but
I want to thank everyone who supported me; because of you, I've earned the chance to have my work formally reviewed and peer-reviewed

William Grant20 said:Can I just watch while you shove those fake dollars down your leggings? ☕

So, do you tip them on OnlyFans?

Harold Adams19 said:I tried wearing them once and nearly snapped my leg—so yeah, skip the heels 🕺

It’s fine—I just end up spinning in circles at every red light while waiting to cross the street 🎉

Athletes don't wear heels, they wear leggings 👍

William Grant20 said:Tell Maria Wright62 to get a grip and stop wearing that garbage. ☕ I’d much rather deal with someone being naked than someone prancing around you like a damn ballerina. ☕

Why don't you guys in Miami just organize some public nudity events like they do in more developed parts of the world? You could actually try requesting permits from the local authorities or the police for a specific location and time for a group public nude performance.

Is it actually worth it? You’ve got a city that's pushing half a million people, yet you're keeping it so isolated and backward from the rest of the developed world. Then, you have the nerve to try and drive tourists away from Miami—people coming from actual developed nations—just because they aren't dressed for a fashion show.

Take a look at Seattle—it’s a prime example of a highly developed American city that actually respects nudism. [link] The whole concept of "appearance fees" in the entertainment industry is getting out of hand—it’s becoming a total farce. I was reading about this recent situation where celebrities are demanding massive payouts just to show their faces at an event, regardless of whether they actually perform or contribute anything meaningful. It’s pure greed, plain and simple. Think about it: you have these big-name stars showing up to a gala or a club opening, standing there for twenty minutes, taking a few selfies, and then vanishing. Meanwhile, the organizers are left holding a massive bill that could have funded an entire charity drive or a local community project. It’s like paying a premium for a luxury car just to have someone sit in the driver's seat while you do all the driving—what exactly are you paying for? We used to value talent and actual engagement. Now, it feels like we're just paying for a brand name or a social media post. If you aren't bringing any substance to the table, why should the check be so large? It’s turning the business into a hollow shell of itself, driven by ego rather than artistry. Honestly, if I wanted to see a celebrity stand in a room, I'd go to a mall in Los Angeles; I wouldn't pay six figures for the privilege.



Is there some kind of dictatorship going on in Miami? It’s ridiculous—they’re banning things that are perfectly legal in Seattle and most other developed nations.

Do you honestly believe a country stuck with such a narrow, primitive mindset can ever claw its way out of this crisis? It’s no coincidence that California is facing such a massive meltdown—it's a direct result of the exact same mentality running the show there.

I can walk into any shop wearing my running shorts without a second thought—except for that one Tommy Hilfiger in Miami. Apparently, there's a rule against it there.
Honestly, things are going to get even more disastrous down in California if that blatant female dictatorship doesn't pack up and leave.

William Grant20 said:What kind of leggings don't provide any compression? They slide right into the anatomy—how is that even possible? ☕

A lot of women pull on tight leggings or size down just to show off the fact that they aren't packing hardware—though I honestly wonder if that's worth it when you're basically inviting dust and particles to get caught in the fabric right against the vulva.

You don't need to buy a smaller size.

rowdytiger13 said:I’m stepping up to show my support for the marginalized minority—specifically silverwolf88’s fight for visibility—and to shine a light on the systemic issues they're facing. 👍

Thanks. Hopefully, after four months of this, you'll finally have the chance to step up as one of the lead moderators once we expose the corrupt moderation team.

Look, I’m not some academic astrologer with a PhD—I’m more of an alternative practitioner. My astrological forecast? Pandemics will essentially neutralize themselves once we see a massive surge of men wearing leggings. We’ve had a huge demographic of women in leggings for about 35 years now; if we don't hit a critical mass of men in them, there’s a legitimate astrological possibility the virus could mutate as early as the start of 2022. Honestly, it's better if I don't even dwell on what the future holds without men in leggings. That said, I’m an optimist. I believe in collective human intelligence and that this global crisis can be navigated positively without spiraling into major catastrophes. I actually posted on another forum regarding how global intelligence can bypass dangerous pandemics and other disasters by respecting sexual emancipation for all genders here is the link
http://www.alternativa-forum.com/ast...roskopu-4.html
But again, that’s just my take as an alternative astrologer. Mainstream science refuses to acknowledge
that astrology actually works

