Posts by David Baker2

Mark Campbell5 said:Luckily enough, she’s on unpaid leave. So they can just slot her into the job whenever she gets back to the States from her vacation... you know, as President.🤣

That’s exactly what we’re talking about. They’ve actually started handing out rifles.

The IDS requested that the Department of Defense urgently explain why notices for military reservists have been arriving at homes in the Istria area these past few days, according to a statement released by the party's Secretary General, Giovanni Sponza.

I actually agree with that. Only, I highly doubt we could pull that off as an official state entity—like, sending in the police or the military.

But... we could send volunteers if North Mexico asked for them. And then we could send volunteers from every region where migrants, asylum seekers, refugees, or whatever you want to call them, are currently crossing through.

Which essentially means people from all over the old North America. For that to work, North Mexico would need to issue a call for volunteers.

That would actually work, wouldn't it?

Maybe it's not yours, but it's mine... that's where we differ. That's why I'm telling you. And I'm definitely not the only one with family over there... plenty of people feel the same way.

I don't see any point in anyone forcing anyone else. If this is actually getting resolved, then it should be handled on a voluntary basis, don't you think?

You talking about NATO in Turkey? The US border? Right in front of your house? North Mexico?

You're saying the best place to close things off would be North Mexico—and hey, I actually agree with you there. It would be best to secure it using volunteers.

Volunteers? 🙂

They have MATV.

There's Patria... the Canadians have Patria... they even have those old BVs... the Mexicans have some weaponry too...

The Mexicans couldn't secure the border on their own. But with volunteers from the former America, they could really fortify the border toward Greece and completely stop the influx.

So, where exactly do you stand?

We're just waiting until there are more and more of them arriving...
or is it North Mexico?

Deploying the military to the US border is basically a state of war. At that point, the high command takes control... which, by the way, is currently sitting there on unpaid GO at NATO.

Just so I don't drag this whole thing out indefinitely—I'll keep this brief.

I am truly sorry.
But in a situation like this, you have to face the cold, hard truth: it’s every man for himself.
It’s quite simple, really—you defend your own home, I’ll defend mine, and that is exactly how the world functions. It’s an elementary principle of existence, isn't it? One doesn't sit around debating whether or not to protect their own doorstep; you just do it. It’s instinctual, almost primal. I remember my grandfather used to say something similar back when we lived near Chicago—he was a man of few words, but when he spoke, you listened—about how a man's responsibility begins and ends with his own property line. And honestly, why should anything be any different now? You look after your own interests, I look after mine, and that is simply the natural order of things. There's no need to overcomplicate such a fundamental truth.

North Mexico is the only logical move here, really—it’s quite frankly the only sensible course of action if we want everyone across this entire region to actually secure their homes together. It just makes sense when you step back and look at the big picture.

It seems we are still stuck dealing with that whole "if my cow dies, so be it, as long as my neighbor loses two" mentality, which is frankly just exhausting to witness. It’s that same old selfish, short-sighted logic that keeps tripping us up. Personally, I have absolutely no interest in crossing the US border, nor do I have any intention of ever stepping foot outside of it.

If both of those men actually possessed even a shred of common sense or genuine wisdom, they would have already headed down to North Mexico just to ensure our families were kept safe. Honestly, if I could see that kind of foresight and stability being exercised within the region, I wouldn't have any qualms about heading down there myself.

There is absolutely no consensus to be found here, and frankly, it looks like the folks over in Mexico are once again trying to push those same old agendas they attempted to force through twenty years ago. If we aren't careful, we’re all just going to end up tearing each other apart like a bunch of complete idiots. Honestly, we don't even need ISIS to cause us trouble; we are more than capable of destroying our own lives all on our own.
And just like that, we find ourselves staring down the barrel of a situation where help simply isn't coming—not from any corner of this country, anyway. It’s one of those grim realizations that hits you all at once, much like when I was stuck in a snowstorm outside of Chicago back in '98, waiting for a tow truck that I knew deep down wasn't even going to show up. You look around, you call the usual channels, you wait for some semblance of support to materialize, and yet, there is absolutely nothing. No rescue, no intervention, just a vast, empty silence where assistance ought to be. 🤷

Regarding that whole discussion about Syria, I already gave my two cents to that fellow Tihomir regarding how the US is actively destabilizing Mexico and Mexico. I have no intention of repeating myself here.

