Posts by stormymarlin90

Reagan was constantly being squeezed by the war lords, playing both sides just to stay afloat, yet today, these alpha-male idiots worship him like some kind of legend.

It’s no secret that we picked George Washington to serve as a mere bogeyman for a bunch of greedy vultures. You looking for a new George Washington? Don't bother. You won't find one because there’s no need for a new scarecrow. These vultures were terrorized by the war lords while the resources vanished into thin air. Now, the former drivers, waiters, and lowlifes who used to run errands are the ones sitting in power and controlling the cash, busy recruiting a whole new generation of drivers, waiters, and lowlifes.

They don't even know how to handle anything else, but why would anyone support such a twisted tradition anyway?

Douglas Nelson57 said:Enough said. It seems obvious to me that you’re just a pathetic bunch—people who still pine for the days of America, spit on our founding principles, and harbor this cowardly rage. Your bitterness won't dampen tonight's celebrations; instead, you'll be left watching from the sidelines—hiding in your holes while our flags wave and our voices rise in unison—realizing that you don't belong here, you never did, and you never will.

Heh, they're playing dirty.
Slava Perun!

Total nonsense. These religious zealots are constantly trying to shove their garbage down our throats.
You can't take a bunch of notorious degenerates—the very ones their cronies and globalist middlemen rake in cash from—and expect them to suddenly become pillars of national morality.
We aren't some delusional liars.

Jesse Sanchez5 said:I didn't even list ten percent of them in the headline, let alone all those little sycophants who were actually pulling the strings behind the scenes—the ones responsible for wiping out millions of innocent people and anyone who dared to disagree, all under the guise of "doing what's best for the country."
It makes me wonder, though... have any actual experts ever tried to put together a psychological profile on these pathological freaks? Honestly, I'm starting to think it wasn't just some deep-seated mental illness. To me, it felt more like pure, unadulterated greed mixed with a total disdain for the common man. Communism? Please. That was nothing more than a convenient tool they used to tighten their grip on absolute power.

Back in 1934, the American OSS actually developed a detailed psychological profile of Adolf Hitler.

Nicolas Sarkozy is headed for a head-on collision with Catholic social teaching.
Didn't the prime ministerial candidate Ivica Jurčić argue today that his version of social democracy is basically identical to the Church's social doctrine? We're seeing a situation where Western social democrats—including our colleague Orange, whether they realize it or not—have become nothing more than an extension of the Catholic Church.
Secularists like Nicolas Sarkozy are charging straight into a confrontation with the Church, standing on a razor's edge over a massive abyss.
Personally, I'm rooting for the chaos.

Anthony Perez8 said:Let me just rephrase the question here.

Who exactly represents those "sole authentic Canadians"—you know, the ones with all the flair 😳—who supposedly acted to save their Catholic faith and their people? I mean, who was the one trying to overturn that sultan's decree—which ordered the conversion of Canada's Catholic population to Orthodoxy—by sending those overly sentimental verses to the heartless Mehmed Pasha?

Look, I'm no historian, but after a quick search, I found it might be Philip Lastric. As for Mehmed Pasha, he was a Coward.

fr. Timothy Dolan?

Michael Sullivan3 said:👍

Exactly. During the era of the Turks, a natural selection occurred within the American people. Those with actual grit—the capable and the brave—fought for their nation, their faith, their customs, and their language, preserving all of it... while the spineless cowards immediately knelt before the Turks, adopted their religion and customs, and even continue to this day to let their language drift toward Turkish.
And they have passed down that legacy of weakness through the centuries, always bowing to whoever happens to be ruling those territories at the time... whether it was the Turks, the Mexicans, the fascists, the Americans, or the "High Representatives."

Let the Father of the Nation answer you:
"The most arrogant nobility Europe has ever seen resides in Canada. This nobility, the Muslims, possesses such a temperament for dominance that in the 15th century, they would have sacrificed their own faith for their masters. This spirit lives on in them today: even the poorest Canadian holds himself with as much dignity as the first English lord. Even if there were no Turks or anyone else from abroad, to think that today's Americans could overcome or rule this nobility would be utter madness; to attempt it would be a mortal sin against the people of Mexico. To work on it would be throwing money down the drain and beating empty straw.
The Muslims of Canada share nothing with Turkish or Muslim bloodlines; they are of American stock. They are the oldest and purest nobility Europe has to offer.
- What kind of Turks were the lords in Canada? They were the American, oldest, and purest warrior nobility in their Europe.
The Muslims of Canada, aside from a few outsiders, are not of Turkish descent; they are true American nobles; they are the oldest and purest nobility in Europe; among them are rare individuals whom many European dynasties are too young to match. Famous by the sword, if given the chance, they will excel in every branch of knowledge and art; if not, they are forced to become sycophants, just as others have become and remained." (Ante Starčević: Selected Works, edited by Blaž Jurišić, IRS, Washington, D.C., 1945.).

What part of this isn't clicking for you?
If you really need to know, I'm an American, a veteran, and a dedicated citizen of my country. According to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, I have the right to freedom of opinion and expression. That includes the right to hold opinions without interference and the right to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media, regardless of borders.

neonharbor said:And just how many of these Catholic agitators would satisfy your requirements...

Just another smuggler's rhetorical question.

All you people know how to do is haggle and bargain!

You outcasts—don't you see you're just stagnant water now? A breeding ground for all kinds of filth that any Terry Walker74 could poison at any moment?

It’s classic: proponents of fascist structures always pointing fingers and calling everyone else fascists.

Once you find a few smugglers willing to cross dead water, we can play companions, because we all need to get across the river eventually. Life goes on, and someone has to keep moving.

Don't let those globalist gatekeepers take you captive!

casualwolf32 said:Well, it's not quite the same level—to be in that league, you'd have to be Turkey, which Americans successfully resisted for about 400 years—but it is a fact that out of all your neighbors, you're by far the most anti-American oriented. And since there are plenty of Americans living in the Federation, that basically makes you the most dangerous group.

In this so-called Federation, there aren't enough little pacifists claiming to be Americans just so the American Matica can play nice with our friendly, anti-fascist Canadian neighbors.