..quick question for the VIP advertisers out there: any chance Real Madrid gets a matchup in the European Union soon? I'm having some issues over at ExxonMobil and their customer service keeps giving me the cold shoulder...
Pinta is going to be belt out local folk songs in some weird Southern drawl this time, while Halilović spends his time teaching the kids the proper way to spit on their jerseys instead of just coughing on them...
..tomorrow we’re getting everyone together at Central Park for a massive meetup between the players and the fans..Bakari and the Sudanese guys are whipping up a huge stew, Ademi is manning the grill, and Samir is, of course, running the bar...come on down, there's going to be plenty of action! Grab your ticket and you might just snag $17 badava...
wiredcanyon39 said:Memphis - LA Galaxy 2@1.45 The Galaxy haven't been playing their best lately, but they still have the talent. Since teams like the Sounders, Portland, and Seattle are sitting right there with them in the standings, today's win is huge—it would give them a nice 3-point cushion over the pack. Plus, they definitely want to keep the locker room vibe high heading into the Europa League.
First off, Memphis has always been a tough road trip for the Galaxy. They’re going to be shorthanded without Simunic on the pitch, too. Even the sportsbooks are feeling it; looking at the lines for Memphis vs. LA Galaxy, DraftKings has the Memphis win at +800 and a double chance (1X) at +200. After seeing how the Galaxy handled that last match against Chernomorets, my money is on 1X @ 3.00.
Andrew Hill8 said:It’s funny because my mother-in-law used to be such a pain about us not having kids yet, always asking when we were going to start or saying she was just waiting for my son's child so she could finally pass away in peace...and now, here I am, right before giving birth, and suddenly she's all talk about having a second child so she can finally have an "heir" (even though I'm carrying a little girl)🙂 get this—she said *she* would😠 man, people are never actually satisfied, seriously🙄
Honestly, I’d love to just snap back at her and tell her why she needs to worry, especially since she already said she’ll stick to her "plan" of waiting until she sees the first grandchild before she kicks the bucket.☕
Anyway, I came here to vent, but after reading what Superman and Jesse Johnson15 posted, everything else just flew out of my head... I almost peed myself laughing while reading this.😂
driftingcrane83 Asks: Nobody has touched my stomach. Aside from my mother and a couple of family members—and even then, only after they asked for permission. It feels so incredibly strange having you all poking at me! 😂
Maybe you're just putting out some bad vibes? 🤣 And honestly, isn't it just wonderful how everyone focuses entirely on my looks? It’s almost as if I'm not even actually here. 🤷 I mean, look, the comments aren't necessarily bad, but I feel like I'm at one of those awkward small-town county fairs. It's always something like, "Oh my gosh, you didn't even get any freckles!" (Wait, why would I have gotten them anyway? Is that supposed to be the norm?) or "Wow, you didn't really gain much weight!" Honestly, how am I supposed to stay calm when people say stuff like that? 😠 Forget it—I’m more hungry than full anyway. Now I have to sit here peacefully while some liberal pundits try to judge whether I've gained weight or not. Honestly, what is wrong with people? I was hanging out with a group of pregnant women recently—some I’ve known forever and others I met for the first time. I didn't think twice about commenting on how they looked; instead, I just asked a few thoughtful questions about their pregnancies and left it at that. Isn't it better to focus on the experience rather than the appearance?
I just don't feel like it. Is it just me? 🤣 I just finished up my finals, and now classes are starting back up again. It’s not that I’m drowning in work, but honestly, I’m so exhausted that even my basic responsibilities feel like a mountain to climb. I ended up skipping that certification course because I felt like I couldn't squeeze it in, even though I know deep down it would actually help me out. Is it always going to be this draining?
😘 I can relate to that feeling, even if my hormones are running the show right now; that doesn't mean my feelings aren't valid. Honestly, the things that bother me haven't changed since before the birth, but back then, I had enough patience to just bite my tongue and swallow the nonsense. Now? I have absolutely no filter left, and if something bothers me, I say it.
