Posts by granitecyclist99

granitecyclist99, is this thread only open because I mentioned to you earlier today that we didn't end up stripping out the partial on the PDF?

I mean, honestly, what’s even the big deal here? I already touched base with a few people via private message—redharbor9 reached out to me, though Rosey stayed quiet. I wasn't making stuff up out of thin air; I was just kind of connecting the dots based on what I saw.
So, what kind of fake excuse is that, claiming I was trolling just because I got a warning? Like, seriously? At the same time, I was just casually posting on other threads that, honestly, I don't even care about anyway.
Anyway, I already gave my word that I wouldn't act like that again, so I guess that's that.

And yet, even after all that, I guess it’s still a no.

Look, there’s really no point in dragging out this whole thing by throwing around insults or crying about nonsense right now...

I mean, at this point, you guys aren't even acting like moderators, let alone supermoderators...

You honestly don't even have the right to call yourselves that.

Honestly, you guys could really stand to come up with some better nicknames: Chicken, the poser, and the coward.

Hey, would you mind changing the thread title from Supermoderators... to Administrators?
...

So, we're talking about this whole conspiracy where the moderators are basically sabotaging their own thread. It feels like they’re trying to derail the entire conversation just to insult the most active users and shut down anything that doesn't line up with their own personal biases.

I mean, their actual job should be to keep the gaslighters from hijacking the space—making sure the people who actually know what they're talking about can lead the way. Anything else is just pure demagoguery. Or, if you want to go with how Silentium puts it, it's just dirty, reckless, and unprofessional "reframing."

To whom it may concern,

I feel like I really need to point out how there’s been this relentless violation of basically every fundamental rule of moderation lately, which is totally undermining the whole reason forums.org even exists. It’s been happening over in the Psychology section for weeks now.

The trio running the show over in Psychology first went ahead and locked the Borderline Personality Disorder thread. Supposedly, the reason was just some petty bickering between users—you know, stuff like arguments over silicone implants versus penis enlargement, specifically. But if you ask me, the real cause is just pure personal bias, sheer intolerance, and a total denial of the facts regarding BPD violence and BPD promiscuity—topics that were actually being discussed on the forum right before they shut it down. There’s already a discussion about this over on PŽK:


Then, after about ten days, they unlocked the thread, but only with this little disclaimer saying moderation would be "lighter." During those ten days, I guess the moderators were busy coordinating a plan to basically mine their own thread—trying to steer the conversation away from its actual purpose, marginalizing the most active contributors, and making sure nobody writes anything outside of the rigid, selfish little boxes they’ve constructed...

First off, they invited all these irrelevant types into the thread—just a bunch of amateurs, clueless people, frauds, and pseudo-therapists. They’re even breaking basic psychotherapeutic principles for treating personality disorders and promoting methods that essentially give criminal BPD individuals false hope.
I’m talking specifically about the moderator Sacreus and his little band of followers and defenders (Balky, vatroled, filter). Even though they’re new, they act incredibly arrogant, handing out unsolicited advice, playing fast and loose with scientific facts, and attacking individual users who won't go along with this group trolling.
There’s just too much coordination and clear intent in how they’re acting for it to be some kind of coincidence, I suppose...
And yeah, there’s a thread about that on PŽK too.



I’m directly accusing the moderator Rosey of orchestrating this entire coup because of her own rigid, personal feminist views, and now she’s just watching the BPD thread fall apart from the shadows. I’m accusing the admin Sakreus of backing her up and bringing in his cronies from Hypnosis. And I’m accusing Mrs. Pringles of being weak and conformist, because I’m pretty sure she sees everything and knows exactly what’s happening, but she just doesn't want to lift a finger.

A moderator’s job isn't to sneakily push their personal agendas; it's supposed to be about fostering quality in the sections they manage. These threads don't exist for them—they exist for me and everyone else who actually has something meaningful to contribute...

