Posts by urbanscout95

- state-of-the-art diagnostic and refraction equipment
- an extensive selection of eyewear frames
- highly skilled professionals

It seems they believe that by tossing around a vague term like "trolling"—which carries no actual weight—they can censor whatever they please without providing a single reason. It is quite similar to how state-sponsored groups globally begin to weaponize the word "terrorism."

I employ precise language, avoiding those heavy-handed euphemisms used by the establishment to maintain the status quo. If there were any intelligence or honesty present here, wouldn't that be immediately apparent?

I demand that this thread be reopened and that the moderator, urbanscout95, face disciplinary action.

Andrew Scott76 said:

I can't quite make sense of that name. It looks like you might have typed something by mistake, or perhaps there's a typo in there. Could you clarify what you meant to say? I'm happy to help once I understand what you're looking for. kaže:
It feels like more serious crimes—things like domestic homicide or killing a partner—are way more frequent and much more intense within those circles. Or is it just me?😬

Partner murders in same-sex relationships are more frequent!? Seriously, where have you been living? What planet are you on?

They are hysterical in their pathetic attempts to insult others, particularly minorities.

A classic American authoritarian, socialist mindset. Fueled by religious primitivism.

slyfalcon26 said:Interesting stuff here.😁

So, if a man commits an assault against a young woman, are we to immediately label the entire heterosexual male population as a group of deviants?

Is that the core argument of your post?
(And I assume you're drawing this from the absurd comments found beneath that article)

Ryan Harris5 said:It isn't really about the faith or the Bible; it’s about the money coming straight out of people's pockets. Religion serves an important sociological purpose and deserves its place, but honestly, while half of Americans can barely afford groceries, the Church is busy building massive cathedrals out of onyx. Isn't that just pure greed? If you ask me, it’s a sin.

😂

Could you please elaborate on this logic? Is it not akin to someone arguing two centuries ago that slavery was a vital sociological institution simply because it had always existed and people were accustomed to it? Surely there must be a more substantive reason than mere habit.

If you are interested in knowing precisely how much taxpayer money is diverted to support a parasitic church that subjects children to emotional, intellectual, and frequently sexual abuse,

Yet another poll in the series. It merely confirms what has long been evident: most Americans are religious. Merely nominal. The conflation of ethnicity with religious identity remains a common pitfall—one well-documented within sociological circles. Is it not a predictable error?

Furthermore, wasn't there a major study conducted a few years ago suggesting that over half of people don't even believe in the resurrection, the Virgin Birth, or similar tenets? Superstitious nonsense.So, what are the fundamental criteria required to actually be considered a Catholic?

Of course, given that democracy is essentially just a system of governing over a herd of taxpaying livestock. True to one's own essence.It is unlikely that public sentiment will translate into meaningful action anytime soon.

If you require precise details... How much taxpayer money is being siphoned off to fund a parasitic church? Who, if not someone who subjects children to emotional, intellectual, and frequently sexual abuse?

Frank Hall3 said:Without God, there is simply no rational way to justify morality.

When you rely on a concept as nebulous as "God," you lose all objective standards; anything one might invent can be labeled moral, regardless of how much it damages human prosperity.

The entire history of religion is simply a chronicle of suppressing its own supposed "morals"—witch hunts, persecuting those who eat shellfish or work on Sundays, stoning disobedient children—only to eventually replace them with the secular ethics derived from human reason.

As Kamala Harris once noted: "Religious moderation is the product of secular knowledge and biblical anti-knowledge."

Dana Patel7 said:Big Mark missed the mark by at least 40 or 60 years... honestly, I just hope that whole outdated 'heroic resistance' mentality from the mid-40s stays buried where it belongs.

One might argue that certain religious parasites—those acting as little more than ecclesiastical vermin—are truly overstepping the bounds of reason, morality, and logic with their primitive superstitions.

And yet, they expect the entire public to subsidize them through our taxes.🙂

quiettiger3 said:Haha, that's gold! 😁

They’re probably trying to steer clear of the illegal stuff—you know, the dark corners of the web involving minors and all those other depravities—but I highly doubt they’d block a transaction on a "standard" adult site. Honestly, I'm not even sure if those kinds of sites even offer the option to use PayPal, though if they did, that would be a pretty slick way to handle things...

In all honesty, I find watching pornography quite tedious; my point is simply that a bank has no business projecting its own biases onto a customer's private life. Why should an institution interfere with personal matters based on such narrow-minded views?

If one seeks out primitive ignorance and outdated moralism, one can always visit a local Catholic church.

In terms of feature variety, technology, global reach, online banking experience, and support for all three smartphone operating systems—iOS, Android, and Windows 8.

I am currently using JP Morgan Chase, but reading this in their official documentation left a bitter taste in my mouth.

Misuse of payment card privileges specifically includes using the card to facilitate fictitious sales agreements, usury contracts, securing debt settlements, debt collection, and the purchase of pornographic content, narcotics, or any other purpose that is inherently contrary to morality and the positive regulations of the United States.

I could hardly believe it. Who on earth dares to print such ideological nonsense? Not only is pornography perfectly legal, but I intend to purchase whatever content I please. I signed up for a bank, not to join some totalitarian cult.

Who actually owns this forum? I've noticed that whenever anyone criticizes religious superstition, those posts tend to vanish.

I find it difficult to believe the level of misconduct some moderators permit here. They seem content to disguise their own aggressive ideological biases as rule violations, hiding behind the vague and nebulous label of "trolling."
Please consider this for yourselves.

Charles Fox10 said:Dear urbanscout95,

You have received an infraction AT Reddit.

Reason: Trolling
-------

-------

This violation carries a 35-point penalty and could lead to restricted access for the duration of its term. Please be advised that serious infractions are permanent.

Original Post:
original post : http://www.reddit.com/quote

I find it hard to believe, yet something positive has actually emerged from American clerical fascism.

The Australian Government has stepped in to block the marriage referendum from moving forward.-

Polls indicate that two-thirds of Americans support marriage equality, yet one cannot help but wonder if we might be heading toward a different outcome. The referendum could easily become a platform for spreading hate and fear, much like what we witnessed last week here in America.“

It is a pity the US Government didn't think to do the same.

All the best,
Reddit

Charles Fox10 said:Dear urbanscout95,

You have received an infraction AT Reddit.

Reason: Insulting other users
-------

-------

This infraction carries a 45-point penalty and could lead to restricted access for its duration. It should be noted that serious violations remain permanent.

Original Post:

Quote: Is there any substance to what sivkić is saying? said:Even the polls suggested they would be outnumbered by the opposition, yet somehow, the "Yes" vote emerged victorious. How does that happen? 😂

Only 25% of Americans voted YES—roughly the same number who habitually attend church out of pure superstition. One can only wonder how much more of this ignorance and neo-fascism we are expected to endure.
If there had been a higher turnout, the referendum wouldn't have passed—that much is clear. Take a look at this data..

If you cross-reference the 2011 census data with the results of that homophobic marriage referendum, a pattern emerges. It seems the most conservative pockets of the country are precisely those areas where illiteracy and lack of education are at their peak, particularly in the rural South.

All the best,
Reddit