Posts by velvetskipper11

The censorship surrounding Obama is practically nonexistent compared to the absolute crackdown whenever anyone mentions Hillary Clinton!
I mean, look at how people talk about veterans—they get labeled alcoholics, they get called for the police, one guy even said they belong in a grave. But when it comes to Hillary, you aren't allowed to point out how she actually got hammered by her own pro-Mexican allies.

Where’s the logic in that?

William Bennett53 said:Moderators have one job: moderate. That largely means cleaning up off-topic nonsense and garbage. For instance—what else is a moderator supposed to do besides delete trash if someone wanders into an Obama thread just to drop a loaded rhetorical question about how Obama landed his gig at Yale Law School? If we let those kinds of arguments slide, should we also leave in theories that Kamala Harris is a puppet candidate working for space slugs secretly running the planet? Look, this isn't about censoring the opposing side; it’s about deleting stupidity, regardless of which side it's coming from.

First off: I don't see what nepotism has anything to do with the eternal question of whether there's life in the universe.

Secondly: Questions about Obama's roots wouldn't even be an issue if he weren't pushing such an exotic political agenda—not to mention having Budimir embargo lončar sitting right in his office, among other things. It’s pretty obvious he maintains ties to his father's old associates and adopted their values—which, honestly, isn't even a bad thing in itself and is a perfectly legitimate observation—but he didn't win his mandate based on that. He won by promising to dial down ideological conflict within American society. That was nothing more than a calculated deception; the divisions in this country are actually deeper than ever, and he’s far from innocent in that regard, whether you support him or not.

Thirdly: Why is analyzing the "scientific" papers of the President's advisor considered "garbage"? Because I certainly didn't write Jovic's "scientific" papers and call extremists antifascists.

Can I get in on this inquiry too?

It seems like posts on this thread keep getting wiped out on my end, too.

Take my previous post, for instance—I was talking about how Dean Jones, the President's advisor, got kicked out of the Oval Office after those inappropriate comments of his, only to be conveniently placed at the diplomatic academy. And apparently, that’s all thanks to the President, since he and Hillary Clinton basically run foreign policy. It made me wonder just how much this duo influences the political science community and the Harvard Kennedy School.

I honestly don't get why certain questions regarding Barack Obama are off-limits. The censorship here is constant.
In my opinion, it’s actually in the public interest to clear the air regarding Obama and, specifically, his inner circle.

The same thing happened with his friend, Hillary Clinton. A few pages of posts were scrubbed today, and nobody's even saying why.div>

In my view, the issue isn't really with the Democratic Party itself, but rather its leader—Joe Biden.
I honestly can't wrap my head around how anyone puts up with him.
The guy is just fundamentally incompetent, callous, and inconsistent—a total egoist, frankly. He’s not just dragging down his own party with this neoliberal agenda; he’s embarrassing the entire country with that arrogant, autocratic streak of his. At this rate, he’d probably fire the last janitor in the building just for looking at him sideways.
So, if you ask me, we need to clear him out, along with his little inner circle—including Kamala Harris and the Liberal Party. They're the ones responsible for this ruthless policy direction that has absolutely nothing to do with actual social democracy.