They don't have kids dealing with BPD, and they haven't lived through the hell of "walking on eggshells," so they really shouldn't have any right to silence people who actually understand the reality of the situation....

Look, I’ve been a Super Moderator before—I used to be an admin for that massive "4 Tskuter" forum, and I'm still a moderator over at MOJskuter.com. This just isn't how you run things. This is a fraud and a betrayal of everything a moderator is meant to represent. Honestly, it's embarrassing if you guys don't step in.

All the old-school users from the BPD thread will tell you that what I'm saying is the truth. Harry York, MaxMagnus, Exborder, Nicole Turner35, vilenjacica double Word... and plenty of others... they absolutely stand by my words.

...hehehe, I mean, any self-proclaimed expert can see this is all just a big buildup for the inevitable debate over whether Bisolex or Iceland Moss is actually better for treating tuberculosis... The real good stuff won't even start until I get back :-)

Since I can't even access the thread right now, I'm definitely not going to go whining about @Sacreus, though I suppose I am basically at the mercy of @Sacreus's moderation to let me back in if I want to post there—which means, theoretically, all three of us would have to be on the same page just to get me permission to write again...

And look, I already gave my word to miss Pringles, just a regular old chip-muncher, that I wouldn't be such a sleazy... oops, I mean trollish... person anymore...

Besides, Mr. svet and I don't really have any theoretical reasons to clash over the topic about BPD. It’s pretty obvious he wants to debate these various treatment methods, whereas everyone knows my take is that BPD is incurable and that any sort of symptom relief just happens spontaneously once someone hits their 40s. If we did actually butt heads, there wouldn't even be much of a debate; we'd probably just trade some insults like normal people and then go our separate ways...😍 I suspect he’d end up leaving the thread because... well, I guess it's pretty clear why. Nobody understands the BPD dynamic quite like I do; my arguments are deeply sincere, true, and indisputable. I'm an expert in neurophysiology, neuropathology, and neurohistology (I used to be a teaching assistant in the latter two fields), so I stay on top of the latest scientific breakthroughs regarding BPD matters, specifically keeping up with the newest updates in the DSM-V (where they actually accepted my stance on the non-existence of NPD, treating it instead as just a cluster of behaviors and actions without a specific personality structure)

Trust me, if I'm on the thread, nobody is going to be complaining about @Sacreus.....

I don't really buy the idea that this whole lockout is about some personal grudge. They were pretty upfront about what's bothering them, and honestly, I suspect they're probably having a total meltdown over all that talk about BPD violence and BPD promiscuity. It’s just easier for them to lean on these tired old tropes:
- men are mostly just domestic abusers
- men are way more likely to cheat

I guess that’s just the kind of stuff they feed you in those psychology programs, and apparently, they aren't exactly sweating the details or looking to change the narrative.

...if the moderators had ever actually looked a close BPD loved one in the eye and felt the sheer weight of that pain, if they’d spent days feeling sick to their stomach despite having perfectly healthy digestion, or if they could still vividly recall the absolute heartbreak of what the future might have been... maybe they wouldn't be so quick to lock down threads just because things get a little "intense" or emotional.

Look, discussions about violence within the BPD community aren't welcome here unless violence is your specific issue; the same goes for talking about promiscuity—if that isn't what's eating at you, then don't bring it up.

Man, or woman, whatever—you guys are basically trying to deny, ban, or just label at least three core diagnostic criteria as "off-limits." I'm talking about difficulty controlling anger, inappropriate outbursts, impulsivity, and those patterns of unstable relationships.

If that isn't straight-up censorship, I don't know what is. It feels like hypocritical upbringing, intellectual narrow-mindedness, or just being brainwashed by all those "feminist-patriarchal" truths regarding how men and women relate to one another.

The reality is that BPD-related violence and BPD-related promiscuity are inseparable from any actual discussion about BPD. If you want to shine a light on this phenomenon, you have to deal with the conflict that comes with it.

