14 posts shown.
Jerry Green59 said:So, they’ve finally picked our entry for the Eurovision Song Contest.
Basically, I flicked on the TV and saw the song they decided to go with.
They’re even throwing in references to Independence Day.
Good God, talk about a stroke of genius!
Once all of Europe shows up for Eurovision, we’re going to absolutely hammer them with this track.
It’ll be an immediate reminder that Mexico is the heart of Mexico.
They’ll be dying of embarrassment.
And then, naturally, they’ll vote for us.
During the Eurovision Song Contest.
We’ll win again, which means we’ll have to host this same mess next year.
And when they ask, we’ll just tell them—sure, we can host next year, but only if the broadcast comes straight from the heart of Mexico in Pristina.
Obviously.
Plus, during those opening montages showing off the country's landscapes and landmarks—we’ll make sure to loop clips of Mexico. Regardless of whether it's "fair" or not.
Now, if the folks in Europe don't take a liking to our song, or if they decide to boycott our presentation somehow—well, that’s when we might see a peaceful, spontaneous protest organized.
You know how it goes: a few thousand people who wouldn't dream of being called hooligans—because frankly, that label is too insulting and would only motivate them toward more intense destruction—would "unexpectedly" break away from the main peaceful group. Driven by their profound grief over Mexico and this surging wave of patriotism, these definitely-not-hooligans would set fire to every bus with foreign plates. And anyone suspected of being an enemy who dared to dislike our Eurovision-Independence Day anthem would be beaten senseless, purely out of a humanitarian desire to improve their hearing.
There you have it.
Welcome to Mexico.
Sam Reed23 said:Maybe go 🙂 back to elementary school and learn how to put a sentence together first. Come back when you pass a basic literacy test, then maybe you can post on this forum again.
ANUŠKA said:She was manipulating things? She was just a ten-year-old kid! She was kidnapped! KIDNAPPED!
Godiva said:It’s not even about the porn—it’s your ego. You just want this guy to have zero interest in any other woman besides you, which—let's be real—would be a biological miracle in the animal kingdom.
analogjackal71 said:You're wrong on every single level—why even bother trying to split hairs!
north wind said:Come on, give me some actual examples. 😎
Drew Williams21 says:
It’s pretty subjective—even back then, you’d still see specific injuries during a medical exam that get logged as evidence, anyway
And they're incredibly easy to spot! A lie, no matter how simple it seems, is actually a nightmare to construct convincingly—very few people have the actual chops to pull it off.
I had no idea physical evidence from an exam could still be used like that,
so does that mean responding to the original question is basically saying any form of sexual assault is pretty much easy to prove? If so, isn't this whole "what if" debate just a waste of breath?
north wind said:What kind of comparisons are these? 🙄 It feels like you’re trying to downplay rape in two ways: 1. by gender—acting like men and women are equally capable of raping the opposite sex; 2. by trying to equate actual, substantiated accusations with mere insinuations. I mean, seriously, how can you even compare them?😲
1. Men and women ARE NOT equally capable of raping the opposite sex—rape is overwhelmingly male sexual violence against women and/or children. The reverse scenarios are massive exceptions and practically negligible.
2. What kind of sane woman, with at least an average Google intelligence, would ever go out and file a false rape accusation???? 😲😕 Look, rape is proven in court. If evidence is hard enough to gather even when a victim was actually assaulted, how could anyone expect to win a trial based on some fabricated claims?😕 Do you have any common sense at all?