Posts by Anonymous

Jason Ortiz5 said:My mom is honestly a legend. She looks at me totally deadpan and goes, "Seriously, slow down, or you’re gonna end up with a backside as wide as the rear of a Ford." But then, she turns around and spoils my husband rotten, cooking everything exactly how he likes it and hovering over his plate like a mother hen... 🙄

My mother-in-law basically gave up on me. After a few failed attempts to lecture me about my diet, she just threw her hands up and said, "I have no idea how you survive..." (Oh, I know exactly how—it's everything sitting in my fridge 😁).

Meanwhile, my sweet hubby is over here trying to force-feed the kid... "You have to eat this, you have to finish it all, you can't just eat bologna without bread" (I still haven't cracked the mystery of why that's a rule 😕)... Just leave her alone, for heaven's sake... When she's actually hungry, she'll ask... 🤷

Hehe... that cracked me up... I mean, how is he going to survive eating deli meat without bread? He'll be starving!

Oh man, I don't even have a kid or a husband... but whenever my younger brother comes to visit... I just load him up with fries... chocolate milk, Nutella toast, apples, deli meats... and every two hours I'm like, "Are you hungry? You want some?" 🙄... What am I supposed to do? I won't force him... but I'm in charge for those five days... I'm terrified he might actually starve to death... And when he's sleeping, I go check on him, and when I get up in the middle of the night... I check again just to make sure he hasn't kicked off his covers and caught a cold.

OH MY GOD, I am totally one of those people... but I won't nag him with "eat, eat, eat, eat, eat"... I'll just ask every two hours, "Are you hungry?"... "Probably not... well, don't be." 😁

Why do I do it? I don't know... I even ask my boyfriend if he's eaten when we're out hiking all day... mostly because once he doesn't eat, he gets super cranky.

And my mom... oh boy, that's a whole other level of exhaustion... It was easy for Mom to deal with me, but Dad... whenever I come home... he buys me everything I love... asks if I need a ride... stuff he wouldn't have even thought about back when I was in high school, but now he thinks I need it. I don't know... I guess people just love to worry. Even now, since I'm not home that much, I actually appreciate it... it's nice having someone care about you—not whether you've worked out, fixed your hair, passed an exam, or earned a paycheck, but just whether you're full and if you're warm enough. I only see them a few times a year, so it works for me... but as soon as I stay home for a while, they never stop... My dad especially could never get used to the idea of coming to check on me at 5 AM before he heads to work 😲 every single morning... and that's how he wakes me up... even after Mom explained that we aren't babies anymore... and that he doesn't need to hover over us to see if we're tucked in properly.

Props to the pyrotechnics crew

Honestly, things were just better back when we were cruising down the interstate🙂

You aren't eating nearly enough...

Hey, I have a quick question for you guys. I need to get my deviated septum fixed, but while I'm under the knife, I really want to go for a full aesthetic nose job too. I’m talking about a noticeable transformation—I want it to actually look better, not just a minor tweak. Does anyone know a top-tier surgeon in Los Angeles who specializes in both functional and cosmetic work? If anyone has a recommendation, Please!

When it comes to women’s sexual freedom, the backlash from patriarchal society has become such a predictable cliché that, honestly, I don't even find it shocking anymore—it’s just an annoying reality to acknowledge.
What really gets me thinking, though, is how women themselves perceive all of this. Even though they are living within that same societal structure, so many just drift along with the current. People talk about them and judge them based on someone else's arbitrary yardstick, yet many women accept those standards as the "default" setting for how they should act. I’m specifically talking about *reactions*. Even when we think we’re making our own choices through our actions, if we’re simply reacting to pre-set social parameters, we aren't actually being free—we're just responding to a script. We end up turning our own behavior into these mental projections, viewing ourselves purely through a physical lens where a woman's beauty becomes one of the most critical deciding factors.

Screw those goddamn Orthodox chetniks.

It’s a definite yes 😁

Brian Foster3 said:Look, let's be real: when a woman goes out of her way to please a man, there’s always some kind of underlying calculation at play to benefit her. I'm mostly talking about all those perks you get from this hyper-materialistic, consumerist culture we're stuck in—it's all just part of the game.

I actually think there are plenty of other motivations behind why a woman might try to please a man.
We can't ignore all those "social norms" shaped by upbringing, societal mindsets, and various collective "guidelines." Right here in the States, we see examples of a culture where women are raised specifically to be accommodating—to serve men. They aren't necessarily looking out for their own interests; they are simply fulfilling a role they find completely acceptable because they haven't been exposed to any other way of living.
We are all painfully aware of the rising number of women facing abuse, sometimes even losing their lives at the hands of their partners. What’s truly alarming isn't just the lack of awareness among these women (which is why feminism is more than welcome, though perhaps not just through press conferences), but the passivity of law enforcement and the total lack of educational resources available to both men and women—especially to those who are still growing up.