He’s full of energy and stays looking youthful because guys in athletic gear carry themselves like athletes—and let’s be honest, athletes generally have solid health profiles (which means wearing leggings acts as a bit of a shield against germs 😁). Anyway, from what I’ve seen, moderate athletes wearing athletic wear are usually in pretty great shape

William Grant20 said:I don't have any. I hate feeling constricted like that. I can barely stand wearing leggings—honestly, I’d rather just be naked all day.☕

Leggings are just as tight as underwear, so what's the difference? Are you just wearing baggy pants with nothing underneath so everything hangs loose?

Being naked is great for circulation—I agree with that. I usually head to a clothing-optional beach. Actually, in Carmel-by-the-Sea, it's hard to find a free nude beach, so I end up going to the popular local swinger beach instead. People say that specific spot is why Carmel-by-the-Sea gets such a massive influx of seasonal tourists in the US; even when other beaches are deserted, Love Beach is packed.

Lately, a lot of women (anywhere from 25 to 65) have been approaching me because they realized I'm not gay. Times are changing—prejudices about guys wearing leggings are finally shifting.

Supposedly, there's a gay beach right behind the swinger beach, but I don't go there.

I respect gay and lesbian rights—whatever works for people, that's democracy. As long as nobody is forcing anything on anyone else, we're good.

William Grant20 said:Men wearing tights is pretty gay. ☕

Who on earth convinced you that dressing in an empowering, sexually liberated way somehow dictates someone's sexual orientation? It’s a ridiculous leap in logic—completely nonsensical.

Look, I respect gay rights—period. But it’s just as much my right to not be gay. I wear leggings because I enjoy the attention from women, and frankly, I enjoy checking them out too. You really think that isn't just basic biological instinct?
A friend of mine mentioned that everyone—men and women alike—is basically walking around in leggings these days.
I'm heading out to a clothing-optional beach where everyone—men and women alike—is completely naked.

Why are you so incredibly blinded by stereotypes?

Harold Adams19 said:You actually got banned for wearing leggings? For three whole months? Good grief.

Basically, just ignore these nitwits who have a problem with leggings and astrology!!

We’re here to talk about different styles of leggings and what’s coming up in the Tarot and horoscope readings.🎉

If you're looking to get banned, try posting something about men in leggings over on the "unknown: what is it?" thread.

My post there was nuked almost instantly, and I was slapped with a three-month ban right away—but since I already knew from previous experience that this forum would ban me for "trolling" regarding leggings, I made sure to screenshot my post immediately. It serves as proof that certain influential people (not everyone, mind you) on this forum engage in discrimination against male gender minorities, and here it is:https://ibb.co/xzpqMxP

Chloe Cooper10 said:Of course they're socks. 🙂

What orders, Ruby? I have no idea what you're talking about—honestly, I don't even understand myself.☕

@Silvio, don't let them push you around—the Council has your back, and Conti is just out to test your resolve. 😳

I really hope this country actually follows the rule of law. They’re trying to intimidate me by bringing up cafe owners who have "connections"—it's ridiculous. I'm in a position where I need to wrap up my work quickly so I can submit it for review to multiple different outlets. That way, even if these people have influence over a few specific scientists, they won't be able to control the entire scientific community.
I don't know what this Council is supposed to be, but it reminds me of the journalistic mindset at BuzzFeed, where they gave me just as much trouble over certain facts. The truth is, there's something seriously wrong with this Council; they discriminate, violate human rights, and won't even recognize creative work as actual professional labor—they'd rather try to pass it off as some kind of disability claim. , so now I'm just waiting to hear back from the IRS on how a freelance artist is supposed to handle taxes on song sales through online platforms.