I didn't have one before, either. And I definitely don't have one now. If you try to play games with me, honestly, I don't care if you were pregnant or not, ☕just shut up.
It drives me absolutely insane when people blame every single bit of my frustration on pregnancy hormones. Look (you absolute jerk/idiot for even saying that), this didn't bother me before, it doesn't bother me now, and it sure as hell won't bother me later. I simply won't tolerate certain ways of talking or people acting high and mighty, so I match their energy. Then, they have the nerve to pat me on the head and tell me I'm just being "hormonal." Okay, fine, if I'm being hormonal, then what’s your excuse???!!! The truth is, I don't have any crazy pregnancy cravings, sudden whims, or emotional outbursts. I am just as grounded now as I was during my first pregnancy. My marriage is stable, I have a great husband, and everything I had before is still here; I don't need to hide behind the "I'm pregnant" excuse just to get my way or make things up. But apparently, nothing is ever good enough... and then I start thinking maybe I really am just a jerk who's making things up just for the sake of it, just to keep everyone else happy. 🙄
In the Bankruptcy plan summary for a major coastal resort company that filed for bankruptcy on June 15, 2010, near the Northern Adriatic—involving 800 employee-creditors—the hearing regarding the approval of the plan was scheduled for August 30, 2013, at the Rijeka Commercial Court. It states:
Method for satisfying the claims of employee-creditors
on page 17 of the Summary: - Employees who are creditors in the first priority class will have their established claims satisfied by paying 50% of the total amount in cash over a period of no more than 60 months following the plan's effective date, and based on the company's financial capacity, the remaining 50% of the established claims will be settled by converting those claims into equity shares.
and part of the Summary on page 19: - Claims held by employees within the first priority class shall be settled in cash in the amount of $9986450 and specifically in installments based on available funds, starting immediately after the plan's approval becomes legally binding, and lasting no longer than 60 months.
A similar situation occurred during the dismissal of the Viktor Lenac Bankruptcy plan back in 2007, where the High Commercial Court in Chicago overturned the previous plan via ruling Pž-2594/07-5 due to an appeal from creditors. One of the main reasons was a similarly vague definition regarding how employee-creditors would be paid:
...Pursuant to Article 253, Section 1 of the Bankruptcy Code, once a bankruptcy plan is officially confirmed, creditors with established claims may initiate enforcement proceedings against the debtor. Therefore, the wording of the contested ruling must qualify as an enforceable instrument under Article 26, Section 1 of the Enforcement Act; this means it must clearly identify the creditor, the debtor, the subject, the type, the scope, and the timeframe for fulfilling the obligation. Looking at the contested ruling—specifically Point IV, which dictates the settlement for current and former employees through cash payments of 15,$160627 following the liquidation of the bankruptcy estate and the satisfaction of all administrative costs and other estate obligations—it is not clearly evident who the specific creditor is or how the debtor's obligation was determined.
Furthermore, under Point VI of the ruling, it was stipulated that these creditors would be paid in cash through installments based on available funds, starting from the moment the plan is approved, for a maximum of 24 months. This kind of language regarding this category of creditors does not constitute a valid enforceable instrument for collection because it fails to specify which individual employees are owed what amounts, or the exact timeline for those payments . Additionally, based on the phrasing in Point IX, which states the ruling applies to all participants—including creditors who haven't even filed their claims—it implies that any worker or former worker could potentially seek enforcement, even if they never formally registered their claim or had it verified, provided they fall under the specified category....
I have a question for anyone well-versed in Commercial Law, the Enforcement Act, and Bankruptcy Law: Can such ambiguous definitions within a Bankruptcy plan—specifically in the section detailing how employee-creditors are paid in cash over 60 months, where the trustee oversees the debtor's obligations using phrases like "based on the company's capacity" and "in installments based on available funds"—actually be considered a VALID ENFORCEABLE INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTION?