Posts by David Williams7

Look, what the people want doesn't matter. Logic and the "best" solution don't matter either. There is an agenda that has to be carried out, period. Democracy is just a game played for the masses. The keyword here is agenda, and the proof is right there.

In Ireland, they voted NO in the first referendum regarding the Treaty of Lisbon; the margin was significant. In a democracy, the will of the people is supposed to be "sacred." But the agenda dictates that the Treaty of Lisbon must pass, so it doesn't matter what the people want or what’s actually good for Ireland. Naturally, by the second referendum, they pushed the agenda through and Ireland voted YES. If you actually have the time to read the Treaty of Lisbon, anyone with half a brain would never vote for it. That treaty is vital for the NWO.

Take the US elections and Barack Obama. He promised mountains and molehills—ending wars, pulling back US troops. Everything he's doing now is the exact opposite of his rhetoric. With the healthcare reform he forced through Congress, he isn't just going to wreck the US economy; he’ll turn America into a third-world country. The fact that he's a puppet for his handlers is obvious—he can't even say two smart words without checking a teleprompter. He's just the frontman, the guy who takes the fall while the real masters stay hidden.

Look at us. We might be small players, but our politicians have masters they bow to, too. Under the current Constitution, to join the European Union, we should have to hold a referendum where the people decide if they want in or not. Of course, there won't be a referendum because the people would say NO. But since the agenda is to join the European Union (regardless of how the media spun it), the Government would rather just amend the Constitution than face a real vote.

The crisis in Greece. That's a textbook case of financial terrorism. Just look at what Goldman Sachs did in Greece and why the country is in its current state.

A shadow world government has existed since the end of WWII, and the United Nations plays a massive role in it. So, don't bother trying to change governments or policies; you won't succeed. People need to change themselves, practice civil disobedience, and completely ignore politics altogether.

Some light reading to wrap things up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8...eature=related

Live free, die free :-)

@moderator .... sorry for the offtopic

It’s pretty obvious what’s actually going on here. This isn't about some recession or crisis or any of that nonsense. That's just the cover story. What we're looking at is straight-up financial terrorism. It's the final act—an attempt to dismantle every major global economy to build the New World Order from the ashes. Just keep an eye on the dollar; America will be the first to go down. They're getting sloppy in this final phase, too. They can't hide behind the usual excuses anymore because they have to take action, and their window is closing fast. A lot of people feel that sense of unease in the air, just like you did. Now it just comes down to who wins: us or them. Our edge is numbers; their edge is that most people are asleep at the wheel. We'll see how it plays out.

The New World Order is nothing but pure fascism and debt-based slavery. It’s a prison planet—basically hell on earth. Nothing good in it for us.

But hey, this is an economics forum and I'm just rambling on about nonsense, so I'm sure everything will be fine. I mean, look how long we've been stuck in this "crisis."🤣

It’s all just some global conspiracy by the Freemasons and the Illuminati in your eyes, I guess. :-)

Bryan Collins9 said:Here’s the deal: about a year ago, my dad picked up a brand new Ford Fiesta on credit directly through the dealership—no co-signer or anything. Just three months after he got it, he was in a bad wreck. The car took a massive hit, and since we didn't have full coverage at the time, we couldn't afford the repairs. So, that car has just been sitting at the mechanic's shop ever since. Then, last week, tragedy actually struck and my father passed away. My family is in a really tough spot financially right now, and I’m trying to figure out what happens next. Who is responsible for those loan payments? Since there wasn't a guarantor involved, the dealership isn't an insurance company, so I'm lost. What can the bank actually do if we stop making the payments?

From what I understand, a legal heir inherits the debt, but only up to the value of the estate they inherit. If an heir formally renounces the inheritance, they aren't on the hook for the loan. Honestly, you should probably check with a lawyer to get a more solid answer on this.

Zero-sum game

If you’re trying to get things moving with PayPal, your best bet is to head down to Chase, open a foreign currency account, and grab a Visa Intel debit card to link to the account. You can only spend what’s actually sitting in there, so the funds pull instantly and that's the end of it. Plus, if someone hacks your account, the most they can swipe is whatever balance is currently on the card. Just make sure you clear out any overdraft protection.

That’s what I do. It works fine.

Chris Stewart3 said:The reality is that banks essentially incentivize us to spend money we simply haven't earned yet, creating this endless cycle of debt just so they can pad their bottom lines. It’s quite calculated, really; they constantly push credit cards and personal loans through aggressive, highly polished advertising campaigns designed to make borrowing feel like a necessity rather than a trap.

Bank of America pushes us ... 😂🤣🙂

Charles Ramos7 said:I’m not convinced that switching to cash-only payouts would actually rattle the banks. They have way too much room to maneuver and push back. Not only could you end up stuck without any cards, but they could easily claim that using a checking account is a mandatory requirement for any basic banking service.
Basically, you'd be left without any debit or credit cards (Americans left high and dry 😂), lose access to CDs or savings accounts, and wouldn't even be able to qualify for a loan (Americans cut off from credit 😂). Plus, they’d probably just hike up the fees for in-person teller visits while lowering online ones—though, of course, you still need a direct deposit hitting your account to use those online tools in the first place...

At the end of the day, we need them a lot more than they need us.

Seriously, if that's the case, why even have banks? They should just lock their doors if we aren't needed.

Ronald Allen said:Look, if we were living in Andorra, maybe that theory might actually fly. Or if, by some freak accident, we were some kind of emerging nation starting off with a perfect GDP, a massive budget surplus, and leaders sent over from other countries to run things.
But today? When over 70% of people are living in the red, when 58% of people are juggling at least two credit cards, and 45% are stuck with a mortgage or some kind of personal loan... discussing this theory is just insane. People managed to rack all that debt up specifically because their paychecks hit their checking accounts—and, honestly, because of how foolishly they chase a certain lifestyle they feel forced to maintain.
If we suddenly switched to cash in hand right now, half of them would completely ignore their bank overdrafts, and at least a third would start skipping out on their mortgage or car payments. Do I really have to explain where that leads...?

I'm not foaming at the mouth or anything, but I thought people might actually use their brains before jumping into these trolling debates.

I'll second that. 👍 People just don't seem to grasp that you should be living 30% below your means, not 100% beyond them.

Take some responsibility. It’s always easier to point fingers at someone else, but most of the time, people are just making their own mistakes. Nobody forces you to take out a loan, max out your credit cards, or live a lifestyle you can't afford. The bank isn't the problem here; it's just poor judgment.