hiddensailor14 said:🤷 Maybe it's just because most philosophy is way too complex for my tiny, flat cerebral cortex... I honestly have no clue what they're blathering about/scribbling down.
Real talk—I think philosophers are total hacks. Philosophy (and those "social sciences") aren't even real sciences in my book. It’s actually embarrassing to lump them in with actual natural and technical sciences—those are the only true sciences, while this stuff is just the leftover waste from human laziness.☕
Social sciences and basic life skills definitely aren't your strong suit—your posts make that pretty obvious. 😛 If you ask me, why do engineering schools even bother teaching things like ethics, communications, or psychology? They're all social subjects, yet you call them nothing but the byproduct of human idleness.🙄
Ontopic: Now that I've read the whole thing, I get the point. The guy is arguing that pseudo-skepticism is the polar opposite of spiritualism and mysticism. He's saying pseudo-skeptics aren't acting scientific at all because they don't actually use a research-based approach—they just negate things "in the name of science."
What part of that is so hard to grasp, hiddensailor14?😍