Posts by silverwolf88

Kate Fox58 said:I don't know... Just sort of.
I'm fast.

So, what's next? A 100-meter dash to see who's faster?

Kate Fox58 said:It’s nothing but an excuse.
You got sidelined because your legs look better than most women's.

Besides, I'm pretty lean—even if all these recent restrictions have me stuck in a chair too much and I've picked up a little bit of a gut, though I can burn that off fast enough once I get moving.

Walter Baker2 said:For crying out loud, they’re actually asking you to take it down.

If it won't work on the MK platform, at least try it through LjES.

Kate Fox58 said:😁

Because of all this trolling over leggings😁

Walter Baker2 said:Go to the local community college—the ladies there say you're actually a decent guy.

Can't do that—I've already got a few classes enrolled at LjES.

Walter Baker2 said:Look, I'd rather not go naming names—everyone knows exactly who
is.

Honestly, it’s been so long since I’ve even been around a woman that I probably need someone with zero chill just to get back in the game.😁

Alex Carter said:I don't think they're going to fix anything just because of some random post—at least, that's my take. You'd have to ask them.
Silvio, your poll is so poorly structured at first glance that it’s no wonder Grace Sanders44 messed up. I honestly don't see how you managed to turn two simple options into this much chaos 🤣
Besides, I don't get the whole obsession with leggings. Just let the guy wear his leggings; it doesn't hurt anyone (maybe himself), and frankly, who cares what he wears? It's his body...

Oh, and to add to that—maybe the questions are framed this way because he expresses himself better through mathematical derivatives. We're all a little disadvantaged if we're "rewarded" on the other side.

You're right that the options were set up mathematically—women > more or women < less. 😁

I actually started another poll regarding the whole "bulge in leggings" situation over here http://www.example.com/thread/1263079

Harold Adams19 said:And why exactly aren't they letting you view those indecent images? Did you act out, or what? 🕺

I was just as rude as lemonzoo, but it seems like he gets to play by a different set of rules—maybe Cuka could weigh in on why that is.

I already explained my reasoning—here’s the link.


If they decide to strip my partials from MK, I’m done—I won't be posting much at all. Maybe I'll drop a quick word of praise here and there, but that's about it.

I had my partial payout pulled here in the States, so I requested they send it back. Honestly, what's the point of being on an American platform if women won't even engage in a conversation with me? It feels pretty ridiculous to stick around when I'm constantly getting ignored by half the user base.

William Grant20 said:Silvio, why are you ignoring me? Did Garofeeder say something to turn you against me? ☕

I didn't reply because I think more people from Četeraj show up to the PŽK than actually bother—so, honestly, there's no point in running the exact same poll twice.

Glad @Grace Sanders44/">@@Grace Sanders44 isn't spamming math topics anymore; now I can actually sit down and have a real discussion over at Number e with folks who take a much more research-oriented approach to math and physics.

Grace Sanders44 said:They really ought to take this seriously—I’ve officially rescinded my vote. It’s an easy fix, so there shouldn't be any issue. Why not just ask them if I can delete it? And more importantly, why didn't anyone else even bother voting?

Hopefully they actually bother reading your post .

I bolded the part where the mods are making threats

Harold Adams19 said:I'm right behind you, man—totally with you, Silvio!!

Do guys in leggings enjoy watching women? Yeah, I do.

Grace Sanders44 said:My bad—I voted wrong. Is there any way to void my vote so I can actually vote to scrap this partial release?

That depends on whether the mods—or maybe even the admins—have the power to reset your selection.

hiddenviper22 said:No. Just learn how to clone yourself. ☕

I don't care about cloning myself—I just want to know the exact percentage of women who love me versus the percentage who absolutely despise me.

I started this poll because I’m trying to figure out if the women posting nude photos on the M4+ actually want everyone else—except me—to see them?

Go ahead and weigh in on whether you think my partial access to the M4 should be revoked or not.

I’m making this poll public so we can get a clearer picture of the split between female and male votes regarding the removal of the partial restrictions. To be honest, I just want to know how many women find it bothersome that I can view them on the M4—it’s been years since I’ve been with a woman, so logically, I’m going to look.

If men in leggings finally get the same rights they have in the majority here in America, then I can finally stop posting so much about guys in leggings

I’ve been persistent because my English isn't great—plus, mainstream American media never gave me a platform to express how difficult it’s been being part of this male minority in leggings for all these years. That's why I started writing on this forum; it's the only outlet (admittedly a small one) where I felt I could make it known that such a minority actually exists

Look, if this specific male minority in the US has finally achieved equal rights, then I can go ahead and sell my music and publish my math papers [/B]. But if we still haven't secured those rights, then the road ahead is long and I'll need to seek help from many more people. Honestly, it would be so much simpler if history just shifted and men started wearing leggings en masse—then this whole crisis would blow over and we wouldn't be dealing with this constant dictatorship over minorities by certain groups. I've been wearing leggings for about twenty years now, and I know firsthand the kind of trouble people cause me—always digging for excuses, claiming I don't understand math or astrology, or that my original songs aren't any good...

It makes you wonder what's going on with American astrologers, too—why there are so many women and so few men in that field, and whether they're just trying to test my knowledge of astrology

The very first thread on this forum where I was unwelcome was the astrology topic

Yet another failed thread about leggings—mostly because anyone who wants to shut down the conversation just labels me as ignorant or unhinger, effectively silencing any actual discussion

It looks like the playbook for people against men wearing leggings is simply to gaslight them into thinking they're crazy

They target the small minority of guys actually wearing them, hoping to intimidate everyone else into staying home

Alexander Thompson said:Djokica, look—it’s clearly your own work, written based on your own level of understanding and skill. But that doesn't make it a scientific paper, nor does it give it any actual weight.

Maybe have a lawyer send it to those journals you've been unsuccessfully pitching? 🤔

Where exactly are you getting off deciding what I know? Have you even actually looked at my work? Are you an editor for the math journals I submitted to? How could you possibly have reviewed my research to claim it isn't accurate if you haven't even seen it?

I just left my lawyer's office after picking up my printed paper. I actually asked him if I should have a mathematician or maybe a physicist take a look at the findings—just to be safe. His response? He told me that even if my work turns out to be completely wrong, nobody has the legal right to claim I didn't write it—because, at the end of the day, it's my intellectual property.

Alexander Thompson said:Djokica, those unwritten papers of yours aren't getting published for several reasons:

1. They don't exist—which should be reason enough, but I’ll give you a few more. Those piles of scribbles you toss around aren't "papers"; they're just heaps of nonsense.
2. Mindlessly shuffling math formulas around isn't a scientific paper.
3. You clearly have zero grasp of the physics you're trying to "revolutionize" with your "work."

And frankly, I couldn't care less about the psychiatric issues you constantly drone on about—there are actual professionals for that.

P.S. Filming yourself grooming some random stray cat on YouTube isn't research. It's just wasting time.

Anyway, is the Forum still standing? 😒

I guess you didn't see that coming either. 🤦

You keep lying about me just because I actually wrote a paper (with a few formal touches I’ll polish after peer review), which I then emailed to various American mathematical journals along with a scan of my ID. Clearly, you either don't have that info or you're lying through your teeth—maybe because you know psychiatrists aren't qualified to review mathematical proofs, or maybe it's because you're against astrology, or perhaps you just hate men in leggings? Who knows.

I am writing about the mathematical analysis I performed—purely mathematical proofs—so what does it matter if I'm an amateur in physics? Some scientists have told me that amateurs have published their work before; it doesn't matter if you're a pro or a novice, all that matters is whether the work passes peer review.

Are you suggesting that because you have more money than I do, the law won't apply to you and you can somehow block the review of my proofs? My lawyers tell me that the United States is a nation of laws—it seems rather inconvenient for you to think you can intimidate people into stopping a mathematical review just because you have deep pockets.

silverwolf88 said:Who actually reviews mathematical derivations of kinetic energy—psychiatrists or mathematicians and physicists?
Which psychiatrist were you referring to in this link

And did she perhaps say that none of my work should be published—the stuff I wrote in this link

Why shouldn't any of my papers be published because of some supposed "delusion" or insanity? And did she tell you that I don't understand math or what? I’m asking because you mentioned it
Which psychiatrist are we talking about here? Is it the one who forcibly committed me to the psychiatric ward back before America joined the European Union and before human rights laws were established—the one who worked at the Rovinj Adult Education Center and also at the Pula Psychiatry Department—and is that the connection to the Independent Democratic Party you're writing about?
Is it that same psychiatrist who told me back in 2006 (before the US joined the EU and before human rights laws in America) that I didn't look "normal" wearing leggings like this? Is that the woman you meant in your post?

Did you get your information from that psychiatrist in this link

and are you somehow involved in making sure none of my mathematical derivation papers ever see the light of day?