Chloe Cooper10 said:Because he’s a scientist. You just don't get it. Regular folks like us can't even get banned for being insulting—we don't even know how to do it right. ☕

Look, I won't claim the title of "scientist" until I've passed a peer review by actual experts in math and physics. But here's the thing—international scientists who actually care about my work don't buy into the nonsense coming from people in America who pretend to be experts while they're really just running coffee shops. The EU and other developed nations aren't blind to how corrupt things can get in America, and posts like

raise serious questions about whether we're looking at an abuse of power.

William Grant20 said:Your review won't fly—local cafe owners in Santa Barbara have already reviewed your mathematical derivations and notified us that everything is incorrect. ☕

Look, only three or four cafes in Santa Barbara have banned me from their premises—but it's great that you've written this post, implying that cafe owners somehow hold sway over the validity of mathematical proofs. Honestly, this idea of business owners meddling with math and astronomy is getting ridiculous—that’s what lawyers are for. If there's actual corruption involved, then let the lawyers handle it and launch an investigation.

William Grant20 said:We don't want you hanging around this forum anymore—not with all the constant lying about being an astrologer when you haven't even met the basic qualifications to work at NASA. To make matters worse, we actually double-checked your math—it's completely wrong. ☕

I wasn't lying—I present myself as an alternative astrologer who developed my own situational astrological theory to correct classical astrology, which mainstream scientists dismiss as mere pseudoscience. Look, let's be real—the academic establishment doesn't recognize astrology degrees as legitimate science, and frankly, those theories aren't backed by a single shred of scientific evidence.
Maybe we should just go straight to the scientists and ask them why the media keeps trying to censor me over an astrology degree—especially since "official" science doesn't recognize astrology, let alone any degrees associated with it. Is it that the American media is suddenly at war with actual science?

Look, you can't possibly determine the accuracy percentage of my astrological theory without putting it to the test in a real-world setting. It’s basic logic—you haven't verified the data through practical application. So, why is there such a blatant refusal to actually test my theory? Here’s my proposal: put my theory into practice. If I fail to pass your little "exam," then go ahead—permanently ban me from this forum. Simple as that.
That being said—it turns out some people actually found my astrology theory interesting [link]


Look, let's get one thing straight—I don't follow traditional astrology. That’s exactly why I market myself as an alternative astrologer. Astrology itself is considered an alternative practice, which makes me a practitioner of the "alternative to the alternative"—an concept that, frankly, might be a bit too much high-level math for some of you to wrap your heads around. If my situational astrological theories prove accurate in practice, it shouldn't be such a monumental task for other astrologers to actually learn from them. I’ve put in the work to develop these corrections specifically because mainstream scientists refuse to validate the expertise of anyone holding an astrology degree. So, here is my question: if the scientific community doesn't recognize classical astrology anyway, why does the media suddenly have such a problem with people trying to refine it? Why are you all acting like you're defying science when the scientists themselves don't even buy into it?

So, why exactly are you refusing to statistically validate the accuracy rate of my situational astrological theory? Seriously—what’s the hold-up? And while we're at it, why is intellectual property treated like a joke here in America? It's frustrating, frankly—original work barely gets any respect around here.

Regarding my research paper on mathematical corrections for kinetic energy—I’m currently wrapping that up. Once it hits the peer review stage, I'll let you guys know if it actually makes the cut or gets rejected.

Even if one of you journalists holds a degree in math or physics, I haven't actually presented my derivations to you—nor have I published them publicly anywhere—so you're in no position to judge something you haven't seen or verified. What I posted on this forum was merely a minimal presentation comparing different calculation methods; it was intended as a way to pique the interest of actual scientists so they might finally take a look at my mathematical proofs. To be clear, I wasn't posting my full derivations here—I was providing comparative numerical presentations of various mathematical expressions. There is a massive difference between presenting a mathematical expression and actually writing out a derivation with an explanation of how you arrived at that expression.

If my review doesn't clear the hurdle—then I guess we’re playing by your rules—I won't be allowed to post on this forum anymore. Period.

Look, if my mathematical proofs actually pass peer review, are you guys going to issue a public apology?

If my review actually clears peer review—which probably won't happen in some third-rate academic wasteland like this—then I’m going straight to Garofeeders. I’ll be demanding a public apology in the media for every single way they mistreated me.