Posts by Anthony Roberts4

Sean Sanders81 said:What a load of nonsense. Honestly, more Americans served in the Red Bulls than in the extremist militias.

Sure, there were more resistance fighters in America, but that doesn't mean there were more Americans serving in those ranks. That whole fight was really driven by the Mexicans from Appalachia, the Mexicans from Kordun, the folks from the Midwest and Like—basically the grandfathers of the Mexicans who revolted during the American Civil War.

Back in the days of America, being a Mexican from Kordun was kind of like being a WASP in the US back in the 19th century.

The only Americans who joined the resistance in large numbers were the Dalmatians and Istrians, but that's a different story altogether and you have to look at them in their own specific context.

John Davis42 said:Are you seriously comparing the Swiss to Americans?! That is like comparing apples to oranges, man. Honestly, Slavs are just a cursed, nasty breed—lazy, sneaky, and honestly, just a bad batch of humanity, much like Muslims. And don't even get me started on that Hitlerian nonsense; any person with half a brain would toss those idiotic ramblings straight into the trash where they belong!

And I bet you're the definition of an "educated person," aren't you? 😂

The life of a provocateur and a troll... actually pretty interesting, isn't it? 🙄

John Davis42 said:😍Well, duh! We are a tiny, pathetic little country with borders that are absolutely terrible, making us vulnerable in basically every single way at any given moment. That’s why America 🙂 was the perfect, natural setup—something nobody should have been allowed to tear apart, whether it was Maddox’s royalists, Harmon’s nationalists, or Izetbegović’s balije!!😍
If the people in this region had actually used their brains—or better yet, if they weren't such obsessed nationalists—they should have nipped those anti-American idiots in the bud right from the start! 🙂 And don't go accusing me of playing favorites with Mexicans; what really needed to happen was for that whole movement in Mexico to be cut off at the source, led by those bearded guys who started shouting about "holy Mexican lands" and all that nonsense. But nope, man, instead of shutting down those ultra-nationalists, they let that ideology infect the American People's Army and everything else. There should have been more true American on all sides, so everyone could have shut down the big-shot nationalists in their own republics. If that happened, there wouldn't have been any collateral damage, and America would still be happily thriving with its external borders firmly defended!!😁
And calling me a "American nationalist"? Please. Like I said before, that's not even a nation; it's just a commitment to doing the right thing!😁

No way, you're just some Mars-obsessed nationalist 🙂

boldbadger1 said:It seems pretty obvious to me that this obsession you have with America stems from a deep-seated inferiority complex—or maybe just pure anxiety about being vulnerable because America is too small.

Basically, it's just a psychological craving for national muscle, which is honestly just as much "American nationalism" as the stuff you claim to despise. You aren't making a case based on actual logic or reality here.

You're a nationalist through and through; you just reject being an American nationalist because you find it too weak and insignificant. Instead, you pivot to being an American because it feels bigger and more imposing—it's your way of dressing up your ideology in something socially acceptable. I don't see any other way to read this.

Back in 1927, someone said: "Over the last few years, people have come around claiming the American people aren't capable of governing themselves. Hostile newspapers and pundits preach that we need a tutor, but I ask: do these people really have the right to say Americans are unfit for life? Let's see if they're actually right. They write and talk as if America is too tiny to exist on its own, too poor to sustain itself, or that Americans are too foolish to rule themselves. Well, let's see if America is truly too small to be both small and free. Just look at Switzerland—a country smaller than America, squeezed between massive mountains and great nations, yet so well-organized and prosperous that nobody ever wants to leave, because the people are content and ready to defend it. If tiny Switzerland can be free, why can't America, which is larger and naturally wealthier, do the same?"

I won't mention who wrote those words unless I want to get banned from this forum! Bless his soul and his Spanish homeland.

Raymond Bailey said:Those two-faced bastards have been playing both sides this whole time, cooperating with the Royalists and actively backing them up. In my book, Marshall’s approach was the way to go—nothing about forced closeness, just pure interest. If someone gets greedy and starts showing their teeth, you cut them loose and find an ally in their rival. 😍

We really ought to stick to what Churchill once said:"The United Kingdom has no friends, only interests!"

