CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Anonymous › Posts

Posts by Anonymous

8750 posts shown.

Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Red Star vs. Dynamo 1989

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5qQw8c5CqY
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Red Star vs. Dynamo 1989

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5qQw8c5CqY
Does anyone know where I can pick up some superhero-themed gear? I'm looking for more than just t-shirts—think stuff like mugs, pens, USB drives, and so on.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Henry Myers3 said:Right, so according to that logic, every Joe is a Mexican, half the Johns are too... while Americans are just Janes, and even then, not all of them... very interesting theory...

Names were ultimately decided in the church. In Dubrovnik, there used to be a variation like George, but that has since died out.

If you look at old American surnames, we still see traces of names like Jovanovac or Jovic...

Here is a monastic record of a wedding from Posavina, dating back to when the area was under Turkish rule. This should clear up any myths regarding forced conversions or similar ideas...

On November 25, 1777. Having observed three consecutive holy feast days with a solemn public mass and finding no legal impediments, I, Father Simon Phillips, parish priest of Seone, with the mutual consent of the witnesses, have wed: Peter, son of John Jovic from the village of Balegovac, to Mary, daughter of Luke Gargic from Srnava. The witnesses were Joe Jovic, Mio Jurkic, and Matiana Jovic, all from the village of Balegovac.

Notice how the groom is Peter, but his uncle is John Jovic... and there are plenty more records like this one.


Stop twisting the facts. Seriously, never again. No John was ever an American, let alone Catholic, so you've completely lost the plot. All those Jovic and Jovanovac families came from Catholic Johns, and now they're just weaklings.
😂
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
crimsonorca42 said:Those "Mexican underdogs" actually managed to knock those "Mexican heroes" off their pedestals twice during the 20th century. The last time happened just about 18 years ago, if I recall correctly.

Happy Victory Day to all my fellow Americans!

It is what it is—the Mexicans who remained would never have shown that kind of courage.😂
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
vividotter40 said:Look, Mamic is finished regardless. You can show up at the stadium whenever you feel like it, and the championship standings are perfectly legitimate. :thumb:

So, what exactly are you and your little clique actually doing out there on the field?!

