Starting this Monday, I’ve got a new commute ahead of me, traveling from my neighborhood all the way out to the area near the Lidl over by the industrial park. My plan is to just bike it—honestly, driving doesn't even make sense given the cost. I've been biking around town for a while now, but I haven't actually tackled this specific route before.
The route I'm looking at is starting from my place, hitting main street, passing by the concert hall, and then heading straight down toward the industrial district... does that sound doable? Or would it be smarter to take a different path, maybe something like:
Taking the bypass through the outskirts, hitting the roundabout, crossing the bridge, and then cutting over to the business park?
I’m thinking thirty minutes should give me enough time to get there... what do you guys think? Am I being too optimistic?
I’m sitting at about a 5.9 in one direction, though I tend to rack up a lot more mileage when I'm out running errands. Honestly, I find it way easier to just hop on my bike rather than dealing with the headache of other ways to get around.
Honestly, I’ve been commuting to work by bike all August—maybe hopping on a bus or two if I have to—and I haven't missed my car one bit. It’s actually been pretty great.
Shakespeare - Briton.
The only real hiccup was when the heat hit those 95-degree peaks; I was sweating bullets, so I had to pack extra layers. But even then, it wasn't a huge deal since I can just work in shorts, and I always kept a pair of slacks in my bag anyway, just in case an unexpected meeting popped up. I usually just carry them in my laptop backpack. That was really the only downside, mostly because I’m lugging around a 17" laptop, which is a beast. Between that, the charger, and a few other bits, it starts feeling pretty heavy 😢 and I end up soaked in sweat by the time I arrive.
But overall, huge thumbs up to daily bike commuting.
There are still a few games left on the schedule, but they’ve already gone ahead and bought the rights for the third-place match, the semifinals, and the big finale
When we talk about being "popular" in terms of Television and broadcasting, we’re really talking about what pulls the biggest live TV audiences and gets the most listeners on the radio. Popularity isn't just about how much a sport is played or consumed; it's about which one reaches the absolute masses.
You're intentionally comparing the heavy hitters—those massive sports where all you need is two goals and a field, or maybe a patch of asphalt and a hoop—against sports that require specialized, high-end infrastructure like figure skating.
Take hockey, for example. In a city like Chicago, you have well over a hundred people dedicated to it, and there are more than 700 kids playing through the little local leagues and the big school programs, all using just two indoor rinks! Then you factor in the younger cadets, the junior divisions, the seniors, the veterans, and finally the recreational players (there are at least a hundred of us just playing for fun).
When you actually sit down and do the math, you realize that roughly two thousand people in Chicago are involved in hockey, all centered around just two locations.
It's pretty interesting when you look at it that way—honestly, it's kind of phenomenal.