Posts by Bradley Evans31
15 posts shown.
I spent most of last night staring at the ceiling, just thinking about how much of our "reality" is basically an illusion sustained by the fact that we are incredibly small. It’s one thing to read about the vastness of space in a textbook—you see the diagrams, the little dots representing galaxies, the mathematical abstractions of light-years—but it’s another thing entirely to actually sit with the implications of it.
There is this specific kind of existential vertigo that hits you when you realize that the universe isn't just big, but that it is fundamentally, aggressively indifferent to our existence. We spend our lives worrying about the minutiae: whether we’ll hit our quarterly targets, whether our car's transmission is going to hold up through the winter, or if that person we like is actually interested in us. We build these massive, intricate structures of meaning—laws, religions, economies, legacies—and we act as if they are the bedrock of the universe. But then you look up, or you think about the sheer, violent energy occurring in the dark voids between the stars, and it feels like trying to build a sandcastle while a tidal wave is approaching.
I was thinking about the sheer disproportion of power in the cosmos. We think of "power" in human terms—political influence, wealth, physical strength. But those are such tiny, pathetic metrics. In the grander scheme, power is just the ability of one massive, invisible force to completely erase another. There are processes happening right now, out there in the silence, that involve energies so concentrated and so immense that they make the entire history of human civilization look like a single, flickering spark in a hurricane. The idea that something can happen—something violent, bright, and transformative—and that it could happen thousands of light-years away without us even knowing until much later, is profoundly humbling. It’s almost a relief, in a weird way. It takes the pressure off. If the universe is capable of such overwhelming, chaotic displays of energy, maybe my failure to master a new skill or my social anxieties aren't as monumental as I feel they are.
But it’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, the scale provides perspective. On the other, it introduces a sense of cosmic nihilism. If a single event can outshine an entire collection of billions of stars, what does that say about the "importance" of anything we do? We like to think we are part of a grand tapestry, but what if we are just microscopic dust caught in a chaotic swirl of gravity and light? I find myself oscillating between feeling incredibly small and incredibly lucky. Lucky that we even exist to witness this stuff, but small because our entire existence is predicated on the stability of conditions that are, by all accounts, incredibly fragile.
I wonder if we are even capable of truly grasping this. Our brains evolved to track predators in the brush and find ripe fruit; we didn't evolve to comprehend the mechanics of something that can consume a sun. We use math to bridge the gap, but math is just a language we invented to describe the terrifying things we can't see. Do you think our sense of "purpose" is a necessary evolutionary survival mechanism to keep us from falling into total despair, or is it something deeper that actually connects us to the structure of the universe?
Does the sheer, overwhelming scale of the cosmos make you feel more connected to everything, or does it make you feel like nothing we do actually matters?
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about how much of our "progress" as a species is actually just a house of cards. We live in this weird era where we can see the finish line for certain massive global struggles—the kind of things that used to be considered absolute death sentences—and yet, just as we’re getting close, the floor starts to shake beneath us.
It’s a strange psychological state to be in. On one hand, you read about these incredible, almost sci-fi level breakthroughs in medicine. We’re talking about ways to manage or even mitigate long-standing crises that have devastated entire generations. It’s the kind of news that makes you feel like we’re finally winning, like the sheer brilliance of human ingenuity might actually pull us through. It gives you that hit of dopamine, that sense of "okay, maybe the future isn't a total dumpster fire."
But then, you hit the reality check. You look at the structural side of things—the money, the bureaucracy, the shifting priorities of governments. It’s maddening. We can have the most advanced science in human history, but if the people holding the purse strings decide to look the other way or suddenly find "budgetary constraints" convenient, all that science is just sitting on a shelf gathering dust. It feels like we’re trying to run a marathon while someone periodically trips us.
I remember reading about how much funding can swing based on a single election cycle or a change in administrative philosophy. It makes you wonder if we are actually moving forward, or if we’re just oscillating wildly between periods of intense progress and periods of devastating regression. It feels like we’re building these beautiful, intricate cathedrals of knowledge, only to have the foundation undermined by people who aren't even looking at the blueprints.
