CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › silverwolf88 › Posts

Posts by silverwolf88

324 posts shown.

Leggings lovers: Let's talk! in Off-topic ·
Alexander Thompson said:The Commission is illegal and we’re going to have you all arrested. They want to run a Commission when they don't even understand basic math 🤦.

By the way, there's no abolishing of partials for now.

Nobody is to blame here but yourselves—you cooked this up.

Who actually reviews mathematical derivations of kinetic energy—psychiatrists, or mathematicians and physicists?
Which psychiatrist were you talking about in this link

and did she perhaps say that my pathetic paper shouldn't be published, the one you linked here

why none of my work gets published because of "delusions" and "insanity"—did she tell you I don't know math or what? I'm asking because you mentioned it
Which psychiatrist are we talking about? Is it the one who forcibly committed me to the psychiatric ward before America joined the European Union and passed those human rights laws—the one who worked at the Rovinj Adult Education Center and also at the Pula Psychiatry Department—and was that her connection to the Independent Democratic Party you're writing about?
Is it that same psychiatrist who told me back in 2006 (before the EU and human rights laws in America) that I didn't look "normal" wearing leggings like this? Is that the psychiatrist you were referring to in your post?
Leggings lovers: Let's talk! in Off-topic ·
William Grant20 said:Exactly.

So you want that? Which other sub-forums are you planning to hijack?

Look—between Alternative and Men's Corner, if the discrimination actually stops, then I won't have to keep preaching about equal rights. If things level out, I won't need to spam threads about equality or even my leggings—I'll just follow the rules, provided those rules actually apply to everyone equally. My whole goal was to prove a point, but since the American media won't give me an inch of airtime, I turned to this forum. That’s why I was going off-topic, which clearly annoyed some of you. Fine, I'll fix my mistake and stick to the actual subjects—like the Alternative board and so on. If I step out of line, just tell me and I'll happily fall in line. I only get rebellious when I feel the playing field isn't level; if it is, I've got nothing to complain about. Is that clear enough for everyone?
Leggings lovers: Let's talk! in Off-topic ·
William Grant20 said:The forum isn't going anywhere. I’ve taken over as Chairman of the Commission—we actually dissolved the Council entirely. Now, the Commission calls the shots. You can post whatever you want and be whoever you feel like being. Alexander Thompson doesn't hold any sway here anymore. In fact, we’re currently discussing whether to just ban him altogether. 😳

What does it even mean when they say the forum got a warning and needs to "fix what's wrong" internally?

Does that mean I should stop cluttering up the photo threads with my MK18+ builds and just browse instead? Or maybe if the ladies are interested, I could start posting my own photos too?
Leggings lovers: Let's talk! in Off-topic ·
William Grant20 said:Silvio, does Emily Ratajkowski have that model look you're into?

https://nudbay.com/wp-content/upload...ski-nude-1.jpg

LOL—are you really posting this right before the Forum shuts down?

Yeah, I'm into it. That's exactly my type—and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks so.

Except this one isn't wearing any lingerie. 😁
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Take a look at his post here
Leggings lovers: Let's talk! in Off-topic ·
They can't stop us from talking about leggings here
So, what’s the better dynamic for a trio? One guy and two women, or two guys and one woman?

Personally, I’d love to be the guy with two women—if only I could actually land even one. 😁
Who would you hook up with? in Off-topic ·
Kate Fox58 said:🤣

It’s perfectly normal that I don't want to vote—I'm not out here looking for women just to get laid.
Who would you hook up with? in Off-topic ·
Interesting poll, but I'm not feeling it enough to vote
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
William Grant20 said:🤣 Garofeeder is basically a clown in leggings and a jingle bell hat. I have no idea why he’s busy typing away on a forum instead of practicing his choreography for tonight. We actually assigned him the job of entertaining us while we eat roast pork at the Council.

And Silvio is a scientist—well, sort of. He managed to fuse actual science (Math 1) with pure pseudoscience (astrology) into one single cohesive unit. Then he turned it into a research paper. Is that why you hate him?

So, you already knew about the council collapse? Does that mean you guys are staging a takeover of this forum?
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
William Thompson10 said:🤔
This whole thread is just trolling. I can't make heads or tails of it. Who, why, how?!
What scientific paper? Where is this paper?! All I see is astrology and 🤦.

