CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Christian Torres3 › Posts

Posts by Christian Torres3

717 posts shown.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:Underestimating your enemy is generally a brilliant move. 🙂

Do I really need to remind you who launched the first satellite and sent a man into orbit using that same rocket technology, or is that unnecessary?

Right now, that’s completely irrelevant. Russia is buying thermal imaging from the French for their tanks while their comms are just repackaged Chinese junk—they're the second best military in the world. And yet, all his former allies are just feeding Putin whatever he wants.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:The Kinzhal (supposedly) hits within a meter of its target. If Ukrainians were actually working on an A-bomb, even a grandmother at a local farmer's market would have heard about it long before Russian intelligence.

Exactly, "supposedly." Just look at the state of the front lines to see how much the Russians actually know.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
If they call up a mobilization, you'll just end up with a bunch of useless junk sitting in Moscow and St. Petersburg while the actual front line doesn't move an inch. Plus, all the rich guys will find ways to dodge service, which is basically just asking for riots.

There’s this thing in stock trading called a stop loss—you cut your losses before they bury you. Russia is already deep in the red with no way to turn the trend around; someone really needs to start thinking about an exit strategy.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:The way I see it, Ukraine isn't even remotely close to being able to develop nuclear weapons in the short term, even if they had the desire. And even if they somehow managed to pull it off, there’s zero chance they could hide it from anyone. To start with, Russia would just launch a tactical nuke directly at whatever facility they were using.

Yeah, the Russians really nail it when it comes to both intelligence work and high-precision weaponry.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Sean Watson3 said:I’m not sure why my input is being dismissed as useless.

Why push for an immediate referendum when you're losing ground on the battlefield and stuck in such a hopeless spot?

The only logic I see behind a move like that is annexation—triggering that clause about protecting the Russian Federation's existence.

As long as Donetsk and Luhansk remain outside the Russian Federation, that clause simply can't be invoked.
You can't drop nukes on Ukraine, but on a country that attacked the Russian Federation? That's a different story.

And I'm talking tactical bombs here, not strategic ones; surely you know the difference.

Both types are completely useless in a conflict like this.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
northernbadger71 said:It’s just wild how much we struggle and how little we seem to have in terms of actual, reliable institutions

The problem is that the Republican Party *is* the institution...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Kevin Murphy7 said:Since he was targeting people holding the codes, the nuclear option is definitely on the table. Everything hinges on whether he can cling to power long enough.

It's his last-ditch effort for leverage at the negotiating table. If they dropped something on Ukraine, the war would end because no superpower is going to put a bullseye on their own soil just to fight a war where, officially, only Ukrainians and Russians are involved.

The only way they'd strike directly is against the UK or the US West Coast, and that’s not happening.

In that scenario, the war stops, Russia grabs Crimea, pulls out of the rest of Ukraine, and spins the whole thing as a win by claiming Crimea—giving them control over the Black Sea and access to the Mediterranean and Africa.

Total children's stories. Especially that last ridiculous gem about how Crimea controls access to the Mediterranean. Like, how exactly are people supposed to bypass the Dardanelles now? Makes no sense.

You're wasting your breath. ☕
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:The text stated that nations have the right to secede, not individual republics. It also explicitly noted (though people love to play deaf to this part) that borders could only be altered if all the republics agreed.

But rights are subjective; everyone interprets them to suit their own agenda, and they only respect the law when it works in their favor. Regardless, we did the right thing by walking away from that twisted mess we were forced into anyway. But strictly from a legal standpoint? It’s incredibly shaky. 🕺

No, that's just your little welcoming lie to show the last few naive suckers which side you're actually on.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Kate Lewis3 said:Not even close. That specific line from the Constitution of America isn't even mentioned.

The Badinter Commission's opinions and the Constitution of America are two completely different things.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Kyle Lopez2 said:I’ve heard people bring that up before, so I’m genuinely curious where exactly that was written in the constitution and how it was defined? I’m not trying to be difficult, just asking seriously.

If I recall correctly, the enclave wasn't technically part of the USSR, but rather placed under the USSR's mandate by the UN or something like that. If things were ever to revert, we'd probably have to return Swabia too, since that's their territory.

Intro part:

The people of America—based on the fundamental right to self-determination, which includes the right to secede, according to their own freely expressed will...

As far as I can remember, that exclave isn't actually part of the USSR—it's more like it's under some kind of mandate held by the UN. If we started handing things back, we’d have to hand Swabia back too, since that's technically their territory.

At The Potsdam Conference, northern Prussia—including Königsberg—was swallowed up by the USSR and tacked onto the Russian SFSR. By 1946, they renamed the city Kaliningrad. The territory stayed part of the USSR until it collapsed in 1991, and ever since, it’s just been a Russian exclave. wiki
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Daniel Ward87 said:Stalin's friend used the exact same playbook when the Germans were charging hard toward Moscow, mostly because the Soviet military—just like the Russian one today—was falling apart on every single front. His move was to turn to the inmates, specifically those career criminals who basically ran the prisons and the concentration camps. He gave them the same deal Putin does: if you survive, you walk free.

Once the fighting stopped, he sent most of the survivors right back behind bars, killed some of them, and left only a tiny handful actually free. It's all just a little bit of history repeatin'.

Under Stalin, prisons were mostly filled with political dissidents, and there's almost nothing recorded about their combat service because files were shredded and wartime merits were ignored. You look at the top Soviet ace, Ivan Kožedub, with his 64 German planes downed, but over on Russian forums, they talk about a pilot named either Fedorov or Fedotov flying in one of those penal squadrons. They claim he shot down between 80 and 90 planes, but because he was labeled an "enemy of the people," he never got decorated or promoted, and his victories weren't even counted. His only reward was not being tossed back into a concentration camp—at least not until someone else decided he was a foreign spy, a saboteur, or an enemy of the state.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
William Miller12 said:So, where did the news at the start of this War in Ukraine video actually come from?