So who are we supposed to talk to then? You're essentially sentencing countless victims to go vent to some DOJ investigators or social workers from the American Meteorological Society who are just going to double down on the victimization.

You haven't actually put forward a single real argument; now you're just retreating behind these little word games... I'm not really reading anyone else's thoughts here, and maybe... we're all grown adults...

Pathetic.

The thread is locked until we figure out how to structure it (either by adding specific guidelines to this topic) or just starting a fresh one with new rules and a link back to this locked version.

Setting strict guidelines feels like a bad move to me. I guess, after thinking about it for a second ☕ my take is that we’d be better off just opening a dedicated BPD sub-forum within the Psychocouch section.
That way, people could spin up their own threads to talk or read about whatever specific slice of BPD they actually care about. We’d see certain issues bubble up naturally, everyone would have their own unique angle, and they could seek out support or answers on their own terms. If things ever got heated—and I don't mean that as a negative thing, maybe just someone giving empty platitudes or a totally wrong answer—we could have a designated space, maybe call it the Ring or the Arena or something like that, where individuals or groups could hash things out to the bitter end (or not), correct someone's logic, or point out when someone's being destructive.
We could have all sorts of specific spots: an ambercyclist50 corner, Medication, Vinina's thoughts, anorexia, bulimia, addiction, Assange's generalizations, PTSD, prostitution, self-harm, homosexuality, larceny, DBT therapy... you get the idea, just various BPD-related topics...

Guidelines wouldn't even be necessary because, honestly, people just won't bother engaging in discussions that don't interest them. It would preserve that sense of creativity and free speech regarding this subject—which any kind of rulebook would just stifle and eventually kill—and everyone could express their individuality just by starting their own thread.
In the end, we'd probably see some really valuable general topics and personal ones crystallize. I know you guys might not agree with me, but given how incredibly witty and insightful people can be (those with BPD can be pretty hilarious, actually), plus the sheer potential for learning through studying BPD, Non-arguments, defense mechanisms, and the various reasons why conflicts happen, it might be better to skip the whole "Arena" thread concept and instead open an Arena sub-forum under the BPD umbrella, featuring threads like those from berlinlover-Harry, Max-Silent, and so on... 😂 Even the arguments don't have to be personal; we can argue and go at each other's throats over broader topics too...
I mean, it's probably a total utopia to think that Non-arguments and people with BPD will ever truly agree on anything, in any capacity. There’s always going to be some level of friction (it's part of the clinical picture, after all), so why fight it?
Anyway, hope that helps a bit.

I honestly don't mind at all that this thread got locked. I'm totally on board with whatever the moderators are doing to keep things under control... especially when it comes to Almost Rosey and Michelle Evans

Schizophrenia is basically this neurobiological, hereditary disorder hitting up the newest, most vulnerable, and honestly, most insignificant part of the CNS and the nervous system at large—the cerebral cortex... I mean, who actually gives a damn about a warehouse fire filled with civilization's junk when all the stuff that actually dictates our social medical issues and the fate of society and individuals is happening way deeper down in the midbrain? Like, at the end of the day, if someone's crazy, they're just dealing with their own mess, but personality disorders? Those don't just screw over the individual; they bleed into their inner circle and sometimes even impact society as a whole (including those so-called "normal" people who probably have their own little personality disorders too). Just leave Schizophrenia out of it, it’s boring. BPD is where the real action is...
The whole foundation for how society and individuals get manipulated and brainwashed is really just this paradigm of the borderline vs. non-borderline relationship. That’s what defines how we live our lives, not some hallucinations, paranoid delusions, or those weird catatonic states... Sure, maybe Marx and Engels figured out the economic principles behind how human society evolves, but true social development is essentially just brainwashing, following the exact same pattern of how BPD brainwashes its "non" counterpart much more effectively.

Schizophrenia is just tedious... let's shake things up a bit and pretend women are the primary domestic abusers (I mean, come on, looking at the global gender prevalence, it's roughly 75% to 25%)