Given that this individual identifies online as a "doctor of energy medicine, psycho-energetic therapist, and color therapist," and considering our forum rules strictly prohibit discussions regarding alternative therapies or their practitioners here, I suggest moving this inquiry to the Alternative Medicine subforum.
Anthony Morris2, your post has been moved here (click the link) since this thread focuses on surgically implanted ocular lenses rather than standard contact lenses.
Dana Newman3 said:Thanks to everyone for the replies, especially Google 😉. Fortunately, things have settled down in the meantime. We're just waiting peacefully now for the big day when the little one arrives 🙂.
Glad to hear the good news.
Wishing you all the best. Enjoy every moment with your little angel once they arrive. 🙂
stormyfalcon6 said:The AM hormone report mentions the serum sample was hemolytic. Could this lead to an inaccurate reading? Thanks!
Hello,
It likely depends on the specific assay method used. I came across information suggesting that hemolysis does indeed impact results when using the methodology mentioned in the manual title:
Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) ELISA Kit
Sample Collection
Note:
Sample hemolysis will influence the result, so hemolytic specimen can not be detected.
To be honest, your best bet is to call the lab directly. They are the ones actually running the tests; they hold the expertise here.
I could be wrong, though—I’m not intimately familiar with the technical nuances of how they measure anti-Müllerian hormone.
restlessangler said:P Test 1. P. oval (positive/few) and Demodex folliculorum (negative). - I'm wondering what this positive result means, and if they found the actual cause here or what?
Hello,
P. oval is a yeast—some call it a fungus. It’s believed to play a role in certain skin conditions, specifically seborrheic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, and some types of psoriasis. If one of those diagnoses is confirmed (though a P. oval test alone isn't always enough), an antifungal is typically added to the primary treatment plan.
That said, pursuing a full workup is the right move, just as you were advised. The mere presence of P. oval doesn't rule out other underlying causes for skin changes.
The tests you sent are designed to see if there's an immunological reason behind these symptoms—specifically looking for lupus, since similar presentations can occur with discoid lupus or systemic lupus erythematosus.
The first two posts have been moved from the "Allergies" thread. Since we can't confirm if this is actually an allergic reaction, it's best to handle the discussion in its own dedicated topic.
Hi everyone, sorry to interrupt the flow, but I need to let you know that one of the previous posts was removed. Per our community guidelines, the donation, exchange, or sale of medications and supplements is strictly prohibited.
Anthony Nelson4 said:So, I went ahead and had a chat with the doctor who's authorized to handle the medical clearances for the shipping company—you know, the one who does the official physicals—and I asked him point-blank if he actually requires a secondary note from a private physician stating I'm fit to work without any health issues. He told me straight up that I don't even need to bring that in; instead, I'll just have to sign some kind of waiver or declaration—I can't remember the exact wording, honestly, but that's the gist of it.
It’s likely a declaration where you swear under penalty of perjury that you aren't suffering from any physical or mental health issues that would prevent you from performing the job duties. Or, more simply, you'll probably fill out a questionnaire covering things like chronic illnesses, current medications, or surgical history, then sign off stating everything is accurate and consenting to drug testing.
The role you're taking on probably doesn't fall under those high-stakes maritime safety categories that require deep dives into your medical records. In my experience working in general practice, a self-disclosure is often sufficient—unless regulations have shifted recently.
According to the Federal Maritime Regulations regarding health fitness standards for maritime crew members on ships, boats, and yachts (link), the requirements state:
A medical examination must include: – laboratory tests (ESR, CBC, blood glucose, urinalysis), – screening for drugs and alcohol.
The Coast Guard guidelines concerning health fitness for crews on ocean-going vessels and inland waterway craft (link) provide more specific details on the testing parameters:
drug tests (psychoactive substances), specifically targeting major metabolites (cannabinoids/THC, opiates/morphine, codeine and heroin, cocaine/benzoylgoine, ecstasy, speed, amphetamine, methamphetamine, methadone).
Based on this list, it follows that the medications mentioned will not be detected by these specific screenings.
That said, much like any occupational medicine exam, you are required to provide documentation from your primary care physician detailing any chronic or mental health conditions. The physician is obligated to provide accurate data in this certification. This should naturally include information regarding epilepsy and your current medication regimen.
I am uncertain, however, if your specific role falls under these particular regulations or if different criteria apply to your position. If it does fall under these rules, an epilepsy diagnosis would likely result in being deemed unfit for duty.
I need to adjust my previous point above. Looking closer at the regulations, it turns out epilepsy is explicitly listed as a contraindication for only certain maritime positions. It isn't mentioned for others, which leaves the question open as to whether this restriction applies to all crew roles or just a select few.
According to the Federal Maritime Regulations regarding health fitness standards for maritime crew members on ships, boats, and yachts (link), the requirements state:
A medical examination must include: – laboratory tests (ESR, CBC, blood glucose, urinalysis), – screening for drugs and alcohol.
