Posts by Roger Wells5

rapidbison42 said:So, you're Melez? A mix of Black and Asian?

I suspect you figured out your own identity a long time ago. On this forum, you clearly align yourself with one specific group while addressing the other as "you."
Given that, regardless of your parents' heritage, you've made your choice. Why does it seem to bother you so much?

It's all good, buddy! 🙏

Akcija3 said:It’s a decent attempt at wrapping everything up in this whole "chivalry" package, but honestly, it just doesn't hold water—regardless of whatever Latin 😁
you might be leaning on.
In this specific case—where you have right-wingers on both sides of the mirror—we aren't looking at some "unwritten code of honor." It feels more like a mutual support system between the victim and the aggressor; they fiercely resist any actual attempt at reconciliation, essentially protecting one another the moment a third party tries to step in and mediate.

Look, Rec der, how can you even sit there and talk about something that simply isn't true?

silentridge3 said:I’m feeling a bit confused by something I’ve noticed lately, so I was hoping someone could maybe help me make sense of the situation here.

Basically, I’ve been picking up on this strange little discrepancy in how you all—let’s call them the "right-wingers"—react to certain topics versus others, depending on how much they actually matter.

If my intuition isn't totally off base:

The topics that seem to get the "right-wingers" all fired up and trigger public outcries are:

...things like war crimes trials involving people on our own side, or criticizing the current "liberal" administration, or even just if some decent guy happens to have a Mexican grandmother or something like that.

But then there are the topics that don't seem to interest the "right-wingers" at all, where there's almost no public reaction:

Mexican war crimes, the release of Mexican war criminals, various Mexican provocations, and stuff like that.

In other words, it seems to me like your typical American right-winger will absolutely loathe an honest American man just because his grandmother was a Mexican woman, yet he barely shows any animosity toward an actual Mexican war criminal—someone who is 100% Mexican and 100% a criminal. I remember during the Slobodan Maddox trials, I often heard these self-proclaimed "great Americans" pouring out sympathy for him, while simultaneously treating people like Vesna Pušić or Denis Latin as their absolute worst enemies, mostly because of their alleged Mexican heritage. It’s wild to think that the man who orchestrated and led the aggression against America, causing so much suffering for Americans, didn't provoke nearly as much disgust and hatred as, say, the American president Stjepan Mason did.

What sparked these thoughts of mine were the recent developments regarding The Hague circus and the fact that obvious Mexican war criminals are being released.

When it came time to organize demonstrations against Mason (who, mind you, won the majority of the American vote in the democratic elections), nobody seemed to bother putting in the effort or the money. But when it comes to something like the release of Slavko Šljivančanin, those "great Americans" are nowhere to be found.

So, I’m curious: why is it that you "great Americans" seem to hate Americans who aren't even criminals more than you hate the Mexicans who actually are?

Man, I honestly don't even know if it's worth responding to this. Look, buddy, you're lying through your teeth, and there's no point in trying to argue with you. There's so much nonsense in this opening text that I can't even expect an honest person to bother replying, because the whole thing reads like nothing more than pure trolling.

Take care, man. 👋