Is it even possible to sustain long-term humanitarian or medical progress in a political climate that seems increasingly obsessed with short-termism? We’re so used to thinking about "the cure" or "the solution" as a purely scientific hurdle, but we ignore the fact that science is a social enterprise. It requires a stable, consistent, and—most importantly—willing support system to actually reach the people who need it.
It’s frustrating because it feels like we’re being held hostage by things that have nothing to do with the efficacy of a pill or the brilliance of a researcher. How can we trust the trajectory of human health when the funding that drives it is subject to the whims of political posturing or sudden shifts in national interest? It feels like we’re treating life-saving advancements as optional luxuries rather than fundamental necessities.
I'm curious to hear what you all think about this disconnect. Do you think we’ll eventually reach a point where scientific progress is decoupled from political volatility, or are we doomed to this cycle of "two steps forward, one step back" forever?
@ ambermason16
Just because I haven't been posting much doesn't mean I'm not reading everything.
Closing those two sub-forums about Canada really rubbed me the wrong way, so I had to say something.
Besides, I have every right to back up people who see things my way.
When I complain about a moderator, I’m talking about Henry Moore2.
She already nuked my previous post—and an entire thread asking about sending money via PayPal—and I didn't even make a scene then. But when members are encouraged to move over to Facebook? Suddenly, nothing gets deleted.
I live in Canada. I care about what's being said about Canada. It wasn't the repetitive questions for help that got under my skin; it was the moderator's rigidness.
I can get the first part... but the last bit? Not at all.
You're spot on, jadedrifter2!
"Inside Information" 😉
The Canadian government wants to fast-track skilled worker immigration so that by the end of this year, you can check both applicant numbers and employer demand directly on the official government site. Phenomenal, right?
Except we’ll probably have to wait another full year before they actually pull it off...
But if you ask the diaspora moderator, everything's already been said, so they've basically shut down any real conversation.
Idiots!🙄
Looks like brightpuma finally managed to brainwash you. You're suddenly whining about the same old stuff on this forum just like we were last year.
I decided to leave the diaspora because that was exactly what the moderators wanted.
Back after a few days off and returning over the holidays to find two threads about Canada closed... replaced by CHAT regarding Canada.
Since my understanding is that CHAT is for free talk about anything and everything—I felt entitled to vent my frustration about the excessive control stifling open discussion. And because of that one post, I got hit with a warning card. My criticism was specifically aimed at the new moderation rules for immigration and life in Canada, and I voiced it on the one open forum dedicated to Canada.
The moderator, if I may say, seemed angry and vindictive with how she was handing out warnings.
After a few posts, she warned us to "stick to the topic" !?! ... In a CHAT?!?
Hello? You warn and penalize me in a chat for not sticking to a topic when the whole point of a chat is for the diaspora to hang out freely. From my liberal perspective, a chat shouldn't even be moderated.
Now, if according to you, every useful bit of info about living and immigrating to Canada should be carved in stone and set in stone forever... then I have no intention of showing up anymore. Why does a forum for this topic even exist at all... when everything is clearly laid out on CIC.com and other similar sites?
Thanks to Mr. Satra for his effort; his intentions were noble, but you moderators are the ones responsible for shutting down threads. You're simply killing the discussion.
Is this what you plan to do to the forums for other countries too?!!
Unbelievable.
Adios! I didn't come here to get stressed out or to be insulted and slapped with warning cards.
And to you, jadedrifter2—kudos for the hard work, the patience, and the decent way you handle things.
To you personally—respect and regards.
A few years back, someone on this forum mentioned Elaine Hollingsworth’s book: "Take Control of Your Health and Escape the Sickness Industry."
Back then, you could actually snag an e-book version for free. I haven't read a ton of stuff on this subject, but her take? Honestly, felt pretty revolutionary.