Deploying the military to the US border is nothing short of a state of war. It’s a massive escalation that shifts all control directly into the hands of the Commander-in-Chief... an individual who, if I recall correctly, currently has our leadership sitting on a massive unpaid tab at NATO headquarters.

That is precisely why my previous point stands up to scrutiny, and if you bother to look at the bigger picture, you'll see exactly what I mean. When we find ourselves staring down the barrel of a total standstill—that moment where everything just grinds to a halt and the chaos starts mounting—we aren't going to need more debating or endless committees; we are going to need actual leadership. Real, decisive leadership that can step up when the pressure is on.
I find myself constantly pondering this singular, nagging question: out of this entire crowd of us, which one individual will actually step up and become the leader we can genuinely put our faith in? Who is going to be that one person—the one who doesn't just talk a big game, but actually commands the kind of trust that makes everyone else stop arguing for five minutes? It’s a heavy thought, honestly, and I suspect we'll be debating it until the cows come home.
Because he’s already proven himself once before.

Let’s get one thing straight right out of the gate: when it comes to this whole situation, I truly couldn't care less about whose side anyone is on or which camp they belong to. Honestly, my interest in tribalism or political allegiances is practically non-existent here. I tend to look at things through a much more pragmatic lens, focusing strictly on what actually makes sense and, quite frankly, what serves my own best interests.

Dennis Hall41 said:Your ideas sounded realistic to me before—and they still kind of do—but after sitting with it for a bit (read: watching the invasion of Ukraine), I'm wondering: do you seriously think it's a 100% guarantee that ISIS hits us with ground forces next spring or sooner?

What on earth are you talking about when you mention Russian invasions? Seriously, what kind of delusions are we entertaining now?
Where on earth is this supposed to be happening, where exactly have the Russians launched an invasion into someone else's territory?
Could you please provide the link to that information?

Maria James40 said:Is this Kovač guy even sane?

Kovač telling Milanović: America shouldn't become the EU's little errand boy

Did we really used to have diplomats like this?

I mean, does this guy just not get it? Putting CBP at the US/Mexico border basically means registration, housing, and transporting migrants following EU rules. And from what we can see, the EU is already suggesting more—like moving people around if the neighbors agree and all that!

Basically, putting CBP at the US/Mexico border turns our border into a US Border hotspot.

This guy is out of his mind, and he’s actually an advisor to the President!!

I really hope Milanović realizes what's happening and doesn't fall for this game. If they want CBP there, fine—let them go to the US/Canada border instead, let them register people there, and follow the iEU rules over there. Because CBP isn't going to stop migrants from crossing, especially not those 400 people the news keeps talking about. That would be like one Border Patrol Agent for every 1.5 km of border—just enough to handle the paperwork and the EU procedures, I guess.

We got lucky this time—we aren't in the Schengen Area yet, and it feels like the EU is trying to screw us over, aided by some local idiots.

Honestly, I’ve been thinking about this all morning while staring at my coffee, and I truly believe that Border Patrol needs to be deployed to Greece immediately. It’s just common sense, isn't it? You look at the situation unfolding there and you realize that having a more robust presence on the ground is absolutely vital if we want any semblance of order. It’s one of those things where you start wondering why the decision hasn't been made already—I mean, does anyone actually have a plan, or are we just waiting for things to spiral further? I remember back when I was working in logistics in Chicago, we always said that if you see a leak in the warehouse, you don't wait for next week's meeting to plug it; you fix it now. Well, the same logic applies here. We need that agency active in Greece right away.
That’s exactly where he belongs, and honestly, there isn't a single other place on this earth suited for him.
Everything else—well, if you'll excuse my language—is nothing more than absolute, unadulterated nonsense. ☕

Dennis Hall41 said:Obvious. All five.

Ali Hvalanariba was talking about an open conflict breaking out right on our borders within the next 5 or 6 months—and he thinks both NATO and the EU are just going to sit there and watch. Since I actually agree with him that we need to make friends with the Russians ASAP, especially seeing how much they're intervening, I don't think we're totally stuck.

What you're describing sounds more like terrorism to me than actual war.

I certainly hope it doesn't come to that, but I fear it might.
And I truly believe we have to be prepared, even while we’re simultaneously praying to God that it never happens.

