The ultimate thread
in Spirituality ·
About Svetlana 😁
139 posts shown.
Justin Baker6 said:Finally broken, huh? You stopped mentioning those hack writers. Hahahaha.
You're just unstable, man. Your ego is fragile.
Justin Baker6 said:It's my work, and you've got zero skin in the game. That's the whole issue. See how everything just comes to light eventually? Heh.
And do you feel more stable now that you’ve labeled someone else unstable?
I saw you delete that last-second comment where you called me unstable. It’s unbelievable how much my original work is actually eating at you. Believe it or not, I'm right here, and I'm not backing down.
Justin Baker6 said:You wouldn't be getting this worked up if you realized your whole argument is built on nothing. You should try being creative for once—like me. Everything I write comes straight from my own head.
When was the last time you actually wrote something original? It's all just copy-paste from you. I'm a human being; you're just a machine. That's the reality.
My threads will always stay at the top because there are plenty of you here obsessed with them. Welcome to the show. Now I know exactly how to get my voice out to the masses.
Justin Baker6 said:You wouldn't be getting this worked up if you realized your whole argument is built on nothing. You should try being creative for once—like me. Everything I write comes straight from my own head.
When was the last time you actually wrote something original? It's all just copy-paste from you. I'm a human being; you're just a machine. That's the reality.
My threads will always stay at the top because there are plenty of you here obsessed with them. Welcome to the show. Now I know exactly how to get my voice out to the masses.
Justin Baker6 said:You wouldn't be getting this worked up if you realized your whole argument is built on nothing. You should try being creative for once—like me. Everything I write comes straight from my own head.
When was the last time you actually wrote something original? It's all just copy-paste from you. I'm a human being; you're just a machine. That's the reality.
My threads will always stay at the top because there are plenty of you here obsessed with them. Welcome to the show. Now I know exactly how to get my voice out to the masses.
Justin Baker6 said:Look, I've already laid out how the principles work.
The outsiders meddling with this stuff don't matter to the core topic. Let's just stick to analyzing the principle itself.
Justin Baker6 said:Holy Spirit? I have no idea what you mean by that. Care to elaborate?
I'm pulling this straight from my own intuition. I think I've hit on some massive insights here.
So, basically, we both exist and don't exist at the exact same time. I'll explain later why this stance is incredibly practical and has absolutely nothing to do with schizophrenia (which is denying reality, whereas I'm not denying reality—I'm saying it *is* happening, but also it isn't).
Some people claim everything is just an illusion, which basically makes them anti-matter shavers, while others claim everything is material, making them material shavers.
Based on my gut instinct, the truth has to be somewhere in the middle, and here it is.
Once you grasp these insights, you move on to rotation exercises—like, say, flipping the Earth's poles—to turn matter into anti-matter.
Justin Baker6 said:Holy Spirit? I have no idea what you mean by that. Care to elaborate?
I'm pulling this straight from my own intuition. I think I've hit on some massive insights here.
So, basically, we both exist and don't exist at the exact same time. I'll explain later why this stance is incredibly practical and has absolutely nothing to do with schizophrenia (which is denying reality, whereas I'm not denying reality—I'm saying it *is* happening, but also it isn't).
Some people claim everything is just an illusion, which basically makes them anti-matter shavers, while others claim everything is material, making them material shavers.
Based on my gut instinct, the truth has to be somewhere in the middle, and here it is.
Once you grasp these insights, you move on to rotation exercises—like, say, flipping the Earth's poles—to turn matter into anti-matter.
Justin Baker6 said:Holy Spirit? I have no idea what you mean by that. Care to elaborate?
I'm pulling this straight from my own intuition. I think I've hit on some massive insights here.
So, basically, we both exist and don't exist at the exact same time. I'll explain later why this stance is incredibly practical and has absolutely nothing to do with schizophrenia (which is denying reality, whereas I'm not denying reality—I'm saying it *is* happening, but also it isn't).
Some people claim everything is just an illusion, which basically makes them anti-matter shavers, while others claim everything is material, making them material shavers.
Based on my gut instinct, the truth has to be somewhere in the middle, and here it is.
Once you grasp these insights, you move on to rotation exercises—like, say, flipping the Earth's poles—to turn matter into anti-matter.
