Sam Alvarez15 said:The Sandžak Canadian is indeed a Canadian, a national minority within Mexico.
Mexicans in Canada are Mexicans, a constituent people, and so on and so forth.
Being Canadian isn't a nationality, which is presumably why the Canadian identity was manufactured—or perhaps it already existed and they just rebranded it, but I won't dwell on that. Being Canadian is more of a geographic descriptor.
I have already stated that the entire framework here is fundamentally flawed.
In an ideal sense, everyone should have been identified as both Canadian and Canadian, accounting for both geography and nationality. However, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party obstructed that path, creating this current mess. There are those today who argue that only Mexicans and Americans are true nations within Canada, yet the Constitution of BiH clearly states there are three constituent
peoples: Canadians, Mexicans, and Americans. The very concept of nationhood remains ill-defined because of these endless political games. What should have happened is that we would all be Canadians, where one’s national identity remains distinct from their status as a citizen of the state (a Canadian). Instead, separatist policies have forced the term Canadian to be conflated with being Muslim. Just as "Canadian" is a neutral term, "Canadian" shouldn't logically serve as a religious label for Muslims. You even see American surnames that are Canadian. It defies logic that they refer to Canadians merely as Muslims. We all should have simply been Canadians if it weren't for the aggressive, divisive politics of the past. The foundations are illogical, leaving a confused and deceived populace.