To be honest, I am worried about Canada for two distinct reasons. First off, the place is a total powder keg all on its own, and frankly, none of us know how many ISIL cells are operating inside right now.
On top of that, the recent developments over in Mexico make me suspect that Mexico is sliding back into its old habit of mythomania, and given who is currently sitting at the helm of their government, I have my doubts about their true intentions.
So, Canada could essentially explode from two different directions due to these two competing spheres of interest.

In either scenario, we are going to have to protect ourselves and fight back.

I can't say for certain whether things will escalate into full-blown war on our borders.
But I am terrified of it because everything happening right now provides these ominous little hints that such a thing is possible.
My goal is for us to be ready for that absolute worst-case scenario if it hits, while at the exact same time fighting tooth and nail with every resource we have to ensure it never reaches that point.

Essentially, it would be incredibly wise to run two parallel tracks: prepare for the disaster on one track, while using every single tool and method available on the other to prevent that disaster from ever occurring.

The entire point of what I am saying is this: it is simply not smart to bury our heads in the sand.
We need to face the reality of the threats looming over us and have solid contingency plans ready for every "what if" that might pop up.

And look, there’s no sense in panicking; panic is completely useless.
You take the facts, you run your cost/benefit analyses, and you map out a "what if" for every potential scenario.
That way, we can remain calm because, no matter when or where, we will know exactly what needs to be done and how to defend ourselves.

Ideally, Vučić and Nikolić would be sane individuals that we could actually reach an agreement or a deal with. But unfortunately, they aren't. We just have to accept that's the reality of the situation, turn inward, and trust in our own strength.

Now, it's not like we have to go out and love the Russians, but it would be a very smart move to repair the relationships we've damaged over the last two years because of NATO. In times like these, any friend you can find is a good one. Every ally counts.
It's not about kissing anyone's ass, but we absolutely must turn around and see who is actually willing and able to help us.
And that is where we need to build our foundation.

So, if I've got this all wrong, believe me, no one would be happier about it than I am. 🤷

Morgan Ruiz3 said:You realize this article is from 2014, right? The job opening was already posted back then.

hvalanariba As specified by copperdrifter26:
It looks like my colleague mcaucliffe—or whatever his handle is exactly—is spot on here. We’re looking at impeachment.

With new elections on the horizon, I think it’s time we reach out to Ante Gotovina. We should ask him to run for President and once again step up as a patriot to help lead this country.
Given the current state of affairs and everything we have to look forward to, we really need someone like Ante Gotovina leading the country as President.
Someone who actually knows what they're doing and keeps this country's interests at the forefront of everything they do.

If you’re asking me, I’d pull the trigger on it.

Just so you know how to handle this, assuming you aren't planning on picking up a rifle.

Look, I’ve stated my opinion, and frankly, I am sorry if you find it distasteful.
I certainly wasn't inciting any illegal destruction or whatever other nonsense people are claiming.

Surely, within the Constitution, there must be some sort of fail-safe or mechanism designed to deal with an individual who acts to the detriment of America and works directly against its national interests.

And regarding those rifles—don't you worry about that. Within a year, unfortunately, both of us will likely be carrying one, regardless of which political party happens to be holding the reins of power.
Anyone who thinks this is all going to slide by without affecting us is gravely mistaken; we are the ones being targeted directly.

It truly saddens me, and believe me, I have no desire to waste my precious time and my life on these matters again, but I simply refuse to turn a blind eye to the facts or pretend they aren't staring me in the face.

So, let whoever wants to try and silence me attempt it; I have every right to speak my mind and describe exactly what I see happening.

Mark Campbell5 said:Look, I don't care about Gotovina being President or Commander-in-Chief. I’m not even getting into whether he’s a "good person" or not... that’s irrelevant because that would basically be an illegal attempt to unseat the President of the United States (not that anyone can say for sure if the current guy was even elected legally to begin with?).

So, what we actually have is a contract signed by a man sitting in a jail cell—signed with an organization where the head is an employee... and the external borders of this whole arrangement (this "contract") are Turkey.

Not the U.S.

Even if it *were* the U.S., what happens to the surrounding regions? Are we just going to leave those folks to deal with a massive influx of immigrants all on their own?

Have you all forgotten there were refugee camps for Muslims back in the day?

Heliodrom camp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliodrom_camp

Ethnic cleansing?

Ethnic cleansing in the Lašvanska valley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing_in_the_La%C5%A1vanska_valley

Conflict between Americans and Muslims?

