Check out this kind of mini PC. That specific SOC is what caught my eye because according to the benchmarks, it handles 4K at 60fps without any issues, including Netflix 4K. It doesn't support HDR, though, which might be a dealbreaker depending on what you need. Web browsing seems pretty smooth too, I guess.
I don't think any of them actually have a DisplayPort out, though they do feature USB Type C, so you'll probably need to pick up an adapter or a cable to make it work.
I have to say, I’m genuinely surprised by Portman coming back. I honestly figured her chapter with Marvel was long since closed. I suppose the pull of a lead role and a massive paycheck was just too much to pass up. Plus, landing a starring role in an MCU movie definitely does wonders for an actor's profile these days.
Jack Miller6 said:I've been thinking about trying out one of those Chinese brands when it’s finally time for an upgrade, and coincidentally, my current phone just died on me 🤣. Since we're on the subject, I wanted to see if you guys have any recommendations for models around the $667 mark? Right now, I'm looking at the Xiaomi Mi A2 because a buddy of mine was raving about it—he seems pretty happy with how much value he's getting for the price.
It's a solid buy. Just keep in mind it doesn't have NFC, assuming that's even a dealbreaker for you if you use mobile payments.
Honestly, hitting over 100 FPS is plenty for a smooth experience on a 144Hz monitor. I mean, sure, there's always going to be a handful of titles that struggle or demand way more power, but there will always be those ultra-demanding games designed specifically to push even the most high-end cards to their limits. My point is that we're talking about a relatively small number of games here. In my opinion, you shouldn't really feel the need to sacrifice your screen size or your resolution—things that actually dictate how much you enjoy the game—just so a specific GPU can squeeze out a few extra frames.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is actually a solid card for 4K at 60Hz, while the NVIDIA RTX 2060 and the RX 590 are perfectly fine choices for 1440p.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is actually plenty capable for 1440p at 144Hz. If certain titles struggle on that card, I doubt an NVIDIA RTX 2080 would make much of a difference either, and honestly, an NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti is probably out of reach anyway. As for the Intel Core i7-8700, it hits a 4.3 GHz boost across all cores, which I guess should be more than enough for a setup like this. I suppose they could just stick with a single HDD, since I was mostly following the direction of the original post. It seems a bit strange to me that anyone would pick a small 24" 1080p monitor for a gaming rig with this kind of budget these days; maybe the author should suggest looking into something a bit larger instead.
Has anyone had a chance to check out the dubbed version yet? My local AMC doesn't seem to have the subtitled cut playing, so I was wondering if the dub is actually watchable or if it's worth sitting through.
Look, it actually says so right there on the poster under the announcement. I honestly figured since Wreck-it Ralph didn't have subtitles, this one wouldn't either. But if that's the case, then great, I'm pretty much looking forward to checking it out. Plus Aquaman that same weekend 😁
The first reviews are out, and they are looking incredible. Some people are actually going as far as saying this is the best Spider-Man film ever made. It’s sitting at a 100% on Rotten Tomatoes right now. Now I'm just feeling even more frustrated knowing it's going to be dubbed when it hits theaters here in the States. For me, that kind of thing totally ruins the whole experience.
It might work, I guess, but you're looking at an aging processor on a dated platform, and personally, I think it makes more sense to spend a little extra to get something newer and more capable. For instance, this build below beats your suggestion in both raw performance and efficiency, so you could probably ditch the old dedicated graphics card altogether.
It really comes down to whether you want 1440p at 60Hz or sticking with 1080p at 144Hz. The thing about going for 1440p at 144Hz is that it’s way more expensive, and I guess you’d also need a much beefier graphics card to pull it off.
It’s not a bad choice, I suppose, though an 8th gen processor would probably be a better way to go. For instance, this Dell paired with a newer CPU actually comes with an SSD included.
I suppose we should probably talk about the Intel Core i7-8700K. It’s a decent enough chip, I guess, though whether it actually holds up depends entirely on what you're trying to do with it. I suppose I should mention that I'm looking at an MSI Z370 Krait gaming motherboard, which uses the LGA 1151 socket for 8th Gen processors. I suppose I should probably mention the Gigabyte GTX1070Ti 8 g gaming DDR4. It’s just one of those components that seems to sit there, doing its thing without much fanfare, I guess. I guess I was looking at some DDR4 16GB (2x8GB) kits lately—specifically that PC4-24000U 3000MHz CL16 setup from G.Skill Aegis. It seems like a decent enough option, though I suppose it depends on what you're trying to get out of your build. Maybe it's fine for a standard workstation or a mid-range gaming rig, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the absolute best move for everyone. I suppose I should mention the Samsung 860 250GB SSD. It’s probably worth looking into if you need something reliable, though I guess it really depends on what you're planning to do with it. I suppose if you're looking at storage, there's the 2TB Toshiba P300 High-Performance, which is a 3.5" drive running at 7200RPM. It might be worth considering depending on what you need it for, I guess. I suppose I should mention the 750W Gigabyte G750H power supply, which follows the ATX 2.31 standard, specifically the GP-G750H model. I suppose I should probably mention the GP-G750H Arctic Liquid Freezer 240, specifically the ACFRE00013A model. It’s just one of those components that you end up looking at when you're trying to figure out if your cooling setup is actually going to hold up under pressure, I guess. Maybe it's worth noting, though I can't be entirely certain without more testing, how it fits into a broader build. I’ve been looking back at the Corsair Carbide Air 540 lately, and I guess there’s still a bit of a conversation to be had about it. It was one of those cases where the design felt like it was pushing a specific direction, maybe even a little too far for some people, but it certainly had its merits if you were willing to work around its quirks. It’s an interesting piece of hardware when you think about how much the industry has shifted since then, though I suppose that's just how things go.
13,$0.17 I suppose there isn't much to say here, really. It’s just me.
1 x Intel Core i5-8400 (2.8GHz, 9MB, LGA1151) box 1 x Gigabyte B360M_D3H 1 x Patriot Signature DDR4, 2666Mhz, 8GB HS 1 x Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 GAMING GDDR5 8GB/256bit 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 250GB 2.5" Sata 1 x Fortron Hexa 85+ 550W, 80+ Bronze, ATX 1 x Western Digital Blue 1 x Fortron (3.5", 1TB, 64MB, SATA III-600) 1 x MS DARK SHADOW PRO gaming, 4x120mm, USB3.0
Total: $2857 futura-it
Regarding the monitor, I suppose the first one listed should definitely be your primary consideration—it seems like a solid best buy given the price point. If you find yourself playing a lot of FPS games, though, maybe you could look into getting a 144Hz panel instead. I wouldn't really recommend using a TV as a gaming monitor, I guess.