The Coast Guard guidelines concerning health fitness for crews on ocean-going vessels and inland waterway craft (link) provide more specific details on the testing parameters:
drug tests (psychoactive substances), specifically targeting major metabolites (cannabinoids/THC, opiates/morphine, codeine and heroin, cocaine/benzoylgoine, ecstasy, speed, amphetamine, methamphetamine, methadone).
Based on this list, it follows that the medications mentioned will not be detected by these specific screenings.
That said, much like any occupational medicine exam, you are required to provide documentation from your primary care physician detailing any chronic or mental health conditions. The physician is obligated to provide accurate data in this certification. This should naturally include information regarding epilepsy and your current medication regimen.
I am uncertain, however, if your specific role falls under these particular regulations or if different criteria apply to your position. If it does fall under these rules, an epilepsy diagnosis would likely result in being deemed unfit for duty.
I’ve been messaging this user via DM. When they first started the thread, I moved it over to Natural Science, but there hasn't been any traction there either. They reached out privately asking to have it moved to Health instead.
So, please leave it where it is. It’ll likely sink pretty quickly, but fine—let's give it a shot, even if it doesn't personally belong in Health in my opinion.
Modern ophthalmology doesn't recognize these treatment methods. We won't be debating them here on the Health forum.
I’d kindly ask you to move this inquiry over to the Eye Exercises - Natural Vision Correction thread (just click the link) located in the Alternative Medicine section.
My sister is eight months pregnant. For the last two weeks, she’s been throwing up almost everything she eats, struggling to breathe, and dealing with constant heartburn.
Has anyone else dealt with symptoms this intense during the final stretch? Everything was fine until suddenly 😕 To be honest, I haven't found much info online, so I'm leaning toward calling 911.
Hello,
It seems a significant number of expectant mothers deal with vomiting in the late stages of pregnancy. It's a matter of physics: as the baby grows and the uterus expands, it puts pressure on the stomach and shifts the anatomical relationship between the stomach and the esophagus. This can lead to nausea, heartburn, acid reflux, and occasionally vomiting.
However, the fact that your sister is essentially vomiting everything she consumes is serious. My advice would be to have her contact her doctor immediately.
They need to rule out underlying causes for such frequent and excessive vomiting—for instance, something like gestational diabetes or other pregnancy-specific conditions.
It is also vital to check her hydration levels and electrolyte status if necessary; excessive vomiting can quickly lead to dehydration and electrolyte imbalances, among other complications.
She should definitely reach out to her physician.
Best regards, and wishing you and your sister all the best. 🙂
Everything matches exactly what is printed on the report I received.🤷
Yes, certain markers point toward a viral infection—specifically mononucleosis. This is suggested by the elevated lymphocyte count paired with the presence of reactive lymphocytes seen under microscopic examination.
Furthermore, the clinical symptoms you detailed in the "sore throat" thread (the sore throat with tonsillar exudate and that nasal quality to your voice—a symptom rarely noted, though apparently quite common) lean toward infectious mononucleosis.
Once the serology comes back (since those tests were ordered), we will have a definitive answer.
For now, the indicators suggest mono; typically, the strain caused by CMV presents a milder picture.
Kenneth Vaughn2 said:My apologies, but I was just at the clinic over in Seattle. After a blood smear, they told me I have mono. It seems to be a milder version for me. They also drew some blood for further testing, but I won't get those results for another 10 to 14 days. Does anyone know what those tests actually look for? Is it to identify the specific virus or something else?
Sir,
When a sore throat, fever, and fatigue persist beyond a week—and in your case, much longer—mono becomes a primary suspect.
To confirm the diagnosis, you need serology. Essentially, they are checking for antibodies against various triggers of mononucleosis. While Epstein-Barr is the usual culprit, it could also be cytomegalovirus (CMV) or something else entirely.
I'm not sure if they’ve already run a CBC, LDH, or CRP for you?
Feel free to share your experiences—good or bad—but please watch your language. You can make your point without being crude. Using insults toward specific healthcare providers, such as calling someone an "idiot," a "thief," or any other derogatory label, is strictly against the rules.
Because of this, one of the previous posts has been removed. The author is welcome to repost their thoughts, provided they strip out the offensive language.
First off, you hit the nail on the head. Using "AST" as an abbreviation for antistreptolysin titer isn't ideal; it should be AST-O or ASO. In a clinical setting, "AST" usually refers to a liver enzyme.
Regarding the biology, the streptolysin O that triggers these antibodies is released by pyogenic streptococcus—specifically Group A beta-hemolytic strep (the usual suspect behind strep throat or scarlet fever). That said, Group C and Group G pyogenic streps can also release streptolysin O.
While measuring the AST-O titer helps confirm a recent Group A strep infection, it doesn't offer much practical value during an acute bout of tonsillopharyngitis. A single number, stripped of clinical context or other diagnostic data, tells us very little.
It’s also worth noting that this value provides zero insight into the actual site of infection—whether it's the tonsils, the ears, the sinuses, or a skin infection.