Is it "cevapi" or "cevapp"?

Amy Nelson34 said:😂😂Hell no! Just whichever ones I run into. Sure, I’d probably end up scrolling through way more threads on the forum than I have so far, but eventually, I’d build up a circle of smart people who could actually help me out.

Reach out to Lastname and Pilatuson,
they do it for the fun of it and don't charge a dime 👍

You didn't seriously think you were the only one doing this, did you?
We could probably organize a massive "correction committee" rally right about now 😉

Gregory Garcia said:Everyone seems to have their own little theory about everything—honestly, it doesn't really matter much.

Are we actually looking at realistic claims here? 😕 Well, looks like we have another joke teller in our midst.

Look, I think the fundamental issue here—and it’s a bit of a sticking point, really—is that whenever you get hit with a ban, or even just a warning or some content being wiped, there actually exists a functional way to appeal it. You can actually stand up and say, "Hey, wait a minute," and have your say.

So, if you’re going to walk around acting like you didn't get banned—or even given a warning, for that matter—and just carry yourself like you're some kind of untouchable legend who doesn't have to follow the rules you agreed to when you signed up... well, I mean, what am I even supposed to say to that? It’s just a bit much, don't you think? 🤷

Look, I don't think anyone actually believes that bans or red cards are handed out just to mess with people or play some kind of cruel prank—it’s really quite the opposite, isn't it? In my view, the whole point of those measures is to actually curb the trolling and prevent anyone from being harassed or picked on in the first place. It's about keeping things civil, I guess. 😉

Was that second-to-last post supposed to be your final word?

Exactly, 👍 everyone’s got their own take,everyone thinks they're right.
It's just the black and purple crowd who, on top of what they claim, also love to mess with and harass people
with bans and warnings.
I can DM you some examples; there are
millions of them all around us. 🙂

And what about us? ZiDic will stick around in one form or another, but certain mods and
admins will keep stirring the pot and being provocative... honestly, the only solution
in my book would be to strip the admins of their power at PZK; I think that would probably
calm down some of the mods too. 👍

Gregory Garcia said:Look, please forgive me for responding to everyone like this, but I’m hoping this will be my final word on the matter—after which I'll just let the "proper institutions do their jobs." 😁 Just kidding. 😛

The argument being made is that banned users haven't been this restricted anywhere else except on their own little corner of the internet—their specific niche where they can behave almost however they damn well please. And then, when they get called out, they act like, "Well, maybe there's a post somewhere else..." 🤷 But honestly, after reading everything, the most likely truth remains exactly what the Democratic Party presented—which is how I’ve interpreted it, anyway. I’m sure there are details I don’t know, and frankly, I don't need to know them. 🙂

The main issue here—the absolute core of the problem—is that the banned individuals simply refuse to follow the rules of the forum. Actually, it’s more than that; they don't give a damn about them. But hey, who actually reads the fine print, right? Everyone just clicks "next, next" in a rush to become some big-shot expert...

So, as long as you remain so convinced that anyone questioning this is just being "biased," and you maintain that you're completely innocent and were only banned due to some moderator's whim, nobody is going to believe you—except, of course, your fellow banned buddies and friends.
Your narrative—that this whole thing is just one moderator acting out of pure spite—simply doesn't hold water.

It’s pretty obvious that you don't take bans seriously if you immediately create clone accounts to keep doing the exact same thing. The point of a ban isn't to start a factory for clones; it's to prevent undesirable behavior from cluttering the forum and to give the banned person a chance to actually reflect and change. If someone creates a clone the very second they are banned, it’s clear they haven't given even a moment's thought to whether they bear any responsibility for their own situation.

Anyway, I just want to—with all due respect and purely out of goodwill—point out that you might benefit from a little self-reflection.

Since steelskipper5 brought it up, I remember times when I used to complain about moderators on PZK, which led to me being locked out or having posts deleted—I can't quite recall the specifics anymore. In my case, the moderator just quietly accepted the judgment of the person I was complaining about without making a huge scene. In your case, however, EVERY moderator knows who you are. So, is it really possible that every single one of them has a personal vendetta against you, or is it more likely that you're creating an immense amount of unnecessary work for them by constantly breaking the rules?

And this whole "you punished me instead of him" thing is honestly laughable... Let me give you a real-world example. Suppose a police officer pulls you over and evaluates (which is within their rights) that you are unfit to drive and suspends your license. What do you think would happen if you ordered a friend to show up in a different car, pull up right in front of the officer, hop in the driver's seat, and just keep driving? 🙂

Out of ten suspended licenses, maybe ten people manage to slide by. So, should the officer who actually caught you sit there whining, "Why aren't you chasing those other guys?" :confused. It makes no sense.