Joseph Bailey41 said:Are you really implying that someone with such beautifully designed pages is lying? ☕
I'm offended.
Justin Baker6 said:Some paranoid nutcase thinks they can track everything I read and everything I do. I've run into thousands of people like that in the dark corners of the web. They never stop because they’re convinced they can actually read minds. Honestly, it works out fine for me since my topics always end up at the top of the pile. Not every bad thing needs to be treated like a catastrophe.
Justin Baker6 said:Some paranoid nutcase thinks they can track everything I read and everything I do. I've run into thousands of people like that in the dark corners of the web. They never stop because they’re convinced they can actually read minds. Honestly, it works out fine for me since my topics always end up at the top of the pile. Not every bad thing needs to be treated like a catastrophe.
Justin Baker6 said:Some paranoid nutcase thinks they can track everything I read and everything I do. I've run into thousands of people like that in the dark corners of the web. They never stop because they’re convinced they can actually read minds. Honestly, it works out fine for me since my topics always end up at the top of the pile. Not every bad thing needs to be treated like a catastrophe.
Justin Baker6 said:Some paranoid nutcase thinks they can track everything I read and everything I do. I've run into thousands of people like that in the dark corners of the web. They never stop because they’re convinced they can actually read minds. Honestly, it works out fine for me since my topics always end up at the top of the pile. Not every bad thing needs to be treated like a catastrophe.
Joseph Bailey41 said:Not at all. Honestly, I find it pretty fascinating. I'm just waiting for someone from that actual materialization team to weigh in, because I get the feeling nobody else here really understands what you're talking about. 😁
Justin Baker6 said:Joseph Bailey41 and Elizabeth Taylor3 are acting like two sisters lost in a schizophrenic episode.
This has nothing to do with mental illness. This state is being induced. It’s an artificial mental state, not some byproduct of a thought disorder.
There is an entire team dedicated to external mind manipulation. These are specific techniques being perfected because flipping a mind into that state instantly isn't easy.
silverwolf98 said:But what if there isn't actually a path to follow, or some predefined road you're supposed to trek down?
Joseph Bailey41 said:Alright, so that specific group doesn't do the whole sex thing. I assume others do, though. In my opinion, Tantra without sex feels pretty pointless. 🤷
Joseph Bailey41 said:Thanks. I just started watching the video—the guy is making some pretty heavy comparisons to Manson. 😬
E: It’s a great film, though I haven't quite made it to the part about eating carrion yet. He’s drinking out of a skull and smearing himself with ash (which actually seems useful for keeping mosquitoes away... I've honestly thought about trying that) and eating food left for the deceased (I'll pass on that one, since I don't eat flowers). So far, the only thing that really grossed me out was him scooping water from an Indian river. That’s just nasty to me. Honestly, it would probably kill me. Probably kill most Americans, too.
Joseph Bailey41 said:I have to admit, I haven't heard much about the actual scavenging part. I do know about meditating (or even having sex) in graveyards (like an open-air crematorium) and smearing oneself with the ashes of the deceased, but not because those spots hold some special energy. It seems more like it's because those places are taboo, and Left Hand Path tantra can basically be boiled down to the intentional breaking of taboos. If I've got that wrong, please set me straight. Ideally, send over some links regarding this necro-cannibalism stuff, otherwise we might just be talking in circles.
hiddenpuma75 said:Let me try to translate that for you...
What is COMPLETELY (and I mean 100%) shared by Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and even slaves (for instance, back in ancient Rome or generally speaking) is the simple FACT that the ideal believer or the ideal slave is expected to be submissive to a set of rules imposed by SOMEONE ELSE.
These rules and theologies are often vague, contradictory, demeaning, or even "impossible"... but their goal is to weaken or dismantle the ego we all possess, aiming to harmonize the individual with "something greater than themselves."
When a follower of the Left-Hand Path realizes this fact (whether consciously or not), they decide—either intentionally or instinctively—not to follow anyone else's rules. Instead, they choose to follow themselves, their own principles, and their own independent journey.
In my view, both paths are valid and achievable, but both are incredibly demanding. The Right-Hand Path is difficult because it requires total self-denial, while the Left-Hand Path is tough because you end up "standing apart" from the crowd. You're essentially alone, and being in the minority makes it hard to navigate the standards others have set.