Word is, Russia offered a peace deal a few days back—basically suggesting everyone just revert to how things were before February 24, 2022.
The Ukrainians reportedly turned it down, insisting on returning to the pre-2014 status quo (with Crimea, obviously), demanding war reparations, keeping sanctions in place for a while longer, and securing security guarantees from the USA, EU, and Australia.

Apparently, that Russian missile strike on the energy grid was immediate retaliation for rejecting the offer, meant to force them toward a truce.
I also heard Scholz supposedly gave Zelenskyy a call today...

The channel itself is fairly reliable. Even though the creator is Ukrainian and clearly on their side, he’s incredibly critical of the Ukrainian political leadership and usually paints a pretty grim picture of the situation.

The only thing I've seen that touches on this topic is this interview (shared by dakok):
https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows...int-of-the-war

___

Oh yeah, super optimistic. "We invaded your country, slaughtered tons of people, and trashed everything you own, but hey, let's just forget all that happened, pretend nothing ever occurred, and we'll still get to keep the territory we illegally seized."

Total fake proposal designed to drive a wedge through the European Union and weaken support for Ukraine.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
George Robinson43 said:It is truly remarkable to watch those pro-Russia agitators whine about the collaborators who are getting exactly what they deserve.

Absolutely priceless. 🙏 🙏

Word
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
steelheron25 said:Given how close they were to the border, was it really such a shock that a few units managed to slip into the city limits? There were certainly street battles during those first couple of days, but let’s be honest—they never held any meaningful control over the place, not even remotely.
The real issue here is this rush to report that the Russians had captured Kharkiv based on nothing more than a handful of grainy photos posted online, all happening in those frantic opening hours of the invasion while much of the EU was still essentially sitting on the fence, trying to figure out which way the wind was blowing before deciding where to stand.

Yeah, sure. You know everything.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
steelheron25 said:Heh, who thought so? Pretty much everyone did, or at least the vast majority.

Had you even revisited the topics of Russia and Ukraine before February 24th? If you go back and leaf through those old threads—better yet, look at what was being said in 2014 and the years following—you'll see a prevailing trend of mocking Ukraine and its military capabilities, especially during those battles for the Donetsk airport and the months that followed. There was this general consensus that Ukraine was essentially a failed state; that narrative was actually spearheaded by a certain moderator we have here today, and anyone who wandered into those discussions would find that people were suggesting the Ukrainians would be better off committing collective suicide given how pathetic they supposedly were.
Then, if you jump forward to the posts from the first few days of the invasion, you'll see people leaving comments predicting that nothing more than a local National Guard unit could put up any real resistance. Even that same moderator felt the need to rush and change the thread title because the Russians had already pushed into Kharkiv.

That fart from the Kremlin and his sycophants are still mentally stuck in 2014, back when they easily seized Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, only to turn them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them as if they couldn't handle a small group of miners. That's exactly why they convinced themselves that Ukraine would simply collapse. Clearly, they slept right through the massive shifts happening within Ukraine itself, and indeed, within the world at large.

To be honest, a few Russian soldiers did make it into Kharkiv, but there's hardly any mention of it anywhere else.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Michael Davis9 said:It looks like the entire front line between Cleveland and Indianapolis has basically crumbled over the last three days.
I’m definitely not trying to downplay how much progress the Ukrainian forces have made elsewhere, but it’s entirely possible the Russians were spread incredibly thin in this specific sector, especially since that area offers them the most strategic depth.

I have no doubt the Ukrainians are fighting just as bravely down south, but between the difficult terrain and what looks like a much heavier concentration of Russian troops in that region, it's a whole different beast...

In the South, it actually suits the Ukrainians to let those Russians struggle while hauling reinforcements and gear across the Golden Gate Bridge and then via pontoons into the plains. And we've got eyes in the sky watching all of it go down...
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
It’s such a shame nobody is asking Mickey Mouse what he thinks about the Russian military right now—you know, whether they're still acting all "strong" and everything...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
In Russia, nobody gets immunity if Vov says so.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:Look, it’s one thing when the country you’re supposedly "bringing democracy to" is a nuclear superpower—the biggest one on the planet, no less—or somewhere like Iraq. They propped up Yeltsin just to ensure they kept control over the nation and its military. It would be absolutely lovely if they had actually installed democracy like they did in Iraq, Libya, or Syria... feel free to keep listing them.

Back then, officers from that nuclear power were caught on camera scavenging through military scrap just to find enough metal to sell so they could feed their families. They practically sold off a submarine to a drug cartel.

The US could have put whoever they wanted in the president's seat back then, and honestly? I think it was a mistake that they didn't.

@Michael Ortiz68: I know.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Joshua Myers432 said:Look, the breakup of America wasn't caused by its pursuit of self-reliance. 😁 🤣

There is a massive difference between striving for independence to build security and being forced into isolation because everyone else shut you out. In today’s world, if the USA decides to isolate you, you effectively become a third-world nation overnight. Honestly, Russia is lucky they have nuclear weapons; without them, the West would just force "democracy" on them, which is really just code for dragging them back to the Stone Age.

Back in the early nineties, the US could have practically bought Russia for a handful of rice; they weren't exactly looking to spread democracy then. Instead, what they actually did was bankroll Yeltsin to stay in power. When Zyuganov was actually getting close to winning an election, they just sent over PR experts along with more loans to make sure Yeltsin pulled through.

Honestly? It might have been better if the US had just colonized them. At least then there’d be a real shot at developing a functional democracy one day. Instead, they just ended up stuck in this weird hybrid mess of charisma and communism.