This forum is a virtual space for fun and games, but it isn't a Formula 1 track. People can definitely get "wrecked" by driving too fast here—this time, you were the ones driving recklessly, and who knows how many others you've sent to the virtual hospital or forced into virtual hard labor through your antics—deleting your posts and hunting down clones? This isn't just "fun and games" to everyone involved. Try to grasp that, and maybe then you can come back. 🙂

😂

Who's claiming what? The mods? The admins?

You're really getting on Gregory Garcia's nerves, aren't you? You're barely making an impact.
And you're basing half a page of text on nothing but "people are saying"???

If a mod or an admin tells you the sky is blue, man, you've gotta take it with a grain of salt
and verify it yourself, because the second someone turns black or purple on this forum,
you simply have to stay skeptical. 👍

By the way, Gregory Garcia actually made some valid points here before they were deleted—posts, entire threads—why was that? 🤷

Douglas Palmer47 said:I’m not even going to bother reading through zidić because those chat threads are exhausting; they’re just constant, mindless nonsense. Honestly, the whole off section is like that. So, I really don't get why their thread was nuked in the first place.

I have to say, seeing how they were handled actually caught me off guard. If I'm being objective, it doesn't look fair at all: a thread gets wiped, some people get hit with permanent bans, and yet nobody has actually explained what happened (not in any of the visible threads, anyway).
It honestly feels like they were intentionally baited by having their thread deleted, only to be kicked off Reddit for good.

Honestly, I used to look forward to hopping onto zidić just to read their nonsense😁

And hey, Douglas Palmer47, let me tell you something—does this remind you of anything?
Like the World Wars. No sane person can wrap their head around what was going through the mind of some
ugly little guy trying to wipe an entire nation off the map!

That's how it goes: swastikas flying, erasing history, looting, and just shooting down everyone on zidić, the fans, the supporters...
Is there another technical term for this? 🤔No rational person, including my dear Douglas Palmer47, understands it,
they just do it for themselves. 👍

Watch out, though—because of your "lack of understanding," you might be next. 👍

Terry Lee3 said:Hey C_F, just scrub this nonsense before one of our experts decides to quote ten of their "masterpieces" from this PDF. 🤣 🙏

I’ll be the first to say it—so what?
just hanging out 🤷
and if you ask me... ☕

Jerry Gray5 said:☕

🤣

jademarlin26 said:"Quote:"

[Note: The user provided only a single word "medeari" which does not contain any instructions for rewriting, nor does it fit the persona description or substitution list. However, since I am instructed to act as a professional copywriter and follow specific rules, I will await further input if this was an error, or interpret it as a prompt that lacks sufficient content to process according to the complex transformation rules provided.] says: And what "neutral ground" are we even talking about? We have abstraction on one side and reality on the other (which is now staring us right in the face). Where exactly is this change supposed to take place?🤷

Equality is merely an abstraction in our current reality. The concessions granted by patriarchal leaders today are nothing more than crumbs tossed from the table rather than genuine attempts at reform. The system we operate under isn't built on equality; quite the contrary, it is fundamentally rooted in hierarchy. Any semblance of equality might be achieved on certain horizontal levels, but even if it were, it would have zero impact on the vertical power structure.

Where neutrality exists, I have no idea. I am not drawing conclusions; I am merely making an observation.

Fair enough. I get where you're coming from. If we look at the reality of things right now, the picture is static, which makes any hope for change feel like a total abstraction. All we can really do is watch and try to act within our own small spheres to plant some seeds of momentum. 🙂

Huge props to Armada, man, I'm feeling absolutely terrible right now.🙂

jademarlin26 said:Attempting to integrate into a "male-dominated" world via supposedly progressive means is just another subtle form of patriarchal tyranny. True equality should be pursued on neutral ground, rather than within the existing system.

But what kind of "neutral ground" are we talking about here? It feels like we're stuck choosing between pure theory and the harsh reality of how things work right now. If we don't work within the existing structure, where exactly is this change supposed to happen?🤷

silentridge8 said:The reason they stay dependent is because the foundation was flawed from day one. People get hung up on the whole patriarchal versus matriarchal debate—but what does that even mean in practice? Sure, you had matrilineal societies in certain historical contexts, like in ancient Jewish traditions, but true matriarchy has really only ever existed within specific small tribes, both historically and even today. Most people just end up rebelling against a straw man, only to find themselves left with nothing but empty heads and an empty existence.🤔

When I brought up relationship dependency, what I meant was that the urge to dominate requires a target; without someone to exert control over, dominance loses its entire point. Even when we try to reclaim our femininity, there’s often this subconscious pull toward someone who will take charge. It’s just another way of staying tethered to a dynamic. Honestly, men aren't any different in that regard. There's always some external trigger that dictates how we react. To me, that isn't strength—it's just an escape or an inability to actually face oneself. It's the exact opposite of being spiritual.