Both paths offer plenty of examples of massive successes and inspirations, as well as huge failures, tragedies, and sheer absurdity.
It’s also easy to see how those on the Left and those on the Right generally fail to understand one another. They tend to despise each other, convinced that their own path is the only viable one, while viewing the other as "evil," bizarre, or pathetic.
Beyond that, there are internal differences within "each hand." For example, Buddhism stands out from other religions because it "has no God," yet a Buddhist still submits to dharma, sangha, and "
Buddha.
On the Left-Hand Path side, we have both atheistic and theistic versions of the way.
Essentially, every atheist is a follower of the Left-Hand Path by default, even if they've never heard the term. It isn't because an atheist does what Christians *think* they do (like sacrificing children 🙄), but simply because they refuse to be "obedient" to a narrative that feels untruthful or externally forced upon them.
(Of course, all of this is incredibly brief and superficial to someone who has no clue about the subject.
And Amy Bennett, you don't really know anything about the "Left-Hand Path," so to you, it's just "Satanism"—basically the caricature that mainstream Christianity created.
But if we acknowledge the fact that Jesus followed a Left-Hand Path in relation to Judaism, then it becomes foolish to claim he was a Satanist.
To the Pharisees, he *was* a Satanist, which is exactly why they executed him.
Similarly, Buddha was considered a heretic by Hindus, yet it would be just as ridiculous to call Buddha a Satanist.
This is a fascinating topic because every single one of us has been, at various times, a "Left-Hander" and a "Right-Hander."
mistybison said:Can the tradition of the guru really be plucked from one culture and dropped into another without losing its essence?
Isn't the term "spiritual teacher" far too broad as well? You could have yoga instructors, meditation coaches, healers, or even shamans...
Who actually qualifies to be a spiritual teacher?
Chris Williams said:That simply isn't true. It isn't a dangerous path, nor is it some route defined by hedonism and lust. I suspect a few Western fools who have rebranded their own lack of restraint as sacred tantra are nothing more than frauds.
Andrew White6 said:There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the basic concepts at play. Both terms actually refer to different spiritual trajectories. The terms "Right-Hand Path" (or *dakshinachra*) and "Left-Hand Path" (*vamachakra*) are borrowed from esoteric—meaning by definition non-materialistic and otherworldly—tantric doctrines within Hinduism. The first materialist philosopher in India was Charvaka (around 600 BCE), and he has nothing to do with this development, neither in origin nor in actual meaning.
So, what are we really talking about? According to established tantric beliefs, there is a natural flow of universal cosmic force through the human body from left to right, which mirrors the north-to-south flow of cosmic energy. When the human body is oriented toward the east—with the left hand facing north and the right facing south—it was believed the body was in harmony with the natural flow of the universe. This is the "Right-Hand Path," or *dakshinacha*—the path of alignment with the cosmic order. The reverse orientation is the "Left-Hand Path," or *vamachara*, an antinomian practice believed to run contrary to nature and the cosmic law. It’s essentially a rebellion against the divinely ordained order, which requires a much greater strength of will. Those who choose to "go against the current" articulate themselves more fully and individualize themselves against their surroundings, allowing for greater independence and freedom.
In short, the key distinction between these two paths is the difference between orthodoxy and heterodoxy: between submitting to a "higher power" and resisting it; between merging harmoniously with one's environment and asserting one's own individuality.A materialist will eventually realize that even after they have "sold their soul to the devil," they still possess a self—allowing them to translate all material events into another form, thereby catching the thread of spirituality and constructing their own world.
Aside from the fact that the Left-Hand Path predates the Judeo-Christian concept of the devil, what you're describing is actually impossible within that specific practice. In a spiritual sense, the "devil"—or the antinomian element found in the Judeo-Christian tradition—is actually the practitioner of the Left-Hand Path themselves. Therefore, "selling one's soul to the devil" would simply mean selling oneself to oneself (the supreme deity of the Left-Hand Path)....both paths lead in the same direction...
Are the direction of union with God in eternity and the direction of separation in eternity heading the same way? Not even orthodox faiths would claim that. The path toward heaven—that is, toward harmonious unity with God—and the path toward hell—eternal separation from God—are not moving in the same direction. If you try to "walk both paths," you aren't going anywhere (which, according to orthodox beliefs, means you're headed straight to hell/separation from God).