The Daily News Sweet Spot
in Off-topic ·
Pasted the wrong link..
124 posts shown.
Rachel Palmer56 said:Hey everyone—with the holidays creeping up, the majority of this group decided it was time to open a little political sweets corner. Use this space to share anything delicious you’re craving or whatever treats you’ve whipped up yourself.
Why "political" sweets?
Since it feels like everything revolves around politics these days, I figured I might as well acknowledge it—but the "politics" here is simple: respect. Treat every user like an individual. Let’s aim for actual dialogue and find common ground through basic courtesy and decent vibes.😬
I truly believe everyone here has something sweet to contribute, so let's work together😳 to make this thread as enjoyable as possible by following the house rules.😬
Thanks to DreamWorks for the title idea. 🤣
Nicole Myers said:When we typed Dream into the search engine, this guy kept popping up. 😁
Grace Anderson3 said:This one's for Dream:
Nicole Myers said:Dream, remember this one? 🤣
Carl Rivera43 said:Finally found a decent rhythm today... weekends are always the worst for staying in touch. People with free time have way too much of it, and people who are busy don't have any at all.
Carl Rivera43 said:The reality is that women who are, say, more curvaceous respond way slower than others.
For example, it looks like this:
Željko Vedran Markić — response in about 2 to 8 seconds.
Taylor Swift — response in about 2 to 4 hours.
Lady Gaga — an emoji {maybe after seven to twenty days}.
Carl Rivera43 said:The issue is that some guys are way too eager—especially when dealing with women who aren't exactly high on the attractiveness scale.
Sometimes the questions are just absurd: "Where are you?" "When will you call?" "Who's coming?"
Meanwhile, some attractive women might take two, three, or even ten days—maybe weeks—to actually reply.
Others just respond with bizarre emojis.
Anthony Nguyen81 said:Reply when you can. Ideally, as soon as you can.
If someone needs a few hours to get back to you, just adapt to their pace.
Sometimes people are busy; sometimes they just don't care.
If it's someone playing those hot-and-cold games with response times, you either make them a priority or you cut ties.
You can't lose your mind over certain things, but if someone clearly doesn't want to talk to you, why would you bother talking to them? 🤷
Nicole Myers said:I consider quick replies to be a virtue, so I don't see the issue. You check it off your list and move on.
But if you really want to delay responding, stop staring at your phone. Leave it at home, or decide you'll only check messages three times a day and answer then.
If it's just about one specific person, just mute the notifications.
Grace Sanders44 said:I don't think the point is about women posting photos in leggings—that’s beside the point. If you men actually wanted to show some support for Silvio, you should all just start wearing leggings yourselves. 👋
Walter Baker2 said:I'm all for it—let that officer get a good look at Grace Sanders44's leggings 🍿 Alex Carter, you wearing leggings too?
Sam Alvarez4 said:@George
Wear your convictions on your sleeve—fight for what you believe in. Just maybe skip the mindless polls...
Sadly, that's just the 21st-century digital landscape for you.
A place where one person's trivial distraction is another person's life mission.
William Grant20 said:🤣 Look, I’ve told him a hundred times—just try showing up somewhere without being tucked in so tight (not naked, obviously) and see how the conversation with women goes. But he won't do it. He thinks that would basically be an invitation to ask for sex, and he’s just not interested in that approach. 😳 🤣
William Grant20 said:How do you not get it? People are annoyed by those leggings because his anatomy is on full display. Some women in Santa Barbara even told him he’s got ugly balls. And here we are, fighting for the right to wear whatever we want. 😳
Grace Sanders44 said:They really ought to listen since I publicly retracted my vote. It’s fixable—shouldn't be an issue. Why not just ask if they can delete it? And why didn't anyone else bother voting?
silverwolf88 said:
I assume they're actually reading your post .
I bolded the part where the mods are making threats