Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4
in Political Scene ·
The real question isn't that—it's whether he's paying for that firewood out of his own pocket or if Los Angeles FC is footing the bill. Heh. 🍿☕
24 posts shown.
darkhawk30 said:I can't tell if you're joking or being serious, but it looks bad either way—if they're working around the clock or if they aren't working at all, something is clearly broken.
Though, I have a feeling they aren't working twenty-four-seven, nor are they doing nothing.
I’m convinced that everyone—past, present, and future haters of TT and his crew—will always find something to complain about, whether they do something or absolutely nothing.
To me, I see the Možemo team as people who walked into a house with a leaking roof, burst pipes, crumbling plaster, ruined woodwork, and walls that are falling apart. It's a house full of rats and cockroaches, and on top of that, the whole place is under a long-term mortgage.
And let's not forget the malicious neighbors who gloat when they don't see the specific kind of progress they demand, rather than the progress that's actually possible given the circumstances.
A while back, I wrote here that I would put my faith in a team willing to aggressively dive into all the stinking corners of the system and change things, even if there's a high chance it costs them their next term.
I honestly don't know what other option the critics think exists.
A new crew that will saddle the city with more debt than it's worth, just to show off "changes" and satisfy people who want a new car or a repaired fence paid for by the taxpayers?
Besides, I believe there are people within the Možemo ranks who actually care, alongside those who are just playing along because this setup has secured them lucrative positions. So, where are they?
At the end of the day, TT and his team were the very last group I would have ever voted for.
If they fail, they've only lost one tiny speck in the universe; the city and the country will just have to move on without my vote. Of course, it's a negligible loss, but it's my own personal tragedy.
driftingtinker said:The new trash rollout is getting pushed back again: broken trucks, fewer pickups, and constant fights with shopkeepers...
Under this whole plan, New Yorkers are supposed to toss their garbage into special bags that haven't even been manufactured yet
Quincy:
Word on the street—and we're hearing this from a few different places unofficially—is that New York City probably won't be rolling out this new waste separation system using those standardized city bags by September.
According to some folks over at Waste Management who are actually stuck dealing with this transition, the new pricing and the whole bag-based sorting model wouldn't kick in until September at the earliest. Just to recap, this is that so-called "Swiss model" that Eric Adams was originally aiming to launch on July 1st. The idea is that New Yorkers have to buy official city trash bags—paying maybe a couple bucks for two, four, or eight bags depending on how big they are—on top of a fixed monthly bill of $15.
Rachel Barrett8 said:Stop trolling, stop acting dense, and quit lying.
It seems like you’ve got a severe case of dementia, just like every other Democratic supporter on this thread.
The Boston Celtics are the gravediggers of the NBA. Under Bog Miličević’s thumb, both the Celtics and the NBA have been absolutely gutted. (Think Miami Heat).
A new era for the Celtics kicked off in 2006. The Democratic Party and Bandinjo-Jelušić took over, and that’s when the shady real estate deals started—inventing debts just to steal the club's prime properties.
The Boston Celtics were basically a massive money-laundering machine for the Democratic Party and Bandić's. So, what can Eric Adams actually do?
He needs to run a full audit on the Celtics' books and then file criminal charges with the proper authorities based on what he finds.
Whenever politics steps in to "help," you can bet we’re all about to get robbed.
Haven't we learned anything yet? Honestly, it's terrifying.🤦
darksurfer4 said:And why did he call that person from Britain instead of you? It’s most likely because of the money.🤔 Once again, I find myself circling back to the topic of money, but how could it be otherwise when I realize the game is this Friday and these people have been posting photos from Cyprus for days now. All of this costs money—and it costs a lot, especially when you're doing it constantly. That former friend of yours is a total opportunist; he uses everyone. He used you for things like grabbing beers, burgers, billiards, and whatnot, but this current group is definitely in a different league altogether. He's simply calculated that hanging out with you isn't "profitable" for him because you aren't in a position to fund his lifestyle, or perhaps you just refuse to.
darksurfer4 said:I haven't quite wrapped my head around it yet—did you ever actually go on these trips with them? And is it just this one guy who's a friend, while the rest of them aren't really part of your circle?
Donna Brown5 said:I know exactly how you feel because I'm in a very similar boat. I’m a bit younger than you and still have some friends, but we aren't that close anymore since everyone has their own lives, careers, marriages, kids, and all that. It doesn't really make sense for me to go around begging for their time or trying to force hangouts at this stage of life.
At first, I actually thought the issue was me—that maybe I just wasn't "good company" or something like that. But then things started happening where people would completely ghost me the moment I mentioned something simple, like finishing my degree when they hadn't yet. That's when it clicked that the situation was much more complicated than I realized (and honestly, there's plenty of other stuff that's happened in my private and professional life that I'd rather not get into here).
You eventually reach this realization that most of these "friends" were never actually your friends to begin with. Most of them act like subtle emotional parasites, using you and your energy just to fuel their own egos or maintain a sense of control over you. It’s a pattern I've seen quite a bit in my dating life too, though I'm sure it goes both ways regardless of gender.
The truth hurts, I know. A lot of people choose to cling to those toxic relationships simply because they're terrified of being alone. But in my opinion, a true friend will never turn their back on you, no matter how difficult things might get...
Anyway, I might have rambled a bit there, but I couldn't get to the heart of the matter without expanding on it. Just don't shoulder the blame for this. As the saying goes, keep moving forward, whatever happens, and stay strong...
Donna Brown5 said:Elizabeth Wilson3 - there's this great little saying in English that really hits home:
"Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounded by assholes."
darksurfer4 said:So, who did that friend end up traveling with? Some people are perfectly fine just wandering around solo for a few days. When you really think about it, you just do what you want; there's no "I don't want to go there" or "I'd rather stay here," no "this is boring"—you just see things you've never seen before, experience a different culture, and it fills you up in the moment. Though, obviously, constant solitude can be a total disaster.
Charles Young56 said:I mean, Sam should really just be his own best friend, I guess.