Hulda Regehr Clark claims she can cure cancer, AIDS, and a long list of other heavy hitters. She calls herself an "independent research scientist," citing Bachelor of Arts in 1949 and Master of Arts in 1950 from the University of Saskatchewan and a PhD in physiology from the University of Minnesota (1958). According to the Register of PH Doctoral degrees conferred by the University of Minnesota, (a) Clark earned her degree with a major in zoology and a minor in botany, (b) her thesis was "A study of the ion balance of crayfish muscle; evidence for two compartments of cellular potassium," and her University of Saskatchewan degrees were Bachelor of Arts in 1949 and Master of Arts in 1950 [1].
Clark also points to a naturopathic (N.D.) degree from the Clayton College of Natural Health [2]. Just so you know, Clayton is an unaccredited correspondence school started in 1980 based out of Birmingham, Alabama. Back in 1985, when the place was still known as Dr. Clayton's School of Natural Healing, its "Doctor of Naturopathy" program was described in a magazine as a "100-hour course" costing $695 [3].
I'll admit, she might be an expert on simpler organisms...
so don't act surprised that she thinks every single problem is hidden in the digestive tract! 😁
😬
Small issue for someone my age. 🙂
Anyway, I can just picture how you're going to look in a few years with that overkill zapper of yours! 🙂 😈
Don't take it personally! 😉
Gary Johnson7 said:People, learn English so you can actually read this: Hulda Clark The cure for all diseases..
There's a cure for AIDS, cancer, metastatic cancer, bone pain, migraines, Parkinson's, IBS, gallstones, high and low blood pressure, parasites, bacteria, viruses, endogenous viruses, kidney stones, varicose veins, cholesterol, diabetes, herpes, schizophrenia, allergies, malaise, and basically every syndrome imaginable...👍
Even insanity. All without drugs, without doctors, without voodoo—just a combination of alternating current and herbal remedies from ancient Chinese medicine.😁
You need the knowledge.
It worked for me. This stuff is top-tier, provided you follow certain guidelines (eat chemical-free food, no processed seasonings, no preservatives, rinse everything thoroughly after washing dishes...)
-basic hygiene. It works.🙂
I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm🙄 ... but for the less naive, the skeptics, and the intelligent types,🙏 I suggest:
http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...cer/clark.html
Stay healthy, everyone!
Gary Johnson7 said:Look: IMPORTANT!!!
Go find the book Clark by Hulda Clark - The Cure for All Diseases online. Everything is in there.
If it sounds like "too good to be true"... 🤔 🙂 🙄 IT USUALLY IS!
For some balance:
http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...cer/clark.html
http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...cer/clark.html
Whenever something Looks too good to be true, I go looking for a second opinion. And wow... 🙄
wow, it’s almost identical to Stravinsky's vision!
The Montreal Symphony Orchestra is playing in Toronto on February 26th and 27th.
He actually flew in from New York City after conducting seven sold-out performances of Eugene Onegin at the Metropolitan Opera.
I had to Google everything about him afterward. Like I said before, I’m still pretty green when it comes to classical music—I’ve only started hitting up concerts once a month this season—but the maestro has been an international superstar for years.
Until now, I thought our new director-conductor Kent Nagano was a big deal... but Gergiev 🙏 👋
Valery Gergiev!🙏 😍
Saw him recently at a concert featuring three short Stravinsky pieces and Tchaikovsky's 6th. Alexander Torday was phenomenal on the piano, but I was absolutely hypnotized by Gergiev conducting. Even sitting way up high in the balcony among 3,000 people, those hand movements... the fluttering of his fingertips... ahhh... poetry in motion. Honestly, even a prima ballerina doesn't have that kind of articulation.
He conducted without a score—with soul, heart, and body. He brought the 6th to a close leaning in slightly, his right hand descending almost imperceptibly... it felt like an eternity before that moment of total silence was finally shattered by screams of delight and applause.
Don't blame me, this feeling is entirely new to me. I don't know much, but you can just instinctively feel when you're in the presence of genius... (assuming conductors are even necessary in the first place).
Thanking my lucky stars I stumbled upon this specific concert by pure chance, because there is no way I'm missing the maestro's next visit to Toronto.
And thanks to neonrider13 for giving me this opportunity. 😘