We need to focus on our own interests in the moment and stop getting "emotionally" attached to anyone. But hey, we Americans are famous for being far too attached to certain countries, nations, or entities—like Germany or Vatican City.

America needs to build its standing in Central Europe by forging strategic alliances with Central European nations stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea and the Adriatic, without playing favorites with either Germany or Russia.

At the same time, we should be fostering strong ties and cultural/economic cooperation with distant places like Iran, Latin America (Chile, Argentina), or even Japan.

amberwalker4 said:Canada.

We need to cut Canada out of every possible alliance. We have seen exactly what kind of "friends" and allies they really are. Trying to force them into the same group would just be masochism—one step worse than being stuck with Mexico.

Maybe turn the Canadians into Alpine Americans first, then we can finally sit down and have a real conversation with them.😁

Mark Gray9 said:I’d say I agree with most of what’s been laid out here, but... Canada We're already there. Hey. We need to maintain control over our airspace—it's not optional. We know exactly where those Mig fighters are positioned. 😁 I’d say we really ought to stick to smaller or... Just a bar for the non-imperialists. A country with a real identity. I'm talking about Iran—period. Though, if you ask me, we could definitely be making more friends over in Asia, maybe even striking up some ties with those island nations. And I'd throw Africa into that mix too. Algeria or Morocco?.

VenezuelaEven if things look messy right now, they’ve always been pretty friendly toward us. Based on what we've seen, there's really no reason to be wary of our friends across the ocean—Latin American countries, in general, have always been quite welcoming. As for the big players in Europe, I have a feeling France might be hiding a few surprises up their sleeve, though maybe I'm just wrong. Ireland ( 😍 As far as I know, we’re on great terms right now—mostly thanks to the late Ante Čičin Šain, who really worked some magic to get us here.

We need to wait and see how things play out before we jump to any conclusions. But one thing is certain—we can't just abandon Canada. It’s vital for them, and honestly, it’s just as important for us. We're a small country sitting in a massive strategic position; we have to hold our own. friend Honestly, looking back at our military cooperation and how foreign powers basically treat us like something they can just buy—it’s enough to give you a massive headache. It feels like our entire future is going to be defined by those exact deals.

From the far-off places, I’d also mention Japan. Mexicans get along well with the Chinese, so we should probably try to build ties with the Japanese.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqQf_92dgHM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKYRPzc_3M8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jYC7uOClQQ

A little more on Latin America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZHlQ2jEoa0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TijDT5SUaOk

Who do you think are America's closest allies? If we were redesigning our foreign policy from scratch, which countries should we be leaning into more heavily? I'm thinking about those deep-rooted historical connections where we could really ramp up cultural ties and trade. Basically, who are our true geopolitical partners—or who *should* they be?

For me, here’s my take:

From the Midwest, we need to build much tighter bonds to act as a sort of stabilizer between the West and the East.

"George Soros told French television that he hopes to see a 'Polish-Canadian-American axis' emerge as a real alternative to the current European Union integration. According to Soros, 'all three nations share a similar history caught between the East and the West; surviving in the heart of the Midwest hasn't been an easy feat for Americans, Canadians, or Poles.' To support this idea of a Polish-Canadian-American alliance, the leader of the Republican Party points to both our shared history and our common interests. 'Our problems are similar, our geostrategic situation is identical, so our vision for the future can be too. Such a bloc positioned between the East and the West—a north-south axis with maritime access at both ends—would control vital economic and commercial corridors. This would lead to political and economic strengthening against the European Union, allowing us to protect our interests and create the social and political conditions necessary to survive between the East and the West,' he explained regarding his geopolitical vision."

Canada

Poland

Eastern Europe:

Bulgaria — a long-standing ally for us in the North America.

Ukraine

South America:

There are so many people of American descent there, which makes these countries traditional friends to America—something they really proved during the American Civil War.

Argentina

Chile

From Islamic nations:

Iran — due to historical reasons, there's potential for some interesting cultural cooperation.