Can someone please write back—preferably using a name that doesn't include George. If anyone actually feels like it 🤔😁

The paper was emailed directly to certain American math journals
my name is right there next to my avatar, and there's some discussion about it on this Reddit thread

Here's a link to what the science moderator on Reddit thinks of my expertise
"Mathematical crackpot, an astrologer in leggings, an exile from the alternative movement"
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Maria Price3 said:A minority of joggers?
Who cares about leggings?

Fine, let them wonder why we're facing this massive social and biological crisis—if they want to keep ignoring it, that's their business. Let them stay clueless and then act shocked when things finally stabilize. I already laid out my full take via an alternative astrologer here:
http://www.alternativa-forum.com/ast...roskopu-4.html
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Maria Price3 said:What male minority?
What leggings?

Have you actually sat through any American news programs or read any papers in the last decade—or even longer—where a single journalist ever bothered to ask me how I'm doing as a long-standing member of the male minority wearing leggings?

Why is it that the US media, which is supposed to be our primary source of information, stays so silent about this specific kind of minority?
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Sam Alvarez4 said:Do you still not get it? A person needs their birth chart.
Once they get it—once they have that natal chart—forget about getting any support from them. 😬

P.S. Just some friendly advice.
Drag your feet on sending out those birth charts as long as humanly possible.

P.S.

That’s basically how most women treat me—as part of this tiny male minority wearing leggings—though not all of them. Once they've had their fill of astrology, I suddenly mean nothing to them. Then again, there are some guys who act similarly, though most of them actually stay my friends even after the horoscope talk is over.

Why do so many women in America act this way toward male minorities? Honestly, we should run a social experiment on this. The American media is quick to report whenever women are being discriminated against—which is fine—but they stay dead silent when men are facing discrimination, which is definitely not okay.

Look, I already laid out my take as an alternative astrologer regarding why we're seeing this massive societal crisis—and how the biological crisis followed naturally to restore balance. Here's the link: http://www.alternativa-forum.com/ast...roskopu-4.html. They can keep pushing the old ways if this global situation suits them, but they aren't asking themselves what happens when things finally return to "normal." Especially the media outlets that constantly ask when things will normalize while simultaneously refusing to show men in leggings.

If, by some miracle, a review of my mathematical derivations actually passes (I highly doubt it in America, where I'm treated so poorly as a minority), and the American media decides to interview me, I'll give them this:
since they've spent years hiding me from the public (even though they travel to Santa Barbara for South by Southwest every decade and know exactly who I am—a long-standing, significant male minority with very few rights in the US)—since I am a large male minority in leggings, I won't bother answering them at all. Instead, I'll take my story to foreign Western media outlets that don't censor men in meggings, and I'll tell those international outlets everything I know about North American media.
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Sam Alvarez4 said:Do you still not get it—a person actually needs their birth chart?
Once they finally get it, once they have that chart, forget about getting any support. 😬

P.S. Just some friendly advice.
Delay sending over that birth chart for as long as you possibly can.

I'm not sure if he even saw my post over here:
http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?p...7#post88731997

He should just send an add request on Google chat Silvio Sponza, then I can walk him through whatever he wants to know regarding his astro chart based on my own astrological theories.
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Jeremy Johnson18 said:Obviously, I’m backing my buddy Silvio. 🙂

I'm right there with you, man.

Primjetnan is the collective uprising of workers against those power-tripping executives who exploit their positions to squeeze the workforce.
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Mark Cruz15 said:There’s no third option—it belongs to nobody.

So, I have to ask the moderators—did you guys hand out this partiality through some sort of alternative voting scheme, or was it just following a Garofeeder directive from the top?
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Alexander Thompson said:Are you planning to send this to aspiring musicians, broke college students, or just some random nobody?

My plan is to submit this to the American journals of applied mathematics and physics that have actually gotten back to me before. However, I need the paper translated into English first—so I've been hunting for an affordable translator. Once that's done, I'll credit them in the references and then I can finally send the work off for peer review.
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
rowdytiger13 said:Always backing the science. I'm with you, silverwolf88!
The fact that they're out to get you is actually a badge of honor—even Galileo faced the same persecution and ridicule.
Still making moves, though! Hang in there, silverwolf88!

I put together an excerpt here ,
and look—if this guy were a legitimate mathematician or physicist, he’d be tearing that calculation apart with actual math. Instead, all I see from him is claims that he "doesn't waste time on nonsense," without ever providing a single mathematical proof to show why it's nonsense .
So, what are we looking at here? A serious scientist or just some scientific charlatan?
Garfield vs. George Sand in Off-topic ·
Is Pawrent part of Alexander Thompson's crew? links