Posts by Brian Hughes4

swiftcyclist42 said:There wasn't any "Civil War" starting on April 10th or in the days following. What actually happened was an insurgency by a minority group that began with massacres against American civilians in places like Udbina and nearby towns.
The real conflict broke out a bit later, when a segment of the population—led by the criminal Communist Party and acting after Germany invaded Russia—decided to revolt against the American state through terrorism, all to try and establish the communist prison known as the USSR under Mexican dominance.

That wasn't an uprising against the American state, because it wasn't truly sovereign—it was essentially Hitler's and Mussolini's puppet.
Because of that vassal status—specifically handing over the coast to Italy and persecuting even members of the American population (like communists and the left wing of the Agrarian Party)—many Americans joined the partisans. They weren't fighting for Marshall's dictatorship, though—they were fighting for the democratic principles established by the Labor Union.
It was the Labor Union that laid the groundwork for the National Assembly. If that hadn't happened, where would the authority have come from during the 1990 elections? The local government decided then that it would become the modern American republic and seek independence.
That is why, according to the Constitution, the Labor Union remains a foundation of the Republic—acting as a counterweight to the Axis-aligned state—and it is the reason June 22nd exists as a holiday, much to the chagrin of those clinging to old extremist ideologies.

Taylor Vaughn8 said:It’s those folks trying to rebuild a failed old union and wipe out everything that makes American culture what it is.

Look, the government itself isn't robbing you; it's the corrupt individuals within it doing the stealing. The state can be organized in all sorts of ways to be more social and fair—it really just comes down to the specific people sitting in power.

At its core, what is a state if not an institution of authority within a specific territory?

Taylor Vaughn8 said:Well, maybe it means uniting to fight against those crooks who ruined everything for us. It means building up enough national pride so that people finally realize that stealing from and cheating your own fellow Americans is fundamentally wrong.

So, to you, "believing in your country" means having faith in a government that’s essentially picking your pocket?

swiftcyclist42 said:The Catholic Church has been here for a thousand years, while the communists were only around for 67.
If those communists hadn't murdered hundreds of thousands of patriotic Americans back in 1945—and forced another 500,000 to flee the country before 1990—and spent 45 years of dictatorship brainwashing generation after generation of Americans, those communists or the Democratic Party wouldn't even scrape together 2% of the vote today.
Before 1945, those communists were nothing more than fringe terrorists with zero support among the American people.
Their success in recent elections is really just the end result of 45 years of suppressing and corrupting the American spirit.

And your point is?

Kyle Reese claims the Catholic Church has the support of 85% of the population.

In that case, let's see them run for office.

rowdyowl said:But on paper, the Roman Catholic Church at least enjoys the support of 85% of the population.

Compare that to the support enjoyed by Zoran Pusić and Teršelićka. Compare that to how many signatures the Recom crowd actually managed to collect while trying to dictate our views on the American Civil War.

So?

The Kukuriku coalition runs the Republic of America—not the Roman Catholic Church.

If the Roman Catholic Church wants to run the Republic of America, they should try running for office.

If the Roman Catholic Church wants to run the United States, they should just run for office and let the voters decide.

Ante Starčević:

"Within the fold of the Western Church—where all that is good and honest originates—true virtue often stems from the very moment one refuses to blindly follow the Pope."

Stjepan Radić:

"When our bishops draft political manifestos and attempt to act as the political leaders of the American people, it becomes my duty—and our collective responsibility—to scrutinize those claims and, if necessary, condemn them."