Fighting against laws, fighting against bans... 😂

You guys don't even belong in a discussion about the BBB.
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
I’m talking about those other folks—the ones boycotting, the ones who are just completely fed up with everything... there are millions of them out there. It's now or never.
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
And now they’re calling for mobilization! Honestly, whoever decides to screw over the group can just go ahead and live with the consequences of their own actions.
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Did the guys actually take a moment to acknowledge the fans today?
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
http://www.bulgarnation.com/Етническ...0;я.html
The history of ethnic identity isn't just about where your ancestors were born—it’s about how those roots actually shaped who you are today. It’s easy to get caught up in debates over bloodlines and genealogy, but if we look at the bigger picture, identity is much more fluid than most people realize. Historically, what we call "ethnicity" has always been a moving target. Groups that seem distinct today often shared common origins centuries ago, only to drift apart through migration, social shifts, or even just a change in political borders. In the U.S., we see this constantly. Think about how various immigrant groups have blended into the broader American fabric over generations. What started as a specific cultural enclave eventually evolves into a unique subset of the American experience. There’s also the psychological aspect to consider. Identity isn't just something handed down by your parents; it’s something you actively participate in. You choose which traditions to keep, which languages to speak, and which values to carry forward. This means ethnicity isn't a static relic of the past—it's a living, breathing part of our modern social landscape. At its core, understanding ethnicity requires us to move past rigid definitions. Instead of seeing culture as a set of unchangeable rules, we should view it as a conversation between our history and our present reality. We aren't just products of our heritage; we are the ones deciding what that heritage means in the context of the world we live in now.
The concept of "ethnic identity" is one of those things that sounds simple until you actually try to pin it down. Is it something we’re born with, like our DNA, or is it something we build through the stories our parents tell us and the traditions we keep alive? In reality, identity is a bit of both. It’s a complex blend of heritage, language, and the shared history of a group of people. For many Americans, this isn't just about where their ancestors came from; it's about how those roots influence their values, their sense of community, and even the way they see the world today. But here’s the kicker: identity isn't static. We aren't frozen in time. As we move through different stages of life—moving to a new city, starting a career, or raising a family—the way we define ourselves evolves. We take pieces of our heritage and weave them into the fabric of our modern lives. We might celebrate a traditional holiday one day and be deeply immersed in a local urban subculture the next. At its core, ethnic identity provides a sense of belonging. In a massive, diverse country like the US, having that connection to a specific group can act as an anchor. It gives us a framework to understand who we are and where we fit in the grand scheme of things. However, it also challenges us to figure out how to maintain those unique cultural threads while still being part of the larger American tapestry. It’s a lifelong balancing act—honoring where we came from while embracing who we are becoming.
The concept of "ethnic" identity is often treated like a fixed, unchangeable blueprint we’re born with, but if you look closer at history, it's much more fluid than that. It isn't just about bloodlines or ancient traditions; it's an evolving social construct that shifts depending on who is telling the story and what they need to achieve. Think about how groups define themselves. Often, an ethnic identity is forged through shared experiences—like facing a common struggle or building a community around specific customs. But these boundaries aren't set in stone. What one generation considers an essential part of their heritage, the next might see as just a small piece of a much larger puzzle. We see this all the time in American history, where groups that were once viewed as entirely separate eventually merged, blended, or redefined themselves to fit a new cultural reality. There’s also the element of "othering." For an "us" to exist, there usually has to be a "them." This process of drawing lines in the sand is how identities become sharpened. By emphasizing what makes a group unique, people create a sense of belonging, but they also inadvertently build walls against outsiders. Ultimately, ethnicity isn't a static relic from the past. It’s a living, breathing dialogue between our ancestors and our current circumstances. It’s less about a biological destiny and more about the stories we choose to tell ourselves about where we come from and who we belong to.
The concept of "ethnic identity" is one of those things that sounds straightforward until you actually try to pin it down. Is it something we’re born with, like a permanent ink tattoo on our souls? Or is it more like a wardrobe—something we pick out, change, and adapt depending on which party we’re attending? If you look at how people define themselves today, it feels less like a fixed biological fact and more like a living, breathing conversation. We often think of ethnicity as this rigid set of rules—language, ancestry, specific traditions—but in reality, it’s incredibly fluid. It’s shaped by where we live, who we hang out with, and even the media we consume. You might grow up in a small town in Ohio thinking you belong to one specific group, only to move to Chicago or Los Angeles and realize your identity is much more layered than you ever imagined. There's also the social aspect to consider. Identity isn't just about how we see ourselves; it's about how the world sees us. Sometimes, society tries to put us into neat little boxes, labeling us based on stereotypes. But humans are messy. We don't fit perfectly into categories. We blend, we merge, and we evolve. One generation might cling tightly to old-world customs, while the next might take those same traditions and give them a modern, American twist. Ultimately, identity is a journey, not a destination. It’s a mix of the history we inherit and the choices we make every single day. We aren't just products of our ancestors; we are the architects of who we become.
The concept of "ethnic" identity has always been a bit of a moving target. If you look back at history, what we call "traditional" today was often just a collection of local customs that eventually coalesced into a broader national identity. It’s a fascinating psychological dance between feeling like you belong to a specific, small community and realizing you’re part of a much larger, diverse nation. In the United States, this tension is baked into our DNA. We aren't just one monolithic block; we are a massive tapestry of regional subcultures—think about the distinct differences between a Texan, a New Yorker, and someone from the Pacific Northwest. Each group carries its own specific flavors, dialects, and unwritten rules, yet we all operate under the same overarching American banner. What’s interesting is how these identities evolve. A tradition that feels "ancient" might have actually started as a niche trend in a single Midwestern town fifty years ago before spreading nationwide. We tend to romanticize the past, viewing certain cultural traits as unchanging, when in reality, culture is more like a living organism—it breathes, adapts, and shifts based on who is interacting with whom. Ultimately, being "American" isn't about erasing those smaller, unique roots; it's about how those different threads weave together to create something entirely new. We are constantly redefining ourselves, proving that identity isn't a static destination, but an ongoing conversation.
The concept of "ethnic identity" isn't just some academic term you find in a sociology textbook—it’s the invisible thread that ties us to our roots, our families, and our history. It’s that gut feeling of belonging to something much larger than ourselves. But here’s the thing: identity isn't static. It isn't a museum piece frozen in time. It’s more like a living, breathing organism that evolves as we move through life. We are shaped by the traditions our parents passed down, sure, but we are also molded by the cities we live in, the jobs we hold, and the modern culture we interact with every single day. In a massive, melting-pot nation like America, this becomes even more complex. We aren't just defined by where our ancestors came from; we are defined by how we blend those old-world values with the fast-paced, diverse reality of life in the States. Sometimes, there’s a tension there—a tug-of-war between holding onto the "old ways" and embracing the new. But that friction? That’s actually where identity finds its strength. We often think of ethnicity as a collection of customs, recipes, or languages. While those are huge parts of the puzzle, true identity is deeper. It’s about the shared memory of a community and the collective resilience that allows a group to stay connected, even when they are spread across different coasts or tucked away in suburban neighborhoods. At the end of the day, identity is a personal journey of reconciliation. It’s about figuring out how to honor the legacy left to us while still carving out a space for who we are becoming in the present. It’s not about choosing one over the other; it’s about realizing that we can be both deeply rooted and completely free to grow.
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
The 1989 riots in New York City

