Posts by silverwolf88

hiddenmarlin14 said:this poll is garbage😳

The question should have been: who's packing bigger, better gear? 😳

What does anyone actually care about—size or how they hang?

As far as I’m concerned, I’ve got nothing to hide, but it seems like this guy is keeping things strictly under wraps. Honestly, you'd have a hard time even catching a glimpse because he seems to have some delusional idea that showing off is somehow "unmanly" 😁—as if there’s any connection between anatomy and being soft 😁. Check the thread here:

Maybe just ask him to strip down at the shooting range using his MK18+? 😁 I’d be happy to drop my pants right then and there, but I can't—I'm still dealing with a partial recovery from surgery.

Linda King said:I'm with silverwolf88 on this one. From what I can tell, Alexander Thompson is just a small-minded bureaucrat—exactly the kind of person who stifles science and innovation here in America.
Sand, if you were over here in the States, people would be carrying you on their shoulders for those celestial mass calculations—especially with all the hype surrounding Oumuamua lately 🙂.
And nobody would give a damn whether you ran your formulas through LaTeX or scribbled them on a napkin. ☕

Thanks. I'll check online to see if there's an American Physical Journal worth submitting this paper to for peer review.

Linda King said:Where was this debate happening? Can someone drop a link?

The arguments kicked off over at Alternative and then bled into Various—but look, he and his crew are obsessed with debunking astrology. That’s why those threads get so heated; people start throwing out psychiatric diagnoses, disability claims, expert witness testimonies, and just general insults regarding Kerov or that loser Djokica. Here's the link:

It's pretty funny to watch—the moderators either back him up or they can't bring themselves to ban him due to some directive, yet I’ve been banned countless times for trolling about leggings. You can ban a former US President on social media without blinking, so clearly, either there's something broken with this forum or something is fundamentally wrong in America.

hiddenmarlin14 said:this poll sucks😳

The question should've been about who's packing the bigger, better stones😳

How can you even ask when he's too busy being a total pansy instead of focusing on sneakers?

his posts link

😁 😁 😁

William Grant20 said:That's your problem. You're the scientist here—he's just the court jester. 😳

I'm hardly a scientist if my work hasn't even been reviewed yet. A paper can't exactly pass peer review if nobody has even looked at it.

Besides, even before I finished writing, Alexander Thompson gave me his "word" that my research wouldn't end up published in any journal


What kind of authority does this person think they have to make guarantees like that without ever seeing the manuscript? Isn't that a blatant conflict of interest?

If you’ve been following the posts from Alexander Thompson and silverwolf88, whose side are you actually taking?

If you’ve been following the posts by Garfield and silverwolf88, what kind of diet are you even on?

Moderators, please delete this thread—I couldn't get the poll to work properly, so I need to restart the whole thing.

silverwolf88 said:I sent my paper on mathematical derivatives to some American math journals—now I finally have nothing to do but dive into astrology.

P. S:

We're just sitting here waiting for the peer reviewers to decide whether Gottfried Leibniz or Daniel Bernoulli actually had it right.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:Silvio, buddy, when are you actually going to sit down and look at my birth chart? 🍿

I finally finished submitting my mathematical proofs to some American academic journals—so now, I actually have some breathing room for astrology.

Kimberly Jackson51 said:The way the question is phrased above is flawed. I haven't conducted a scientific study to determine if most women actually like testicles or not—I can only speak for myself. If you want any actual insight, the question needs to be framed personally for women.☕

The reason it’s an anonymous poll is that if it were public, I doubt many women would be honest—but since it's anonymous, there's no way to tell who's voting "male" versus "female." It makes pulling any meaningful statistics nearly impossible—not to mention we've barely received any responses so far.

silverwolf88 said:Take a look at this image I uploaded to my Silvio Sponza (@SilvioSponza) | Twitter profile—it shows the correction to the VIS viva compared to calculations using measurement data from comet Hale–Bopp https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...82052249997312 ,
I pulled the measurement data from this link: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00037.000.html
along with the orbital elements from https://theskylive.com/halebopp-info
Here’s the deal: I worked out a mathematical derivation where the VIS viva is divided by the square root of two. If you look at the example using the exact same data without that adjustment, the VIS viva fails when compared to the observed data https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...74033121161218
(You can click the images to enlarge them if you want to actually see the numbers)

To be clear, this isn't the full mathematical proof itself—this is just a presentation. It's meant to grab the attention of actual physicists and mathematicians so they might actually bother looking at the derivations I've done to give them a pass or fail. So far, however, no one in the American physics community has found this presentation compelling enough to even glance at my work

In my initial mathematical derivation regarding the kinetic energy correction $E = m \cdot (v^2)$ and the comparison involving comet Hale–Bopp—which I sent via PDF to various American mathematical journals—I noted that based on the measurement data from the cited links, the period of comet Hale–Bopp is 896,686.574 days. However, according to the calculations from the link https://theskylive.com/halebopp-info, the period of comet Hale–Bopp is listed as 897,204.6223 days.

Keith Ward2 said:most of the women I've been with were just plain unattractive

they look like they belong in a horse stable

What’s more important—watching what you're packing or watching the hole it's going into?

They haven't even seen how much better things look than some farm animal—and apparently, those animals are supposedly immune to cancer.

Walter Baker2 said:People in the States are just backwards—you clearly belong in Paris, where women might actually appreciate that look, considering even musketeers used to wear tights.

There's actually a nudist park in Paris, check this out:

https://www.cntraveler.com/story/a-n...-park-in-paris

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41106020

https://www.euronews.com/2017/09/01/...st-nudist-park

Is there anything like a nudist park in Chicago, New York City, or Boston?

Walter Baker2 said:In my opinion, these modern guys are just metrosexuals—basically letting women run the show. I’m old school—I wear slim-fit jeans specifically to highlight my assets.

Check out this video of how the old guard used to roll

People talk about those eras like life was actually good back then,
unlike today, where you see nothing but mass discontent—
because these male Masons and their elite female counterparts are constantly trying to strip away our rights, freedoms,
and basic human values. Then they act surprised when catastrophes and pandemics start popping up out of nowhere.

Can you even picture General Mills wearing yoga pants? Or maybe al dente in leggings?

Do you think al dente and General Mills feel somehow inferior to women because of their living situation—that's why some women in leggings might be whispering instructions to them about what they should be doing? And honestly, do you think General Mills is getting more intel from the ladies than from the guys?

Take a look at this post from al dente:

Why on earth is General Mills mocking my original musical compositions? Here's the link:
And does anyone know who else refuses to acknowledge my creative work? Is General Mills being influenced by those specific people?
Check out this other link: regarding General Mills' post

What’s everyone else's take on all this?

Grace Ward21 said:I have no idea. I can't speak for them.
But you can certainly speak for yourself.

Look, I already said I’m not trying to hide the fact that I’m a man—I don't need to wear baggy cargo shorts just to mask my anatomy—but that doesn't mean I'm going to leave myself vulnerable when things get sketchy, like if a dog decides to charge at my groin. In any normal, everyday situation, I want it to be obvious that I'm male, not female. Honestly, plenty of guys at the beach wear those oversized swim trunks that hide everything, almost as if they think being a man is somehow less important than being a woman—especially since women are everywhere at the beach flaunting their curves in bikinis or wearing leggings through town.

So, tell me: when you're at the beach, are you wearing those baggy shorts or tight swim briefs? And do you actually feel like your gender is somehow "lesser" than a guy wearing tight trunks or leggings?

Is there some unspoken rule that makes scientists in baggy trousers more valuable than those wearing leggings?
And what about female researchers—is one style considered more prestigious than the other?

Link https://www.noaa.gov/

Grace Ward21 said:So why are you so obsessed with leggings?

What is it about leggings that makes them such a massive staple for women?

William Grant20 said:Would you give up your faith for just one day if you knew you were going to get laid that day?

Even if she was stunning—I mean, a gorgeous face, an incredible body, and a perfect anatomy—I still wouldn't agree to hook up for a discount if it meant renouncing my faith for a single day. I can't stand it when women try to use sexual manipulation against me; honestly, I'd rather just skip the sex entirely.

William Grant20 said:Would you want someone lying naked on the bed right in front of you, using their hands to touch your balls? 😳

There is a massive gap between what I want and what any woman actually wants. If even one woman had shared my vision, we’d have been together ages ago—regardless of whether I wear leggings or not. But clearly, in twenty years, not a single one has been interested. And even when someone actually did like me, some other woman inevitably swoops in to talk her out of it, convincing her that I'm not worth the trouble.