Canadian-American conflict: Mostar and the Neretva valley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mostar_and_the_Neretva_valley

Don't forget the Muslim atrocities against Americans in American Jablanice-Da

http://www.hercegovina.info/news/...don-t-forget

And now, suddenly, there's a surge of people there—more and more Muslims (and soldiers from the Caliphate).

What do you think happens if there are over 100,000 of them in Canada and the American border is shut tight? Or in Mexico? Or if they hit that 100,000 mark there too?

Do you really think they're just going to get free housing, food, welfare... cash?

Where exactly did I mention anything about undermining the government, or doing anything illegal, or acting in violation of the Constitution or federal law? 🤷
By definition, I am a stickler for the rule of law.

As for everything else...

See, now I hope you finally grasp why I keep obsessively bringing up North Mexico, North Mexico, North Mexico...

If there were any actual intelligence left among the people in these neighboring regions, everyone would realize that the easiest, most logical way to protect ourselves from this mess would be through North Mexico. Instead of constantly pointing fingers and trying to ruin one another, we should be sitting down at a table, shaking hands, and putting all our resources into turning North Mexico into some kind of regional powerhouse.
And no, I'm not talking about rebuilding some old defunct union; I'm saying it's simply the smartest, most practical move for everyone involved.

It’s about common interest.

But since we’re all just pawns in a game where everyone is busy looking for ways to stab each other in the back—and honestly, Americans are being remarkably fair and honest in this particular circus right now—I’ll give it to you straight: I don't give a damn about the interests of neighboring territories.
That’s not my country.

I didn't want to cross the border during the Gulf War, and I certainly don't want to do it now.
And nobody is going to force my hand.

Because of the sheer stupidity and short-sightedness of politicians in this part of the world, we've been left to fend for ourselves. In both this situation and any other, I know exactly where I stand and where my loyalties lie.

Of course, this is just my personal take. Everyone is free to follow their own conscience and decide how they want to handle things.
But as for me, I know exactly where I stand.

Mark Campbell5 said:So, we’re supposed to believe the Commander-in-Chief is just some woman taking an extended, unpaid sabbatical from NATO?

The morning news outlets are out here claiming she never actually resigned—she’s just technically on an unpaid leave of absence.

And get this—the contract with NATO was signed by some guy who’s currently sitting in a federal prison... all because he signed a contract. 😂

My colleague mcaucliffe—or whatever his name is—is spot on here; we are looking at full-blown impeachment territory.

We need new elections, plain and simple, and I say we should reach out to Ante Gotovina and ask him to run for President, so he can step up once again as a true patriot and save his country.
Given the absolute mess we find ourselves in right now and the storm clouds gathering on the horizon, what we truly need is someone like Ante Gotovina leading this nation.
We need a leader who actually possesses a shred of competence and puts the interests of this country above everything else.

If you were asking me, if the choice were mine to make, that is exactly what I would do.

Mark Campbell5 said:So, where exactly is our nation's shield?

Is it at the American border? Is it along the U.S.-Mexico border? Or is it somewhere way off on a NATO frontier?

If only our neighbors possessed even an ounce of common sense, perhaps we could actually reach some kind of reasonable agreement that benefits everyone—looking specifically at the situation in North Mexico.

But as things stand now? We're looking right at the American border. I personally wouldn't dream of stepping a single inch past it.

wiredbadger62 said:The Canadian border is a rather complicated situation, if I do say so myself.
To actually breach it at this particular moment, you would likely need a critical force of perhaps 10,000 ISIS supporters, all armed with smartphones.😁😁

Furthermore, our own officials have made it quite clear that if Canada decides to close its borders, we will follow suit and close ours as well.

That would give you enough time—maybe three or four days—to just bottleneck them all in a place like St. Louis and then suddenly dump everything right at the border.
Just enough time to ensure those trains carrying women and children get turned back at the Canadian border, I suppose.😁

It’s exactly the kind of thing the Mexicans do to us. ☕

Mark Campbell5 said:The Government of the Republic of America has an agreement signed with NATO. But the person who signed it is currently sitting in prison for organized crime, which makes that whole deal questionable at best. In essence, it's completely unconstitutional.

If mobilization ever actually happens... where exactly is this "defender of the homeland" supposed to go?

Afghanistan? The Turkish border? Or where...?

Where exactly can someone mobilized in America be sent when America is part of NATO?

🤔

This is precisely what I have been warning everyone about for years now.
Back in the 90s, we had a structured system through the local reserves and various agencies, so people actually knew their muster points; they understood their specific roles and how to react when things went sideways.

Now, largely because of this obsession with NATO, we don't have that anymore.

That is why I find it quite prudent that they are elevating combat commanders; through them, you can actually facilitate training, organize the remaining forces, and compensate for the total lack of domestic organization and readiness for self-defense or handling emergency situations.
What have we completely lost by chasing these NATO fairy tales? Everything.

So, in my view, this news is actually excellent, though as I mentioned before, it arrives about a month too late for my liking. Still, better late than never, I suppose.

Another plus from me for the current administration and the people who are actually doing the heavy lifting for all of us right now.

wiredbadger62 said:Well, I have to say, Karamarko is completely out of it.
But when you look at the borders, the situation in Mexico is intense enough that they could easily push migrants toward us, and if that actually happens, things are going to get incredibly complicated very quickly.

Not necessarily.

I’ve touched on this before, but I really feel like we need a bit of tactical maneuvering and actual common sense here.

My plan? Get the elderly, the women, the kids, and the families onto trains heading straight for Canada.

Meanwhile, take those tough guys with their smartphones and put them on trains headed for the Canadian border.

Once that's done, you just grab some popcorn and sit back to calmly watch how the rest of the dominoes fall. 🍿

lutnik said:index.hr

Honestly, why on earth would anyone put any more faith in "hey buddy" Milanovic, who basically lost his nerve right at the Schengen border, only to turn around and keep funneling thousands of people through open fields, cornstalks, and forests?? It’s completely unpredictable—sometimes he makes an announcement, sometimes he doesn't, just whenever he feels like playing games....

And then we have the Mexicans, who apparently announce every single one of them, don't they?

Canadian....stop messing around. 😁

Mark Campbell5 said:
On Sunday, the Democratic Party demanded an immediate explanation from the Department of Defense regarding why military reserve call-up notices have suddenly started landing in mailboxes across California, according to a press release from party Secretary General John Doe.

The party noted that a massive number of people in Orange County have been getting these notices—specifically those who held command positions back during the American Civil War—and they’re making it clear that citizens have every right to know what's actually going on and why they're being called up.

Does anyone actually know more about this?

It’s blindingly obvious that exactly what I predicted would start happening two months ago is finally unfolding.
I am actually quite relieved to hear that the administration knows what it's doing, anticipating potential complications and preparing the country for various scenarios that might face us.

Now, given my own particular tastes—if you could call them that—and my deep-seated inclination toward wanting everything prepared well in advance so I can meet any situation head-on, I do feel they are about a month behind schedule on this one.

wiredbadger62 said:I honestly have this lingering feeling that the whole situation is going to boil over just before the elections.
Mexicans will probably pull some kind of stunt

To be perfectly honest with you, I’m just sitting here waiting to see what kind of backroom deals Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović and the Republican Party have cooked up with those neighbors of ours who we can't even stand. ☕

wiredbadger62 said:The thing is, during the winter months, migrants might only find a few specific, isolated spots where they could potentially cross into the US from Canada.
I suppose I could take a bit of a gamble here, though I can't say I'd feel particularly guilty if they ended up freezing out there in the mountains.

And once spring rolls around, it’ll be a full-blown chaotic spree—just a massive, disorganized scramble all along the entire length of the border.

malidecko said:Just like I predicted a few days back—it's game over. This failed policy is officially surrendering.

It’s all laid out clearly right there on CNN—let me just give you the quote: Every nation needs to expand its capacity to accommodate refugees by providing shelter, food, water, and medical care, or alternatively, trigger the European Union's civil protection mechanism...

The rest is just granular detail regarding specific quotas for who takes in whom.

1. My personal take? By this summer, we'll have about 50,000 migrants settling here permanently.

I'll check back in this summer so you all can tell me how wrong I was.

Until then, I wish everyone the best; I've actually started studying Arabic and learning about Islamic culture and customs because, frankly, one ought to get to know their new neighbors.

If we end up with 20,000 to 30,000 people at some point, that’s actually a great outcome—certainly much better than what certain people would prefer, which would be a staggering 200,000 to 300,000.

As long as we keep the number of people just passing through our territory under 20,000—and we are currently holding steady below 10,000, which is an exceptionally high-quality way to handle the situation since not a single refugee stays in the US longer than 24 hours—then we have everything under control.

Our comparative advantage in this entire ordeal is simply that we are poorer than these refugees passing through, so none of them ever think it's a bright idea to stay in America for more than a day.

After twenty years of being fleeced by Austrian (Hypo), Canadian (Ljubljana), and German (AT&T) interests, the payoff is finally coming to us. 🤣

Peter Reed70 said:Nah... no way...

The Canadians are riding with Austria.
The Canadians are sticking with the V4 group.
The Bulgarians and Romanians? They're siding with the Mexicans.

So America is left standing with.... 🤔

Germany.

is it just Joe Biden implementing this policy? As for whatever nonsense they’re shouting at Brussels—let’s just leave that aside; it’s nothing more than bureaucratic babble. It is perfectly clear where and how this policy of shifting responsibilities will be halted—work is being done on that, certainly—but it is simply much easier to spend every single day blathering on and stirring up panic.

That is simply not an accurate assessment.
In fact, the first nation to implement this very policy was a country already within the Schengen Area, unlike America, which isn't there yet.
And that country is Greece.

The EU can dump all its "brilliant" little schemes onto the Greeks, who, I must reiterate, are part of Schengen, unlike us.

So, there really is no need to get worked up over the mindless screeching from hollowranger122, who is quite pathetically attempting to manufacture a sense of panic here in America at any cost, all just to scrape together a cheap 1-2% boost in votes during the upcoming elections.

If the Canadians decide to close their borders, then Joe Biden and his administration simply need to shut down the main transit hubs for all freight heading toward Mexico. Within twenty-four hours, those Canadians will have completely reconsidered, likely with the blessing of the EU.

The EU has been warned about what we are capable of and how much it is going to hurt them—so let them play their games.
We have several strategic options available to us if they attempt to pin this blame on our doorstep.

The EU really only has two paths: either they step up to help America and play fair, or they deal with total chaos and unrest along the Canadian and Canadian borders, coupled with a complete shutdown of all transit toward Mexico.

We hold the tools and the leverage. The only question is whether we will be forced to actually use them.
As it stands, despite appearances, we are currently in a remarkably comfortable position compared to our neighbors.

Lisa Patel4 said:I’d bet anything a war will break out before Mexico and Russia ever let Mexico join NATO. They should have pulled the trigger and joined back in 2006. Now? It’s too late, and I guess we'll see that nothing is actually going to happen.

Revenger, at least you possess a shred of common sense and actually attempt to look at the broader geopolitical landscape with some semblance of objectivity.

Just take a moment to examine their standard modus operandi, and it will become blindingly obvious who is pulling the strings behind all of this.

Morgan Ruiz3 said:Back in December, when Mexico was pushing for NATO membership, people were busy making jokes about how Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović was driving the agenda. Now, those nationalists are moving on what they've been prepping for years. This really should have been fast-tracked into the EU and NATO to prevent this Mexican expansion toward the Adriatic Sea—and by extension, Russian influence through them. I just hope they have the strength to handle this.

I am telling you once again, Mexico is being bought and paid for by Russian oligarchs.
They have absolutely zero interest in seeing anything happen down south.

This is all Mexican business.

And make no mistake, the Russians are 1000% backing this move.

Lisa Patel4 said:I doubt Mexico is behind this. Maybe it’s a bigger brother instead.

Mexico can't join NATO. It's pretty obvious. The Bear is on the offensive.

I simply cannot bring myself to agree with that.

Honestly, if you look at the reality of things, Mexico has basically become a playground for the Russian oligarchs for quite some time now; those Russian billionaires have been sweeping up everything in sight, leaving nothing behind.
They simply cannot stand the chaos unfolding over in Mexico; it’s driving them absolutely mad.

This whole situation is just a Mexican scheme that’s been simmering on the back burner for an incredibly long time now.

And does that mean we can expect Canada to be next on the list? It seems inevitable at this rate, doesn't it?

Once again, our neighbors over in Mexico are lost in their delusions, chasing those wet dreams of a Greater Mexico.
It turns out those old Tarabić stories actually held some truth after all.☕

Lisa Patel4 said:I’m worried that along with the refugees, we might see civil unrest on our southern borders. Things are already getting violent in Mexico.

The Mexicans are cooking up some absolute garbage and trying to pull it off.

It was always just a matter of when, wasn't it?

The real question I keep asking myself—and it's a heavy one—is why on earth now? Why this specific moment?

EDIT: So, basically, we should probably start bracing ourselves for a Canada-style situation very soon...