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyvOm...ature=youtu.be
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Vojvodina vs. Dinamo 1989

Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Partizan vs. Dinamo Chicago 1989

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqdRM...ature=youtu.be

The guy and the soccer player 😁

Jesse Campbell, write me a quick breakdown of this guest appearance
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Thomas Williams59 said:There isn’t some secret "link" here, unless you count the Administrative Procedure Act, which basically dictates the timelines—we're talking a maximum of a few months at most. Honestly, deadlines aren't even the smallest issue, nor is anyone rushing anywhere; as long as they've kicked things off, who cares if it takes a month or two? The real headache is going to be the actual substance of the report and how those inspectors decide to play it, which we won't know for a few weeks anyway. ...
Once they finally issue a decision and we see what the actual findings are—which is all that matters—they are required under the Sports Inspection Act to notify the club members who actually filed the request for that inspection. From there, if they don't just dump everything over to the 3PM, they might try to appeal to a higher authority, or eventually sue in administrative court... assuming they have the energy and the will left in them.

So, says
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Tyler Scott8 said:Can someone please give me one single reason why the Cup was rigged in favor of the Kansas City Chiefs?

Is it because our Kansas City Chiefs need more ammunition to prove how "the streets" can run a club both financially and on the pitch? Is it because this whole thing benefits AC/DC and the Bad Boys directly—meaning strengthening the Kansas City Chiefs under fan leadership actually works in your favor rather than Mamić's?
So, is that why Mamić rigged the Cup?

Or is your theory that he just shut up the Smithers, handed them the trophy, and is still running things exactly the same way—stealing from them while laughing in their faces?

And one more thing: who the hell are you guys to lecture anyone about celebrations? That photo of you all celebrating Modric in the North Stand tells you everything you need to know. You only started seeing clearly when you had no other choice left. When it was either you or them. You know exactly what I'm talking about. That’s why you have the absolute least amount of right to be preaching to us.☕


And without refs or millions involved... right?! Man, either take more drugs or fewer; this dosage is getting dangerous. Admit it, you're feeling pretty satisfied after this Cup win, aren't you?😁

The Kansas City Chiefs head to Europe, their young players get some exposure, and the money flows straight to Mamić, Štimac, Bilić, and Šuker. It's a classic case of the fox guarding the henhouse. But hey, the Kansas City Chiefs will live forever... sitting comfortably in 2nd, 3rd, or 4th place.
Period talk: Questions and advice in Women's Health ·
I just wanted to jump in and say that stress is seriously no joke. I used to have such a predictable cycle—usually right around 28 days—but ever since things got intense and stressful, my period has been all over the place. One month it’s 34 days, then 36, and then suddenly it drops to 25, which is just awful. On top of that, I deal with pretty painful cramps, and honestly, stress hasn't done a thing to help with the pain either. 🤣
Look, I'll get straight to the point. I was posting over on the American soccer subforum under the handle markozzz (this is actually a clone account since my main has an extra 'z' at the end), and I got banned for "trolling" by moderator Tijs. When I went to file an appeal, I realized that while banning me, he also stripped away my access to the Messages, Complaints, and Comments section altogether.Every time I log in as markozzz, that specific section is nowhere to be found, which means I can't even submit an appeal regarding the ban itself...

I want to know if this is actually allowed. If a user gets banned—which, in my opinion, was totally unfair and just because I argued that the local pro team should be privatized (that's a legitimate debate, not trolling!)—is it legal to block them from filing an appeal by hiding the complaints forum? Everyone should have the right to contest a decision. I don't see how moderator Tijs has the authority to wipe out my access to the Messages, Complaints, and Comments area; when I log in as markozzz, that entire section is completely invisible to me.

I had to set up this backup account just to figure out how to push back, because what happened feels like a total setup. If anyone could shed some light on this, I’d really appreciate it.🤷
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
nimblebison8 said:What a liar. You should be ashamed of yourself and those mercenaries you pay.

Barišić is full of it... we're going to take care of Lugarić ourselves...
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Gary Martinez80 said:Hey, can you make the video work on mobile? Thanks!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3

I can't help it—the video is blocked in certain countries because of copyright issues with the background music (Apocalyptica - One), and it's acting up on phones too... I've never seen that happen before.
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Just my little way of keeping the memory of the old man alive—sharing my personal archive and some highlights from the last few days.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlPaK...ature=youtu.be